Predictive coding in agency detection

References

• Andersen, M., Nielbo, K. L., Schjoedt, U., Pfeiffer, T., Roepstorff, A., & Sørensen, J. (2017). Predictive minds in Ouija boards sessions. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, M., Schjoedt, U., Nielbo, K. L., & Sørensen, J. (2014). Mystical experience in the lab. Method and Theory in the Study of Religion, 26, 217–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apps, M. A. J., & Tsakiris, M. (2014). The free-energy self: A predictive coding account of self-recognition. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 41, 85–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atran, S., & Norenzayan, A. (2004). Religions evolutionary landscape: Counterintuition, commitment, compassion, communion. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 27(6), 713–770.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atran, S. (2002). In gods we trust: The evolutionary landscape of religion. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bader, C., Mencken, F. C., & Baker, J. O. (2011). Paranormal America: Ghost encounters, UFO sightings, bigfoot hunts, and other curiosities in religion and culture. New York: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, K., & Gibson, N. J. S. (2013). Supernatural agency: Individual difference predictors and situational correlates. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 23, 42–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, J. (1999). Theological correctness: Cognitive constraint and the study of religion. Method & Theory in the Study of Religion, 11, 325–339.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, J. (2000). Exploring the natural foundations of religion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(1), 29–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, J. (2004). Why would anyone believe in god? Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, J. (2007). Cognitive science of religion: What is it and why is it? Religion Compass, 1(6), 768–786.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, J. (2011). Cognitive science of religion: Looking back, looking forward. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 50(2), 229–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, J. L., & Keil, F. C. (1996). Conceptualizing a nonnatural entity: Anthropomorphism in god concepts. Cognitive Psychology, 31, 219–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, J. L., & Lanman, J. A. (2008). The science of religious beliefs. Religion, 38, 109–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, J. L., & Nyhof, M. A. (2001). Spreading non-natural concepts: The role of intuitive conceptual structures in memory and transmission of cultural materials. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 1(1), 69–100.
   Google Scholar
• Bexton, W. H., Heron, W., & Scott, R. H. (1954). Effects of decreased variation in the sensory environment.. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie, 8, 70–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, P., & Veres, C. (1999). The perceived intentionality of groups. Cognition, 71, B1–B9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botvinick, M., & Cohen, J. (1998). Rubber hand “feel” touch that eyes see. Nature, 391(6669), 756.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyer, P. (1994). The naturalness of religious ideas: A cognitive theory of religion. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, P. (1996). Cognitive limits to conceptual relativity: The limiting-case of religious categories. In J. Gumperz, & S. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 203–231). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, P. (2001). Religion explained - The human instincts that fashion gods, spirits and ancestors. London: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, P., & Ramble, C. (2001). Cognitive templates for religious concepts: Cross-cultural evidence for recall of counter-intuitive representations. Cognitive Science, 25(4), 535–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bubic, A., Von Cramon, D. Y., & Schubotz, R. I. (2010). Prediction, cognition and the brain. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4, 25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulbulia, J., & Schjoedt, U. (2013). The neural basis of religion. In F. Krueger (Ed.), The neural basis of human belief systems (pp. 169–190). Hove: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Castelli, F., Frith, C., Happé, F., & Frith, U. (2002). Autism, Asperger syndrome and brain mechanisms for the attribution of mental states to animated shapes. Brain, 125, 1839–1849.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, A. (2013). Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(3), 1–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, A. (2016). Surfing uncertainty: Prediction, action and the embodied mind. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, E., & Barrett, J. L. (2008). Conceptualizing spirit possession: Ethnographic and experimental evidence. Ethos, 36(2), 246–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corlett, P. R., Frith, C. D., & Fletcher, P. C. (2009). From drugs to deprivation: A Bayesian framework for understanding models of psychosis. Psychopharmacology, 206(4), 515–530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1987). From evolution to behavior: Evolutionary psychology as the missing link. In J. Dupré (Ed.), The latest on the best: Essays on evolution and optimality (pp. 276–306). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Csibra, G., Gergely, G., Bíró, S., Koós, O., & Brockbank, M. (1999). Goal attribution without agency cues: The perception of “pure reason” in infancy. Cognition, 72, 237–267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denison, R. N., Piazza, E. A., & Silver, M. A. (2011). Predictive context influences perception selection during binocular rivalry. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Den Ouden, H. E., Kok, P., & De Lange, F. P. (2012). How prediction errors shape perception, attention, and motivation. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 548.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114(4), 864–886.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, H., & Friston, K. (2010). Attention, uncertainty, and free-energy. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4(215), 1–23.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Friston, K. (2009). The free-energy principle: A rough guide to the brain? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(7), 293–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friston, K. (2010). The free-energy principle: A unified brain theory? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(2), 127–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friston, K., & Kiebel, S. (2009). Predictive coding under the free-energy principle. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1521), 1211–1221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friston, K., Mattout, J., & Kilner, J. (2011). Action understanding and active inference. Biological Cybernetics, 104(1-2), 137–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friston, K. J., & Stephan, K. E. (2007). Free-energy and the brain. Synthese, 159(3), 417–458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frith, C. (2005). The self in action: Lessons from delusions of control. Consciousness and Cognition, 14(4), 752–770.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frith, C. (2007). Making up the mind: How the brain creates our mental world. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Frith, U., & Frith, C. (2003). Development and neurophysiology of mentalizing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 358, 459–473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gervais, W., & Henrich, J. (2010). The Zeus problem: Why representational content biases cannot explain faith in gods. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 10, 383–389.
   Google Scholar
• Gervais, W. M., Willard, A. K., Norenzayan, A., & Henrich, J. (2011). The cultural transmission of faith: Why innate intuitions are necessary, but insufficient, to explain religious belief. Religion, 41(3), 389–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granqvist, P., Fredrikson, M., Unge, P., Hagenfeldt, A., Valind, S., Larhammar, D., & Larsson, M. (2005). Sensed presence and mystical experiences are predicted by suggestibility, not by the application of transcranial weak complex magnetic fields. Neuroscience Letters, 379, 1–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granqvist, P., & Larsson, M. (2006). Contribution of religiousness in the prediction and interpretation of mystical experiences in a sensory deprivation context: Activation of religious schemas. The Journal of Psychology, 140(4), 319–327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, A. (2015). The mindreading debate and the cognitive science of religion. Sophia, 54, 61–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths, T. L., Kemp, C., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2008). Bayesian models of cognition. In R. Sun (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of computational psychology (pp. 59–100). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gunnoe, M. L., & Moore, K. A. (2002). Predictors of religiosity among youth aged 17-22: A longitudinal study of the national survey of children. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 41(1), 613–622.
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, S. (1993). Faces in the clouds: A new theory of religion. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, S. (1996). Religion: What is it? Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 35(4), 412–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie, S. (2002). Animal animism: Evolutionary roots of religious cognition. In I. Pyysiäinen & V. Anttonen (Eds.), Current approaches in the cognitive science of religion (pp. 38–67). London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, S. (2013). Spiritual beings: A Darwinian, cognitive account. In The handbook of contemporary animism (pp. 353–358). Durham: Acumen Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, S. (forthcoming). Anthropology and anthropomorphism in religion. In H. Whitehouse & J. Laidlaw (Eds.), The salvaged mind: Social anthropology, religion and the cognitive sciences. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, S. (1980). A cognitive theory of religion. Current Anthropology, 21(2), 181–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haggard, P., & Chambon, V. (2012). Sense of agency. Current Biology, 22(10), R390–R392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammer, O., & Sørensen, J. (2010). Religion - i psyke og samfund. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heider, F., & Simmel, S. (1944). An experimental study of apparent behavior. The American Journal of Psychology, 57, 243–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermans, C. A. M. (2015). Towards a theory of spiritual and religious experiences: A building block approach of the unexpected possible. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 37, 141–167.
   Google Scholar
• Heyes, C. (2012). New thinking: The evolution of human cognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 367, 2091–2096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, D. R., & Persinger, M. A. (2003). Application of transcerebral, weak (1 microT) complex magnetic fields and mystical experiences: Are they generated by field-induced dimethyltryptamine release from the pineal organ? Perceptual and Motor Skills, 97, 1049–1050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hohwy, J. (2007). The sense of self in the phenomenology of agency and perception. Psyche, 13(1), 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Hohwy, J. (2013). The predictive mind. Croydon: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hohwy, J. (2014). The self-evidencing brain. Noûs, 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Hohwy, J., Roepstorff, A., & Friston, K. (2008). Predictive coding explains binocular rivalry: An epistemological review. Cognition, 108, 687–701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Y., & Rao, R. P. (2011). Predictive coding. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 2(5), 580–593.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hufford, D. J. (1982). The terror that comes in the night: An experience-centered study of supernatural assault traditions. Philadelphia: University of Pensylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• La Barre, W. (1972). Hallucinations and the shamanantic origins of religion. In P. T. Furst (Ed.), The flesh of the gods (pp. 261–278). New York, NY: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, M., Larhammar, D., Fredrikson, M., & Granqvist, P. (2005). Reply to M.A. Persinger and S. A. Koren’s response to Granqvist et al. “Sensed presence and mystical experiences are predicted by suggestibility, not by the application of transcranial weak magnetic fields”. Neuroscience Letters, 380(3), 348–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, T. E., & McCauley, R. N. (1990). Rethinking religion: Connecting cognition and culture. Gateshead: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lehmann, A. (1920). Overtro og trolddom. Copenhagen: Frimodts forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, I. M. (2003). Ecstatic religion: A study of shamanism and spirit possession. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Luhrmann, T. M., Nusbaum, H., & Thisted, R. (2010). The absorption hypothesis: Learning to hear god in evangelical Christianity. American Anthropologist, 112(1), 66–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupyan, G. (2015). Cognitive penetrability of perception in the age of prediction: Predictive systems are penetrable systems. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 6(4), 547–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupyan, G., & Ward, E. J. (2013). Language can boost otherwise unseen objects into visual awareness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(35), 14196–14201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielbo, K. L., & Sørensen, J. (2013). Prediction error during functional and non-functional action sequences: A computational exploration of ritual and ritualized event processing. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 13(3-4), 347–365.
   Google Scholar
• Persinger, M., Bureau, Y. R. J., Peredery, O. P., & Richards, P. M. (1994). The sensed presence as right hemispheric intrusions into the left hemispheric awareness of self: An illustrative case study. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 78, 999–1009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persinger, M., & Koren, S. A. (2005). A response to Granqvist et al. “Sensed presence and mystical experiences are predicted by suggestibility, not by the application of transcranial weak magnetic fields”. Neuroscience Letters, 380(3), 346–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persinger, M. (1983). Religious and mystical experiences as artifacts of temporal lobe function: A general hypothesis. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 57, 1255–1262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persinger, M. (2001). The neuropsychiatry of paranormal experiences. Neuropsychiatric Practice and Opinion, 13(4), 515–524.
   Google Scholar
• Persinger, M. (2002). Experimental simulation of the god experience: Implications for religious beliefs and the future of the human species. In R. Joseph (Ed.), Neurotheology: Brain, science, spirituality, religious experience (pp. 279–292). San Jose, CA: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Persinger, M., Saroka, K. S., Koren, S. A., & St-Pierre, L. S. (2010). The electromagnetic induction of mystical and altered states within the laboratory. Journal of Consciousness Exploration & Research, 1(7), 808–830.
   Google Scholar
• Porta, J. B. (1593). De Refractione. Optices Parte. Libri Novem. Naples: Salviani.
   Google Scholar
• Premack, D., & Premack, A. (1995). Origins of social competence. In M. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 205–218). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Purzycki, B. G., & Willard, A. K. (2016). MCI theory: A critical discussion. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 6(3), 207–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riekki, T., Lindeman, M., Aleneff, M., Halme, A., & Nuortimo, A. (2013). Paranormal and religious believers are more prone to illusory face perception than skeptics and Non-believers. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27, 150–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochat, P., Morgan, R., & Carpenter, M. (1997). Young infants’ sensitivity to movement information specifying social causality. Cognitive Development, 12, 537–561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roepstorff, A., & Frith, C. (2004). What’s at the top in the top-down control of action? Script-sharing and “top-top” control of action in cognitive experiments. Psychological Research, 68(2-3), 189–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruohonen, J. (1998). Transcranial magnetic stimulation: Modelling and new techniques (Doctoral dissertation). Department of Engineering Physics and Mathematics, Helsinki University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Schiffer, A. M., Siletti, K., Waszak, F., & Yeung, N. (2016). Adaptive behaviour and feedback processing integrate experience and instruction in reinforcement learning. NeuroImage, 146, 626–641. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.08.057
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schjoedt, U., & Andersen, M. (2016). How does religious experience work in predictive minds? Religion, Brain & Behavior. Authors copy ahead of print.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schjoedt, U., Sørensen, J., Nielbo, K. L., Xygalatas, D., Mitkidis, P., & Bulbulia, J. (2013a). Cognitive resource depletion in religious interactions (target article). Religion, Brain & Behavior, 3(1), 39–55.
   Google Scholar
• Schjoedt, U., Sørensen, J., Nielbo, K. L., Xygalatas, D., Mitkidis, P., & Bulbulia, J. (2013b). The resource model and the principle of predictive coding: A framework for analysing proximate effects of ritual. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 3(1), 79–86.
   Google Scholar
• Schjoedt, U. (2009). The religious brain: A general introduction to the experimental neuroscience of religion. Method and Theory in the Study of Religion, 21, 310–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shea, N., Boldt, A., Bang, D., Yeung, N., Heyes, C., & Frith, C. D. (2014). Supra-personal cognitive control and metacognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(4), 186–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomonova, E., Frantova, E., & Nielsen, T. (2011). Felt presence: The uncanny encounters with the numinous other. AI & Society, 26(2), 171–178.
   Google Scholar
• Sperber, D. (1975). Rethinking symbolism (No. 11). Gateshead: CUP Archive.
   Google Scholar
• Sperber, D. (1996). Explaining culture: A naturalistic approach. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Taves, A. (2009). Religious experience reconsidered: A building-block approach to the study of religion and other special things. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taves, A., & Asprem, E. (2017). Experience as event: Event cognition and the study of (religious) experiences. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 7, 43–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Elk, M. (2013). Paranormal believers are more prone to illusory agency detection than skeptics. Consciousness and Cognition, 22, 1041–1046.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Elk, M. (2015). Perceptual biases in relation to paranormal and conspiracy beliefs. Plos One, 10(6), e0130422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Elk, M., Rutjens, B. T., van der Pligt, J., & van Harrevel, F. (2016). Priming of supernatural agent concepts and agency detection. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 6(1), 4–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegner, D. M. (2002). The illusion of conscious will. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehouse, H. (1992). Memorable religions: Transmission, codification, and change in divergent Melanesian contexts. Man, 27(4), 777–797.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehouse, H. (2002). Modes of religiosity: Towards a cognitive explanation of the sociopolitical dynamics of religion. Method and Theory in the Study of Religion, 14(3/4), 293–315.
   Google Scholar