USE YOUR OWN WORDS! Developing science communication skills of NST experts in a guided discourse

References

• Baram-Tsabari, A., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2013). An instrument for assessing scientists’ written skills in public communication of science. Science Communication, 35(1), 56–85. doi: 10.1177/1075547012440634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baram-Tsabari, A., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2017). Preparing scientists to be science communicators. In P. G. Patrick (Ed.), Preparing Informal Science Educators: Perspectives from Science Communication and Education (pp. 437–471). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Baram-Tsabari, A., & Osborne, J. (2015). Bridging science education and science communication research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(2), 135–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besley, J. C., Dudo, A., & Storksdieck, M. (2015). Scientists’ views about communication training. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(2), 199–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blonder, R. (2010). The story of nanomaterials in modern technology: An advanced course for chemistry teachers. Journal of Chemical Education, 88(1), 49–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blonder, R., & Dinur, M. (2011). Teaching nanotechnology using student-centered pedagogy for increasing students’ continuing motivation. Journal of Nano Education, 3(1-2), 51–61.
   Google Scholar
• Blonder, R., & Sakhnini, S. (2012). Teaching two basic nanotechnology concepts in secondary school by using a variety of teaching methods. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 13(4), 500–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blonder, R., & Sakhnini, S. (2015). The making of nanotechnology: Exposing high-school students to behind-the-scenes of nanotechnology by inviting them to a nanotechnology conference. Nanotechnology Reviews, 4(1), 103–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blonder, R., & Sakhnini, S. (2017). Finding the connections between a high-school chemistry curriculum and nano-scale science and technology. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(4), 903–922.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blonder, R., & Yonai, E. (2020). Exposing high-school students to nanoscience. In K. Sattler (Ed.), Twenty-first century nanoscience – A Handbook (Vol. 10). Bosa roca: Taylor & Francis (CRC Press).
   Google Scholar
• Bryan, L. A., Magana, A. J., & Sederberg, D. (2015). Published research on pre-college students’ and teachers’ nanoscale science, engineering, and technology learning. Nanotechnology Reviews, 4(1), 7–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busch, K. C. (2016). Polar bears or people? Exploring ways in which teachers frame climate change in the classroom. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 6(2), 137–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(3), 271–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, S. R. (2008). Constructing communication: Talking to scientists about talking to the public. Science Communication, 29(4), 413–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gifford, R., & Comeau, L. A. (2011). Message framing influences perceived climate change competence, engagement, and behavioral intentions. Global Environmental Change, 21(4), 1301–1307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halpern, D. F., & Hakel, M. D. (2003). Applying the science of learning to the university and beyond: Teaching for long-term retention and transfer. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 35(4), 36–41.
   Google Scholar
• Hsueh-Chao, M. H., & Nation, P. (2000). Unknown vocabulary density and reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 13(1), 403–430.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, K., Bodner, G. M., & Bryan, L. (2011). Middle-and high-school students’ interest in nanoscale science and engineering topics and phenomena. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 1(1), 4.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M. G., Andre, T., Superfine, R., & Taylor, R. (2003). Learning at the nanoscale: The impact of students’ use of remote microscopy on concepts of viruses, scale, and microscopy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 40(3), 303–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. G., Blonder, R., Gardner, G. E., Albe, V., Falvo, M., & Chevrier, J. (2013). Nanotechnology and nanoscale science: Educational challenges. International Journal of Science Education, 35(9), 1490–1512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. G., Taylor, A., Minogue, J., Broadwell, B., Wiebe, E., & Carter, G. (2007). Understanding scale: Powers of ten. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(2), 191–202.
   Google Scholar
• Kähkönen, A. L., Laherto, A., Lindell, A., & Tala, S. (2016). Interdisciplinary nature of nanoscience: Implications for education. In K. Winkelmann & B. Bhushan (Eds.), Global perspectives of nanoscience and engineering education (pp. 35–81). Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kapon, S., Ganiel, U., & Eylon, B. (2010). Scientific argumentation in public physics lectures: Bringing contemporary physics into high-school teaching. Physics Education, 44(1), 33.
   Google Scholar
• Kapon, S., Ganiel, U., & Eylon, B. S. (2010). Explaining the unexplainable: Translated scientific explanations (TSE) in public physics lectures. International Journal Of Science Education, 32(2), 245–264. doi: 10.1080/09500690802566632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laherto, A. (2010). An analysis of the educational significance of nanoscience and nanotechnology in scientific and technological literacy. Science Education International, 21(3), 160–175.
   Google Scholar
• Laherto, A., Tirre, F., Parchmann, I., Kampschulte, L., & Schwarzer, S. (2018). Scientists’ perceptions on the nature of nanoscience and its public communication. Problems of education in the twenty-first century (Spausdinta).
   Google Scholar
• Libarkin, J. C., & Kurdziel, J. P. (2002). Research methodologies in science education: Qualitative data. Journal of Geoscience Education, 50(2), 195–200.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, S., Daniels , K., & Harris, C. (2004). Cognitive mapping in organizational research. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research. (pp. 73–86). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Moosavifazel, V., Kumar, A., Cho, H. J., & Seal, S. (2014). Laboratory research motivated chemistry classroom activity to promote interests among students towards science. Journal of Nano Education, 6(1), 25–29.
   Google Scholar
• Murry, J. W. Jr, & & Hammons, J. O. (1995). Delphi: A versatile methodology for conducting qualitative research. The Review of Higher Education, 18(4), 423–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NAP. (2016). Triennial review of the national nanotechnology initiative. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/18271.
   Google Scholar
• Nation, I. (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(1), 59–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbet, M. C., & Scheufele, D. A. (2009). What's next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions. American Journal of Botany, 96(10), 1767–1778.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quirola, N., Marquez, V., Tecpan, S., & Baltazar, S. E. (2018). Didactic proposal to include nanoscience and nanotechnology at high school curriculum linking physics, chemistry and biology. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1043, No. 1, p. 012050). IOP Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Rakedzon, T., Segev, E., Chapnik, N., Yosef, R., & Baram-Tsabari, A. (2017). Automatic jargon identifier for scientists engaging with the public and science communication educators. PloS One, 12(8), e0181742.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roco, M. C. (2001). From vision to the implementation of the U.S. National nanotechnology initiative. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 3, 5–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakhnini, S., & Blonder, R. (2015). Essential concepts of nanoscale science and technology for high school students based on a Delphi study by the expert community. International Journal of Science Education, 37(11), 1699–1738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakhnini, S., & Blonder, R. (2016). Nanotechnology applications as a context for teaching the essential concepts of NST. International Journal of Science Education, 38(3), 521–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakhnini, S., & Blonder, R. (2018). Insertion points of the essential nanoscale science and technology (NST) concepts in the Israeli middle school science and technology curriculum. Nanotechnology Reviews, 7(5), 373–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, N., Jiang, X., & Grabe, W. (2011). The percentage of words known in a text and reading comprehension. The Modern Language Journal, 95(1), 26–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shkedy, A. (2012). The meaning behind the words: Methodologies of qualitative research: Theory and practice. Jerusalem: The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
   Google Scholar
• Simis, M. J., Madden, H., Cacciatore, M. A., & Yeo, S. K. (2016). The lure of rationality: Why does the deficit model persist in science communication? Public Understanding of Science, 25(4), 400–414. doi:10.1177/0963662516629749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spence, A., & Pidgeon, N. (2010). Framing and communicating climate change: The effects of distance and outcome frame manipulations. Global Environmental Change, 20(4), 656–667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, A., & Jones, G. (2009). Proportional reasoning ability and concepts of scale: Surface area to volume relationships in science. International Journal of Science Education, 31(9), 1231–1247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1980). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. London: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar