Relations among epiphytic microbial communities from soil, leaves and grapes of the grapevine

References

• Badri DV, Weir TL, van der Lelie D, Vivanco JM. 2009. Rhizosphere chemical dialogues: plant-microbe interactions. Curr Opin Biotech. 20:642–650. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2009.09.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barata A, Malfeito-Ferreira M, Loureiro V. 2012. The microbial ecology of wine grape berries. Int J Food Microbiol. 153:243–259. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.11.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg J, Tom-Petersen A, Nybroe O. 2005. Copper amendment of agricultural soil selects for bacterial antibiotic resistance in the field. Lett Appl Microbiol. 40:146–151. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2004.01650.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodenhausen N, Horton MW, Bergelson J. 2013. Bacterial communities associated with the leaves and the roots of Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS One. 8:e56329. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056329
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bokulich NA, Joseph CML, Allen G, Benson AK, Mills DA. 2012. Next-generation sequencing reveals significant bacterial diversity of botrytized wine. PLoS One. 7:e36357. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036357
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bokulich NA, Thorngate JH, Richardson PM, Mills DA. 2014. Microbial biogeography of wine grapes is conditioned by cultivar, vintage, and climate. PNAS. 111:E139. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1317377110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castañeda LE, Barbosa O. 2017. Metagenomic analysis exploring taxonomic and functional diversity of soil microbial communities in Chilean vineyards and surrounding native forests. Peerj. doi: 10.7717/peerj.3098
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chelius MK, Triplett EW. 2001. The diversity of Archaea and Bacteria in Association with the roots of Zea mays L. Microb Ecol. 41:252–263. doi: 10.1007/s002480000087
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke KR, Gorley RN. 2006. Primer v6: user manual/Plymouth Routines in Multivariate Ecological Research. Plymouth: Plymouth Marine Laboratory; p. 1–181.
   Google Scholar
• Compant S, Mitter B, Colli-Mull JG, Gangl H, Sessitsch A. 2011. Endophytes of grapevine flowers, berries, and seeds: identification of cultivable bacteria, comparison with other plant parts, and visualization of niches of colonization. Microb Ecol. 62:188–197. doi: 10.1007/s00248-011-9883-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coombe BG. 1995. Growth stages of the grapevine: adoption of a system for identifying grapevine growth stages. Aust J Grape Wine Res. 1:104–110. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0238.1995.tb00086.x
   Google Scholar
• Gardes M, Bruns TD. 1993. ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes – application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Mol Ecol. 2:113–118. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.1993.tb00005.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert JA, Lelie DVD, Zarraonaindia I. 2014. Microbial terroir for wine grapes. PNAS. 111:5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1320471110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leveau JHJ, Tech JJ. 2011. Grapevine microbiomics: bacterial diversity on grape leaves and berries revealed by high-throughput sequence analysis of 16S rRNA amplicons. Acta Horticulturae. 905:31–42. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2011.905.2
   Google Scholar
• Li ZM, Chen L, Bai ZH, Wang DL, Gao LP, Hui BD. 2015. Cultivable bacterial diversity and amylase production in two typical light-flavor Daqus of Chinese spirits. Front Life Sci. 8:264–270. doi: 10.1080/21553769.2015.1041188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindow SE, Brandl MT. 2003. Microbiology of the phyllosphere. Appl Environ Microbiol. 69:1875–1883. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.4.1875-1883.2003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindow SE, Leveau JH. 2002. Phyllosphere microbiology. Curr Opin Biotech. 13:238–243. doi: 10.1016/S0958-1669(02)00313-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonvaud-Funel A. 1999. Lactic acid bacteria in the quality improvement and depreciation of wine. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 76:317. doi: 10.1023/A:1002088931106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonvaud-Funel A. 2001. Biogenic amines in wines: role of lactic acid bacteria. Fems Microbiol Lett. 199:9–13. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2001.tb10643.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez-Velasco G, Welbaum GE, Boyer RR, Mane SP, Ponder MA. 2011. Changes in spinach phylloepiphytic bacteria communities following minimal processing and refrigerated storage described using pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA amplicons. J Appl Microbiol. 110:1203–1214. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2011.04969.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martins G, Lauga B, Miot-Sertier C, Mercier A, Lonvaud A, Soulas ML, Soulas G, Masneuf-Pomarède I. 2013. Characterization of epiphytic bacterial communities from grapes, leaves, bark and soil of grapevine plants grown, and their relations. PLoS One. 8:e73013. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panagopoulos CG. 1969. The disease ‘tsilik marasi’ of grapevine: its description and identification of the causal agent (Xanthomonas ampelina sp. nov.). Annales De Linstitut Phytopathologique Benaki. 9:59–81.
   Google Scholar
• Sabate J, Cano J, Esteve-Zarzoso B, Guillamón JM. 2002. Isolation and identification of yeasts associated with vineyard and winery by RFLP analysis of ribosomal genes and mitochondrial DNA. Microbiol Res. 157:267–274. doi: 10.1078/0944-5013-00163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schloss PD, Handelsman J. 2005. Introducing DOTUR, a computer program for defining operational taxonomic units and estimating species richness. Appl Environ Microbiol. 71:1501. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.3.1501-1506.2005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, Hall JR, Hartmann M, Hollister EB, Lesniewski RA, Oakley BB, Thallinger GG, Van Horn DJ, et al. 2009. Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol. 75:7537–7541. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01541-09
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tournas VH, Katsoudas E. 2005. Mould and yeast flora in fresh berries, grapes and citrus fruits. Int J Food Microbiol. 105:11–17. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2005.05.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent R, Olivier C, Aline L. 2005. Understanding the microbial ecosystem on the grape berry surface through numeration and identification of yeast and bacteria. Aust J Grape Wine Res. 11:316–327. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0238.2005.tb00031.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wawrik B, Kerkhof L, Kukor J, Zylstra G. 2005. Effect of different carbon sources on community composition of bacterial enrichments from soil. Appl Environ Microbiol. 71:6776–6783. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.11.6776-6783.2005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West ER, Cother EJ, Steel CC, Ash GJ. 2010. The characterization and diversity of bacterial endophytes of grapevine. Can J Microbiol. 56(3):209–216. doi: 10.1139/W10-004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanagida F, Srionnual S, Chen YS. 2008. Isolation and characteristics of lactic acid bacteria from koshu, vineyards in Japan. Lett Appl Microbiol. 47:134–139. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2008.02398.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarraonaindia I, Owens SM, Weisenhorn P, West K, Hampton-Marcell J, Lax S, Bokulich NA, Mills DA, Martin G, Taghavi S, et al. 2015. The soil microbiome influences grapevine-associated microbiota. mBio. 6:e02527-14. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02527-14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang BG, Bai ZH, Hoefel D, Wang XY, Li BJ, Li ZM, Zhuang GQ. 2009. The impacts of cypermethrin pesticide application on the non-target microbial community of the pepper plant phyllosphere. Sci Total Environ. 407:1915–1922. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.11.049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar