The Precautionary Principle and the Dilemma Objection

REFERENCES

• Ackerman, F. (2008a). Poisoned for pennies: The economics of toxics and precaution. Washington DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ackerman, F. (2008b). Hot, it's not: Reflections on Cool it, by Bjorn Lomborg. Climactic Change, 89, 435–446.
   Google Scholar
• Ackerman, F., & Heinzerling, L. (2004). Priceless: On knowing the price of everything and the value of nothing. New York: The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aven, T. (2011). On different types of uncertainties in the context of the precautionary principle. Risk Analysis, 31, 1515–1525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bognar, G. (2011). Can the maximin principle serve as a basis for climate change policy?The Monist, 94, 329–348.
   Google Scholar
• Burnett, H. S. (2009). Understanding the precautionary principle and its threat to human welfare. Social Philosophy and Policy, 26, 378–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, S. (2005). Future technologies, dystopic futures and the precautionary principle. Ethics and Information Technology, 7, 121–126.
   Google Scholar
• Commission of the European Communities. (2000). Communication from the Commission on the Precautionary Principle. http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/health_consumer/library/pub/pub07_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, L. (2011). Clarifying types of uncertainty: When are models accurate, and uncertainties small?Risk Analysis, 31, 1530–1533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cranor, C. (2001). Learning from law to address uncertainty in the precautionary principle. Science and Engineering Ethics, 7, 313–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cranor, C. (2004). Toward understanding aspects of the precautionary principle. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 29, 259–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, K., & Dickson, M. (2011). Distinguishing risk and uncertainty in risk assessments of emerging technologies. In T.Zülsdorf, C.Coenen, A.Ferrari, U.Fiedeler, C.Milburn, & M.Wienroth (Eds.), Quantum engagements: Social reflections of nanoscience and emerging technologies (pp. 165–167). Heidelberg: AKA Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Engelhardt, T., & Jotterand, F. (2004). The precautionary principle: A dialectical reconsideration. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 29, 301–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, R. (2005). Microeconomics and behavior (6th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, E., Jones, J., & von Schomberg, R. (Eds.). (2006). Implementing the precautionary principle: Perspectives and prospects. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Gardiner, S. (2006). A core precautionary principle. Journal of Political Philosophy, 14, 33–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardiner, S. (2011). A perfect moral storm: The ethical tragedy of climate change. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goklany, I. (2001). The precautionary principle. Washington, DC: Cato Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, J. (2001). Decision-analytic refinements of the precautionary principle. Journal of Risk Research, 4, 127–141.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, J., & Holm, S. (2002). Extending human lifespan and the precautionary paradox. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 3, 355–368.
   Google Scholar
• Hartzell, L. (2009). Rethinking the precautionary principle and its role in climate change policy (PhD dissertation). Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Hartzell-Nichols, L. (2012). Precaution and solar radiation management. Ethics, Policy, and Environment, 15, 158–171.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, S. (2011). The case for a carbon tax: Getting past our hang ups to effective climate policy. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jevrejeva, S., Moore, J. C., & Grinsted, A. (2010). How will sea level respond to changes in natural and anthropogenic forcings by 2100?Geophysical Research Letters, 37, L077033.
   Google Scholar
• Lempert, R. (2002). A new decision science for complex systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(suppl. 3), 7309–7313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lempert, R., Popper, S., & Bankes, S. (2003). Shaping the next one hundred years: New methods for quantitative, long-term policy analysis. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
   Google Scholar
• Lempert, R., Groves, D., Popper, S., & Bankes, S. (2006). A general, analytic method for generating robust strategies and narrative scenarios. Management Science, 52, 514–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lomborg, B. (2001). The skeptical environmentalist: Measuring the real state of the world. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lomborg, B. (2007). Cool it: The skeptical environmentalist's guide to global warming. New York: Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Lomborg, B. (2010). Smart solutions to climate change: Comparing costs and benefits. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manson, N. (2002). Formulating the precautionary principle. Environmental Ethics, 24, 263–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchant, G. (2001). The precautionary principle: An ‘unprincipled’ approach to biotechnology regulation. Journal of Risk Research, 4, 143–157.
   Google Scholar
• Marchant, G., & Mossman, K. (2004). Arbitrary and capricious: The precautionary principle in the European Union Courts. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
   Google Scholar
• McKinnon, C. (2009). Runaway climate change: A justice-based case for precautions. Journal of Social Philosophy, 40, 187–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, S. (2009). Unsimple truths: Science, complexity, and policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nordhaus, W. (2007). Critical assumptions in the Stern review on climate change. Science, 317, 201–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordhaus, W. (2008). A question of balance: Weighing the options on global warming policies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nordhaus, W. (2012). Why the global warming skeptics are wrong. The New York Review of Books, March 22 issue.
   Google Scholar
• Nordhaus, W., & Boyer, J. (2000). Warming the world: Economic models of global warming. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• North, W. (2011). Uncertainties, precaution, and science: Focus on the state of knowledge and how it may change. Risk Analysis, 31, 1526–1529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parry, M. L., Canziani, O. F., Palutikof, J. P., van der Dinden, P. J., & Hansen, C. E. (Eds.). (2007). Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability: Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Posner, R. (2004). Catastrophe: Risk and response. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, R. (2010). What's the harm? An evolutionary theoretical critique of the precautionary principle. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 20, 181–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raffensberger, C., & Tickner, J. (Eds.). (1999). Protecting public health and the environment: Implementing the precautionary principle. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsey, F. P. (1928). A mathematical theory of saving. Economic Journal, 38, 543–559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmon, W. (1966). The foundations of scientific inference. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schelling, T. (1997). The cost of combating global warming: Facing the tradeoffs. Foreign Affairs, 76, 8–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuur, E., & Abbott, B. (2011). High risk of permafrost thaw. Nature, 480, 32–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, P. (2002). One world: The ethics of globalization. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K. B., Tignor, M., et al., (2007). Climate change 2007: The physical science basis: Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Soule, E. (2004). The precautionary principle and the regulation of US food and drug safety. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 29, 333–350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, N. (2007). The economics of climate change: The Stern review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, N., & Taylor, C. (2007). Climate change: Risk, ethics, and the Stern review. Science, 317, 203–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumner, J., Bird, L., & Smith, H. (2009). Carbon taxes: A review of experience and policy design considerations. Technical Report NREL/TP-6A2-47312. Oak Ridge, TN: US Department of Energy.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. (2001). Risk and reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. (2005). Laws of fear. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tol, R. (2005). The marginal damage costs of carbon dioxide emissions: An assessment of the uncertainties. Energy Policy, 33, 2064–2074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tol, R. (2010). Carbon dioxide mitigation. In B.Lomborg (Ed.), Smart solutions to climate change (pp. 74–105). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trouwborst, A. (2006). Precautionary rights and duties of states. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, D., & Hartzell, L. (2004). The lack of clarity in the precautionary principle. Environmental Values, 13, 449–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Schomberg, R. (2006). The precautionary principle and its normative challenges. In E.Fischer, J.Jones, & R.von Schomberg (Eds.), Implementing the precautionary principle: Perspectives and prospects (pp. 19–41). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Whiteside, K. (2006). Precautionary politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zenghelis, D. (2010). Book review: Smart solutions to climate change: Comparing costs and benefits. Journal of Environmental Investing, 1, 79–89.
   Google Scholar