Accounting for Future Generations in Energy Ethics: The Case for Temporalized Ethical Matrices

References

• ASN. (2008). Guide de sûreté relatif au stockage définitif des déchets radioactifs en formation géologique profonde. Retrieved October 23, 2020, from. http://www.asn.fr/Media/Files/guideRFSIII2fV12
   Google Scholar
• Beauchamp, T., & Childress, J. (2001). Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brunius, C. (2016). The ethical matrix as a potential tool in public procurement of food. In A. Olsson (Ed.), Food futures: Ethics, science & culture (pp. 194–198). Wageningen Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Chatfield, K. (2018). Traditional and complementary medicines: Are they ethical for humans, animals and the environment?. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cotton, M. (2009). Evaluating the ‘ethical matrix’ as a radioactive waste management deliberative decision-support tool. Environmental values, 18(5), 153–176. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327109X438044
   Google Scholar
• Cotton, M. (2013). Deliberating intergenerational environmental equity: A pragmatic, future studies approach. Environmental values, 22(3), 317–337. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327113X13648087563665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Shalit, A. (1995). Why posterity matters: Environmental policies and future generations. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Doorn, N., & Taebi, B. (2018). Rawls’s wide reflective equilibrium as a method for engaged interdisciplinary collaboration: Potentials and limitations for the context of technological risks. Science, Technology & Human Values, 43(3), 487–517. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243917723153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamborg, C. (2002). The acceptability of forest management practices: An analysis of ethical accounting and the ethical matrix. Forest Policy and Economics, 4(3), 175–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-9341(02)00007-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godman, M., & Hansson, S. O. (2009). European public advice on nanobiotechnology—four convergence seminars. NanoEthics, 3(1), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-009-0054-2
   Google Scholar
• Grimm, H. (2018). Linking professionals in the food chain: A modified ethical matrix to debate zootechnical interventions. In S. Springer, & H. Grimm (Eds.), Professionals in food chains (pp. 55–59). Wageningen Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• IAEA. (2007). IAEA safety glossary.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, K., Forsberg, E. -M., Gamborg, C., Millar, K., & Sandøe, P. (2011). Facilitating ethical reflection among scientists using the ethical matrix. Science and Engineering Ethics, 17(3), 425–445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-010-9218-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, M., & Forsberg, E. (2001). Assessing fisheries – using an ethical matrix in a participatory process. Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Ethics, 14(2), 191–200. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011300811590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, M., Millar, K., Thorstensen, E., & Tomkins, S. (2007). Developing the ethical matrix as a decision support framework: GM fish as a case study. Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Ethics, 20(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-006-9023-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kermisch, C., & Depaus, C. (2018). The strength of ethical matrixes as a tool for normative analysis related to technological choices: The case of geological disposal for radioactive waste. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24(1), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9882-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kermisch, C., & Depaus, C. (2020). Applying the optimisation principle to the choice of the host rock for geological disposal: Epistemological and ethical dimensions. NEA IGSC Safety case symposium 2018, to be published. Rotterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Kermisch, C., & Taebi, B. (2017). Sustainability, ethics and nuclear energy: Escaping the dichotomy. Sustainability, 9(3), 446. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9030446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landström, C., & Bergmans, A. (2015). Long-term repository governance: A socio-technical challenge. Journal of Risk Research, 18(3), 378–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2014.913658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, C., Hulpke, J. F., To, M., & Kelly, A. (2007). Can ethical decision making be taught? The justice approach. Social Responsibility Journal, 3(2), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1108/17471110710829678
   Google Scholar
• Malsch, I., Isigonis, P., Dusinska, M., & Bouman, E. A. (2020). Embedding ethical impact assessment in nanosafety decision support. Small, 16(36), 2002901. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202002901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manson, H. M. (2012). The development of the CoRE-values framework as an aid to ethical decision-making. Medical Teacher, 34(4), 258–268. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.660217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mepham, B. (2000). A framework for the ethical analysis of novel foods: The ethical matrix. Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Ethics, 12(2), 165–176. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009542714497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mepham, B., Kaiser, M., Thorstensen, E., Tomkins, S., & Millar, K. (2006). Ethical matrix. Manual. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254833030_Ethical_Matrix_Manual
   Google Scholar
• Millar, K., Thorstensen, E., Tomkins, S., Mepham, B., & Kaiser, M. (2007). Developing the ethical Delphi. Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Ethics, 20(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-006-9022-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ONDRAF. (2011). Waste plan for the long-term management of conditioned high-level and/or long lived radioactive waste and overview of related issues. Report NIROND 2011-02E Retrieved November 15, 2015, from. http://www.ondraf-plandechets.be/nieuw/downloads/Waste%20plan%20-%20English.pdf
   Google Scholar
• O’neil, C., & Gunn, H. (2020). Near-term artificial intelligence and the ethical matrix. In S. M. Liao (Ed.), Ethics of Artificial Intelligence (pp. 237–270). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oughton, D., Forsberg, E.-M., Bay, I., Kaiser, M., & Howard, B. (2004). An ethical dimension to sustainable restoration and long-term management of contaminated areas. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 74(1–3), 171–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2004.01.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, D., & Palmer, C. (2003). Technology assessment and the ‘ethical matrix’. Poiesis and Praxis, 1(4), 295–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10202-003-0027-4
   Google Scholar
• Seedhouse, D. (2008). Ethics: The heart of health care. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Shrader‐frechette, K. (2000). Duties to future generations, proxy consent, intra‐and intergenerational equity: The case of nuclear waste. Risk Analysis, 20(6), 771–778. https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.206071
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sovacool, B. K. (2013). Energy and ethics: Justice and the global energy challenge. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Spash, C. (2020). Greenhouse economics: Value and ethics. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Taebi, B. (2011). The morally desirable option for nuclear power production. Philosophy & Technology, 24(2), 169–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-011-0022-y
   Google Scholar
• Taebi, B. (2012). Intergenerational risks of nuclear energy. In S. Roeser (Ed.), Handbook of risk theory (pp. 296–318). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Taebi, B., & Kadak, C. (2010). Intergenerational considerations affecting the future of nuclear power: Equity as a framework for assessing fuel cycles. Risk Analysis, 30(9), 1341–1362. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01434.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorstensen, E. (2019). Stakeholders’ views on responsible assessments of assistive technologies through an ethical HTA matrix. Societies, 9(3), 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc9030051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Poel, I. (2018). Design for value change. Ethics and Information Technology, 23(1), 27–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-018-9461-9
   Google Scholar
• van de Poel, I., Taebi, B., & de Wildt, T. (2020). Engineering and social responsibility. Accounting for values in the development and design of new nuclear reactors. The Bridge, 50(3), 59–65.
   Google Scholar
• WCED. (1987). Report of the world commission on environment and development: Our common future. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-future.pdf.
   Google Scholar