Where does the pipeline get leaky? The progressive ambition of school board members and personal and political network recruitment

References

• Beck, Susan A. 2001. “Acting as Women: The Effects and Limitations of Gender in Local Governance.” In The Impact of Women in Public Office, edited by J. Carroll Susan, 49–67. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bledsoe, Timothy, and Mary Herring. 1990. “Victims of Circumstances: Women in Pursuit of Public Office.” American Political Science Review 84 (1): 213–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boles, Janet K. 2001. ““Local Elected Women and Policy-making: Movement Delegates or Feminist Trustees?” In The Impact of Women in Public Office, edited by Susan J. Carroll, 68–86. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, Henry E., Kay Lehman Schlozman, and Sidney Verba. 1999. “Prospecting for Participants: Rational Expectations and the Recruitment of Political Activists.” American Political Science Review 93 (1): 153–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broockman, David E. 2014. “Do Female Politicians Empower Women to Vote or Run for Office? A Regression Discontinuity Approach.” Electoral Studies 34: 190–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, Nancy, Kay L. Scholzman, and Sidney Verba. 2001. The Private Roots of Public Action. Boston: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burt-Way, Barbara J., and Rita M. Kelly. 1992. “Gender and Sustaining Political Ambition: A Study of Arizona Elected Officials.” Political Research Quarterly 45 (1): 11–25.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, Susan J. 1994. Women as Candidates in American Politics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, Susan, and Kira Sanbonmatsu. 2010. “Can More Women Run? Reevaluating Women’s Election to the State Legislatures.” Presented at the 2010 annual meeting of the American political association, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, Susan J., and Kira Sanbonmatsu. 2013. More Women Can Run: Gender and Pathways to the State Legislature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Center for American Women in Politics. 2017. State Legislature. In State by State Information. Retrieved from http://www.cawp.rutgers.edu/state-by-state.
   Google Scholar
• Costantini, Edmond. 1990. “Political Women and Political Ambition: Closing the Gender Gap.” American Journal of Political Science 34 (3): 741–770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowder-Meyer, Melody. 2013. “Gendered Recruitment Without Trying: How Local Party Recruiters Affect Women’s Representation.” Politics & Gender 9 (4): 390–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowder-Meyer, Melody, Shana K. Gadarian, and Jessica Trounstine. 2015. ““Electoralinstitutions, Gender Stereotypes, and Women’s Local Representation.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 3 (2): 318–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deckman, Melissa. 2007. “Gender Differences in the Decision to Run for School Board.” American Politics Research 35 (4): 541–563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farris, E. M., and M. R. Holman. 2016. “All Politics in Local? County Sheriffs and Localized Policies of Immigration Enforcement.” Political Research Quarterly 96 (4): 1117–1135.
   Google Scholar
• Flaming, Janet A. 1984. Political Women, Current Roles in State and Local Government. Beverly Hills: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, Linda L. 1993. Candidates, Congress, and the American Democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fulton, Sarah A., Cherie D. Maestas, Sandy L. Maisel, and Walter Stone. 2006. “The Sense of a Woman: Gender, Ambition, and the Decision to Run for Congress.” Political Research Quarterly 59 (2): 235–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenlee, Jill S., Mirya R. Holman, and Rachel VanSickle-Ward. 2014. “Making it Personal: Assessing the Impact of In-class Exercise on Closing the Gender Gap in Political Ambition.” Journal of Political Science Education 10 (1): 48–61.
   Google Scholar
• Holman, Mirya R., and Monica C. Schneider. 2014. “Experimental Investigations of the Gendered Political Ambition Gap.” American Political Association Annual meeting, Washington D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Kitts, James. 2000. “Mobilizing in Black Boxes: Social Networks and Participation in Social Movement Organizations.” Mobilization: An International Quarterly 5 (2): 241–257.
   Google Scholar
• Krook, Mona L. 2010. “Why Are Fewer Women Than men Elected? Gender and the Dynamics of Candidate Selection.” Political Studies Review 8 (2): 155–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawless, Jennifer L., and Richard L. Fox. 2005. It Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don’t Run for Office. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lawless, Jennifer L., and Richard L. Fox. 2010. It Still Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don’t Run for Office. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, Chaeyoon. 2008. “Social Networks and Political Participation: How Do Networks Matter?” Social Forces 87 (2): 961–982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maestas, Cherie D., Sarah Fulton, L. S. Maisel, and Walter J. Stone. 2006. “When to Risk It? Institutions, Ambitions, and the Decision to Run for the US House.” American Political Science Review 100 (02): 195–208.
   Google Scholar
• Maestas, Cherie, W. Neeley Grant, and E. Richardson Jr Lilliard. 2003. “The state of surveying legislators: Dilemmas and suggestions.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 3 (1): 90–108.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, Ann. 2002. “Organizing Across the Divide: Local Feminist Activism, Everyday Life, and the Election of Women to Public Office.” Social Science Quarterly 83 (3): 707–725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAdam, Doug. 1986. “Recruitment to High-risk Activism: The Case of Freedom Summer.” American Journal of Sociology 92 (1): 64–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moncrief, Gary F., Peverill Squire, and Malcom E. Jewell. 2001. Who Runs for the Legislature? Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• National School Board Association. n.d. What Do We Know About School Board Members? In Frequently Asked Questions. http://www.nsba.org/about-us/frequently-asked-questions.
   Google Scholar
• Niven, David. 1998. The Missing Majority: The Recruitment of Women as State Legislative Candidates. Greenwood Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Niven, David. 2006. “Throwing Your Hat Out of the Ring: Negative Recruitment and the Gender Imbalance in State Legislative Candidacy.” Politics & Gender 2 (4): 473–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pimlott, Jamie P. 2010. Women and the Democratic Party: The Evolution of Emily’s List. Amherst, New York: Cambria Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2006. Where Women Run: Gender and Party in the American States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sanbonmatsu, Kira, Susan Carroll, and Debbie Walsh. 2009. “poised to Run: Women’s Pathways to the State Legislature.” In Center for American Women and Politics http://www/cawp.rutgers.edu/stites/default/files/resources/poisedtorun_0.pdf (Accessed November 24, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Sapiro, Virginia. 1982. “Private Costs of Public Commitments or Public Costs of Private Commitments? Family Roles Versus Political Ambition.” American Journal of Political Science 26 (2): 265–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, M. C., M. R. Holman, A. B. Diekman, and T. McAndrew. 2015. “Power, Conflict, and Community: How Gendered Views of Political Power Influence Women’s Political Ambition.” Political Psychology 37 (4): 515–531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silbermann, R. 2015. “Gender Roles, Work-life Balance, and Running for Office.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 10 (2): 123–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stambough, Stephen J., and Valerie R. O’Regan. 2007. “Republican Lambs and the Democratic Pipeline: Partisan Differences in the Nomination of Female Gubernatorial Candidates.” Politics& Gender 3 (03): 349–368.
   Google Scholar
• Sweet-Cushman, J. 2014. “Individual Differences in Psychological Evaluations of Electoral Risk: Furthering The Explanation of the Gender Gap in Candidate Emergence.” (PhD diss). Wayne State University.
   Google Scholar
• United States House of Representatives. n.d. Women in Congress, History, Art, and Archives. http://history.house.gov/Exhibition-and-publications/WIC/Women-in-congress/.
   Google Scholar
• Van Assendelft, Laura, and Cynthia Stottlemeyr. 2009. “Women in Local Public Office: A Case Study of Southwest/Western Virginia.” Virginia Social Science Journal 44: 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Welch, Susan. 1977. “Women as Political Animals? A Test of Some Explanations for Male-Female Political Participation Difference.” American Journal of Political Science 21 (4): 711–730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar