Linkages between youth diversity and organizational and program characteristics of out-of-school-time science programs: a mixed-methods study

References

• ACT. (2014). The Condition of STEM 2013: National. Retrieved April 30, 2014, from www.act.org/stemcondition
   Google Scholar
• Afterschool Alliance. (2011). STEM learning in afterschool: An analysis of impact and outcomes. Retrieved April 30, 2014, from http://www.afterschoolalliance.org/STEM-Afterschool-Outcomes.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bell, P., Lewenstein, B., Shouse, A. W., & Feder, M. A. (Eds.). (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brickhouse, N. W., Lowery, P., & Schultz, K. (2000). What kind of a girl does science? The construction of school science identities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(5), 441–458. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200005)37:5<441::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-3
   Google Scholar
• Calabrese Barton, A., & Brickhouse, N. W. (2006). Engaging girls in science. In C. Skelton, B. Francis, & L. Smulyan (Eds.), Handbook of gender and education (pp. 221–235). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Chi, B., & Snow, J. Z. (2010). Project exploration 10-year retrospective program evaluation summative report. Berkeley: The Center for Research Evaluation & Assessment, Lawrence Hall of Science, University of California Berkeley. Retrieved May 1, 2014, from http://www.projectexploration.org/pdf/lhs-final-report-10-year-eval.pdf?utm_source=web&utm_medium=pdf&utm_campaign=10-year-eval
   Google Scholar
• Chun, K., & Harris, E. (2011). STEM out-of-school time programs for girls ( Research Update No. 5, Harvard Family Research Project). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Graduate School of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Correll, S. J. (2001). Gender and the career choice process: The role of biased self-assessments. American Journal of Sociology, 106(6), 1691–1730. doi: 10.1086/321299
   Google Scholar
• Correll, S. J. (2004). Constraints into preferences: Gender, status, and emerging career aspirations. American Sociological Review, 69(1), 93–113. doi: 10.1177/000312240406900106
   Google Scholar
• Dabney, K. P., Tai, R. H., Almarode, J. T., Miller-Friedmann, J. L., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P. M., & Hazari, Z. (2012). Out-of-school time science activities and their association with career interest in STEM. International Journal of Science Education, Part B: Communication and Public Engagement, 2(1), 63–79. doi: 10.1080/21548455.2011.629455
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, J., St. John, M., Cleary, B., & Librero, D. (1987). The exploratorium's explainer program: The long-term impacts on teenagers of teaching science to the public. Science Education, 71(5), 643–656. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730710502
   Google Scholar
• Fadigan, K. A., & Hammrich, P. L. (2004). A longitudinal study of the educational and career trajectories of female participants of an urban informal science education program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(8), 835–860. doi: 10.1002/tea.20026
   Google Scholar
• Gunderson, E. A., Ramirez, G., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2012). The role of parents and teachers in the development of gender-related math attitudes. Sex Roles, 66(3–4), 153–166. doi: 10.1007/s11199-011-9996-2
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, K., & Rogoff, B. (2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertoires of practice. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 19–25. doi: 10.3102/0013189X032005019
   Google Scholar
• Haycock, K. (2001). Helping all students achieve: Closing the achievement gap. Educational Leadership, 58(6), 6–11.
   Google Scholar
• Heckathorn, D. D. (1997). Respondent-driven sampling: A new approach to the study of hidden populations. Social Problems, 44(2), 174–199. doi: 10.2307/3096941
   Google Scholar
• Jick, T. D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), 602–611. doi: 10.2307/2392366
   Google Scholar
• Kong, X., Dabney, K., & Tai, R. (2014). The association between science summer camps and career interest in science and engineering. International Journal of Science Education, Part B: Communication and Public Engagement, 4(1), 54–65. doi: 10.1080/21548455.2012.760856
   Google Scholar
• Krishnamurthi, A., Ballard, M., & Noam, G. G. (2014). Examining the impact of afterschool STEM programs. A paper commissioned by the Noyce Foundation. Retrieved August 16, 2014, from http://www.afterschoolalliance.org/ExaminingtheImpactofAfterschoolSTEMPrograms.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Laursen, S. L., Thiry, H., Archie, T., & Crane, R. (2013). Variations on a theme: Characteristics of out-of-school-time science programs offered by distinct organization types. Afterschool Matters, 17, 36–49.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCreedy, D., & Dierking, L. D. (2013). Cascading influences: Long-term impacts of informal STEM experiences for girls. Philadelphia, PA: The Franklin Institute. Retrieved April 30, 2014, from http://www.fi.edu/girls/
   Google Scholar
• Modi, K., Schoenberg, J., & Salmond, K. (2012). Generation STEM: What girls say about science, technology, engineering, and math ( A Report from the Girl Scout Research Institute). New York, NY: Girl Scouts of the USA.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2013). State nonfiscal survey of public elementary/secondary education, 1996–97 through 2010–11; and national public elementary and secondary enrollment by race/ethnicity model, 1994–2010. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Common Core of Data (CCD).
   Google Scholar
• National Governors Association. (2012). The role of informal science in the state education agenda. Issue Brief. NGA Center for Best Practices. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved April 30, 2014, from http://www.nga.org/files/live/sites/NGA/files/pdf/1203INFORMALSCIENCEBRIEF.PDF
   Google Scholar
• National Science Foundation (NSF). (2013). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering (National Science Foundation 13–304). Arlington, VA: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Noam, G. G. (2001, May 10). Afterschool time: Toward a theory of collaborations. Paper presented at the urban seminar series on children's mental health and safety, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Noam, G. G., & Tillinger, J. R. (2004). After-school as intermediary space: Theory and typology of partnerships. New Directions for Youth Development, 2004, 75–113. doi: 10.1002/yd.73
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (1987). How to use qualitative methods in evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Peske, H. G., & Haycock, K. (2006). Teaching inequality: how poor and minority students are shortchanged on teacher quality: A report and recommendations by the education trust. Washington, DC: The Education Trust.
   Google Scholar
• President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST). (2010). Prepare and inspire: K-12 Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) for America's future. Retrieved August 20, 2014, from http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast-stemed-execsum.pdf
   Google Scholar
• President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (U.S.), & United States. Executive Office of the President. (2012). Report to the president, engage to excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (pp. 1–103). Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President, President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Puvirajah, A., Verma, G., Li, H., & Martin-Hansen, L. (2015). Influence of a science-focused after-school program on underrepresented high-school students’ attitudes and trajectories: A survey validation study. International Journal of Science Education, Part B: Communication and Public Engagement, 5(3), 250–270. doi:10.1080/21548455.2014.930210
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, G., & Kurth, L. A. (1999). Moving from outside to inside: High school students’ use of apprenticeships as vehicles for entering the culture and practice of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(6), 677–697. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199908)36:6<677::AID-TEA6>3.0.CO;2-#
   Google Scholar
• Riegle-Crumb, C., & King, B. (2010). Questioning a white male advantage in STEM: Examining disparities in college major by gender and race/ethnicity. Educational Researcher, 39(9), 656–664. doi: 10.3102/0013189X10391657
   Google Scholar
• Riegle-Crumb, C., King, B., Grodsky, E., & Muller, C. (2012). The more things change, the more they stay the same? Prior achievement fails to explain gender inequality in entry into STEM College majors over time. American Educational Research Journal, 49(6), 1048–1073. doi: 10.3102/0002831211435229
   Google Scholar
• Siaca Curry, J., Traill, S., & Rao, S. (2012). Science beyond the classroom: Critical to New York's Future. TASC-NYSAN Policy Brief. TASC and the New York State Afterschool Network. Retrieved April, 2014, from http://www.tascorp.org/sites/default/files/science_beyond_the_classroom_nysan_brief_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Singer, S. R., Hilton, M. L., & Schweingruber, H. A. (Eds.). (2006). America's lab report: Investigations in high school science. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant observation. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Tai, R. H., Liu, C. Q., Maltese, A. V., & Fan, X. (2006). Career choice: Enhanced: Planning early for careers in science. Science, 312, 1143–1144. doi: 10.1126/science.1128690
   Google Scholar
• The After-School Corporation (TASC). (2014). The 6000-hour learning gap [infographic]. Retrieved April 30, 2014, from http://www.tascorp.org/sites/default/files/tasc_6000-hours-infographic.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Thiry, H., Laursen, S., & Archie, T. (2012). Nuts and bolts: Organizational and program characteristics of youth out-of-school-time programs focusing on science, engineering, and technology (Working Paper commissioned by the Noyce Foundation). Boulder: Ethnography & Evaluation Research, University of Colorado Boulder.
   Google Scholar
• Traphagen, K., & Traill, S. (2014). Working Paper: How cross-sector collaborations are advancing STEM learning. Report commissioned by the Noyce Foundation. Retrieved March 18, 2014, from http://www.noycefdn.org/documents/STEM_ECOSYSTEMS_REPORT_EXECSUM_140128.pdf.
   Google Scholar