715
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

An assessment of civic scientific literacy in Japan: development of a more authentic assessment task and scoring rubric

Pages 301-322 | Received 08 Jun 2016, Accepted 21 Apr 2017, Published online: 09 May 2017

References

  • Amelink, C. (2009). Literature overview: Gender differences in science achievement. SWE-AWE CASEE Overviews.
  • American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1989). Science for all Americans. Washington, DC: AAAS.
  • Blanco-López, Á, España-Ramos, E., González-García, F. J., & Franco-Mariscal, A. J. (2015). Key aspects of scientific competence for citizenship: A Delphi study of the expert community in Spain. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(2), 164–198. doi: 10.1002/tea.21188
  • Bybee, R. W. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy: From purpose to practices. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  • Chang, S., & Chiu, M. (2005). The development of authentic assessments to investigate ninth graders? Scientific literacy: In the case of scientific cognition concerning the concepts of chemistry and physics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3, 117–140. doi: 10.1007/s10763-004-5239-0
  • Choi, K., Lee, H., Shin, N., Kim, S., & Krajcik, J. (2011). Reconceptualization of scientific literacy in South Korea for the 21st century. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(6), 670–697. doi: 10.1002/tea.20424
  • Durant, J. R., Evans, G. A., & Thomas, G. P. (1989). The public understanding of science. Nature, 340(6228), 11–14. doi: 10.1038/340011a0
  • European Commission. (2001). Eurobarometer 55.2-Europeans, science and technology. Retrieved June 2, 2016, from http://ec.europa.eu/research/press/2001/pr0612en-report.pdf
  • Feinstein, N. (2011). Salvaging science literacy. Science Education, 95, 168–185. doi: 10.1002/sce.20414
  • Garner-O’Neale, L., Maughan, J., & Ogunkola, B. (2013). Scientific literacy of undergraduate chemistry students in the University of the West Indies, Barbados: Individual and joint contributions of age, sex and level of study. International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, 13, 41–55. doi: 10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILSHS.13.41
  • Gormally, C., Brickman, P., Hallar, B., & Armstrong, N. (2009). Effects of inquiry-based learning on students’ science literacy skills and confidence. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 3(2), 1–22. doi: 10.20429/ijsotl.2009.030216
  • Hurd, P. D. (1958). Science literacy: Its meaning for American schools. Educational Leadership, 16, 13–16.
  • Ikeuchi, R. (2014). Kagakugijutsu to Gendaishakai [Science and Technology, and Modern Society]. Tokyo: Misuzu Shobo.
  • Kobayashi, T. (2007). Toransu Saiensu no Jidai [The Era of Trans-Science]. Tokyo: NTT Publishing.
  • Kuriyama, T., Sekiguchi, H., Otake, Y., & Chagawa, H. (2011). Nichi Bei Ei niokeru Kokumin no Kagaku Gijutu ni taisuru Ishiki no Hikakubunnseki – Internet wo Mochiita Hikaku Chousa [International comparison of the public attitudes towards and understanding of Science and Technology – Comparative study of internet survey in Japan, the united states of America, and the united kingdom]. (Research Report, 196). Tokyo: Monbu Kagakushou.
  • Kusumi, T. (2011). Kagaku Komyunikeishon niokeru Hihanteki Shikou [Critical Thinking in Science Communication]. Japan Society for Science Education, 35, 153–154.
  • Laugksch, R. C. (2000). Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview. Science Education, 84(1), 71–94. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200001)84:1<71::AID-SCE6>3.0.CO;2-C
  • Lin, S. (2014). Science and non-science undergraduate students’ critical thinking and argumentation performance in reading a science news report. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(5), 1023–1046. doi: 10.1007/s10763-013-9451-7
  • Matsushita, K. (2007). Pafomannsu Hyouka [Performance Assessment]. Tokyo: Nippon-Hyojun booklet.
  • Matsushita, K. (2011). Atarashii Nouryoku niyoru Kyouiku no Henyou: DeSeCo Ki Konpitenshi to PISA Literacy no Kentou [Changes in education through new concepts of ability: An inquiry into DeSeCo key competencies and PISA literacies]. The Japanese Journal of Labour Studies, 53(9), 39–49.
  • Miller, J. D. (1998). The measurement of civic scientific literacy. Public Understanding of Science, 7(3), 203–223. doi: 10.1088/0963-6625/7/3/001
  • Miller, J. D. (2002). Civic scientific literacy: A necessity in the 21st century. Federation of American Scientists Public Interests Report, 55(3), 3–6.
  • Miller, J. D. (2012). What colleges and universities need to do to advance civic Scientific literacy and preserve American democracy. Liberal Education, 98(4), 28–33.
  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology: Japan (MEXT). (2011). Heisei 23 nen ban Kagaku Gijutsu Hakusho [White Paper on Science and Engineering 2011]. Tokyo: Monbu Kagakushou.
  • Miyake, N., & Norman, D. A. (1979). To ask a question, one must know enough to know what is not known. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 357–364. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90200-7
  • National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards: Observe, interact, change, learn. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • National Science Board. (2000). Science and engineering indicators 2000. Retrieved June 1, 2016, from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind00/pdf/c8/c08.pdf
  • Okamoto, S., Niwa, F., Shimizu, K., & Sugiman, T. (2001). Kagaku Gijutsu nikansuru Ishiki Chousa – 2001 nen 2∼3 gatsu chousa [The 2001 survey of public attitudes toward and understanding of science & technology in Japan]. (NISTEP Report, 72). Tokyo: Monbu Kagakushou.
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2007). PISA 2006: Science competencies for tomorrow’s world. Paris: OECD.
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2009). PISA 2006 technical report.
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2013). Assessment of Higher Education Learning Outcomes (AHELO) Feasibility Study Report Volume 2 Data Analysis and National Experiences.
  • Pella, M. O., O’hearn, G. T., & Gale, C. W. (1966). Referents to scientific literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 4(3), 199–208. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660040317
  • Roberts, D. A. (2007). Scientific literacy/science literacy. In S. K. Abell, & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 729–780). Mahwah, NJ: Lwarence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Shen, B. S. (1975). Science literacy and the public understanding of science. In S. Day (Ed.), Communication of scientific information (pp. 44–52). Basel: Karger Publishers.
  • Shimizu, K. (2006). Ippanseijinn no Kagaku Gijutsu nikansuru Chishiki Rikai niokeru Kouzouhouteisiki Model Bunseki [A structural equation model analysis for the factor of public understanding of science and technology in Japan: Comparison of the effect of school science curriculum and public attentiveness for public policies]. Japan Society for Science Education, 30(3), 176–184.
  • Statistics Japan. Retrieved January 12, 2017, from http://www.stat.go.jp/data/kokusei/2010/users-g/wakatta.htm#jump1
  • Stocklmayer, S. M., & Bryant, C. (2012). Science and the public – What should people know? International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 2(1), 81–101. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2010.543186
  • Tanaka, K. (2008). Kyoiku Hyouka [Evaluation]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.
  • Todayama, K. (2011). Kagaku teki Shikou no Ressun [Lesson of Scientific Thinking]. Tokyo: NHK Publishing.
  • Twenty First Century Science. Retrieved June 1, 2016, from http://www.nuffieldfoundation.org/twenty-first-century-science/scientific-literacy
  • Weinberg, A. M. (1972). Science and trans-science. Minerva, 10(2), 209–222. doi: 10.1007/BF01682418
  • Wiggins, G. (1989). A true test: Toward more authentic and equitable assessment. The Chi Delta Kappan, 70(9), 703–713.
  • Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design, expanded 2nd edition. Virginia: ASCD.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.