Intergenerational community conservation projects, STEM identity authoring, and positioning: the cases of two intergenerational teams

References

• Baily, C. (2009). Reverse intergenerational learning: A missed opportunity? AI & Society, 23(1), 111–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-007-0169-3
   Google Scholar
• Bang, M., Brown, B. A., Calabrese Barton, A., Rosebery, A. S., & Warren, B. (2017). Toward more equitable learning in science. In C. Schwarz, C. Passmore, & B. J. Reiser (Eds.), Helping students make sense of the world using next generation science and engineering practices (pp. 33–58). National Science Teachers Association.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, A. C., & Tan, E. (2010). We be burnin'! Agency, identity, and science learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(2), 187–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400903530044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beijaard, D. (1995). Teachers prior experiences and actual perceptions of professional identity. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 1(2), 281–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354060950010209
   Google Scholar
• Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187–1218. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corrigan, T., McNamara, G., & O'Hara, J. (2013). Intergenerational learning: A valuable learning experience for higher education students, Egitim Arastirmalari. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 52, 117–136.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing Among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, B., & Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 20(1), 43–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1990.tb00174.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebbels, S., Evans, S. M., & Delany, J. E. (2011). Promoting environmental citizenship and corporate social responsibility through a school/industry/university partnership. Journal of Biological Education, 45(1), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2011.537834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2002). Literacies, identities, and discourses. In M. Schleppegrel & M. Cecilia Colombi (Eds.), Developing advanced literacy in first and second languages: Meaning with power (pp. 159–175). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Groenewald, T. (2004). A phenomenological research design illustrated. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 3(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690400300104
   Google Scholar
• Harré, R., & van Langenhove, L. (1999). Introducing positioning theory. In R. Harré & L. van Langenhove (Eds.), Positioning theory (pp. 14–31). Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hatton Yeo, A., & Ohsako, T. (2000). Intergenerational programmes public policy and research implications. An international perspective. UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Herbel-Eisenmann, B. A., Wagner, D., Johnson, K. R., Suh, H., & Figueras, H. (2015). Positioning in mathematics education: Revelations on an imported theory. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 89(2), 185–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-014-9588-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C. D. (2017). Expanding visions of how people learn: The centrality of identity repertoires. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 26(3), 517–524. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2017.1336022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. L. (2000). Across the scales of time: Artifacts, activities, and meanings in ecosocial systems. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 7(4), 273–290. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327884MCA0704_03
   Google Scholar
• Moghaddam, F., & Harré, R. (2010). Words, conflicts and political processes. In F. Moghaddam & R. Harré (Eds.), Words of conflict, words of war: How the language we use in political processes sparks fighting (pp. 1–28). Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, A. (2000). Mentoring revisited: A phenomenological reading of the literature. Mentoring and Tutoring, 8(2), 145–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/713685524
   Google Scholar
• Ruby, M., Kenner, C., Jessel, J., Gregory, E., & Arju, T. (2007). Gardening with grandparents: An early engagement with the science curriculum. Early Years, 27(2), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/09575140701425266
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tirado, F., & Gálvez, A. (2007). Positioning theory and discourse analysis: Some tools for social interaction analysis [88 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 8(2), Art. 31. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-8.2.248. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0702317
   Google Scholar
• Varelas, M., Martin, D. B., & Kane, J. M. (2012). Content learning and identity construction: A framework to strengthen African American students’ mathematics and science learning in urban elementary schools. Human Development, 55(5–6), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.1159/000345324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler, C., Gallagher, J., McDonough, M., & Soopokakit-Namfa, B. (1997). Improving school community relations in Thailand. In W. Cummings & P. Altbach (Eds.), The challenge of eastern Asian education: Implications for America (pp. 205–222). State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar