Antarctic Treaty Consultative Parties’ engagement in wilderness protection at home and in Antarctica

References

• Argentina, Chile, Norway, Spain, UK and USA. “Deception Island Management Package.” ATCM Measure 10 (2012) Annex.
   Google Scholar
• Australia. “Protection of Antarctica’s Intrinsic Values: Policy on Non-Government Activities. WP 38.” ATCM XXVIII, Stockholm, June 6–17, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Australia. “Topic Summary: Footprint. IP 48.” ATCM XXXIII, Punta del Este, May 3–14, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Australia. “Management Plan for ASPA No. 164 Scullin and Murray Monoliths, Mac. Robertson Land.” ATCM Measure 13 (2010) Annex.
   Google Scholar
• Australia. “Analyses of the Antarctic Protected Areas System using Spatial Information. IP 26.” ATCM XXXV, Hobart, June 11–20, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Australia and Belgium. “Report of the Open-Ended Intersessional Contact Group on Further Development of a Multi-Year Strategic Work Plan. WP 31.” ATCM XXXVI, Brussels, May 20–29, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Australia, China, India, Romania and Russian Federation. “Management Plan for ASMA No. 6 Larsemann Hills, East Antarctica.” ATCM Measure 15 (2014) Annex.
   Google Scholar
• Bastmeijer, C.J. “Managing Human Activities in Antarctica: Should Wilderness Protection Count?” In New Zealand Yearbook of International Law, 335–353. Christchurch: University of Canterbury, School of Law, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Bastmeijer, C.J. “Protecting Polar Wilderness: Just a Western Philosophical Idea or a Useful Concept for Regulating Human Activities in the Polar Regions?” In The Yearbook of Polar Law 1, ed. in chief G. Alfredsson, T. Koivurova and special ed. Volume 1 D. Leary, 73–99. Boston/Leiden: Brill/Martinus Nijhoff, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Bastmeijer, Kees, M., Lamers, and J., Harcha. “Permanent Land-based Facilities for Tourism in Antarctica: The Need for Regulation.” Review of European Community & International Environmental Law 17, no. 1 (2008): 84–99.10.1111/j.1467-9388.2008.00585.x
   Google Scholar
• Bastmeijer, C.J., and R. Roura. “Environmental Impact Assessment in Antarctica.” In Theory and Practice of Transboundary Environmental Impact Assessment, ed. C.J. Bastmeijer and T. Koivurova, 175–219. Leiden: Brill/Martinus Nijhoff, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Bastmeijer, C.J., and S. van Hengel “The Role of the Protected Area Concept in Protecting the World’s Largest Natural Reserve: Antarctica.” Utrecht Law Review 5, no. 1 (2009): 61–79.
   Google Scholar
• Belarus. Construction and Operation of Belarusian Antarctic Research Station at Mount Vechernyaya, Enderby Land. Draft CEE. Minsk: National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Belgium. Construction and Operation of the New Belgian Research Station, Dronning Maud Land, Antarctica. Final CEE. Brussels: Belgian Federal Public Planning Service Science Policy, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, A.-M. The Emerging Politics of Antarctica. Abingdon: Routledge, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, A.-M. “China’s Antarctic Interests.” In Emerging Politics of Antarctica, ed. A.-M. Brady, 31–49. Abingdon: Routledge, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Brooking, T. “So Different from the USA: Our Late Appreciation of Wilderness.” In Wild Heart. The Possibility of Wilderness in Aotearoa New Zealand, ed. M., Abbott and R., Reeve, 123–131. Dunedin: Otago University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Caouette, B. “Japan.” In Handbook Wilderness Law and Policy, ed. C.F. Kormos, 171–181. Fulcrum: Golden, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• CEP. Report of the Committee for Environmental Protection (CEP IV), St. Petersburg, Russian Federation, July 9–13, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• CEP. Report of the Committee for Environmental Protection (CEP VII), Cape Town, South Africa, May 24–28, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• CEP. Report of the Committee for Environmental Protection (CEP XI), Kyiv, Ukraine, June 2–6, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• CEP. Report of the Committee for Environmental Protection (CEP XIII), Punta del Este, Uruguay, May 3–7, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• CEP. Report of the Committee for Environmental Protection (CEP XIV), Buenos Aires, Argentina, June 20–24, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• CEP. Report of the Committee for Environmental Protection (CEP XVI), Brussels, Belgium, May 20–24, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• CEP. Report of the Committee for Environmental Protection (CEP XVII), Brasilia, Brazil, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Cessford, G., ed. The State of Wilderness in New Zealand. Wellington: Department of Conservation, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Cessford, G., and P. Dingwall. “Wilderness and Recreation in New Zealand.” In State of Wilderness in New Zealand, ed. G.R. Cessford, 35–42. Wellington: Department of Conservation, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Cessford, G., and M.C. Reedy. “Wilderness Status and Associated Management Issues in New Zealand.” In State of Wilderness in New Zealand, ed. G.R. Cessford, 43–56. Wellington: Department of Conservation, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Chile and Germany. “Second Progress Report on the Discussion of the International Working Group about Possibilities for Environmental Management of Fildes Peninsula and Ardley Island. WP 4.” ATCM XXXII, Baltimore, MD, April 6–17, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Chile and UK. “Management Plan for ASPA No. 126, Byers Peninsula, Livingston Island, South Shetland Island.” ATCM Measure 4 (2011): Annex.
   Google Scholar
• China. Proposed Construction and Operation of the New Chinese Dome A Station. Final CEE. Beijing: Chinese Arctic and Antarctic Administration, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• China. “Management Plan for ASPA No. 168 Mount Harding, Grove Mountains, East Antarctica.” ATCM Measure 2 (2008) Annex.
   Google Scholar
• China. Proposed Construction and Operation of a New Chinese Research Station, Victoria Land, Antarctica. Draft CEE. Beijing: Chinese Arctic and Antarctic Administration, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, D.N., and W.E. Hammitt. “Wilderness Management Dilemmas: Fertile Ground for Wilderness Management Research.” In Wilderness Science in a Time of Change Conference – Volume 1: Changing Perspectives and Future Directions. May 23–27, 1999, Missoula, MT, comps. D.N. Cole, S.F. McCool, W.A. Freimund, and J. O’Loughlin, 58–63. Proceedings RMRS-P-15-VOL-1. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Convey, P., K.A., Hughes, and T. Tin. “Continental Governance and Environmental Management Mechanisms Under the Antarctic Treaty System: Sufficient for the Biodiversity Challenges of this Century?” Biodiversity 13, no. 3–4 (2012): 234–248. doi:10.1080/14888386.2012.703551.
   Google Scholar
• Cowley, J., P. Landres, M. Memory, D. Scott, and A. Lindholm. “Integrating Cultural Resources and Wilderness Character.” Park Science 28, no. 3 (2012): 29–33, 38.
   Google Scholar
• Cronon, W. “The Trouble with Wilderness: Or, Getting Back to the Wrong Nature.” Environmental History 1, no. 1 (1996): 7–28.10.2307/3985059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czech Republic. Draft CEE for Czech Scientific Station in Antarctica. Construction and Operation. Prague: Ministry of the Environment, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Conservation. Visitor Strategy. Wellington: Department of Conservation, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Dudeney, J.R., and D.W.H., Walton. “Leadership in Politics and Science within the Antarctic Treaty.” Polar Research 31 (2012): 11075. doi:10.3402/polar.v31i0.11075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudley, N., ed. Guidelines for Applying Protected Area Management Categories. Gland: IUCN, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Elzinga, A. “Rallying Around a Flag? On the Persistent Gap in Scientific Internationalism between Word and Deed.” In Emerging Politics of Antarctica, ed. A.-M. Brady, 193–213. Abingdon: Routledge, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. Guidelines on Wilderness in Natura 2000. Management of Terrestrial Wilderness and Wild Areas within the Natura 2000 Network. Technical Report-2013-069. Brussels: European Union, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Freitag-Ronaldson, S., R.H. Kalwa, J.C. Badenhorst, J.P. Erasmus, F.J. Venter, and F.J. Nel. “Wilderness, Wilderness Quality Management and Recreational Opportunities Zoning within the Kruger National Park, South Africa.” In Seventh World Wilderness Congress symposium: Science and Stewardship to Protect and Sustain Wilderness Values, 2001 November 2–8, Port Elizabeth, South Africa, comps. A. Watson and J. Sproull, 39–49. Proceedings RMRS-P-27. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Germany. European Project for Ice Coring in Antarctica (EPICA). Comprehensive Environmental Impact Evaluation for Recovering a Deep Ice Core in Dronning Maud Land, Antarctica. Final Version. Bremerhaven: AWI, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Germany. “The Admissibility of Land-Based Tourism in Antarctica under International Law. IP 20.” ATCM XXVIII, Stockholm, June 6–17, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Germany. Final CEE of the Proposed Activities “Construction of the Neumayer III Station”, “Operation of the Neumayer III Station” and “Dismantling of the Existing Neumayer II Station and Removal of Materials from Antarctica”. Umweltbundesamt I 2.4 – 94003-2/43. Dessau: Umweltbundesamt, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Hemmings, A.D., and L.K. Kriwoken. “High Level Antarctic EIA under the Madrid Protocol: State Practice and the Effectiveness of the Comprehensive Environmental Evaluation process.” International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 10, no. 3 (2010): 187–208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10784-010-9119-5.10.1007/s10784-010-9119-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemmings, A.D. “‘Environmental Management’ as a Diplomatic Method: The Advancement of Strategic National Interest in Antarctica.” In Exploring Antarctic Values, ed. D. Liggett, and A.D. Hemmings, 70–89. Gateway Antarctica Special Publication Series Number 1301, Christchurch: Gateway Antarctica, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Hemmings, A.D., D.R. Rothwell, and K.N. Scott, eds. Antarctic Security in the Twenty-First Century. Legal and Policy Perspectives. Abingdon: Routledge, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, K.A., P. Fretwell, J. Rae, K. Holmes, and A. Fleming “Untouched Antarctica: Mapping a Finite and Diminishing Environmental Resource.” Antarctic Science 23, no. 6 (2011): 537–548.10.1017/S095410201100037X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• India. Final CEE of New Indian Research Station at Larsemann Hills, Antarctica. Goa: National Centre for Antarctic and Ocean Research, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Italy. “IEE: Construction and Operation of Engima Runway for Light Aircrafts at the Mario Zucchelli Station (Terra Nova Bay, Ross Sea, Antarctica). IP 42.” ATCM XXIX, Edinburgh, June 12–23, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• IUCN. “Members’ Database.” http://www.iucn.org/about/union/members/who_members/members_database/, http://www.iucn.org/about/union/members/who_members/ ( accessed December 25, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• IUCN and UNEP. The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA). Cambridge: UNEP-WCMC. www.protectedplanet.net ( accessed December 25, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Kajala, L. “Finland.” In Handbook Wilderness Law and Policy, ed. C.F. Kormos, 143–155. Fulcrum: Golden, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Kohl, I., and R. Pekny. “Management in the Dürrenstein Wilderness Area – How Much Human Intervention can the Wilderness Tolerate?” eco.mont (Journal on Protected Mountain Areas Research) 3, no. 1 (2011): 51–54.10.1553/eco.mont
   Google Scholar
• Korea. Final CEE. Construction and Operation of the Jang Bogo Antarctic Research Station, Terra Nova Bay, Antarctica. Seoul: Korea Environment Institute, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Kormos, C.F., ed. A Handbook on International Wilderness Law and Policy. Fulcrum: Golden, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Kormos, C.F., and H. Locke. “Introduction.” In Handbook Wilderness Law and Policy, ed. C.F. Kormos, 3–29. Fulcrum: Golden, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Krenova, Z., and H. Kiener. “Europe’s Wild Heart – Still Beating? Experiences from a New Transboundary Wilderness Area in the Middle of the Old Continent.” European Journal of Environmental Sciences 2, no. 2 (2012): 115–124.
   Google Scholar
• Kun, Z., and J. Houdet. “The Economics of Wilderness. Overcoming Challenges, Seizing Opportunities in Europe.” International Journal of Wilderness 18, no. 3 (2012): 13–19, 30.
   Google Scholar
• Landres, P., C.Barns, J.G. Dennis, T. Devine, P. Geissler, C.S. McCasland, L. Merigliano, J. Seastrand, and R. Swain. Keeping It Wild: An Interagency Strategy to Monitor Trends in Wilderness Character Across the National Wilderness Preservation System. USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station General Technical Report, RMRS-GTR-212. Fort Collins: USDA, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Landres, P., B. Barr, and C.F. Kormos. “The Matrix. A Comparison of International Wilderness Law.” In Handbook Wilderness Law and Policy, ed. C.F. Kormos, 31–54. Fulcrum: Golden, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Landres, P., S. Boutcher, L. Merigliano, C. Barns, D. Davis, T. Hall, S. Henry, et al. Monitoring Selected Conditions Related to Wilderness Character: A National Framework. USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station General Technical Report, RMRS-GTR-151. Fort Collins: USDA, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Machado, A. “An Index of Naturalness.” Journal for Nature Conservation 12 (2004): 95–110.10.1016/j.jnc.2003.12.002
   Google Scholar
• Manning, R. “Emerging Principles for Using Information/Education in Wilderness Management.” International Journal of Wilderness 9, no. 1 (2003): 20–27, 12.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, V.G., C.F. Kormos, F. Zunino, T. Meyer, U. Doerner, and T. Akroyd. “Wilderness Momentum in Europe.” International Journal of Wilderness 14, no. 2 (2008), 34–38, 43.
   Google Scholar
• Mochan, V. “Wilderness Potential in Ukraine.” European Journal of Wilderness 2 (2014): 12–13.
   Google Scholar
• Molloy, L. “Wilderness in New Zealand. A Policy Searching for Someone to Implement it.” International Journal of Wilderness 3, no. 2 (1997): 11–13, 45.
   Google Scholar
• Molloy, L., and M. Reedy. “Wilderness within World Heritage Te Wahipounamu, New Zealand.” In Personal, Societal, and Ecological Values of Wilderness: Sixth World Wilderness Congress Proceedings on Research, Management, and Allocation; October 24–29, 1998; Bangalore, India, comps. A.E. Watson, G.H. Aplet, and J.C. Hendee, Vol. II, 162–167. Proceedings RMRS-P-14. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Naeem, S. “Ecology: Into the (Re)Wild.” Nature 497 (2013): 436–437.10.1038/497436a
   Google Scholar
• Netherlands. “Report of the Intersessional Contact Group ‘Outstanding Questions’ on Antarctic Tourism. WP 27 rev. 1.” ATCM XXXV, Hobart, June 11–20, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Netherlands. “Report of the Informal Contact Group on the Increasing Diversity of Tourism and other Non-Governmental Activities in Antarctica. WP 47.” ATCM XXXVI, Brussels, May 20–29, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand. “Towards Additional Protection of Antarctic Wilderness Areas. IP 80.” ATCM XXIII, Lima, May 24–June 4, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand. “Report back on a Systematic Environmental-Geographic Framework (SEGF) for Protected Areas under Annex V of the Environmental Protocol. WP 13.” ATCM XXV, Warsaw, September 10–20, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand. “A Review of the Antarctic Protected Areas System. WP 11.” ATCM XXVIII, Stockholm, June 6–17, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand. “‘Land-Based’ Tourism in Antarctica. WP 12.” ATCM XXVIII, Stockholm, June 6–17, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand. Final CEE for ANDRILL McMurdo Sound Portfolio. Christchurch: Antarctica New Zealand, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand “Understanding Concepts of Footprint and Wilderness related to Protection of the Antarctic Environment. WP 35.” ATCM XXXIV, Buenos Aires, June 20–July 1, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand. “Possible Guidance Material to Assist Parties to Take Account of Wilderness Values when Undertaking Environmental Impact Assessments. WP 35.” ATCM XXXVI, Brussels, May 20–29, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand and Netherlands. “Concepts for Wilderness Protection in Antarctica using Tools in Protocol. WP 50.” ATCM XXXV, Hobart, June 11–20, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand and USA. “Management Plan for ASMA No. 2 McMurdo Dry Valleys, Southern Victoria Land.” ATCM Measure 10 (2011) Annex.
   Google Scholar
• Norway. Final CEE for the Upgrading of the Norwegian Summer Station Troll in Dronning Maud Land, Antarctica, to Permanent Station. Tromsø: Norwegian Polar Institute, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, J. 2011. “Tectonic History and Gondwanan Geopolitics in the Larsemann Hills, Antarctica.” PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review, 34, no. 2 (2011): 214–232.10.1111/plar.2011.34.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• PAN Parks Foundation. Last of the Wild. Overview of Status and Monitoring of some Wilderness Related Species in the Natura 2000 Network. Györ: PAN Parks Foundation, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Parks and Wildlife Service. State of the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area – An Evaluation of Management Effectiveness, Report No. 1. Hobart: Department of Tourism Parks Heritage and the Arts, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Podobaylo, A.V., and A.B. Pidgorna. “Ukraine.” In Handbook Wilderness Law and Policy, ed. C.F. Kormos, 329–338. Fulcrum: Golden, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Riehmann, P. “Wake Up Call for the Fascination of Wilderness!” European Wilderness Journal 2 (2014): 14–15.
   Google Scholar
• Rolston, H. “The Wilderness Idea Reaffirmed.” Environmental Professional 13 (1991): 370–377.
   Google Scholar
• Roura, R., and T. Tin. “Strategic Thinking and the Antarctic Wilderness: Contrasting Alternative Futures.” In Antarctic Futures, ed. T. Tin, D. Liggett, P. Maher, and M. Lamers, 253–271. Dordrecht: Springer, 2014.10.1007/978-94-007-6582-5
   Google Scholar
• Russian Federation. Water Sampling of the Subglacial Lake VostokFinal CEE. St. Petersburg: Russian Antarctic Expedition Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Scotland. Scottish Planning Policy. Edinburgh: Scottish Government, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty. Final Report of the Twenty-Seventh ATCM. Cape Town, South Africa, May 24–June 4, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty. Final Report of the Twenty-Eighth ATCM. Stockholm, Sweden, June 6–17, 2005. Buenos Aires, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty. Final Report of the Thirty-Second ATCM. Baltimore, United States, 6–17 April 2009. Buenos Aires, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty. Final Report of the Thirty-Fourth ATCM. Buenos Aires, Argentina, 20 June–1 July 2011. Buenos Aires, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Shestakov, A., and D. Kats. “The Russian Federation.” In Handbook Wilderness Law and Policy, ed. C.F. Kormos, 215–239. Fulcrum: Golden, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Somers, J. “New Zealand.” In Handbook Wilderness Law and Policy, ed. C.F. Kormos, 193–213. Fulcrum: Golden, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Spiller, J. “Re-Imagining United States Antarctic Research as a Defining Endeavor of a Deserving World Leader: 1957–1991.” Public Understanding of Science 13 (2004): 31–53.10.1177/0963662504042689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Støre, J.G. “Remarks by Jonas Gahr Støre, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Norway.” In Final Report of the Thirty-third ATCM. Baltimore, United States, 6–17 April 2009 Part III 1. Opening Addresses. Buenos Aires: Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Summerson, R., and I.D. Bishop. “The Impact of Human Activities on Wilderness and Aesthetic Values in Antarctica.” Polar Research 31 (2012): 10858. doi:10.3402/polar.v31i0.10858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tin, T., and A.D. Hemmings. “Challenges in Protecting the Wilderness of Antarctica.” In Science and Stewardship to Protect and Sustain Wilderness Values: Ninth World Wilderness Congress symposium; November 6–13, 2009; Meridá, Yucatán, Mexico, comps. A. Watson, J. Murrieta-Saldivar, and B. McBride, 147–152. Proceedings RMRS-P-64. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Tin, T., A.D. Hemmings, and R. Roura. “Pressures on the Wilderness Values of the Antarctic Continent.” International Journal of Wilderness 14, no. 3 (2008): 7–12.
   Google Scholar
• Tin, T., and R. Summerson. “Growing Human Footprint, Diminishing Wilderness in Antarctica.” International Journal of Wilderness 19, no. 3 (2013): 10–13, 36.
   Google Scholar
• UK. “Wilderness and Aesthetic Values in Antarctica. IP 2.” ATCM XXII, Tromsø, May 25–June 5, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• UK, Australia and France. “Antarctica’s Future Environmental Challenges. Report of the CEP Workshop, Edinburgh, UK, 9–10 June 2006. IP 113 rev. 1.” ATCM XXIX, Edinburgh, June 12–23, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• UK. Proposed Construction and Operation of Halley VI Research Station, and Demolition and Removal of Halley V Research Station, Brunt Ice Shelf, Antarctica. Final CEE. Cambridge: British Antarctic Survey, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• UK. “Developing a Strategic Vision of Antarctic Tourism for the Next Decade. WP 51.” ATCM XXXI, Kyiv, June 2–13, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• UK. “Strategic Vision of Antarctic Tourism for the Next Decade. WP 10.” ATCM XXXII, Baltimore, MD, April 6–17, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• UK. “Assessing Cumulative Environmental Impacts: Identifying the Distribution and Concentration of National Operator Activities in Antarctica. WP 23.” ATCM XXXIII, Punta del Este, May 3–14, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• UK. Proposed Exploration of Subglacial Lake Ellsworth, Antarctica. Final CEE. Cambridge: British Antarctic Survey, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• USA. Development and Implementation of Surface Traverse Capabilities in Antarctica. CEE. Final. Arlington: National Science Foundation, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• USA. “Management Plan for ASPA No. 119 Davis Valley and Forlidas Pond, Dufek Massif, Pensacola Mountains (51° 05’ W, 82° 29’ S).” ATCM Measure 6 (2010) Annex.
   Google Scholar
• USA. “The Historical Development of McMurdo Station, Antarctica, an Environmental Perspective. IP 2.” ATCM XXXIV, Buenos Aires, June 20–July 1, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• USA. “Management Plan for ASPA No. 123 Barwick and Balham Valleys, Southern Victoria Land.” ATCM Measure 3 (2013) Annex.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, M. “Federal Wilderness Preservation in the United States: The Preservation of Wilderness?” In The Great New Wilderness Debate, ed. J.B. Callicott and M.P. Nelson, 131–153. Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Wray, K. “The Socio-Cultural Value of New Zealand Wilderness.” In Science and Stewardship to Protect and Sustain Wilderness Values: Ninth World Wilderness Congress Symposium; November 6–13, 2009; Meridá, Yucatán, Mexico, comps. A. Watson, J. Murrieta-Saldivar, and B. McBride, 87–94. Proceedings RMRS-P-64. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Yuschenko, V. “Message from the President of Ukraine Mr Victor Yuschenko to the Participants of the XXXI ATCM.” In Final Report of the Thirty-first ATCM Kyiv, Ukraine, 2–13 June, 2008, Part III Annex D Opening and Closing Addresses. Buenos Aires: Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty, 2008.
   Google Scholar