References
- Becker, P. E., & Hofmeister, H. (2001). Work, family, and religious involvement for men and women. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 40(4), 707–722. https://doi.org/10.1111/0021-8294.00086
- Berghammer, C. (2012). Church attendance and childbearing: Evidence from a Dutch panel study, 1987–2005. Population Studies, 66(2), 197–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.2012.655304
- Berman, E. (2000). Sect, subsidy, and sacrifice: An economist's view of ultra-orthodox Jews*. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(3), 905–953. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2586899 https://doi.org/10.1162/003355300554944
- Bruce, S. (2011). Secularization: In defence of unfashionable theory. Oxford University Press.
- Davie, G. (2002). Europe: The exceptional case: Parameters of faith in the modern world. Darton Longman & Todd.
- Davie, G. (2007). The sociology of religion. Sage.
- Day, A. (2011). Believing in belonging: Belief and social identity in the modern world. Oxford University Press.
- De Laat, J., & Sevilla-Sanz, A. (2011). The fertility and women's labor force participation puzzle in OECD countries: The role of men's home production. Feminist Economics, 17(2), 87–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2011.573484
- Esping-Andersen, G., & Billari, F. C. (2015). Re-theorizing family demographics. Population and Development Review, 41(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2015.00024.x
- Goldscheider, F., Bernhardt, E., & Lappegård, T. (2015). The gender revolution: A framework for understanding changing family and demographic behavior. Population and Development Review, 41(2), 207–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2015.00045.x
- Hackett, C., Stonawski, M., Potančoková, M., Grim, B. J., & Skirbekk, V. (2015). The future size of religiously affiliated and unaffiliated populations. Demographic Research, 32, 829–842. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26350133 https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2015.32.27
- Hochschild, A. (1989). The second shift. Avon Books.
- Iannaccone, L. R. (1998). Introduction to the economics of religion. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(3), 1465–1495. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2564806
- Kaufmann, E. (2010). Shall the religious inherit the earth? Demography and politics in the twenty-first century. Profile.
- Lesthaeghe, R. (2010). The unfolding story of the second demographic transition. Population and Development Review, 36(2), 211–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2010.00328.x
- Lutz, W., Skirbekk, V., & Testa, M. R. (2006). The low-fertility trap hypothesis: Forces that may lead to further postponement and fewer births in Europe. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 4, 167–192. https://doi.org/10.1553/populationyearbook2006s167
- Martin, D. (2005). On secularization: Towards a revised general theory. Ashgate.
- McDonald, P. (2000). Gender equity in theories of fertility transition. Population and Development Review, 26(3), 427–439. http://www.jstor.org/stable/172314 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2000.00427.x
- Pace, E. (2007). Religion as communication: The changing shape of Catholicism in Europe. In N. E. Ammerman (Ed.), Everyday religion: Observing modern religious lives (pp. 37–50). Oxford University Press.
- Stolzenberg, R. M., Blair-Loy, M., & Waite, L. J. (1995). Religious participation in early adulthood: Age and family life cycle effects on church membership. American Sociological Review, 60(1), 84–103. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096347
- Tilley, J. R. (2003). Secularization and aging in britain: Does family formation cause greater religiosity? Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 42(2), 269–78. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1387842 https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5906.00178
- United Nations. (2020). World fertility and family planning 2020 highlights. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. ST/ESA/SER.A/440.
- Voas, D. (2008). The rise and fall of fuzzy fidelity in Europe. European Sociological Review, 25(2), 155–168. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcn044