References
- Barrett, M. (2021). ggdag: Analyze and Create Elegant Directed Acyclic Graphs. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ggdag.
- Bulbulia, J., Wildman, W. J., Schjoedt, U., & Sosis, R. (2019). In praise of descriptive research. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 9(3), 219–220. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2019.1631630
- Harman, G. H. (1965). The inference to the best explanation. The Philosophical Review, 74(1), 88–95. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2183532
- Hill, A. B. (1965). The environment and disease: association or causation? Sage Publications.
- Hoogeveen, S., Haaf, J. M., Bulbulia, J. A., Ross, R. M., McKay, R., Altay, S., Bendixen, T., Berniūnas, R., Cheshin, A., Gentili, C., Georgescu, R., Gervais, W. M., Hagel, K., Kavanagh, C., Levy, N., Neely, A., Qiu, L., Rabelo, A., Ramsay, J. E., … van Elk, M. (2021). The Einstein Effect: Global Evidence for Scientific Source Credibility Effects and the Influence of Religiosity. PsyArXiv, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/sf8ez
- McElreath, R. (2020). Statistical rethinking: A Bayesian course with examples in R and Stan. CRC press.
- Pearl, J. (2000). Causality: models, reasoning, and inference (Vol. 47). Cambridge Univ Press.
- Pearl, J., & Others. (2009). Causal inference in statistics: An overview. Statistics Surveys, 3(none), 96–146. doi:https://doi.org/10.1214/09-SS057
- Pearl, J. (2019). The seven tools of causal inference, with reflections on machine learning. Communications of the ACM, 62(3), 54–60. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/3241036
- Rohrer, J. M. (2018). Thinking clearly about correlations and causation: Graphical causal models for observational data. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(1), 27–42. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917745629
- Textor, J., van der Zander, B., Gilthorpe, M. S., Liskiewicz, M., & Ellison, G. T. (2016). Robust causal inference using directed acyclic graphs: the R package “dagitty.” International Journal of Epidemiology, 45(6), 1887–1894. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyw341
- VanderWeele, T. (2015). Explanation in causal inference: methods for mediation and interaction. Oxford University Press.
- VanderWeele, T. J., Mathur, M. B., & Chen, Y. (2020). Outcome-wide longitudinal designs for causal inference: a new template for empirical studies. Statistical Science: A Review Journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics, 35(3), 437–466.
- Westreich, D., & Greenland, S. (2013). The table 2 fallacy: presenting and interpreting confounder and modifier coefficients. American Journal of Epidemiology, 177(4), 292–298. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kws412
- Wright, S. (1920). The relative importance of heredity and environment in determining the piebald pattern of guinea-pigs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 6(6), 320. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.6.6.320
- Wright, S. (1921). Correlation and Causation (S. Wright, trans.; COLL00002). 557–585. NalDC. https://handle.nal.usda.gov/10113/IND43966364.
- Wright, S. (1923). The theory of path coefficients a reply to Niles’s criticism. Genetics, 8(3), 239. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/8.3.239
- Wright, S. (1934). The method of path coefficients. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 5(3), 161–215. doi:https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177732676