References
- Albert, M., Laberge, S., Hodges, B. D., Regehr, G., & Lingard, L. (2008). Biomedical scientists’ perception of the social sciences in health research. Social Science & Medicine, 66(12), 2520–2531. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.01.052
- Baldassarri, D., & Gelman, A. (2008). Partisans without constraint: Political polarization and trends in American public opinion. American Journal of Sociology, 114(2), 408–446. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/590649
- Bangay, C., & Blum, N. (2010). Education responses to climate change and quality: Two parts of the same agenda? International Journal of Educational Development, 30(4), 359–368. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2009.11.011
- Barford, A., Proefke, R., Mugeere, A., & Stocking, B. (2021). Young people and climate change. British Academy COP26 Briefings. https://www.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/documents/3285/Young-people-and-climate-change.pdf. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5871/bacop26/9780856726606.001
- Bellaby, P., & Clark, A. (2016). Might more harm be done than good when scientists and engineers engage with the public about new technology before it is fully developed? The case of hydrogen energy. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 6(3), 283–302. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2015.1073404
- Bellamy, R., Chilvers, J., & Vaughan, N. E. (2014). Deliberative mapping of options for tackling climate change: Citizens and specialists ‘open up’ appraisal of geoengineering. Public Understanding of Science, 25(3), 269–286. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662514548628
- Bellamy, R., & Lezaun, J. (2017). Crafting a public for geoengineering. Public Understanding of Science, 26(4), 402–417. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515600965
- Bellamy, R., Lezaun, J., & Palmer, J. (2017). Public perceptions of geoengineering research governance: An experimental deliberative approach. Global Environmental Change, 45, 194–202. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.06.004
- Blake, C., Calvert, S., Dècle, C. M. C., Dhassi, K. K., Edwards, R., Garpova, V., Malaj, G., Mirjanić, J., Saunders, W., Sinkovec, Y., Štofan, J., Vellekoop, S., & Yuan, X. (2021). Youth Guide and Policy Brief. Geo-engineering: A Climate of Uncertainty? https://georoutesuk.files.wordpress.com/2021/06/geoengineering-2.pdf
- Braun, C., Rehdanz, K., & Schmidt, U. (2018). Exploring public perception of environmental technology over time. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 61(1), 143–160. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2017.1291414
- Cairns, R., & Stirling, A. (2014). Maintaining planetary systems’ or ‘concentrating global power?’ High stakes in contending framings of climate geoengineering. Global Environmental Change, 28, 25–38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.005
- Carlisle, D. P., Feetham, P. M., Wright, M. J., & Teagle, D. A. (2020). The public remain uninformed and wary of climate engineering. Climatic Change, 160(2), 303–322. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02706-5
- Colvin, R. M., Kemp, L., Talberg, A., De Castella, C., Downie, C., Friel, S., Grant, W. J., Howden, M., Jotzo, F., Markham, F., & Platow, M. J. (2020). Learning from the climate change debate to avoid polarisation on negative emissions. Environmental Communication, 14(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2019.1630463
- Corner, A., Parkhill, K., Pigeon, N., & Vaughan, N. E. (2013). Messing with nature? Exploring public perceptions of geoengineering in the UK. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 938–947. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.06.002
- Corner, A., & Pidgeon, N. (2015). Like artificial trees? The effect of framing by natural analogy on public perceptions of geoengineering. Climatic Change, 130(3), 425–438. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1148-6
- Cummings, C. L., & Rosenthal, S. (2018). Climate change and technology: Examining opinion formation of geoengineering. Environment Systems and Decisions, 38(2), 208–215. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-018-9683-8
- Cutter-Mackenzie, A., & Rousell, D. (2019). Education for what? Shaping the field of climate change education with children and young people as co-researchers. Children's Geographies, 17(1), 90–104. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2018.1467556
- Delgado, A., & Åm, H. (2018). Experiments in interdisciplinarity: Responsible research and innovation and the public good. PLoS Biology, 16(3), e2003921. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2003921
- Delina, L. L. (2020). Potentials and critiques of building a Southeast Asian interdisciplinary knowledge community on critical geoengineering studies. Climatic Change, 163(2), 973–987. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02921-0
- Edwards, R., & Brannelly, T. (2017). Approaches to democratising qualitative research methods. Qualitative Research, 17(3), 271–277. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794117706869
- Flynn, R., Ricci, M., & Bellaby, P. (2011). The mirage of citizen engagement in uncertain science: Public attitudes towards hydrogen energy. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 1(2), 97–114. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2011.585810
- Hansen, J., Sato, M., Kharecha, P., Schuckmann, K. V., Beerling, D. J., Cao, J., Marcott, S., Masson-Delmotte, V., Prather, M. J., Rohling, E. J., Shakun, J., Smith, P., Lacis, A., Russell, G., & Ruedy, R. (2017). Young people's burden: Requirement of negative CO2 emissions. Earth System Dynamics, 8(3), 577–616. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-8-577-2017
- Ipsos MORI. (2010). Experiment Earth?: Report on a public dialogue on geoengineering. Natural Environment Research Council, Swindon https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/publication/1970-01/sri_experiment-earth-report-on-a–public-dialogue-on-geoengineering_sept2010.pdf
- Lawrence, M. G., Schäfer, S., Muri, H., Scott, V., Oschlies, A., Vaughan, N. E., Boucher, O., Schmidt, H., Haywood, J., & Scheffran, J. (2018). Evaluating climate geoengineering proposals in the context of the Paris Agreement temperature goals. Nature Communications, 9(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05938-3
- Lawrie, G. (2021). Considerations of sample size in chemistry education research: Numbers do count but context matters more!. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 22, 809–812https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1039/D1RP90009A.
- Lawson, D. F., Stevenson, K. T., Peterson, M. N., Carrier, S. J., Strnad, R. L., & Seekamp, E. (2019). Children can foster climate change concern among their parents. Nature Climate Change, 9(6), 458–462. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0463-3
- Lucas, C. H. (2018). Concerning values: What underlies public polarisation about climate change? Geographical Research, 56(3), 298–310. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-5871.12284
- Macnaghten, P., & Szerszynski, B. (2013). Living the global social experiment: An analysis of public discourse on solar radiation management and its implications for governance. Global Environmental Change, 23(2), 465–474. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.12.008
- Mahajan, A., Tingley, D., & Wagner, G. (2019). Fast, cheap, and imperfect? US public opinion about solar geoengineering. Environmental Politics, 28(3), 523–543. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1479101
- Monroe, M. C., Plate, R. R., Oxarart, A., Bowers, A., & Chaves, W. A. (2019). Identifying effective climate change education strategies: A systematic review of the research. Environmental Education Research, 25(6), 791–812. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1360842
- Rayner, S., Kruger, T., Savulescu, J., Redgwell, C., & Pidgeon, N. (2009). The Oxford Principles of geoengineering research. http://www.geoengineering.ox.ac.uk/www.geoengineering.ox.ac.uk/oxford-principles/principles/index.html
- Rekker, R. (2021). The nature and origins of political polarization over science. Public Understanding of Science, 30(4), 352–368. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662521989193
- Rousell, D., Cutter-Mackenzie, A., & Foster, J. (2017). Children of an earth to come: Speculative fiction, geophilosophy and climate change education research. Educational Studies, 53(6), 654–669. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2017.1369086
- Rousell, D., & Cutter-Mackenzie-Knowles, A. (2019). A systematic review of climate change education: Giving children and young people a ‘voice’ and a ‘hand’ in redressing climate change. Children's Geographies, 18(2), 191–208. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2019.1614532
- Scheer, D., & Renn, O. (2014). Public perception of geoengineering and its consequences for public debate. Climatic Change, 125(3), 305–318. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1177-1
- Stilgoe, J., Lock, S. J., & Wilsdon, J. (2014). Why should we promote public engagement with science? Public Understanding of Science, 23(1), 4–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662513518154
- Sütterlin, B., & Siegrist, M. (2017). Public perception of solar radiation management: The impact of information and evoked affect. Journal of Risk Research, 20(10), 1292–1307. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2016.1153501
- Szerszynski, B., & Galarraga, M. (2013). Geoengineering knowledge: Interdisciplinarity and the shaping of climate engineering research. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 45(12), 2817–2824. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1068/a45647
- Thew, H., Middlemiss, L., & Paavola, J. (2020). Youth is not a political position: Exploring justice claims-making in the UN Climate Change negotiations. Global Environmental Change, 61, 102036. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102036
- Viseu, A. (2015). Integration of social science into research is crucial. Nature, 525(7569), 291. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/525291a