Introducing the Francis Psychological Type and Emotional Temperament Scales (FPTETS): a study among church leaders and church members

References

• Baab, L. M. (1998). Personality type in congregations: How to work with others more effectively. Alban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Bents, R., & Wierschke, A. (1996). Test-retest reliability of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Journal of Psychological Type, 36, 42–46.
   Google Scholar
• Budd, R. J. (1997). Manual for Jung Type Indicator. Psytech International.
   Google Scholar
• Brewster, C. E., Francis, L. J., & Robbins, M. (2011). Maintaining a public ministry in rural England: Work-related psychological health and psychological type among Anglican clergy serving in multi-church benefices. In H.-G. Ziebertz, & L. J. Francis (Eds.), The public significance of religion (pp. 241–265). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004207066.i-495.90.
   Google Scholar
• Burton, L., Francis, L. J., & Robbins, M. (2010). Psychological type profile of Methodist circuit ministers in Britain: Similarities with and differences from Anglican clergy. Journal of Empirical Theology, 23(1), 64–81. https://doi.org/10.1163/157092510X503020
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. B., & Heller, J. F. (1987). Correlations of extraversion, impulsivity and sociability with sensation seeking and MBTI-introversion. Personality and Individual Differences, 8(1), 133–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(87)90021-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattell, R. B., Eber, H. W., & Tatsuoka, M. M. (1970). Handbook for the sixteen personality factor questionnaire (16PF). Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.
   Google Scholar
• Corr, P. ed. (2018). Personality and individual differences: Revisiting classic studies. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529793772.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1985). The NEO personality inventory. Psychological Assessment Resources. https://doi.org/10.1037/t07564-000.
   Google Scholar
• Cranton, P., & Knoop, R. (1995). Assessing Jung’s psychological types: The PET type check. Genetic, Social and General Psychology Monographs, 121(2), 249–274.
   Google Scholar
• Crea, G., & Francis, L. J. (2021). Psychological type and personal wellbeing among Catholic priests in Italy: A study in positive psychology. Mental Health, Religion and Culture, 24(4), 404–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2020.1758645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVellis, R. F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dolan, C. V. (1994). Factor analysis of variables with 2, 3, 5 and 7 response categories: A comparison of categorical variable estimators using simulated data. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 47(2), 309–326. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1994.tb01039.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, B. (1993). Pray your way: Your personality and God. Darton, Longman and Todd.
   Google Scholar
• Eysenck, H. J., Barrett, P., Wilson, G., & Jackson, C. (1992). Primary trait measurement of the 21 components of the PEN system. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 8(2), 109–117.
   Google Scholar
• Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1964). Manual of the Eysenck Personality Inventory. University of London Press. https://doi.org/10.1037/t02711-000.
   Google Scholar
• Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1975). Manual of the Eysenck personality questionnaire (adult and junior). Hodder and Stoughton. https://doi.org/10.1037/t05462-000.
   Google Scholar
• Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1991). Manual of the Eysenck Personality Scales. Hodder and Stoughton.
   Google Scholar
• Eysenck, S. B. G., Eysenck, H. J., & Barrett, P. (1985). A revised version of the psychoticism scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 6(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(85)90026-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fawcett, B. G., Francis, L. J., & Robbins, M. (2011). Imagining themselves as ministers: How religiously committed Baptist youth respond to the Revised Payne Index of Ministry Styles (PIMS2). Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion, 22, 264–285. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004207271.i-360.60
   Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J. (2005). Faith and psychology: Personality, religion and the individual. Longman and Todd.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., Brown, L. B., & Philipchalk, R. (1992). The development of an abbreviated form of the Revised Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQR-A): Its use among students in England, Canada, the USA and Australia. Personality and Individual Differences, 13(4), 443–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(92)90073-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., Clymo, J., & Robbins, M. (2014). Fresh expressions: Reaching those psychological types conventional forms of church find it hard to reach? Practical Theology, 7(4), 252–267. https://doi.org/10.1179/1756073X14Z.00000000045
   Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., Craig, C. L., & Hall, G. (2008). Psychological type and attitude toward Celtic Christianity among committed churchgoers in the United Kingdom: An empirical study. Journal of Contemporary Religion, 23(2), 181–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/13537900802024543
   Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., Craig, C. L., & Robbins, M. (2007). The relationship between psychological type and three major dimensions of personality. Current Psychology, 25(4), 257–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02915235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., & Crea, G. (2015). Work-related psychological health and psychological type: A study among Catholic priests in Italy. Mental Health, Religion and Culture, 18(7), 593–604. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2014.963996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., & Crea, G. (2017). Openness to mystical experience and psychological type: A study among Italians. Mental Health, Religion and Culture, 20(4), 384–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2017.1328402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., & Datoo, F. A. (2012). Inside the mosque: A study in psychological type profiling. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 15(10), 1037–1046. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2012.709723
   Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., Edwards, O. D., & ap Siôn, T. (2021). Applying psychological type and psychological temperament theory to the congregations at cathedral carol services. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 24(4), 412–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2020.1764516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., Fawcett, B. G., Freeze, T., Embrée, R., & Lankshear, D. W. (2021). What helps young Christians grow in discipleship? Exploring connections between discipleship pathways and psychological type. Mental Health, Religion and Culture, 24(6), 563–580. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2020.1767556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., Fisher, J. W., & Annis, J. (2015). Spiritual wellbeing and psychological type: A study among visitors to a medieval cathedral in Wales. Mental Health, Religion and Culture, 18(8), 675–692. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2014.964002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., & Giordan, G. (2019). The association between psychological type profile and church attendance among female Italian students: A challenge to sociological theories? Studi di Sociologia, 2019(3), 213–226. https://doi.org/10.26350/000309_000067
   Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., & Giordan, G. (2021). Identifying learning preferences among Italian undergraduate students studying the sociology of religion: Drawing on psychological type preferences. Mental Health, Religion and Culture, 24(6), 581–593. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2020.1766846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., & Village, A. (2008). Preaching with all our souls. Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., Gubb, S., & Robbins, M. (2012). Work-related psychological health and psychological type among Lead Elders within the Newfrontiers network of churches in the United Kingdom. Journal of Prevention and Intervention in the Community, 40(3), 233–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/10852352.2012.680422
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Francis, L. J., Ineson, K., & Robbins, M. (2011). To whom the Abbey appeals: A study in psychological type. Rural Theology, 8(2), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1558/ruth.v8i2.131
   Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., & Jones, S. H. (2000). The relationship between the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire among adult churchgoers. Pastoral Psychology, 48(5), 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022036504232
   Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., Jones, S. H., & Hebden, K. (2019). Binding and loosing on earth: Evaluating the strategy for church disciplinary procedures proposed in Matthew 18: 15-18 through the lenses of thinking and feeling. HTS Theological Studies, 75(3), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v75i3.5476. article 5474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., Jones, S. H., & Martinson, J. (2019). Exploring the Marcan account of the Baptism of Jesus through psychological lenses: An empirical study within a Black-led Black-majority Pentecostal church. Journal of the European Pentecostal Theology Association, 39(2), 100–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/18124461.2019.1592330
   Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., Jones, S. H., & McKenna, U. (2020). The Holly Bough service at Liverpool Cathedral and psychological type theory: Fresh expressions or inherited church? HTS Theological Studies, 76(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v76i3.6275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., & Lankshear, D. W. (2019). Work-related psychological health and psychological type: A study among primary school teachers in Wales. Research Papers in Education, 34(4), 391–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2018.1452959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., & Lankshear, D. W. (2021). Psychological type, temperament theory, and religious motivation: Exploring the distinctive congregational profile of southwark cathedral. In L. J. Francis, & D. W. Lankshear (Eds.), The science of congregation studies: Searching for signs of growth (pp. 329–348). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76107-3_16.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., Laycock, P., & Brewster, C. (2017). Exploring the factor structure of the Francis Psychological Type Scales (FPTS) among a sample of Anglican clergy in England. Mental Health, Religion and Culture, 20(9), 930–941. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2017.1375469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., & Littler, K. (2012). Mystical orientation and psychological health: A study employing Eysenck’s dimensional model of personality among clergymen in the Church in Wales. Welsh Journal of Psychology, 1, 4–10.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., Littler, K., & Robbins, M. (2021). Personality and charismatic orientation: An empirical study in psychological type theory. In A. Davies, & A. E. Dyer (Eds.), The spirit in society: Essays in honour of William K. Kay (pp. 159–177). CPT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., Mansfield, S., & McKenna, U. (2021). Psychographic segmentation of cathedral visitors in England and Wales: Introducing the Visitor Expectations Type Scales 2.0 (VETS2.0). Mental Health, Religion and Culture, 24(6), 535–553. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2020.1776692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., McKenna, U., & Sahin, A. (2018). Facing the issues raised in Psalm 1 through thinking and feeling: Applying the SIFT approach to biblical hermeneutics among Muslim educators. Religions, 9(323), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel9100323
   Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., Payne, V. J., & Emslie, N. (2018). The construct validity of the Schutte Emotional Intelligence Scale in light of psychological type theory: A study among Anglican clergy. Mental Health, Religion and Culture, 21(9-10), 945–959. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2018.1519694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., Payne, V. J., & Robbins, M. (2013). Psychological type and susceptibility to burnout: A study among Anglican clergymen in Wales. In B. R. Doolittle (Ed.), Psychology of burnout: New research (pp. 179–192). Nova Science. https://doi.org/10.1037/e591202013-001.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., Powell, R., & Village, A. (2016). Psychological temperament and religious orientation: An empirical enquiry among Australian church leaders. In P. Hughes (Ed.), Charting the faith of Australians: Thirty years in the Christian Research Association (pp. 111–117). Christian Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., Ratter, H., & Longden, G. (2015). Psychological type profile and work-related psychological health of clergy serving in the Diocese of Chester. Practical Theology, 8(3-4), 177–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/1756073X.2015.1105089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., & Robbins, M. (2012a). Not fitting in and getting out: Psychological type and congregational satisfaction among Anglican churchgoers in England. Mental Health, Religion and Culture, 15(10), 1023–1035. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2012.676260
   Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., & Robbins, M. (2012b). The theology of religions and psychological type: An empirical enquiry among participants at the Parliament of the World’s Religions. In J. Astley, L. J. Francis, M. Robbins, & M. Selçuck (Eds.), Teaching religion, teaching truth: Theoretical and empirical perspectives (pp. 205–222). Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., Robbins, M., & Cargas, S. (2012). The perceiving process and mystical orientation: An empirical study in psychological type theory among participants at the Parliament of the World's Religions. Studies in Spirituality, 22, 341–352. https://doi.org/10.2143/SIS.22.0.2182858
   Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., Robbins, M., & Ryland, A. (2015). Emotional intelligence and psychological type: A study among Newfrontiers church leaders in England. In J. Hawkins (Ed.), Personality traits and types: Perceptions, gender differences and impact on behaviour (pp. 133–151). Nova Science. https://doi.org/10.1037/e535012014-001.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., Robbins, M., & Village, A. (2009). Psychological type and the pulpit: An empirical enquiry concerning preachers and the SIFT method of biblical hermeneutics. HTS Theological Studies, 65(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v65i1.161. article #161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., Robbins, M., & Wulff, K. (2011). Psychological type profile of clergywomen and clergymen serving in the Presbyterian Church (USA): Implications for strengths and weaknesses in ministry. Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion, 22, 192–211. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004207271.i-360.38
   Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., & Ross, C. F. J. (2022). Reading the Good Samaritan (Luke 10: 25-37) through the lenses of introverted intuition and extraverted intuition: Perceiving text differently. HTS Theological Studies, 78(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v78i4.7443. article 7443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., & ap Siôn, T. (2016a). Empirical theology and biblical hermeneutics: Exploring lessons for discipleship from the Road to Emmaus (Luke 24: 13-35). Journal of Empirical Theology, 29(1), 24–44. https://doi.org/10.1163/15709256-12341000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., & ap Siôn, T. (2016b). Jesus, psychological type and conflict: A study in biblical hermeneutics applying the reader perspective and SIFT approach to Mark 11: 11-21. HTS Theological Studies, 72(4), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v72i4.3573. article 3573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., Smith, G., & Astley, J. (2022a). Hiring labourers for the vineyard and making sense of God’s grace at work: An empirical investigation in hermeneutical theory and ordinary theology. HTS Theological Studies, 78(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/14704994.2021.1968642. article 7444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., Smith, G., & Astley, J. (2022b). Looking at the birds, considering the lilies, and perceiving God’s grace in the countryside: An empirical investigation in hermeneutical theory. Rural Theology, 20(1), 38–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/14704994.2021.1968642
   Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., & Village, A. (2017). Psychological type and reported religious experience: An empirical enquiry among Anglican clergy and laity. Mental Health, Religion and Culture, 20(4), 367–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2017.1328404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., & Village, A. (2021). Psychological type and responding to Covid-19: An enquiry among lay Anglicans. Type Face, 32(1), 29–31.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., & Village, A. (2022). The Francis Psychological Type Scales (FPTS): Factor structure, internal consistency reliability, and concurrent validity with the MBTI. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2022.2041584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., Village, A., & Powell, R. (2019). Quest religious orientation among church leaders in Australia: A function of psychological predisposition or openness to mystical experience? Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 11(2), 123–130. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., Village, A., & Voas, D. (2021a). Psychological temperament, psychological type and attraction to the Charismatic Movement: An empirical study among Anglican clergy in England. In A. Davies, & A. E. Dyer (Eds.), The spirit in society: Essays in honour of William K. Kay (pp. 179–198). CPT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., Village, A., & Voas, D. (2021b). Psychological type theory, femininity and the appeal of Anglo-Catholicism: A study among Anglican clergymen in England. Mental Health, Religion and Culture, 24(4), 352–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2020.1767557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furnham, A. (1996). The big five versus the big four: The relationship between the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) and NEO-PI five factor model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 21(2), 303–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(96)00033-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furnham, A. (2022). The big five facets and the MBTI: The relationship between the 30 NEO-PI(R) Facets and the four Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) scores. Psychology (Savannah, Ga), 13(10), 1504–1516. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2022.1310095
   Google Scholar
• Furnham, A., Jackson, C. J., Forde, L., & Cotter, T. (2001). Correlates of the Eysenck Personality Profiler. Personality and Individual Differences, 30(4), 587–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00057-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furnham, A., Moutafi, J., & Crump, J. (2003). The relationship between the revised NEO Personality Inventory and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Social Behaviour and Personality, 31(6), 577–584. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2003.31.6.577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garland, G., & Village, A. (2021). Psychological type profiles and temperaments of ministers in the Baptist Union of Great Britain (BUGB) . Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2021.1908974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, H., & Wheelwright, J. B. (1946). Jung's psychological types, their frequency of occurrence. Journal of General Psychology, 34(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1946.10544516
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, G. L., & Hall, D. S. (2021). Mystical spirituality and the Jungian perceiving process: A study in psychological type theory among adult on-line Christians. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 24(6), 554–562. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2020.1764515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howes, R. J., & Carskadon, T. G. (1979). Test-retest reliabilities of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator as a function of mood changes. Research in Psychological Type, 2, 67–72.
   Google Scholar
• IBM Corporation. (2019). IBM SPSS Advanced Statistics 25. ftp://public.dhe.ibm.com/software/analytics/spss/documentation/statistics/20.0/en/client/Manuals/IBM_SPSS_Advanced_Statistics.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. A. (1992). Test-retest reliabilities of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and the type differentiation indicator over a 30-month period. Journal of Psychological Type, 24, 54–58.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, S. J., & Francis, L. J. (2019). Searching for the lost sheep (Matthew 18: 10–14): Do sensing types and intuitive types find different things? Rural Theology, 17(2), 106–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/14704994.2019.1585112
   Google Scholar
• Jung, C. G. (1971). Psychological types: The collected works (volume 6). Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Keating, C. J. (1987). Who we are is how we pray: Matching personality and spirituality. Twenty-Third Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Keirsey, D. (1998). Please understand me: 2. Prometheus Nemesis.
   Google Scholar
• Keirsey, D., & Bates, M. (1978). Please understand me. Prometheus Nemesis.
   Google Scholar
• Kier, F. J., Melancon, J. G., & Thompson, B. (1998). Reliability and validity of scores on the Personal Preferences Self-Description Questionnaire (PPSDQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58(4), 612–622. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164498058004005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klinkosz, W., & Iskra, J. (2010). Examination of the relations of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and the Neo-4 Personality Inventory in a Polish sample. Psychological Reports, 107(2), 578–586. https://doi.org/10.2466/08.09.PR0.107.5.578-586
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landrum, R. E. (1992). College students’ use of caffeine and its relationship to personality. College Student Journal, 26(2), 151–155.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, N., Murphy, C., & Carlson, R. (1972). Personality types among Negro college students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 32(3), 641–653. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447203200307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, C. A. (2012). Psychological type, religion, and culture: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. Mental Health, Religion and Culture, 15(9), 817–821. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2012.721534
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, C. A. (2015). Psychological type, religion, and culture: Further empirical perspectives. Mental Health, Religion and Culture, 18(7), 531–534. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2015.1103520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, C. A. (2021a). Psychological type, religion, and culture: Further empirical perspectives (Part III). Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 24(4), 333–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2021.1929892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, C. A. (2021b). Psychological type, religion, and culture: Further empirical perspectives (Part IV). Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 24(6), 533–534. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2021.1943650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, C. A., Francis, L. J., & Geary, A. M. (2021). Psychological type profile of Methodist churchgoers in England. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 24(6), 638–646. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2020.1846509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd, J. B. (2008). Myers-Briggs theory: How true, how necessary? Journal of Psychological Type, 68, 43–50.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, J. B. (2012). The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and mainstream psychology: Analysis and evaluation of an unresolved hostility. Journal of Beliefs and Values, 33(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/13617672.2012.650028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd, J. B. (2015). Unsubstantiated beliefs and values flaw the Five-Factor model of personality. Journal of Beliefs and Values, 36(2), 156–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/13617672.2015.1033209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd, J. B. (in press). Seeking truth in personality science: Reconciling trait theory and psychological type. Mental Health, Religion & Culture.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loomis, M. (1982). A new perspective for Jung’s typology: The Singer-Loomis Inventory of Personality. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 27(1), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-5922.1982.00059.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Ferrando, P. J. (2012). TETRA-COM: A comprehensive SPSS program for estimating the tetrachoric correlation. Behavior Research Methods, 44(4), 1191–1196. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0200-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald, D., Anderson, P., Tsagarakis, C., & Holland, C. (1994). Examination of the relationship between the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and the NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological Reports, 74(1), 339–344. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1994.74.1.339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez, P. (2001). Prayer life: How your personality affects the way you pray. Paternoster.
   Google Scholar
• McCarley, N. G., & Carskadon, T. G. (1983). Test-retest reliabilities of scales and subscales of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and of criteria for clinical interpretive hypotheses involving them. Research in Psychological Type, 6, 24–36.
   Google Scholar
• McCrae, R., & Costa, P. (1989). Reinterpreting the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator from the perspective of the five factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 57(1), 17–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1989.tb00759.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuiness, J. (2009). Growing spiritually with the Myers-Briggs model. SPCK.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, W. D. (1991). A test of type theory using the TDI. Journal of Psychological Type, 22, 15–26.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, R. L. (ed.) (1988). Carl Jung and Christian spirituality. Paulist Press.
   Google Scholar
• Muskett, J. A., & Village, A. (2015). Created to be guardians: Psychological type profiles of members of cathedral friends associations. Mental Health, Religion and Culture, 18(8), 641–654. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2014.961249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, I. B., & McCaulley, M. H. (1985). Manual: A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, G. (2016). Be a better leader: Personality type and difference in ministry. SPCK.
   Google Scholar
• Oswald, R. M., & Kroeger, O. (1988). Personality type and religious leadership. Alban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, W. D., & Stumpf, H. (1998). A validation of the five-factor model of personality in academically talented youth across observers and instruments. Personality and Individual Differences, 25(6), 1005–1028. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00016-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parry, C. D. H., & McArdle, J. J. (1991). An applied comparison of methods for least-squares factor analysis of dichotomous variables. Applied Psychological Measurement, 15(1), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662169101500105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, V. J., & Lewis, C. A. (2021). The Payne Index of Ministry Styles: A lens on clergy activity from the perspective of psychological type theory. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 24(4), 377–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2020.1784861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, V. J., Lewis, C. A., & Francis, L. J. (2021). Confirming the factor structure of the Francis Psychological Type Scales (FPTS) among a sample of Anglican clergy in Wales. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 24(6), 628–637. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2020.1858275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawling, K. (1992). Preliminary manual: The Cambridge Type Indicator: Research edition. Rawling Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Renner, W., Menschik-Bendele, J., Alexandrovicz, R., & Deakin, P. (2014). Does the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator measure anything beyond the NEO Five Factor Inventory? Journal of Psychological Type, 74, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Rhemtulla, M., Brosseau-Liard, PÉ, & Savalei, V. (2012). When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 354–373. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbins, M., & Francis, L. J. (2011). All are called, but some psychological types are more likely to respond: Profiling churchgoers in Australia. Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion, 22, 213–229. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004207271.i-360.44
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, M., & Francis, L. J. (2012). The psychological type profile of Australian Catholic congregations: Psychological theory and congregational studies. In A. W. Ata (Ed.), Catholics and Catholicism in contemporary Australia: Challenges and achievements (pp. 262–281). David Lovell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, M., Francis, L. J., & Powell, R. (2012a). Congregational bonding social capital and psychological type: An empirical enquiry among Australian churchgoers. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 15(10), 1009–1022. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2012.676264
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, M., Francis, L. J., & Powell, R. (2012b). Work-related psychological health among clergywomen in Australia. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 15(9), 933–944. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2012.698044
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, M., & Powell, R. (2015). Psychological type profile of Protestant church leaders in Australia: Are clergymen and clergywomen different? Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 18(7), 576–585. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2014.963997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, C. F. J., & Francis, L. J. (2010). The relationship of intrinsic, extrinsic, and quest religious orientations to Jungian psychological type among churchgoers in England and Wales. Mental Health, Religion and Culture, 13(7-8), 805–819. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674670802207462
   Google Scholar
• Ross, C., & Francis, L. J. (2015). The perceiving process and mystical orientation: A study in psychological type theory among 16- to 18-year-old students. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 18(8), 693–702. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2014.961353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, C. F. J., & Francis, L. J. (2020). Personality, religion, and leadership. Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Royle, M. H., Norton, J., & Larkin, T. (2021). Psychological type and psychological temperament differences between worshippers at new churches and established ones. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 24(4), 425–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2020.1766847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saggino, A., & Kline, P. (1995). Item factor analysis of the Italian version of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Personality and Individual Differences, 19(2), 243–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(95)00023-Y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silberman, S. L., Freeman, I., & Lester, G. R. (1992). A longitudinal study of dental students’ personality type preferences. Journal of Dental Education, 56(6), 384–388. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.1992.56.6.tb02653.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sipps, G. J., Alexander, R. A., & Friedt, L. (1985). Item analysis of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(4), 789–796. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485454009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele, R. S., & Kelly, T. J. (1976). Eysenck Personality Questionnaire and Jungian Myers-Briggs Type Indicator correlation of extraversion-introversion. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 44(4), 690–691. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.44.4.690
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsuzuki, Y., & Matsui, T. (1997). Test-retest reliabilities of a Japanese translation of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Psychological Reports, 81(1), 349–350. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1997.81.1.349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Village, A. (2011a). Introduction to special section: Psychological type and Christian ministry. Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion, 22, 157–164. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004207271.i-360.28
   Google Scholar
• Village, A. (2011b). Gifts differing? Psychological type among stipendiary and non-stipendiary clergy. Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion, 22, 230–250. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004207271.i-360.49
   Google Scholar
• Village, A. (2012). Biblical literalism among Anglican clergy: What is the role of psychological type? Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 15(9), 955–968. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2012.681482
   Google Scholar
• Village, A. (2021). Testing the factor structure of the Francis Psychological Type Scales (FPTS): A replication among Church of England clergy and laity. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 24(4), 336–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2020.1780575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Village, A., & Baker, S. (2018). Rejecting Darwinian evolution: The effects of education, church tradition, and individual theological stance among UK churchgoers. Review of Religious Research, 60(3), 285–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13644-018-0335-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Village, A., Baker, S., & Howat, S. (2012). Psychological type profiles of churchgoers in England. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 15(10), 969–978. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2012.686479
   Google Scholar
• Village, A., & Francis, L. J. (2021). Shaping attitudes toward church in a time of coronavirus: Exploring the effects of personal, psychological, social, and theological factors among Church of England clergy and laity. Journal of Empirical Theology, 34(1), 102–128. https://doi.org/10.1163/15709256-12341423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Village, A., & Francis, L. J. (2022). Factorial structure and validity of the Francis Psychological Type and Emotional Temperament Scales (FPTETS). Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2022.2026311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Village, A., Francis, L. J., & Craig, C. L. (2009). Church tradition and psychological type preferences among Anglicans in England. Journal of Anglican Studies, 7(1), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1740355309000187
   Google Scholar
• Voas, D., & Watt, L. (2014). Numerical change in church attendance: National, local and individual factors. http://www.churchgrowthresearch.org.uk/UserFiles/File/Voas_report_technical_version.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wakefield, J. A., Sasek, J., Brubaker, M. L., & Friedman, A. F. (1976). Validity of Eysenck’s Personality Questionnaire. Psychological Reports, 39(1), 115–120. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1976.39.1.115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, D. S. (2015). Unsettling the guardian: Quest religiosity and psychological type among Anglican churchgoers. Mental Health, Religion and Culture, 18(8), 655–663. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2014.963291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware, R., Yokomoto, C., & Morris, B. B. (1985). A preliminary study to assess validity of the Personal Style Inventory. Psychological Reports, 56(3), 903–910. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1985.56.3.903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watt, L., & Voas, D. (2015). Psychological type and self-assessed leadership skills of clergy in the Church of England. Mental Health, Religion and Culture, 18(7), 544–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2014.961250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar