Reversibility and Nuclear Energy Production Technologies: A Framework and Three Cases

References

• Arthur, W. B. (1989). Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. The Economic Journal, 99, 116–131.10.2307/2234208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthur, W. B. (1994). Increasing returns and path dependence in the economy. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arts, B., Leroy, P., & Tatenhove, J. (2006). Political modernisation and policy arrangements: A framework for understanding environmental policy change. Public Organization Review, 6, 93–106.10.1007/s11115-006-0001-4
   Google Scholar
• Borup, M., Brown, N., Konrad, K., & Van Lente, H. (2006). The sociology of expectations in science and technology. Technology Analysis Strategic Management, 18, 285–298.10.1080/09537320600777002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, N., & Michael, M. (2003). A sociology of expectations: Retrospecting prospects and prospecting retrospects. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 15, 3–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarfield, G. H., & Wiecek, W. M. (1984). Nuclear America: Military and civilian nuclear power in the United States, 1940–1980. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Collingridge, D. (1980). The social control of technology. London: Frances Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Collingridge, D. (1983). Technology in the policy process: Controlling nuclear power. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, R. (1990). Nuclear power reactors: A study in technological lock-in. The Journal of Economic History, 50, 541–567.10.1017/S0022050700037153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David, P. A. (2007). Path dependence: A foundational concept for historical social science. Cliometrica, 1, 91–114.10.1007/s11698-006-0005-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deutch, J., Moniz, E., Ansolabehere, S., Driscoll, M., Gray, P., Holdren, J..,...Todreas, N. (2003) The future of nuclear power. An MIT interdisciplinary study. Retrieved from http://web.mit.edu/nuclearpower
   Google Scholar
• Faure, M. G., & Fiore, K. (2008). The civil liability of European nuclear operators: Which coverage for the new 2004 protocols? Evidence from France, International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 8, 227–248.10.1007/s10784-008-9076-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure and contradictions in social analysis. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.10.1007/978-1-349-16161-4
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gopalakrishnan, A. (2002). Evolution of the Indian nuclear power program. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 27, 369–395.10.1146/annurev.energy.27.122001.083448
   Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481–510.10.1086/228311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale, B. (2011). Fukushima Daiichi, normal accidents, and moral responsibility: Ethical questions about nuclear energy. Ethics, Policy and Environment, 14, 263–265.10.1080/21550085.2011.605850
   Google Scholar
• Hecht, G. (1998). The radiance of France: nuclear power and national identity after World War II. New Baskerville. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S., & Kim, S. H. (2009). Containing the atom: Sociotechnical imaginaries and nuclear power in the United States and South Korea. Minerva, 47, 119–146.10.1007/s11024-009-9124-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, L., & Stemerding, D. (1994). The sociology of entrenchment: A cystic fibrosis test for everyone? Social Science & Medicine, 39, 1211–1220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebowitz, S. J., & Margolis, S. E. (1995). Path dependence, lock-in, and history. Journal of Law Economics Organization, 11, 205–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lilienthal, D. E. (1947, May 4) We must grasp the facts about the atom The New York Times Magazine, p. 7.
   Google Scholar
• Mulder, K., & Knot, M. (2001). PVC plastic: A history of systems development and entrenchment. Technology in Society, 23, 265–286.10.1016/S0160-791X(01)00013-6
   Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, 3, 398–427.10.1287/orsc.3.3.398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28, 1435–1448.10.1177/0170840607081138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkins, J. R., & Haluza-delay, R. (2011) Social and ethical considerations of nuclear power development. University of Alberta, Department of Rural Economy Staff Paper. Retrieved from: http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/103237/2/StaffPaper11-01.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, R. M. (1995). History of technology policy—commercial nuclear power. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 121, 85–98.10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1995)121:2(85)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinch, T. J., & Bijker, W. E. (1987). The social construction of facts and artifacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. In W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes, & T. J. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of science, pp. 17–50. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ramana, M. V. (2007) Nuclear power in India: Failed past, dubious future, In: S., Henry (Ed.), Gauging U.S.-Indian Strategic Cooperation (Strategic Studies Institute). Retrieved from: http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/display.cfm?pubID=755
   Google Scholar
• Roeser, S. (2011). Nuclear energy, risk, and emotions. Philosophy & Technology, 24, 197–201.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, M. (2010) Nuclear power made in France: A model?, In: S., Henry (Ed.), Nuclear power’s global expansion: Weighing its costs and risks. Strategic Studies Institute. Retrieved from: http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/display.cfm?pubid=1041
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, K. H. (2004). Cultural politics of technology: Combining critical and constructive interventions. Science Technology And Human Values, 29, 184–190.10.1177/0162243903261944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sovacool, B. K., & Valentine, S. V. (2010). The socio-political economy of nuclear energy in China and India. Energy, 35, 3803–3813.10.1016/j.energy.2010.05.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, L. L. (1954, September 17). In: Abundant power from atom seen; It will be too cheap for our children to meter, Strauss tells science writers. New York Times, p. 5.
   Google Scholar
• Swierstra, T., & Te Molder, H. (2012). Risk and soft impacts. In S. Roeser, R. Hillerbrand, P. Sandin, & M. Peterson (Ed.), Handbook of risk theory, pp. 1049–1066. Dordrecht: Springer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Taebi, B., & Kloosterman, J. L. (2008). To recycle or not to recycle? An intergenerational approach to nuclear fuel cycles. Science and Engineering Ethics, 14, 177–200.10.1007/s11948-007-9049-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teräväinen, T., Lehtonen, M., & Martiskainen, M. (2011). Climate change, energy security, and risk—debating nuclear new build in Finland. France and the UK, Energy Policy, 39, 3434–3442.10.1016/j.enpol.2011.03.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomar, R. (1980). The Indian nuclear power program: Myths and mirages. Asian Survey, 20, 517–531.10.2307/2643905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Poel, I. (2011). Nuclear energy as a social experiment. Ethics, Policy & Environment, 14, 285–290.
   Google Scholar
• Van Merkerk, R., & Van Lente, H. (2005). Tracing emerging irreversibilities in emerging technologies: The case of nanotubes. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 72, 1094–1111.10.1016/j.techfore.2004.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, J. S. (1992). Containing the atom: Nuclear regulation in a changing environment, 1963–1971. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wattal, P. (2013). Indian programme on radioactive waste management. Sadhana, 38, 849–857.10.1007/s12046-013-0170-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winner, L. (1980). Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus, 109, 121–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Nuclear Association. (2012a). Nuclear power in India. Retrieved June 5, 2012, from http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf53.html
   Google Scholar
• World Nuclear Association. (2012b). Nuclear power in France. Retrieved July 14, 2012, from http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/info40.html
   Google Scholar
• World Nuclear Association. (2013). Nuclear power in the USA. Retrieved March 9, 2013, from http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/Country-Profiles/Countries-T-Z/USA–Nuclear-Power/#.UVqowWfYF8E
   Google Scholar