Sovereign States in the Greenhouse: Does Jurisdiction Speak Against Consumption-Based Emissions Accounting?

References

• Afionis, S., Sakai, M., Scott, K., Barrett, J., & Gouldson, A. (2017). Consumption-Based carbon accounting: Does it have a future? WIREs Climate Change, 8(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.438
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, R., Cave, M., Lodge, M. (2011). Understanding regulation: Theory, strategy, and practice. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, J., Peters, G., Wiedmann, T., Scott, K., Lenzen, M., Roelich, K., & Le Quéré, C. (2013). Consumption-Based GHG emissions accounting: A UK case study. Climate Policy, 13(4), 451–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2013.788858
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böhringer, C., Balistreri, E. J., & Rutherford, T. F. (2012). The role of carbon-adjustments in unilateral climate policy: Overview of an energy modelling study. Energy Economics, 34(2), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2012.10.003
   Google Scholar
• Caney, S. (2005). Cosmopolitan justice, responsibility, and global climate change. Leiden Journal of International Law, 18(4), 747–775. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156505002992
   Google Scholar
• Caney, S. (2014). Two kinds of climate justice. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 22(2), 125–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coria, J., & Sterner, T. (2011). Natural resource management: Challenges and policy options. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 3(1), 203–230. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-083110-120131
   Google Scholar
• Davis, S., & Caldeira, K. (2010). Consumption-Based accounting of CO2 emissions. PNAS, 107(12), 5687–5692. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0906974107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Sadeleer, N. (2002). Environmental principles: From political slogans to legal rules. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duus-Otterström G and Hjorthen F D. (2019). Consumption-based emissions accounting: the normative debate. Environmental Politics, 28(5), 866–885. 10.1080/09644016.2018.1507467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodin, R. (1985). Protecting the vulnerable. The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goulder, L., & Parry, I. (2008). Instrument choice in environmental policy. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2(2), 152–174. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/ren005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grasso, M. (2017). Achieving the Paris goals: Consumption-based carbon accounting. Geoforum, 79, 93–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.12.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grasso, M., & Roberts, T. (2014). A compromise to break the climate impasse. Nature Climate Change, 4(7), 543–549. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussain, A. (2012). Is ethical consumerism an impermissible form of vigilantism? Philosophy & Public Affairs, 40(2), 111–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2012.01218.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPCC. (2006). 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. IGES.
   Google Scholar
• Jakob, M., Steckel, J. C., & Edenhofer, O. (2014). Consumption- versus Production-Based Emission Policies. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 6(1), 297–318. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-100913-012342
   Google Scholar
• Lawford-Smith, H. (2015). Unethical consumption and obligations to signal. Ethics & International Affairs, 29(3), 315–330. https://doi.org/10.1017/S089267941500026X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenzen, M., Murray, J., Sack, F., & Wiedmann, T. (2007). Shared producer and consumer responsibility — Theory and practice. Ecological Economics, 61(1), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.05.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lininger, C. (2015). Consumption-based approaches in international climate policy. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, L. (2015). A critical examination of the consumption‐based accounting approach: Has the blaming of consumers gone too far? WIREs Clim Change, 6(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.325
   Google Scholar
• Mackie, J. L. (1965). Causes and conditions. American Philosophical Quarterly, 2, 245–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D. (2007). National responsibility and global justice. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. (2012). Territorial rights: Concept and justification. Political Studies, 60(2), 252–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00911.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss, J. (2016). Mining, morality and the obligations of fossil fuel exporting countries. Australian Journal of Political Science, 51(3), 496–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2016.1200533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, G. P. (2008). From production-based to consumption-based national emission inventories. Ecological Economics, 65(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.10.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, G. P., Andrew , R., Karstensen, J. (2016). Global environmental footprints. Norden. Retrieved November 9, 2018, from http://folk.uio.no/roberan/docs/Peters2016_NordicFootprints.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Peters, G. P., & Hertwich, E. G. (2008). Post-Kyoto greenhouse gas inventories: Production versus consumption. Climatic Change, 86(1), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-007-9280-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roser, D., & Seidel, C. (2017). Climate justice. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Roser, D., & Tomlinson, L. (2014). Trade policies and climate change: Border carbon adjustments as a tool for a just global carbonrRegime. Ancilla Iuris, 75, 223–245.
   Google Scholar
• Shue, H. (1993). Subsistence emissions and luxury emissions. Law & Policy, 15(1), 39–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9930.1993.tb00093.x
   Google Scholar
• Springmann, M. (2014). Integrating emissions transfers into policymaking. Nature Climate Change, 4(3), 177–181. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steckel, J., Kalkuhl, M., & Marschinski, R. (2010). Should carbon-exporting countries strive for consumption-based accounting in a global cap-and-trade regime? Climate Change, 100(3–4), 779–786. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-010-9825-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steininger, K., Lininger, C., Droege, S., Roser, D., Tomlinson, L., & Meyer, L. (2014). Justice and cost effectiveness of consumption-based versus production-based approaches in the case of unilateral climate policies. Global Environmental Change, 24, 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steininger, K., Lininger, C., Meyer, L. H., Muñoz, P., & Schinko, T. (2016). Multiple carbon accounting to support just and effective climate policies. Nature Climate Change, 6(1), 35–41. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, N. (2004). Does ‘ought’ imply ‘can’? And Did Kant think it does? Utilitas, 16(1), 42–61. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820803001055
   Google Scholar
• Tietenberg, T. H. (1991). Economic instruments for environmental regulation. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 6(1), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/6.1.17
   Google Scholar
• Vallentyne, P. (2008). Brute luck and responsibility. Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 7(1), 57–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X07085151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valverde, M. (2014). Studying the governance of crime and security. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 14(4), 379–391. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895814541899
   Google Scholar
• van der Poel, I. (2011). The relation between forward-looking and backward-looking responsibility. In N. Vincent (Ed.), Moral responsibility: Beyond free will and determinism (pp. 37–51). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Vincent, N. (2011). A structured taxonomy of responsibility concepts. In N. Vincent (Ed.), Moral responsibility: Beyond free will and determinism (pp. 15–35). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. (2006). Responsibility and global justice: A social connection model. Social Philosophy & Policy, 23(01), 102–130. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052506060043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar