Learning with dinosaurs: a study on motivation, cognitive reasoning, and making observations

References

• Adey, P., Csapó, B., Demetriou, A., Hautamäki, J., & Shayer, M. (2007). Can we be intelligent about intelligence? Why education needs the concept of plastic general ability. Educational Research Review, 2, 75–97. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.001
   Google Scholar
• Ainley, M., Hidi, S., & Berndorff, D. (2002). Interest, learning, and the psychological processes that mediate their relationship. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 545–561. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.94.3.545
   Google Scholar
• Ainley, M., Hillman, K., & Hidi, S. (2002). Gender and interest processes in response to literary texts: Situational and individual interest. Learning and Instruction, 12, 411–428. doi: 10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00008-1
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, J., Johnsson, K., Leibham, M., & Kelley, K. (2008). The development of conceptual interest in young children. Cognitive Development, 23, 324–334. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2007.11.004
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, J. (1964). An introduction to motivation. Priceton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
   Google Scholar
• Bakeman, R. (2005). Recommended effect size statistics for repeated measures designs. Behavior research methods, 37(3), 379–384. doi: 10.3758/BF03192707
   Google Scholar
• Berlyne, D. (1966). Curiosity and exploration. Science, 153, 25–33. doi: 10.1126/science.153.3731.25
   Google Scholar
• Bogner, F. (1998). The influence of short-term outdoor ecology education on long-term variables of environmental perspective. The Journal of Environmental Education, 29(4), 17–29. doi: 10.1080/00958969809599124
   Google Scholar
• Bogner, F. X., & Wiseman, M. (2004). Outdoor ecology education and pupils’ environmental perception in preservation and utilisation. Science education international, 15(1), 27–48.
   Google Scholar
• Braund, M., & Reiss, M. (2004). Learning science outside the classroom. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Braund, M., & Reiss, M. (2006). Towards a more authentic science curriculum: The contribution of out-of-school learning. International Journal of Science Education, 28(12), 1373–1388. doi: 10.1080/09500690500498419
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS. Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Casier, E. (1978). Les Iguanodons de Bernissart. Bruxelles: Editions du Patrimoine de l’Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique.
   Google Scholar
• Crowley, K., & Jacobs, M. (2002). Building islands of expertise in everyday family activity. In G. Leinhardt, K. Crowley, & K. Knutson (Eds.), Learning conversations in museums (pp. 333–356). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Csapó, B. (2007). Research into learning to learn through the assessment of quality and organization of learning outcomes. The Curriculum Journal, 18(2), 195–210. doi: 10.1080/09585170701446044
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic dialectical perspective. In E. Deci & R. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination (pp. 3–33). Rochester, NY: The University of Rochester Press.
   Google Scholar
• Demetriou, A., Spanoudis, G., & Mouyi, A. (2011). Educating the developing mind: Towards an overarching paradigm. Educational Psychology Review, 23(4), 601–663. doi:10.1007/s10648-011-9178-3
   Google Scholar
• Dillon, J., Rickinson, M., Teamey, K., Morris, M., Choi, M. Y., Sanders, D., and Benefield, P. (2006). The value of outdoor learning: Evidence from research in the UK and elsewhere. School Science Review, 87(320), 107–111.
   Google Scholar
• Dinosaurlive. (2016). Retrieved from www.dinosaurlive.com
   Google Scholar
• Driver, R., Guesne, E., & Tiberghien, A. (1985). Children ideas of science. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. (2011). Gendered educational and occupational choices: Applying the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35(3), 195–201. doi: 10.1177/0165025411398185
   Google Scholar
• Falk, J. (1982). Environmental education: Formal vs. informal learning. Environmental Education and Information, 2(3), 171–178.
   Google Scholar
• Falk, J., & Dierking, L. (2002). Lessons without the limit. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.
   Google Scholar
• Faure, E., Herrera, F., Kaddoura, A.-R., Lopes, H., Petrovsky, A. V., Rahnema, M., & Champion Ward, F. (1972). Learning to be: The world of education today and tomorrow. Paris: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Fenichel, M., & Schweingruber, H. (2010). Surrounded by science: Learning science in informal environments. Board of Science Education, Centre of Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. (1991). The unschooled mind. How children think and how schools should teach? New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Goldschmidt, M., & Bogner, F. (2015). Learning about genetic engineering in an outreach laboratory: Influence of motivation and gender on students’ cognitive achievement. International Journal of Science Education, Part B. Advance online pub. doi:10.1080/21548455.2015.1031293
   Google Scholar
• Görlitz, D. (1987). Exploration and attribution as an area for developmental psychology. In D. Görlitz & J. Wohlwill (Eds.), Curiosity, imagination and play: On the development of spontaneous cognitive and motivational processes (pp. 82–93). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hautamäki, J., & Kupiainen, S. (2014). Learning to learn in Finland. Theory and policy, research and practice. In R. D. Crick, C. Stringher, & K. Ren (Eds.), Learning to Learn: International perspectives from theory and practice (pp. 170–193). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hidi, S., & Ainley, M. (2009). Interest and self-regulation: Relationship between two variables that influence learning. In D. Schunk & B. Zimmerman, (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning theory, research, and applications (pp. 267–295). New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis group.
   Google Scholar
• Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4
   Google Scholar
• Hong, Z. (2010). Effects of a collaborative science intervention on high achieving students’ learning anxiety and attitudes toward science. International journal of science education, 32(15), 1971–1988. doi: 10.1080/09500690903229304
   Google Scholar
• Hong, Z., Lin, H., Wang, H., Chen, H., & Yang, K. (2013). Promoting and scaffolding elementary school students’ attitudes toward science and argumentation through a science and society intervention. International Journal of Science Education, 35(10), 1625–1648. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2012.734935
   Google Scholar
• Hoskins, B., & Fredriksson, U. (2008). Learning to learn: What is it and can it be measured? (JRC Scientific and Technical Report). European Commission, Centre for Research on Lifelong Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, K. (1977). Museums for the 1980s: A survey of world trends. Paris: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, K. (1988). Museums of influence. Bath: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Illich, I. (1971). Deschooling society. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Jalil, P., Abu Sbeih, M. Boujetiff, M. and Barakat, R. (2009). Autonomy in science education: A practical approach in attitude shifting towards science learning. Journal of Science education and Technonology, 18, 476–486. doi: 10.1007/s10956-009-9164-4
   Google Scholar
• Jidesjö, A. (2008). Different content orientations in science and technology among primary and secondary boys and girls in Sweden: Implications for the transition from primary to secondary school? NorDiNa, 4(2), 192–208.
   Google Scholar
• Jidesjö, A. (2012). A problematisation of young people’s interest in science and technology at school and in the society – contents, media, and the function of education. Sweden: The Swedish National Graduate School in Science and Technology Education, FontD, Department of Social and Welfare Studies Linköping University (in Swedish).
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice. Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58(9), 697–720.
   Google Scholar
• Klausmeier, H. (1992). Concept learning and concept teaching. Educational Psychologist, 27(3), 267–286. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep2703_1
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, D. (1993). The ultimate dinosaurs book. New York, NY: Avon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Louhimies, A., Juuti, K., & Lavonen, J. (2016). Investigating situational interest in primary science lessons. International Journal of Science Education, 37(18), 3015–3037. doi:10.1080/09500693.2015.1119909
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, S. (2008). Dinosaurs the textbook. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, M., Mullis, I., & Foy, P. (2008). TIMSS 2007 international science report: Finding from IEA’s trends in international mathematics and science study at the fourth and eighth grades. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Centre, Lynch School of Education, Boston College.
   Google Scholar
• Mayr, E. (2001). What evolution is? New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mayr, E. (2004). What makes biology unique? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McClelland, D. (1951). Motivation and personality. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Michalsky, T., Mevarech, Z., & Haibi, L. (2009). Elementary school children reading scientific texts: Effects of metacognitive instruction. Journal of Educational Research, 102(5), 363–376. doi: 10.3200/JOER.102.5.363-376
   Google Scholar
• Oppenheimer, F. (1972). The exploratorium: A playful museum combines perception and art in science education. American Journal of Physiscs, 40(2), 978–984. doi: 10.1119/1.1986726
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. F., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe. London: Nuffield Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Osgood, C. E. (1964). Semantic differential technique in the comparative study of cultures. American Anthropologist, 66(3), 171–200. doi: 10.1525/aa.1964.66.3.02a00880
   Google Scholar
• Palmquist, S., & Crowley, K. (2007). From teachers to testers: How parents talk to novice and expert children in a natural history museum. Science Education, 91(5), 783–804. doi: 10.1002/sce.20215
   Google Scholar
• Powell, D., Aram, R., Aram, R., & Chase, T. (2007). We’re going on a fossil hunt! Science Activities: Classroom Projects & Curriculum Ideas, 44(2), 61–68.
   Google Scholar
• Raven, J., Raven, J. C., & Court, J. (2000). Section 3. Standard progressive matrices, 2000 edition. Oxford: Elsfield Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Raven, J., Raven, J. C., & Court, J. (2003). Manual for Raven’s progressive matrices and vocabulary scales. Oxford: OPP.
   Google Scholar
• Rennie, L. (2014). Learning science outside of school. In N. Lederman & S. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education, volume II (pp. 120–144). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Renninger, K. A., & Hidi, S. (2011). Revisiting the conceptualization, measurement, and generation of interest. Educational Psychologist, 46(3), 168–184. doi:10.1080/00461520.2011.587723
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R., & Connell, J. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalisation: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 749–761. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.749
   Google Scholar
• Salmi, H. (1993). Science Centre education. Motivation and learning in informal education (Research Report 119). Department of Teacher Education, University of Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Salmi, H. (2003). Science Centres as learning laboratories: Experiences of Heureka, the Finnish Science Centre. International Journal of Technology Management, 25(5), 460–476. doi: 10.1504/IJTM.2003.003113
   Google Scholar
• Salmi, H. (2011). Evidence of bridging the gap between formal and informal learning thorugh teacher education. Reflecting Education, 8(2), 45–61.
   Google Scholar
• Salmi, H., Thuneberg, H., & Vainikainen, M.-P. (2016). How do engineering attitudes vary by gender and motivation? Attractiveness of outreach science exhibition in four countries. European journal of engineering education, 18(1), 2–22. doi:10.1080/03043797.2015.1121466
   Google Scholar
• Salmi, H., Vainikainen, M-P., & Thuneberg, H. (2015). Mathematical thinking skills, self-concept and learning outcomes of 12-year-olds visiting a Mathematics Science Centre Exhibition in Latvia and Sweden. Journal of Science Communication, 14(4), 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Screven, C. (1992). Motivating visitors to read labels. ILVS Review: A Journal of Visitor Behavior, 1(2), 36–66.
   Google Scholar
• Sinatra, G., Brem, S., & Evans, E. (2008). Changing minds? Implications of conceptual change for teaching and learning about biological evolution. Evolution: Education & Outreach, 1(2), 189–195. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2008.00023.x
   Google Scholar
• Special Eurobarometer 419. (2014). Public perceptions of science, research, and innovation. Brussels: EU-Directorate of Research and Innovation. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_419_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Stocklmayer, S. (2003). What makes a successful outreach program? An outline of the shell questacon science circus. International Journal of Technology Management, 25(5), 405–412. doi: 10.1504/IJTM.2003.003109
   Google Scholar
• Sturm, H., & Bogner, F. X. (2010). Learning at workstations in two different environments: A museum and a classroom. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 36, 14–19. doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2010.09.002
   Google Scholar
• Tan Wee Hin, L., & Subramaniam, R. (2003). Science and technology centres as agents for promoting science culture in developing nations. International Journal of Technology Management, 25(5), 413–426.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, K. (2005). Dinosaurs as a cultural phenomenon. American Scientist, 93(3), 212–216. doi: 10.1511/2005.53.3454
   Google Scholar
• Thuneberg, H. (2007). Is a majority enough? Psychological well-being and its relation to academic and prosocial motivation, self-regulation and achievement at school (Research report 281). Department of Applied Sciences of Education, Faculty of Behavioral Sciences, Helsinki University Press , Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Trend, R. (1998). An investigation into understanding of geological time among 10- and 11-year-old children. International Journal of Science Education, 20(8), 973–988. doi: 10.1080/0950069980200805
   Google Scholar
• Tunnicliffe, S. (1998). Boy talk/girl talk: Is it the same at animal exhibits? International Journal of Science Education, 20(7), 795–811. doi: 10.1080/0950069980200704
   Google Scholar
• Tunnicliffe, S. (2000). Conversations of family and primary school groups at robotic dinosaur exhibits in a museum: What do they talk about? International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 739–754. doi: 10.1080/09500690050044071
   Google Scholar
• Tunnicliffe, S., & Reiss, M. (2010). What sense do children make of three-dimensional, life-sized “representations” of animals? School Science & Mathematics, 10(3), 128–138.
   Google Scholar
• Vainikainen, M-P., Salmi, H., & Thuneberg, H. (2015). Situational interest and learning in a Science Centre Mathematics Exhibition. Journal of Science Communication, 14(4), 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Zoldasova, K., & Prokop, P. (2006). Analysis of motivational orientations in science education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4(4), 669–688. doi: 10.1007/s10763-005-9019-2
   Google Scholar