Science communication training: what are we trying to teach?

References

• Anon. (2004). Going public. Nature, 431(7011), 883–883. doi: 10.1038/431883a
   Google Scholar
• Baram-Tsabari, A., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2016). Assessment. In M. C. A. van der Sanden & M. J. de Vries (Eds.), Science and technology education and communication: Seeking synergy (pp. 163–185). Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Baram-Tsabari, A., & Osborne, J. (2015). Bridging science education and science communication research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(2), 135–144. doi:10.1002/tea.21202
   Google Scholar
• Baron, N. (2010). Escape from the ivory tower: A guide to making your science matter. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, M. W. (2014). A word from the editor on the special issue on ‘public engagement’. Public Understanding of Science, 23(1), 3–3. doi:10.1177/0963662513518149
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, M. W., Allum, N., & Miller, S. (2007). What can we learn from 25 years of PUS survey research? Liberating and expanding the agenda. Public Understanding of Science, 16(1), 79–95. doi:10.1177/0963662506071287
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, M. W., & Bucchi, M. (Eds.). (2007). Journalism, science and society: Science communication between news and public relations. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, P., Lewenstein, B. V., Shouse, A., & Feder, M. (Eds.). (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, R. (2014). Communication: Spontaneous scientists. Nature, 505(7481), 121–123. doi: 10.1038/nj7481-121a
   Google Scholar
• Besley, J. C., Dudo, A. D., Yuan, S., & Abi Ghannam, N. (2016). Qualitative interviews with science communication trainers about communication objectives and goals. Science Communication, 38(3), 356–381. doi:10.1177/1075547016645640
   Google Scholar
• Besley, J. C., Oh, S. H., & Nisbet, M. (2013). Predicting scientists’ participation in public life. Public Understanding of Science, 22, 971–987. doi:10.1177/0963662512459315
   Google Scholar
• Besley, J. C., & Tanner, A. H. (2011). What science communication scholars think about training scientists to communicate. Science Communication, 33(2), 239–263. doi:10.1177/1075547010386972
   Google Scholar
• Borun, M., Chambers, M., & Cleghorn, A. (1996). Families are learning in science museums. Curator, 39(2), 124–138. doi: 10.1111/j.2151-6952.1996.tb01084.x
   Google Scholar
• Brandenberg, C. (2016, 1 February). Scientific literacy redefined. The Scientist. Retrieved from http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/45102/title/Scientific-Literacy-Redefined/
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (expanded ed.). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bray, B., France, B., & Gilbert, J. K. (2011). Identifying the essential elements of effective science communication: What do the experts say? International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 2(1), 23–41. doi:10.1080/21548455.2011.611627
   Google Scholar
• Bromme, R., & Goldman, S. R. (2014). The public’s bounded understanding of science. Educational Psychologist, 49(2), 59–69. doi:10.1080/00461520.2014.921572
   Google Scholar
• Burns, T. W., O’Connor, D. J., & Stocklmayer, S. (2003). Science communication: A contemporary definition. Public Understanding of Science, 12(2), 183–202. doi: 10.1177/09636625030122004
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, L. L. (2007). The hands-on guide for science communicators: A step-by-step approach to public outreach. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• COMPASS. (2014). #GRADSCICOMM workshop summary: integrating communication training into STEM graduate education. Retrieved from http://compassblogs.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/GradSciComm-Workshop-Summary.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cornell University. (2014). Broadening experiences in scientific training. Retrieved from http://www.best.cornell.edu
   Google Scholar
• Cribb, J., & Hartomo, T. S. (2002). Sharing knowledge: A guide to effective science communication. Canberra: CSIRO.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, S. R., & Horst, M. (2016). Science communication: Culture, identity, and citizenship. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, S. R., & Selin, C. (2012). Energy futures: Five dilemmas of the practice of anticipatory governance. Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture, 6(1), 119–136. doi:10.1080/17524032.2011.644632
   Google Scholar
• Dean, C. (2009). Am I making myself clear? A scientist's guide to talking to the public. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DeBoer, G. E. (2011). The globalization of science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(6), 567–591. doi:10.1002/tea.20421
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268. doi: 10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
   Google Scholar
• Driscoll, M. (2004). Psychology of learning instruction (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Dudo, A., & Besley, J. C. (2016). Scientists’ prioritization of communication objectives for public engagement. PLoS One, 11(2), e0148867. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0148867
   Google Scholar
• Dunwoody, S. (2014). Science journalism: Prospects in the digital Age. In M. Bucchi & B. Trench (Eds.), Handbook of public communication of science and technology (2nd ed., pp. 27–39). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (1996). The expert learner: Strategic, self-regulated, and reflective. Instructional Science, 24(1), 1–24. doi:10.1007/bf00156001
   Google Scholar
• Fahy, D. (2014). The new celebrity scientists: Out of the lab and into the limelight. London: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Fischhoff, B., & Scheufele, D. A. (2014). The science of science communication II. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(Supplement 4), 13583–13584. doi:10.1073/pnas.1414635111
   Google Scholar
• Fischhoff, B., & Scheufele, D. A. (Eds.). (2013). The science of science communication (papers reprinted from proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 110, suppl. 3, pp. 13696 and 14031–14110). Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Gold, B. D. (2001). The Aldo Leopold leadership program. Science Communication, 23(1), 41–49. doi:10.1177/1075547001023001004
   Google Scholar
• Goodell, R. (1977). The visible scientists. Boston, MA: Little Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Ham, B. (2008). Public engagement: Workshops build story-telling skills of scientists. Science, 320(5875), 463–464. doi:10.1126/science.320.5875.463
   Google Scholar
• Hamlyn, B., Shanahan, M., Lewis, H., O’Donoghue, E., Hanson, T., & Burchell, K. (2015). Factors affecting public engagement by researchers: A study on behalf of a consortium of UK public research funders. London: Policy Studies Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, R., & Grossman, D. (2006). A scientist’s guide to talking with the media. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, K. D., Bagley, E., Berkey, A. J. M., Birlenbach, D. M., Carr-Markell, M. K., Crawford, J. W.,  …  Wesseln, C. J. (2014). Amplify the signal: Graduate training in broader impacts of scientific research. BioScience, 64(6), 517–523. doi:10.1093/biosci/biu051
   Google Scholar
• Horlick-Jones, T., Walls, J., Rowe, G., Pidgeon, N., Poortinga, W., & O’Riordan, T. (2006). On evaluating the GM nation? Public debate about the commercialisation of transgenic crops in Britain. New Genetics and Society, 25(3), 265–288. doi:10.1080/14636770601032858
   Google Scholar
• Hundey, E. J., Olker, J. H., Carreira, C., Daigle, R. M., Elgin, A. K., Finiguerra, M.,  …  Wood-Charlson, E. M. (2016). A shifting tide: Recommendations for incorporating science communication into graduate training. Limnology and Oceanography Bulletin, 25(4), 109–116. doi:10.1002/lob.10151
   Google Scholar
• Kiernan, V. (2003). Diffusion of news about research. Science Communication, 25(1), 3–13. doi:10.1177/1075547003255297
   Google Scholar
• Kuehne, L. M., Twardochleb, L. A., Fritschie, K. J., Mims, M. C., Lawrence, D. J., Gibson, P. P., … Olden, J. D. (2014). Practical science communication strategies for graduate students. Conservation Biology, doi:10.1111/cobi.12305
   Google Scholar
• Latimore, J. A., Dreelin, E. A., & Burroughs, J. P. (2014). Outreach and engagement education for graduate students in natural resources: Developing a course to enrich a graduate outreach requirement. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 18(4), 126–154.
   Google Scholar
• Leshner, A. I. (2007). Outreach training needed (editorial). Science, 315, 161. doi:10.1126/science.1138712
   Google Scholar
• Lewenstein, B. V. (2016). Editorial: Can we understand citizen science? [special issue on citizen science]. JCOM: Journal of Science Communication, 15(1), online only, retrieved from http://jcom.sissa.it/archive/15/01/JCOM_1501_2016_E
   Google Scholar
• Longnecker, N., & Gondwe, M. (2014). Graduate degree programs in science communication: Educating and training science communicators to work with communities. In L. Tan Wee Hin & R. Subramaniam (Eds.), Communicating science to the public: Opportunities and challenges for the Asia-Pacific region (pp. 141–160). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• McCombs, B. L. (1996). Alternative perspectives for motivation. In L. Baker, P. Afferbach, & D. Reinking (Eds.), Developing engaged readers in school and home communities (pp. 67–86). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McKinley, D. C., Miller-Rushing, A. J., Ballard, H. L., Bonney, R., Brown, H., Evans, D. M., … Soukup, M. A. (2015). Investing in citizen science can improve natural resource management and environmental protection (Report No. 19). Retrieved from http://www.esa.org/esa/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Issue19.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Meredith, D. (2010). Explaining research: How to reach key audiences to advance your work. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, S., Fahy, D., & Team, T. E. (2009). Can science communication workshops train scientists for reflexive public engagement? Science Communication, 31(1), 116–126. doi:10.1177/1075547009339048
   Google Scholar
• Mulder, H. A. J., Longnecker, N., & Davis, L. S. (2008). The state of science communication programs at universities around the world. Science Communication, 30(2), 277–287. doi:10.1177/1075547008324878
   Google Scholar
• Neeley, E., Goldman, E., Smith, B., Baron, N., & Sunu, S. (2014). GRADSCICOMM report and recommendations: mapping the pathways to integrate science communication training into STEM graduate education. Retrieved December 23, 2016 from http://compassblogs.org/gradscicomm/
   Google Scholar
• Ogawa, M. (2013). Towards a ‘design approach’ to science communication. In J. K. Gilbert & S. Stocklmayer (Eds.), Communication and engagement with science and technology: Issues and dilemmas (pp. 3–18). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, R. (2015). Houston, we have a narrative. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pennisi, E. (2015). Beetle horns and book writing. Science, 350(6267), 1578–1578. doi: 10.1126/science.350.6267.1578
   Google Scholar
• Peters, H. P. (2013). Gap between science and media revisited: Scientists as public communicators. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(suppl. 3), 14102–14109. doi:10.1073/pnas.1212745110
   Google Scholar
• Peters, H. P., Brossard, D., de Cheveigne, S., Dunwoody, S., Kallfass, M., Miller, S., & Tsuchida, S. (2008). Policy forum: Interactions with the mass media. Science, 321(5886), 204–205. doi: 10.1126/science.1157780
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, D. P., Kanter, E. J., Bednarczyk, B., & Tastad, P. L. (1991). Importance of the lay press in the transmission of medical knowledge to the scientific community. New England Journal of Medicine, 325(17 October), 1180–1183. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199110173251620
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Risk and Policy Analysis Consultancy. (2015). Evaluation of the Sciencewise programme 2012–2015: Report for Sciencewise/Ricardo-AEA. Norfolk. Retrieved from http://www.sciencewise-erc.org.uk/cms/assets/Uploads/Learning-Resources/SW-Evaluation-FR-230315.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, G., Horlick-Jones, T., Walls, J., & Pidgeon, N. (2005). Difficulties in evaluating public engagement initiatives: Reflections on an evaluation of the UK GM nation? Public debate about transgenic crops. Public Understanding of Science, 14(4), 331–352. doi:10.1177/0963662505056611
   Google Scholar
• Royal Society. (2006). Science communication: Excellence in science. Survey of factors affecting science communication by scientists and engineers. London: Royal Society.
   Google Scholar
• Scheufele, D. A., & Jamieson, K. H. (Eds.). (2017). Oxford handbook of science of science communication. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, D. L., Lin, X., Brophy, S., & Bransford, J. D. (1999). Toward the development of flexibly adaptive instructional designs. Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory, 2, 183–213.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, J., & Bultitude, K. (2009). Best practices in communication training for public engagement with science, technology, engineering and mathematics. JCOM: Journal of Science Communication, 8(2) Retrieved from https://jcom.sissa.it/archive/08/02/Jcom0802(2009)A03
   Google Scholar
• Skye, E. P., Wagenschutz, H., Steiger, J. A., & Kumagai, A. K. (2014). Use of interactive theater and role play to develop medical students’ skills in breaking bad news. Journal of Cancer Education, 29(4), 704–708. doi: 10.1007/s13187-014-0641-y
   Google Scholar
• Trench, B., & Miller, S. (2012). Policies and practices in supporting scientists’ public communication through training. Science and Public Policy, 39(6), 722–731. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scs090
   Google Scholar
• Turney, J. (1994). Teaching science communication: Courses, curricula, theory, and practice. Public Understanding of Science, 3(4), 435–444. doi: 10.1088/0963-6625/3/4/006
   Google Scholar