Atheist primes reduce religiosity and subjective wellbeing

References

• Anderson, M. L. (2008). Multiple inference and gender differences in the effects of early intervention: A reevaluation of the Abecedarian, Perry Preschool, and Early Training projects. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 103(484), 1481–1495. doi: 10.1198/016214508000000841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ano, G. G., & Vasconcelles, E. B. (2005). Religious coping and psychological adjustment to stress: A meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61(4), 461–480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassett, J. F., & Connelly, J. N. (2011). Terror management and reactions to undocumented immigrants: Mortality salience increases aversion to culturally dissimilar others. The Journal of Social Psychology, 151(2), 117–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamin, D. J., Berger, J. O., Johannesson, M., Nosek, B. A., Wagenmakers, E. -J., Berk, R., … Johnson, V. E. (2018). Redefine statistical significance. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(1), 6–10. doi: 10.1038/s41562-017-0189-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, P. (2007). Religion is natural. Developmental Science, 10(1), 147–151. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00577.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, K. Q., Tong, E. M. W., & Tan, Y. L. (2014). Taking a leap of faith: Reminders of God lead to greater risk taking. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5(8), 901–909. doi: 10.1177/1948550614537309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deaton, A., & Stone, A. A. (2013). Two happiness puzzles. American Economic Review, 103(3), 591–597. doi: 10.1257/aer.103.3.591
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diener, E., Tay, L., & Myers, D. G. (2011). The religion paradox: If religion makes people happy, why are so many dropping out? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(6), 1278–1290. doi: 10.1037/a0024402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egloff, B., & Schmukle, S. C. (2002). Predictive validity of an Implicit Association Test for assessing anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1441–1455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabrigar, L. R., & Petty, R. E. (1999). The role of the affective and cognitive bases of attitudes in susceptibility to affectively and cognitively based persuasion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(3), 363–381. doi: 10.1177/0146167299025003008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischbacher, U. (2007). z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experimental Economics, 10(2), 171–178. doi: 10.1007/s10683-006-9159-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., Rosenblatt, A., Veeder, M., Kirkland, S., & Lyon, D. (1990). Evidence for terror management theory II: The effects of mortality salience on reactions to those who threaten or bolster the cultural worldview. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(2), 308–318. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.58.2.308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J., Simon, L., Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., & Chatel, D. (1992). Terror management and tolerance: Does mortality salience always intensify negative reactions to others who threaten one's worldview? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(2), 212–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., & Pyszczynski, T. (1997). Terror management theory of self-esteem and cultural worldviews: Empirical assessments and conceptual refinements. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 61–139. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60016-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 197–216. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, M., Rowatt, W., & LaBouff, J. P. (2010). Priming Christian religious concepts increases racial prejudice. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1(2), 119–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonas, E., & Fischer, P. (2006). Terror management and religion: Evidence that intrinsic religiousness mitigates worldview defense following mortality salience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(3), 553–567. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.91.3.553
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kupor, D. M., Laurin, K., & Levav, J. (2015). Anticipating divine protection? Reminders of God can increase nonmoral risk taking. Psychological Science, 26(4), 374–384. doi: 10.1177/0956797614563108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaBouff, J. P., Rowatt, W. C., Johnson, M. K., & Finkle, C. (2012). Differences in attitudes toward outgroups in religious and nonreligious contexts in a multinational sample: A situational context priming study. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 22(1), 1–9. doi: 10.1080/10508619.2012.634778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurin, K., Kay, A. C., & Fitzsimons, G. M. (2012). Divergent effects of activating thoughts of God on self-regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(1), 4–21. doi: 10.1037/a0025971
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, N. (2017). Religious beliefs are factual beliefs: Content does not correlate with context sensitivity. Cognition, 161, 109–116. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.01.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Major, B., Kaiser, C. R., O'Brien, L. T., & McCoy, S. K. (2007). Perceived discrimination as worldview threat or worldview confirmation: Implications for self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1068–1086.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClendon, G., & Riedl, R. B. (2015). Religion as a stimulant of political participation: Experimental evidence from Nairobi, Kenya. The Journal of Politics, 77(4), 1045–1057. doi: 10.1086/682717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay, R., Efferson, C., Whitehouse, H., & Fehr, E. (2010). Wrath of God: Religious primes and punishment. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.2125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norenzayan, A., & Shariff, A. F. (2008). The origin and evolution of religious prosociality. Science, 322(5898), 58–62. doi: 10.1126/science.1158757
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosek, B. A., Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (2005). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: II. Method variables and construct validity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(2), 166–180. doi: 10.1177/0146167204271418
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2010). When corrections fail: The persistence of political misperceptions. Political Behavior, 32(2), 303–330. doi: 10.1007/s11109-010-9112-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston, J., & Epley, N. (2009). Science and God: An automatic opposition between ultimate explanations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(1), 238–241. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.07.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston, J. L., Ritter, R. S., & Hepler, J. (2013). Neuroscience and the soul: Competing explanations for the human experience. Cognition, 127(1), 31–37. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.12.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsay, J. E., Pang, J. S., Shen, M. J., & Rowatt, W. C. (2014). Rethinking value violation: Priming religion increases prejudice in Singaporean Christians and Buddhists. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 24(1), 1–15. doi: 10.1080/10508619.2012.761525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randolph-Seng, B. (2007). Honesty: One effect of primed religious representations. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 1(1), 303–315.
   Google Scholar
• Rounding, K., Lee, A., Jacobson, J. A., & Ji, L. J. (2012). Religion replenishes self-control. Psychological Science, 23(6), 635–642. doi: 10.1177/0956797611431987
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutjens, B. T., van Harreveld, F., van der Pligt, J. (2010). Yes we can: Belief in progress as compensatory control. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1(3), 246–252. doi: 10.1177/1948550610361782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutjens, B. T., van Harreveld, F., van der Pligt, J., Kreemers, L. M., & Noordewier, M. K. (2013). Steps, stages, and structure: Finding compensatory order in scientific theories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(2), 313–318. doi: 10.1037/a0028716
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimel, J., Hayes, J., Williams, T., & Jahrig, J. (2007). Is death really the worm at the core? Converging evidence that worldview threat increases death-thought accessibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(5), 789–803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shariff, A., Cohen, A., & Norenzayan, A. (2008). The Devil's advocate: Secular arguments diminish both implicit and explicit religious belief. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 8, 417–423. doi: 10.1163/156853708X358245
   Google Scholar
• Shariff, A. F., Willard, A. K., Andersen, T., & Norenzayan, A. (2015). Religious priming: A meta-analysis with a focus on prosociality. Personality and Social Psychology Review. doi: 10.1177/1088868314568811
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, C. T., & De Houwer, J. (2015). Hooked on a feeling: Affective anti-smoking messages are more effective than cognitive messages at changing implicit evaluations of smoking. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1488. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01488
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, N. (2014). Religious credence is not factual belief. Cognition, 133(3), 698–715. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.08.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, N. (2017). Do religious “beliefs” respond to evidence? Philosophical Explorations, 20(S1), 52–72. doi: 10.1080/13869795.2017.1287294
   Google Scholar
• WVS. (2015). World Values Survey (WVS) wave 6 (2010–2014) (Aggregated Documentation). v.20150418. World Values Survey Association Aggregate. File Producer: Asep/JDS, Madrid, Spain. Retrieved from http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWV6.jsp
   Google Scholar
• Yilmaz, O., & Bahçekapili, H. G. (2016). Supernatural and secular monitors promote human cooperation only if they remind of punishment. Evolution and Human Behavior, 37(1), 79–84. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2015.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar