References
- Allen, M. W., & Craig, C. A. (2016). Rethinking corporate social responsibility in the age of climate change: A communication perspective. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 1(1), 1. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-016-0002-8
- Aufrecht, M. (2017). Leave only footprints? Reframing climate change, environmental stewardship, and human impact. Ethics, Policy & Environment, 20(1), 84–102. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2017.1291823
- Autry, M. K., & Kelly, A. R. (2012). Merging duke energy and progress energy: online public discourse, post-fukushima reactions, and the absence of environmental communication. Environmental Communication, 6(2), 278–284. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2012.672444
- Baer, P., Kartha, S., Athanasiou, T., & Kemp‐Benedict, E. (2009). The greenhouse development rights framework: drawing attention to inequality within nations in the global climate policy debate. Development and Change, 40(6), 1121–1138. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2009.01614.x
- Bickerstaff, K., Lorenzoni, I., Pidgeon, N. F., Poortinga, W., & Simmons, P. (2008). Reframing nuclear power in the UK energy debate: Nuclear power, climate change mitigation and radioactive waste. Public Understanding of Science, 17(2), 145–169. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506066719
- Boholm, Å. (2008). New perspectives on risk communication: Uncertainty in a complex society. Journal of Risk Research, 11(1–2), 1–3. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13669870801947897
- Brei, V., & Böhm, S. (2014). ‘1L=10L for Africa’: Corporate social responsibility and the transformation of bottled water into a ‘consumer activist’ commodity. Discourse & Society, 25(1), 3–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926513503536
- Caldicott, H. (2006). Nuclear power is not the answer. New Press.
- Center for Nuclear Science and Technology Information. (2017). Nuclear for climate. Policy Issues. http://www.nuclearconnect.org/issues-policy/usan4c
- Cohen, M., & McKillop, A. (2012). The doomsday machine: The high-price of nuclear energy, the world’s most dangerous fuel. Palgrave Macmillan.
- Comby, B. (2001). Environmentalists for nuclear energy. TNR Editions.
- Corner, A., & Pidgeon, N. (2010). Geoengineering the climate: The social and ethical implications. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 52(1), 24–37. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00139150903479563
- Cravens, G. (2008). Power to save the world: The truth about nuclear energy. Vintage Books.
- Ferguson, C. D. (2011). Nuclear energy: What everyone needs to know. Oxford University Press.
- Fischhoff, B. (1995). Risk perception and communication unplugged: Twenty years of process. Risk Analysis, 15(2), 137–145. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1995.tb00308.x
- Flynn, J. (2003). Nuclear stigma. In: The social amplification of risk (pp. 326–352). Cambridge University Press.
- French Nuclear Energy Society, American Nuclear Society, & European Nuclear Society. (2015). Nuclear for climate declaration. French Nuclear Energy Society. http://nuclearconnect.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Nuclear_for_Climate_Declaration.pdf
- Gardiner, S. M. (2004). Ethics and global climate change. Ethics, 114(3), 555–600. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/382247
- Gardiner, S. M., & Hartzell-Nichols, L. (2012). Ethics and global climate change. Nature Education Knowledge, 3(10), 5.
- Garvey, J. (2016). The persuaders: The hidden industry that wants to change your mind. Icon Books.
- Globescan. (2011, November 25). Opposition to nuclear energy grows: Global poll. GlobeScan. https://globescan.com/opposition-to-nuclear-energy-grows-global-poll/
- Groot, J. I. M., De, Steg, L., & Poortinga, W. (2013). Values, perceived risks and benefits, and acceptability of nuclear energy. Risk Analysis, 33(2), 307–317. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01845.x
- Hall, C. (2013). What will it mean to be green? Envisioning positive possibilities without dismissing loss. Ethics, Policy & Environment, 16(2), 125–141. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2013.801182
- Hansen, J., Emanuel, K., Caldeira, K., & Wigley, T. (2015, December 3). Nuclear power paves the only viable path forward on climate change. The Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/dec/03/nuclear-power-paves-the-only-viable-path-forward-on-climate-change
- Harris, P. G. (2009). World ethics and climate change: From international to global justice: from international to global justice. Edinburgh University Press.
- Ho, S. S. (2016). Communicating about Nuclear Energy and Climate Change. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.440
- International Atomic Energy Agency. (2015). Climate change: Making a difference through nuclear technologies. https://www.iaea.org/publications/magazines/bulletin/56-2
- Ionescu, T. B. (2012). Communicating in Germany about the Fukushima accident: How direct encounter beat media representations. Environmental Communication, 6(2), 260–267. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2012.672443
- Ipsos MORI. (2011, June 23). Strong global opposition towards nuclear power. Ipsos MORI. https://www.ipsos.com/ipsos-mori/en-uk/strong-global-opposition-towards-nuclear-power
- Jacobson, M. (2016, January 4). Mark Jacobson to James Hansen: Nukes are not needed to solve world climate crisis. EcoWatch.Com. https://lockerdome.com/lad/8058416014960231
- Jacobson, M. (2019). Evaluation of nuclear power as a proposed solution to global warming, air pollution, and energy security. In: 100% clean, renewable energy and storage for everything Cambridge University Press https://web.stanford.edu/group/efmh/jacobson/Articles/I/NuclearVsWWS.pdf
- Jamieson, D. (2003). Morality’s Progress. Oxford University Press.
- Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Doubleday Canada. http://go.utlib.ca/cat/7933729
- Kasperson, R. E., Kasperson, J. X., Slovic, P., & Pidgeon, N. (2003). The social amplification of risk: Assessing fifteen years of research and theory. In: N. Pidgeon, R. E. Kasperson, & P. Slovic (Eds.), The social amplification of risk (pp. 13–46). Cambridge University Press.
- Keller, C., Visschers, V., & Siegrist, M. (2012). Affective imagery and acceptance of replacing nuclear power plants. Risk Analysis: An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 32(3), 464–477. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01691.x
- Kinsella, W. J. (2005). One hundred years of nuclear discourse: Four master themes and their implications for environmental communicaiton. In: Environmental Communication Yearbook (Vol. 2, pp. 49–72). Routledge.
- Kinsella, W. J. (2012). Environments, risks, and the limits of representation: examples from nuclear energy and some implications of Fukushima. Environmental Communication, 6(2), 251–259. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2012.672928
- Kristiansen, S. (2017). Characteristics of the mass media’s coverage of nuclear energy and its risk: A literature review. Sociology Compass, 11(7), n/a-n/a. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12490
- Kristiansen, S., Bonfadelli, H., & Kovic, M. (2016). Risk perception of nuclear energy after Fukushima: Stability and change in public opinion in Switzerland. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, Edw021. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edw021
- Kusumi, T., Hirayama, R., & Kashima, Y. (2017). Risk perception and risk talk: The case of the fukushima daiichi nuclear radiation risk. Risk Analysis, 37(12), 2305–2320. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12784
- Lakoff, G. (2004). Don’t think of an elephant: Know your values and frame the debate. Chelsea Green Publishing.
- Lakoff, G. (2008). The political mind: A cognitive scientist’s guide to your brain and its politics. Penguin.
- Lakoff, G. (2010). Why it matters how we frame the environment. Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture, 4(1), 70–81. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17524030903529749
- Lovelock, J. (2006). The revenge of Gaia: Earth’s climate in crisis and the fate of humanity. Basic Books.
- Lovins, A., Sheikh, I., & Markevich, A. (2009). Nuclear power: Climate fix or folly? Rocky Mountain Insitute.
- Lynas, M. (2008, August 18). Why greens must learn to love nuclear power. New Statesman.
- Lynas, M. (2013). Nuclear 2.0: Why a green future needs nuclear power. UIT.
- Madrigal, A. (2007, November 19). Co-founder of greenpeace envisions a nuclear future. Wired.Com. http://www.wired.com/science/planetearth/news/2007/11/moore_qa
- Mahaffey, J. (2009). Atomic awakening: A new look at the history and future of nuclear power. Pegassus.
- Matthews, H. D. (2016). Quantifying historical carbon and climate debts among nations. Nature Climate Change, 6(1), 60–64. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2774
- Milman, O. (2015a, December 12). James Hansen, father of climate change awareness, calls Paris talks “a fraud.” The Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/dec/12/james-hansen-climate-change-paris-talks-fraud
- Milman, O. (2015b, December 13). John Kerry rejects leading climate scientist’s claim Paris talks were “fraud.” The Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/dec/13/john-kerry-james-hansen-climate-change-paris-talks-fraud
- Monbiot, G. (2011, March 21). Going critical. The Guardian. http://www.monbiot.com/2011/03/21/going-critical/
- Novikau, A. (2017). What is “chernobyl syndrome?” The use of radiophobia in nuclear communications. Environmental Communication, 11(6), 800–809. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2016.1269823
- Nuclear Energy Agency. (2015). Nuclear Energy: Combating Climate Change (No. 7208). OECD.
- Nuclear for Climate. (2015a). Nuclear is part of the solution for flighting climate change. French Nuclear Energy Society; American Nuclear Energy Society; European Nuclear Society. http://nuclearconnect.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Nuclear4Climate-Position-Paper.pdf
- Nuclear for Climate. (2015b, November 18). List of Associations Supporting the Nuclear for Climate Initiative. http://nuclearconnect.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/147.pdf
- Palley, R. (2011). The answer: Why only inherently safe, mini nuclear power plants can save our world. The Quantuck Lane Press.
- Parguel, B., Benoît-Moreau, F., & Larceneux, F. (2011). How sustainability ratings might deter ‘greenwashing’: A closer look at ethical corporate communication. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(1), 15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0901-2
- Parson, S. (2012). ‘Climate first’? The ethical and political implications of pronuclear policy in addressing climate change. Ethics, Policy & Environment, 15(1), 51–56. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2012.672686
- Pidgeon, N., Kasperson, R. E., & Slovic, P. (2003). The social amplification of risk. Cambridge University Press.
- PIME 2016. (2016, February 17). PIME award for communications excellence. PIME 2016: Communicating Nuclear. https://www.euronuclear.org/events/pime/pime2016/award.htm
- Poortinga, W., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2005). Trust in risk regulation: Cause or consequence of the acceptability of GM food? Risk Analysis: An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 25(1), 199–209. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0272-4332.2005.00579.x
- Preston, C. J. (2013). Ethics and geoengineering: Reviewing the moral issues raised by solar radiation management and carbon dioxide removal. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 4(1), 23–37. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.198
- Renzi, B. G., Cotton, M., Napolitano, G., & Barkemeyer, R. (2017). Rebirth, devastation and sickness: Analyzing the role of metaphor in media discourses of nuclear power. Environmental Communication, 11(5), 624–640. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2016.1157506
- Scott, D. (2012). Geoengineering and environmental ethics. Nature Education Knowledge, 3(10), 10.
- Scrase, J. I., & Ockwell, D. G. (2010). The role of discourse and linguistic framing effects in sustaining high carbon energy policy—An accessible introduction. Energy Policy, 38(5), 2225–2233. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.12.010
- Shrader-Frechette, K. (2011). What will work: Fighting climate change with renewable energy, not nuclear power. Oxford University Press.
- Shumate, M., & O’Connor, A. (2010). The symbiotic sustainability model: Conceptualizing NGO–corporate alliance communication. Journal of Communication, 60(3), 577–609. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01498.x
- Slovic, P. (2000). The perception of risk. Earthscan Publications.
- Smith, B. (2006). Insurmountable risks: The dangers of using nuclear power to combat global climate change. Rdr Books.
- Stone, R. (2013). Pandora’s promise [documentary]. Robert Stone Productions.
- Strydom, P. (2002). Risk, environment and society: Ongoing debates, current issues and future prospects. Open University Press.
- Sunstein, C. (2014). Why nudge?: The politics of libertarian paternalism. Yale University Press.
- Sunstein, C. R. (2005). Laws of fear: Beyond the precautionary principle (Vol. 6). Cambridge University Press.
- Tucker, W. (2012). Terrestrial energy: How nuclear power will lead the green revolution and end America’s energy odyssey. Bartleby Press.
- Vainio, A., Paloniemi, R., & Varho, V. (2017). Weighing the risks of nuclear energy and climate change: trust in different information sources, perceived risks, and willingness to pay for alternatives to nuclear power. Risk Analysis, 37(3), 557–569. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12640
- Walker, K., & Wan, F. (2012). The harm of symbolic actions and green-washing: corporate actions and communications on environmental performance and their financial implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(2), 227–242. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1122-4
- Whiteside, K. H. (2006). Precautionary politics: Principle and practice in confronting environmental risk. MIT Press.
- Woody, T. (2009). Stewart brand’s strange trip: whole earth to nuclear power [interview]. Yale Environment 360. https://e360.yale.edu/features/stewart_brands_strange_trip_whole_earth_to_nuclear_power
- World Nuclear Association. (2014, November). Climate change—the science. World-Nuclear.Org. http://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/energy-and-the-environment/climate-change-the-science.aspx