1,102
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Exchanges

Two Mutually Exclusive Concepts of Harm? Retrospective and Structural Wrongful Harm at the Bases of a Compensatory-Based Approach for Loss and Damage

References

  • Allen, M. (2003). Liability for climate change. Nature, 421, 891–892.
  • Allen, M. (2012). The scientific basis for climate change liability. In: R. Lord (Ed.), Climate change liability: Transnational law and practice (pp. 8–22). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Boran, I. (2017). Two concepts of wrongful harm: A conceptual map for the warsaw international mechanism for loss and damage. Ethics, Policy & Environment, 20(2), 195–207.
  • Neuhäuser, C. (2014). Structural injustice and the distribution of forward-looking responsibility. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 38(1), 232–251.
  • Otto, F. E. L., Skeie, R. B., Fuglestvedt, J. S., Berntsen, T., & Allen, M. R. (2017). Assigning historic responsibility for extreme weather events. Nature Climate Change, 7(11), 757–759. nclimate3419.
  • Rawls, J. (1996). Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Rawls, J. 1999. A theory of justice (Revisited Ed.). Harvard: Harvard University Press.
  • Stott, P. A., Christidis, N., Allen, M., Dole, R., Hoerling, M., Huntingford, C., … Stone, D. (2013). Attribution of weather and climate-related events. In: G. R. Asrar & J. W. Hurrell (Eds.), Climate science for serving society: Research, modelling and prediction prioritie. Springer.
  • Thompson, A., & Otto, F. E. L. (2015). Ethical and normative implications of weather event attribution for policy discussions concerning loss and damage. Climatic Change, 133(3), 439–451.
  • Thompson, J. (2002). Taking responsibility for the past: Reparation and historical injustice. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.