The Case for Discounting the Future

References

• Arrow. (1999). Discounting, morality, and gaming. In P. R. Portney & J. P. Weyant (Eds.), Discounting and Intergenerational Equity (pp. 13–21). New York, NY: Resources for the Future.
   Google Scholar
• Boonin, D. (2008). How to solve the non-identity problem. Public Affairs Quarterly, 22, 127–157.
   Google Scholar
• Boonin, D. (2014). The Non-identity problem and the ethics of future people. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199682935.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, B. (2009). Well-being and death. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199557967.001.1
   Google Scholar
• Broome, J. (1994). Discounting the future. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 23, 128–156.10.1111/papa.1994.23.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broome, J. (2012). Climate Matters. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Buckwalter, W. & Stich, S. (2014). Gender and philosophical intuition. In Knobe & Nichols (Eds.), Experimental Philosophy, Vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caney, Simon (2009a). Climate change and the future: Discounting for time, wealth, and risk. Journal of Social Philosophy, 40, 163–186.10.1111/josp.2009.40.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, P. (2008). Discounting climate change. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 37, 141–169.10.1007/s11166-008-9049-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, P. (2014). Pricing climate change. Politics, Philosophy and Economics, 13, 394–416.10.1177/1470594X14541521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz, S., Hope, C., Stern, N., & Zenghelis, D. (2007). A Robust case for strong action to reduce the risks of climate change. World Economics, 8, 121–168.
   Google Scholar
• Field, C.B. et al. (2014). Summary for policymakers. In C. B. Field, V. R. Barros, D. J. Dokken, K. J. Mach, M. D. Mastrandrea, T. E. Bilir, ... M. Chatterjee (Eds.), Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability.Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 1–32). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Feinberg, J. (1984). Harm to others. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feit, N. (2013). Plural harm. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 87(2), 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, M. (2015). A harm-based solution to the non-identity problem. Ergo, 2, 427–444.
   Google Scholar
• Hare, C. (2007). Voices from another world: must we respect the interest of people who do not, and will never exist? Ethics, 117, 498–523.10.1086/512172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanser, M. (1990). Harming future people. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 19, 47–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanser, M. (2008). The metaphysics of harm. Philosophy, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 77, 421–450.10.1111/phpr.2008.77.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanser, M. (2011). Still more on the metaphysics of harm. Philosophy, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 82, 459–469.10.1111/phpr.2011.82.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harman, E. (2004). Can we harm and benefit in creating? Philosophical Perspectives, 18, 89–113.10.1111/j.1520-8583.2004.00022.x
   Google Scholar
• Harman, E. (2009). Harming as Causing Harm. In M. Roberts & D. Wasserman (Eds.), Harming future persons: ethics, genetics and the nonidentity problem (pp. 137–154). New York, NY: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-5697-0
   Google Scholar
• Hartzell-Nichols, L. (2012). Intergenerational Risks. In S.Roeser, R.Hillerbrand, P.Sandin, M.Peterson (eds.), Handbook of Risk Theory (pp. 931–960). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Heyd, D. (2009). The intractability of the nonidentity problem. In David Wasserman & Melinda Roberts (Eds.), Harming Future Persons (pp. 3–25). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Holtug, N. (2001). On the value of coming into existence. Journal of Ethics, 5, 361–384.10.1023/A:1013957425591
   Google Scholar
• Holtug, N. (2010). Persons, interests, and justice. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199580170.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Houghton, J. (2004). Global warming: The complete briefing (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139165044
   Google Scholar
• Kelleher, J. P. (2012). Energy policy and the social discount rate. Ethics, Policy and Environment, 15, 45–50.10.1080/21550085.2012.672684
   Google Scholar
• Klocksiem, J. (2012). A defense of the counterfactual comparative account of harm. American Philosophical Quarterly, 49, 285–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, S. M. (2008). A defense of intuitions. Philosophical Studies, 140, 247–262.10.1007/s11098-007-9140-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machery, E., Mallon, R., Nichols, S., & Stich, S. (2004). Semantics, cross-cultural style. Cognition, 92, B1–B12.10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMahan, J. (2009). Asymmetries in the morality of causing people to exist. In M. A.Roberts & D. T.Wasserman (Eds.), Harming Future Persons (pp. 49-68). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, L. (2003). Past and future. The case for a threshold conception of harm. In L. H. Meyer, S. L. Paulson, T. W. Pogge (Eds.), Rights, culture, and the law. Themes from the legal and political philosophy of joseph raz (pp. 143–159). Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199248254.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Mill, J.S. (1859). On liberty. Reprinted in M. Lerner (Ed.), Essential works of John Stuart Mill New York, NY: Bantam Books, 1961.
   Google Scholar
• Narveson, J. (1967). Utilitarianism and new generations. Mind, 76, 62–72.10.1093/mind/LXXVI.301.62
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orend. (2000). War. In Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy.
   Google Scholar
• Nordhaus, W. (2008b). A question of balance: Weighing the options on global warming policies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parfit, Derek (1984). Reasons and persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parfit, Derek (2011). On what matters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pigou. (1920). The economics of welfare. London, United Kingdom: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Purves, D. (2014). Accounting for the harm of death. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 95(2), 89–112.
   Google Scholar
• Rachels, S. (1998). Is it good to make happy people? Bioethics, 12, 93–110.10.1111/biot.1998.12.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsey, F. P. (1928). A mathematical theory of saving. The Economic Journal, 38, 543–559.10.2307/2224098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidgwick, H. (1981). The Methods of Ethics (7th ed.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company. Originally published 1907.
   Google Scholar
• Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2008). Framing moral intuitions. In Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral psychology: The cognitive science of morality: Intuition and diversity (pp. 47–76), (Volume 2). Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sinnott-Armstrong, W., Mallon, R., McCoy, T., & Hull, J. (2008). Intention, temporal order, and moral judgments. Mind and Language, 23, 90–106.10.1111/mila.2008.23.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon, S., Qin, D. and Manning, M. (2007). Summary for Policymakers(SPM). In S. Solomon, D. Qin, M. Manning, M. Marquis, K. Averyt, M. M. B. Tignor, H. L. Miller, & Z. Chen (Eds.), Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis: Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 1–18). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, N. (2007). The economics of climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511817434
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. (2005). Cost-benefit analysis and the environment. Ethics, 115, 351–385.10.1086/426308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinberg, J., Nichols, S., & Stich, S. (2001). Normativity and epistemic intuitions. Philosophical Topics, 29, 429–460.10.5840/philtopics2001291/217
   Google Scholar
• Woollard, F. (2012). Have we solved the non-identity problem? Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 15, 677–690.10.1007/s10677-012-9359-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar