The sense of presence: lessons from virtual reality

References

• Ahn, S. J. (2011). Embodied experiences in immersive virtual environments: Effects on pro-environmental attitude and behavior. Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, M. (2019). Predictive coding in agency detection. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 9(1), 65–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2017.1387170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, M., Pfeiffer, T., Müller, S., & Schjoedt, U. (2019). Agency detection in predictive minds: A virtual reality study. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 9(1), 52–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2017.1378709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailenson, J. N., Beall, A. C., Blascovich, J., Raimundo, M., & Weisbuch, M. (2001, September). Intelligent agents who wear your face: Users’ reactions to the virtual self. In Angélica de AntonioRuth AylettDaniel Ballin (Ed.), International workshop on intelligent virtual agents (pp. 86–99). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Barna Group. (2012, January 8). What people experience in churches (Research Report).
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, J. L. (2004). Why would anyone believe in God? United Nations Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, V., Mills, K. L., Modinos, G., & Wilkinson, S. (2017). Rethinking social cognition in light of psychosis: Reciprocal implications for cognition and psychopathology. Clinical Psychological Science, 5(3), 537–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702616677079
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bente, G., Rüggenberg, S., Krämer, N. C., & Eschenburg, F. (2008). Avatar-mediated networking: Increasing social presence and interpersonal trust in net-based collaborations. Human Communication Research, 34(2), 287–318. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2008.00322.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyer, S. (1978). The cult of Tara. Magic and ritual in Tibet. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biocca, F., & Harms, C. (2002). Defining and measuring social presence: Contribution to the networked minds theory and measure. In F. R. Gouveia, & F. Biocca (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Presence (pp. 1–36).
   Google Scholar
• Biocca, F., Harms, C., & Burgoon, J. K. (2003). Toward a more robust theory and measure of social presence: Review and suggested criteria. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 12(5), 456–480. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474603322761270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanke, O., Pozeg, P., Hara, M., Heydrich, L., Serino, A., Yamamoto, A., Higuchi, T., Salomon, R., Seeck, M., Landis, T., & Arzy, S. (2014). Neurological and robot-controlled induction of an apparition. Current Biology, 24(22), 2681–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.09.049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloch, M., & Bloch, M. E. (1992). Prey into hunter: The politics of religious experience. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, P. (2001). Religion explained: The evolutionary foundations of religious belief. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Cassaniti, J. L., & Luhrmann, T. M. (2014). The cultural kindling of spiritual experiences. Current Anthropology, 55(S10), S333–S343. https://doi.org/10.1086/677881
   Google Scholar
• Cheyne, J. A. (2012). Sensed presences. In J. Blom, & I. Sommer (Eds.), Hallucinations (pp. 219–234). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, Y. K., Miracle, G. E., & Biocca, F. (2001). The effects of anthropomorphic agents on advertising effectiveness and the mediating role of presence. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 2(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2001.10722055
   Google Scholar
• Corwin, A., & Erickson-Davis, C. R. (2020). Experiencing presence: An interactive model of perception. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 10(1), 166–182. https://doi.org/10.1086/708542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croes, E. A., Antheunis, M. L., Schouten, A. P., & Krahmer, E. J. (2016). Teasing apart the effect of visibility and physical co-presence to examine the effect of CMC on interpersonal attraction. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 468–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csordas, T. J. (1997). The sacred self: A cultural phenomenology of charismatic healing. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Desjarlais, R. R. (2003). Sensory biographies: Lives and deaths among Nepal’s Yolmo Buddhists (Vol. 2). University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engelke, M. (2007). A problem of presence: Beyond scripture in an African church (Vol. 2). University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fernyhough, C. (2004). Alien voices and inner dialogue: Towards a developmental account of auditory verbal hallucinations. New Ideas in Psychology, 22(1), 49–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2004.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flach, J. M., & Holden, J. G. (1998). The reality of experience: Gibson’s way. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 7(1), 90–95. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474698565550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friston, K., & Kiebel, S. (2009). Predictive coding under the free-energy principle. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1521), 1211–21. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0300
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garb, J. (2011). Shamanic trance in modern Kabbalah. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M., & Raye, C. (1981). Reality monitoring. Psychological Review, 88(1), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.88.1.67
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamp, K. S., & Due, H. (2018). How many bereaved people hallucinate about their loved one? A systematic review and meta-analysis of bereavement hallucinations. Journal of Affective Disorders, 243, 463–476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K. M. (2004). Presence, explicated. Communication Theory, 14(1), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00302.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. (2006). Cognition at the heart of human interaction. Discourse Studies, 8(1), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445606059557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lifshiz, M., Van Elk, M., & Luhrmann, T. M. (2019). Absorption and spiritual experience: A review of evidence and potential mechanisms. Consciousness and Cognition, 73, 102760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2019.05.008
   Google Scholar
• Luhrmann, T. M. (2012). When God talks back: Understanding the American evangelical relationship with God. Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Luhrmann, T. M., & Morgain, R. (2012). Prayer as inner sense cultivation: An attentional learning theory of spiritual experience. Ethos, 40(4), 359–389. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1352.2012.01266.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luhrmann, T. M., Nusbaum, H., & Thisted, R. (2010). The absorption hypothesis: Learning to hear God in evangelical christianity. American Anthropologist, 112(1), 66–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1433.2009.01197.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luhrmann, T. M., Nusbaum, H., & Thisted, R. (2013). “Lord, teach us to pray”: Prayer practice affects cognitive processing. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 13(1-2), 159–177. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685373-12342090
   Google Scholar
• Maij, D. L., Van Schie, H. T., & Van Elk, M. (2019). The boundary conditions of the hypersensitive agency detection device: An empirical investigation of agency detection in threatening situations. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 9(1), 23–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2017.1362662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLellan, H. (1996). Virtual realities. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 457–487). Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• McMahan, D. (2013). Empty vision: Metaphor and visionary imagery in Mahayana Buddhism. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Noë, A. (2012). Varieties of presence. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Noll, R., Achterberg, J., Bourguignon, E., George, L., Harner, M., Honko, L., Hultkrantz, Å, Krippner, S., Kiefer, C. W., Preston, R. J., & Siikala, A. L. (1985). Mental imagery cultivation as a cultural phenomenon: The role of visions in shamanism [and comments and reply]. Current Anthropology, 26(4), 443–461. https://doi.org/10.1086/203305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowak, K. L., & Biocca, F. (2003). The effect of the agency and anthropomorphism on users’ sense of telepresence, copresence, and social presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 12(5), 481–494. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474603322761289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh, C. S., Bailenson, J. N., & Welch, G. F. (2018). A systematic review of social presence: Definition, antecedents, and implications. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 5(114), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (version 4.0.0). R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. https://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Ratan, R. (2013). Self-presence, explicated: Body, emotion, and identity extension into the virtual self. In R. Luppicini (Ed.), Handbook of research on technoself: Identity in a technological society (pp. 322–336). IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Ratcliffe, M. (2008). Feelings of being: Phenomenology, psychiatry and the sense of reality. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, B. (1991). Being there: Television as symbolic versus natural experience [Unpublished manuscript]. Institute for Communication Research, Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Reichel-Dolmatoff, G. (1975). The Shaman and the Jaguar. A study of narcotic drugs among the Indians of Colombia. Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rheingold, H. (1991). Virtual reality. Summit Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schloerb, D. W. (1995). A quantitative measure of telepresence. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 4(1), 64–80. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1995.4.1.64
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seth, A. K., Suzuki, K., & Critchley, H. D. (2012). An interoceptive predictive coding model of conscious presence. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheridan, T. B. (1995). Teleoperation, telerobotics and telepresence: A progress report. Control Engineering Practice, 3(2), 205–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/0967-0661(94)00078-U
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snodgrass, J. G., Lacy, M. G., Dengah, H. F., Fagan, J., & Most, D. E. (2011). Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry, 35(1), 26–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11013-010-9197-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taves, A. (2009). Religious experience reconsidered: A building-block approach to the study of religion and other special things. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taves, A., & Asprem, E. (2017). Experience as event: Event cognition and the study of (religious) experiences. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 7(1), 43–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2016.1150327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tellegen, A., & Atkinson, G. (1974). Openness to absorbing and self-altering experiences (“ absorption”), a trait related to hypnotic susceptibility. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 83(3), 268–277. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036681
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Throop, C. J. (2009). Intermediary varieties of experience. Ethnos, 74(4), 535–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/00141840903202116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unterman, A. (2007). Shekhinah. In M. Berenbaum, & F. Skolnik (Eds.), Encyclopaedia Judaica (Vol. 18, 2nd ed., pp. 440–444). Macmillan Reference USA.
   Google Scholar
• van Elk, M., & Aleman, A. (2017). Brain mechanisms in religion and spirituality: An integrative predictive processing framework. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 73, 359–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.12.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Q. (2014). Should I trust him? The effects of reviewer profile characteristics on eWOM credibility. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 136–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yee, N., & Bailenson, J. (2007). The proteus effect: The effect of transformed self-representation on behavior. Human Communication Research, 33(3), 271–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00299.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahorik, P., & Jenison, R. L. (1998). Presence as being-in-the-world. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 7(1), 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474698565541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar