The impact of maleness on judicial decision making: masculinity, chivalry, and immigration appeals

References

• Albonetti, Celesta A. 1997. “Sentencing under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines: Effects of Defendant Characteristics, Guilty Pleas, and Departures on Sentence Outcomes for Drug Offenses, 1991–1992.” Law and Society Review 31: 789–822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, Tammy D., and Joyce E. A. Russell. 1999. “Parental Leave of Absence: Some Not So Family-Friendly Implications.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 29 (1): 166–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, David W., and Diane E. Wall. 1993. “Role Orientations and Women State Supreme Court Justices.” Judicature 77: 156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armato, Michael. 2013. “Wolves in Sheep’s Clothing: Men’s Enlightened Sexism and Hegemonic Masculinity in Academia.” Women’s Studies Quarterly 42 (5): 578–598.
   Google Scholar
• Berberian, Sean B. 1999. “Protecting Children: Explaining Disparities in the Female Offender’s Pretrial Process, and Policy Issues Surrounding Lenient Treatment of Mothers.” Hastings Women’s Law Journal 10: 369.
   Google Scholar
• Bhabha, Jacqueline. 2002. “Internationalist Gatekeepers? The Tension Between Asylum Advocacy and Human Rights.” Harvard Human Rights Journal 15: 155–181.
   Google Scholar
• Bornstein, Stephanie. 2012. “The Law of Gender Stereotyping and the Work-Family Conflicts of Men.” Hastings Law Journal 63: 1297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, Christina L. 2013. “She’ll Settle It?” Journal of Law and Courts 1 (2): 193–219.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, Christina L., Lee Epstein, and Andrew D. Martin. 2010. “Untangling the Causal Effects of Sex on Judging.” American Journal of Political Science 54 (2): 389–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cadinu, Mara, Marcella Latrofa, and Andrea Carnaghi. 2013. “Comparing Self-stereotyping with In-Group-Stereotyping and Out-Group Stereotyping in Unequal-Status Groups: The Case of Gender.” Self and Identity 12 (6): 582–596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, Charles M., and Craig P. Cummings. 2003. “Diversity and Judicial Decision Making: Evidence from Affirmative Action Cases in the Federal Courts of Appeals, 1971–1999.” Annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, IL
   Google Scholar
• Cantalupo, Nancy Chi. 2014. “Masculinity and Title IX: Bullying and Sexual Harassment of Boys in the American Liberal State.” Maryland Law Review 73: 887–965.
   Google Scholar
• Carnes, Molly, Stacie Geller, Eve Fine, Jennifer Sheridan, and Jo Handelsman. 2005. “NIH Director’s Pioneer Awards: Could the Selection Process Be Biased Against Women?” Journal of Women’s Health 14 (8): 684–692.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, Tom S., and Drew A. Linzer. 2013. “Should I Use Fixed or Random Effects?” Political Science Research and Methods 3 (2): 399–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell, R. W., and James W. Messerschmidt. 2005. “Hegemonic Masculinity: Rethinking the Concept.” Gender & Society 19 (6): 829–859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, Frank Rudy, and Ann C. McGinley. 2012. Masculinities and the Law: A Multidimensional Approach. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crowe, Nancy E. 1999. The Effects of Judges’ Sex and Race on Judicial Decision Making on the US Courts of Appeals, 1981–1996. Chicago, IL: Department of Political Science, University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Daly, Kathleen, and Rebecca L. Bordt. 1995. “Sex Effects and Sentencing: An Analysis of the Statistical Literature.” Justice Quarterly 12 (1): 141–175.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, Sue. 1993a. “Do Women Judges Speak ‘In a Different Voice?’ Carol Gilligan, Feminist Legal Theory and the Ninth Circuit.” Wisconsin Women’s Law Journal 8: 143–173.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, Sue. 1993b. “The Voice of Sandra Day O’Connor.” Judicature 77: 134–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, Sue, Susan Haire, and Donald R. Songer. 1993. “Voting Behavior and Gender on the U.S. Courts of Appeals.” Judicature 77: 129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doerner, Jill K., and Stephen Demuth. 2014. “Gender and Sentencing in the Federal Courts: Are Women Treated More Leniently?” Criminal Justice Policy Review 25 (2): 242–269.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, Lee, Andrew D. Martin, Jeffrey A. Segal, and Chad Westerland. 2007. “The Judicial Common Space.” Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 23 (2): 303–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etienne, Margareth. 2010. “Sentencing Women: Reassessing the Claims of Disparity.” Journal of Gender, Race & Justice 14: 73.
   Google Scholar
• Farhang, Sean, and Gregory Wawro. 2004. “Institutional Dynamics on the US Court of Appeals: Minority Representation under Panel Decision Making.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 20 (2): 299–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FeldmanHall, Oriel, Tim Dalgleish, Davy Evans, Lauren Navrady, Ellen Tedeschi, and Dean Mobbs. 2016. “Moral Chivalry: Gender and Harm Sensitivity Predict Costly Altruism.” Social Psychological and Personality Science 7 (6): 542–551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischman, Joshua B. 2013. “Interpreting Circuit Court Voting Patterns: A Social Interactions Framework.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 133–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischman, Joshua B., and David S. Law. 2009. “What Is Judicial Ideology, and How Should We Measure It.” Washington University Journal of Law and Policy 29: 133.
   Google Scholar
• Fiske, Susan T., and Eugene Borgida. 2008. “Providing Expert Knowledge in an Adversarial Context: Social Cognitive Science in Employment Discrimination Cases.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 4 (1): 123–148.
   Google Scholar
• Freiburger, Tina L., and Carly M. Hilinski-Rosick. 2013. “An Examination of the Interactions of Race and Gender on Sentencing Decisions Using a Trichotomous Dependent Variable.” Crime and Delinquency 59 (1): 59–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galanter, Marc. 1974. “Why the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change.” Law and Society Review 9: 95–160.
   Google Scholar
• Giles, Michael W., Virginia A. Hettinger, and Todd Peppers. 2001. “Picking Federal Judges: A Note on Policy and Partisan Selection Agendas.” Political Research Quarterly 54 (3): 623–641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a Different Voice. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, Sheldon, and Charles M. Lamb. 1986. Judicial Conflict and Consensus: Behavioral Studies of American Appellate Courts. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwald, Anthony G., T. Andrew Poehlman, Eric Luis Ulhmann, and Mahzarin R. Banaji. 2009. “Understanding and Using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of Predictive Validity.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 97 (1): 17–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruhl, John, Cassia Spohn, and Susan Welch. 1981. “Women as Policymakers: The Case of Trial Judges.” American Journal of Political Science 25: 308–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gryski, Gerard S., Eleanor C. Main, and William J. Dixon. 1986. “Models of State High Court Decision Making in Sex Discrimination Cases.” Journal of Politics 48: 143–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie, Chris, Jeffrey J. Rachlinski, and Andrew J. Wistrich. 2000. “Inside the Judicial Mind.” Cornell Law Review 86: 777–830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausman, Jerry A. 1978. “Specification Tests in Econometrics.” Econometrica 46: 1251–1271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hekman, David R., Karl Aquino, Bradley P. Owens, Terence R. Mitchell, Pauline Schilpzand, and Keith Leavitt. 2010. “An Examination of Whether and How Racial and Gender Biases Influence Customer Satisfaction.” Academy of Management Review 53 (2): 238–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, Rosemary. 2015. “More Than Just a Different Face? Judicial Diversity and Decision-Making.” Current Legal Problems 68 (1): 119–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, Peter. 1991. “The Cultural Politics of Masculinity: Towards a Social Geography.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 16 (2): 199–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, Susan W. 2017. “Family Matters: Justice Gender and Female Litigant Success in Family Law Cases in the Supreme Court of Canada.” Justice System Journal 61 (0): 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Jolls, Christine, and Cass R. Sunstein. 2006. “The Law of Implicit Bias.” California Law Review 94 (4): 969–996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jost, John T., Laurie A. Rudman, Irene V. Blair, Dana R. Carney, Nilanjana Dasgupta, Jack Glaser, and Curtis D. Hardin. 2009. “The Existence of Implicit Bias Is Beyond Reasonable Doubt: A Refutation of Ideological and Methodological Objections and Executive Summary of Ten Studies that No Manager Should Ignore.” Research in Organizational Behavior 29: 39–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, Daniel. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, Jerry, and Mahzarin Banaji. 2006. “Fair Measures: A Behavioral Realist Revision of ‘Affirmative Action’.” California Law Review 94 (4): 1063–1118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanter, Rosabeth Moss. 1977. Men and Women of the Corporation. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kastellec, Jonathan P. 2011. “Panel Composition and Voting on the U.S. Courts of Appeals over Time.” Political Research Quarterly 64 (2): 377–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenney, Sally J. 2008. “Thinking about Gender and Judging.” International Journal of the Legal Profession 15 (1–2): 87–110.
   Google Scholar
• Kimmel, Michael S. 2004. “Masculinity as Homophobia: Fear, Shame, and Silence in the Construction of Gender Identity.” In Race, Class, and Gender in the United States: An Integrated Study, edited by P. S. Rothenberg, 81–93. New York: Worth.
   Google Scholar
• Klien, Dorie. 1973. “The Etiology of Female Crime: A Review of the Literature.” Issues in Criminology 8 (2): 3–30.
   Google Scholar
• Kritzer, Herbert M., and Thomas M. Uhlman. 1977. “Sisterhood in the Courtroom: Sex of Judge and Defendant in Criminal Case Disposition.” Social Science Journal 14 (2): 77–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruttschnitt, Candace, and Donald E. Green. 1984. “The Sex-Sanctioning Issue: Is It History?” American Sociological Review 49: 541–551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landy, Frank J., and James Farr. 1980. “Performance Rating.” Psychological Bulletin 87 (2): 72–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, Anna O. 2010. The Immigration Battle in American Courts. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, Mona, and Craig Haney. 2011. “Looking Across the Empathic Divide: Racialized Decision Making on the Capital Jury.” Michigan State Law Review 2011: 573–607.
   Google Scholar
• Mack, Kathy, and Sharyn Roach Anleu. 2012. “In-court Judicial Behaviours, Gender and Legitimacy.” Griffith Law Review 21 (3): 728–751.
   Google Scholar
• Marouf, Fatma, Michael Kagan, and Rebecca D. Gill. 2013. “Justice on the Fly: The Danger of Errant Deportations.” Ohio State Law Journal 75: 337–404.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, Elaine, and Barry Pyle. 2004. “State High Courts and Divorce: The Impact of Judicial Gender.” University of Toledo Law Review 36: 923.
   Google Scholar
• Mayo, Jessica. 2012. “Court-Mandated Story Time: The Victim Narrative in U.S. Asylum Law.” Washington University Law Review 89 (6): 1485–1522.
   Google Scholar
• McGinley, Ann C. 2010. “Erasing Boundaries: Masculinities, Sexual Minorities, and Employment Discrimination.” University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform 43: 713–1137.
   Google Scholar
• McGinley, Ann C. 2012. “Reasonable Men?” Connecticut Law Review 45 (1): 1–40.
   Google Scholar
• McGinley, Ann C. 2013. “Masculinity, Labor and Sexual Power.” Boston University Law Review 93: 795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, Banks, Kinda Camp Keith, and Jennifer S. Holmes. 2015. Immigration Judges and U.S. Asylum Policy. Edited by B. B. Lockwood, Jr. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moyer, Laura P. 2013. “Rethinking Critical Mass in Federal Appellate Courts.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 34 (1): 49–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munoz Sastre, Maria Teresa, Evelyne Fouquereau, Valerie Igier, Nadine Salvatore, and Etsienne Mullet. 2000. “Perception of Occupational Gender Typing: A Replication on European Samples of Shinar’s (1975) and Beggs and Doolittle’s (1993) Studies.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 30 (2): 430–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mussweiler, Thomas, and Jens Forster. 2000. “The Sex -> Aggression Link: A Perception-Behavior Dissociation.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79 (4): 507–520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mustard, David B. 2001. “Racial, Ethnic, and Gender Disparities in Sentencing: Evidence from the US Federal Courts.” Journal of Law and Economics 44 (1): 285–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagel, Stewart S., and Lenore J. Weitzman. 1971. “Women as Litigants.” Hastings Law Journal 23: 171.
   Google Scholar
• National Women’s Law Center. 2015. “Women in the Federal Judiciary: Still a Long Way to Go.” In Judges the Courts. Washington, DC: National Women’s Law Center https://nwlc.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/JudgesCourtsWomeninFedJud10.13.2016.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Oxford, Connie G. 2005. “Protectors and Victims in the Gender Regime of Asylum.” NWSA Journal 17 (3): 18–38.
   Google Scholar
• Park, Michael. 2013. “Asian American Masculinity Eclipsed: A Legal and Historical Perspective of Emasculation Through U.S. Immigration Practices.” Modern American 8 (1): 5–17.
   Google Scholar
• Peresie, Jennifer L. 2005. “Female Judges Matter: Gender and Collegial Decisionmaking in the Federal Appellate Courts.” Yale Law Journal 114 (7): 1759–1791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pope, Carl E. 1975. Sentencing of California Felony Offenders. Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice, Law Enforcement Assistance Administration, Criminal Justice Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Ramji-Nogales, Jaya, Andrew Ian Schoenholtz, and Philip G. Schrag. 2007. “Refugee Roulette: Disparities in Asylum Adjudication.” Stanford Law Review 60 (2): 295–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramji-Nogales, Jaya, Andrew Ian Schoenholtz, and Philip G. Schrag. 2011. Refugee Roulette: Disparities in Asylum Adjudication and Proposals for Reform. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rehaag, Sean. 2011. “Do Women Refugee Judges Really Make a Difference? An Empirical Analysis of Gender and Outcomes in Canadian Refugee Determinations.” Canadian Journal of Women and the Law 23 (2): 627–660.
   Google Scholar
• Rovner, Laura L. 2001. “Perpetuating Stigma: Client Identity in Disability Rights Litigation.” Utah Law Review 2: 247–318.
   Google Scholar
• Rudman, Laurie A., and Kris Mescher. 2013. “Penalizing Men Who Request a Family Leave: Is Flexibility Stigma a Femininity Stigma.” Journal of Social Issues 69 (2): 322–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saucedo, Leticia. 2013. “Anglo Views of Mexican Labor: Shaping the Law of Temporary Work Through Masculinities Narratives.” Nevada Law Journal 13 (2): 547.
   Google Scholar
• Scheurer, Katherine Felix. 2014. “Gender and Voting Decisions in the US Courts of Appeals: Testing Critical Mass Theory.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 35 (1): 31–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherry, Suzanna. 1986. “Civic Virtue and the Feminine Voice in Constitutional Adjudication.” Virginia Law Review 72: 543–615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sisk, Gregory C., Michael Heise, and Andrew P. Morriss. 1998. “Charting the Influences on the Judicial Mind: An Empirical Study of Judicial Reasoning.” New York University Law Review 73: 1377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivakumaran, Sandesh. 2007. “Sexual Violence Against Men in Armed Conflict.” European Journal of International Law 18 (2): 253–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Songer, Donald R. 1982. “Consensual and Nonconsensual Decisions in Unanimous Opinions of the United States Courts of Appeals.” American Journal of Political Science 26: 225–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Songer, Donald R., Miroslava Radieva, and Rebecca Reid. 2016. “Gender Diversity in the Intermediate Appellate Courts of Canada.” Justice System Journal 37 (1): 4–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spohn, Cassia, John Gruhl, and Susan Welch. 1987. “The Impact of the Ethnicity and Gender of Defendants on the Decision to Reject or Dismiss Felony Charges.” Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal 25 (1): 175–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srikantiah, Jayashri. 2007. “Perfect Victims and Real Survivors: The Iconic Victim in Domestic Human Trafficking Law.” Boston University Law Review 87: 157–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffensmeier, Darrell, and Chris Herbert. 1999. “Women and Men Policymakers: Does the Judge’s Gender Affect the Sentencing of Criminal Defendants?” Social Forces 77 (3): 1163–1196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffensmeier, Darrell, John Kramer, and Cathy Streifel. 1993. “Gender and Imprisonment Decisions.” Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal 31 (3): 411–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobias, Carl. 1990. “The Gender Gap on the Federal Bench.” Hofstra Law Review 19: 171–184.
   Google Scholar
• UNHCR. 2003. Procedural Standards for Refugee Status Determination under UNHCR’s Mandate. Geneva: UN High Commissioner for Refugees.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Courts for the Ninth Circuit. 2011. 2011 Annual Report. Edited by Office of the Circuit Executive. San Francisco, CA. http://www.ce9.uscourts.gov/publications/AnnualReport2011.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Vojdik, Valorie K. 2002. “Gender Outlaws: Challenging Masculinity in Traditionally Male Institutions.” Berkeley Women’s Law Journal 17: 68–121.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, Margaret S., and Anna O. Law. 2012. “Understanding Judicial Decision Making in Immigration Cases at the US Courts of Appeals.” Justice System Journal 33: 97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar