Status characteristics and their intersectionality: majority opinion assignment in state supreme courts

References

• Arceneaux, Kevin, and David W. Nickerson. 2009. “Modeling Certainty with Clustered Data: A Comparison of Methods.” Political Analysis 17 (2): 177–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, Rosalind Chait. 2005. “Ageism and Sexism in the Workplace.” Generations (San Francisco, Calif ) 29 (3): 25–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boddery, Scott S., and Jeff Yates. 2014. “Do Policy Messengers Matter? Majority Opinion Writers as Policy Cues in Public Agreement with Supreme Court Decisions.” Political Research Quarterly 67 (4): 851–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonica, Adam, and Michael J. Woodruff. 2015. “A Common-Space Measure of State Supreme Court Ideology.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 31 (3): 472–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonneau, Chris W., Paul Brace, and Kevin Arceneaux. 2005–2006. “Collaborative Research: An Individual-Level State Supreme Court Database.” doi:10.15139/S3/12080.
   Google Scholar
• Bonneau, Chris W., Thomas H. Hammond, Forrest Maltzman, and Paul J. Wahlbeck. 2007. “Agenda Control, the Median Justice, and the Majority Opinion on the U.S. Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science 51 (4): 890–905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonneau, Chris W., and Heather Marie Rice. 2009. “Impartial Judges? Race, Institutional Context, and U.S. State Supreme Courts.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 9: 381–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowie, Jennifer Barnes, Donald R. Songer, and John Szmer. 2014. The View from the Bench and Chambers: Examining Judicial Process and Decision Making on the U.S. Courts of Appeals. Charlottesville, VA: UVA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brace, Paul, Jeff Yates, and Brent D. Boyea. 2012. “Judges, Litigants, and the Design of Courts.” Law & Society Review 46 (3): 497–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, Saul. 1982. “Strategic Choice and Opinion Assignment on the U.S. Supreme Court: A Reexamination.” The Western Political Quarterly 35 (2): 204–211.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, Saul. 1984. “Issue Specialization as a Variable in Opinion Assignment on the U.S. Supreme Court.” Journal of Politics 46 (4): 1217–1225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, Saul. 1993. “The Chief Justices’ Self Assignment of Majority Opinions in Salient Cases.” The Social Science Journal 30 (2): 143–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, Saul. 2001. “Majority Opinion Assignment in Salient Cases on the U.S. Supreme Court: Are New Associate Justices Assigned Fewer Opinions?” Justice System Journal 22 (2): 209–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, Saul, and Timothy M. Hagle. 1996. “Opinion Writing and Acclimation Effect.” Political Behavior 18 (3): 235–261.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, Saul, and Harold J. Spaeth. 1986. “Issue Specialization in Majority Opinion Assignment on the Burger Court.” The Western Political Quarterly 39 (3): 520–527.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, Saul, and Harold J. Spaeth. 1988. “Majority Opinion Assignments and the Maintenance of the Original Coalition on the Warren Court.” American Journal of Political Science 32 (1): 72–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunderson, J. Stuart. 2003. “Recognizing and Utilizing Expertise in Work Groups: A Status Characteristics Perspective.” Administrative Science Quarterly 48 (4): 557–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, A. Colin, and Pravin K. Trivedi. 2010. Microeconometrics Using Stata. Revised Edition. College Station, TX: STATA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, E. K. 2008. “Opinion Specialization: Alive and Well in the Federal Appellate Judiciary.” Judicature 92: 103–105.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, Sumi, Kimberle Williams Crenshaw, and Leslie McCall. 2013. “Toward a Field of Intersectionality Studies: Theory, Applications, and Praxis.” Signs 38 (4): 785–810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, Robert K., John Szmer, and Justin M. Stritch. 2012. “Race and Gender Bias in Three Administrative Contexts: Impact on Work Assignments in State Supreme Courts.” Journal of Public Administrative Research 22 (4): 625–648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, Jonathan M. 2002. Inside Appellate Courts: The Impact of Court Organization on Judicial Decision Making in the United States Courts of Appeals. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, Todd, and Laura Moyer. 2008. “Gender, Race, and Intersectionality on the Federal Appellate Bench.” Political Research Quarterly 61 (2): 219–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuddy, Amy J.C., and Susan T. Fiske. 2002. “Doddering but Dear: Process, Content, and Function in Stereotyping of Older Persons.” In Ageism: Stereotyping and Prejudice Against Older Persons, edited by Todd D. Nelson, 3–26. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dhamoon, Rita Kaur. 2011. “Considerations on Mainstreaming Intersectionality.” Political Research Quarterly 64 (1): 230–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farhang, Sean, Jonathan P. Kastellec, and Gregory J. Wawro. 2015. “The Politics of Opinion Assignment and Authorship on the U.S. Court of Appeals: Evidence from Sexual Harassment Cases.” Journal of Legal Studies 44: S59–S85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske, Susan T. 1998. “Stereotyping, Prejudice, and Discrimination.” In The Handbook of Social Psychology, Fourth Edition, edited by D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, and G. Lindzey, 357–441. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Fraidin, Samuel N., and Andrea B. Hollingshead. 2005. “‘I Know What I’m Doing’: The Impact of Gender Stereotypes About Expertise on Task Assignments in Groups.” In Status and Groups (Research on Managing Groups and Teams, Volume 7), edited by Melissa C. Thomas-Hunt, 121–141. Bingley: Emerald Group.
   Google Scholar
• Fridkin, Kim L., and Patrick J. Kenney. 2009. “The Role of Gender Stereotypes in U.S. Senate Campaigns.” Politics and Gender 5: 301–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geolzhauser, Greg. 2011. “Diversifying State Supreme Courts.” Law & Society Review 45 (3): 761–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, Rebecca D., Sylvia Lazos, and Mallory M. Waters. 2011. “Are Judicial Performance Evaluations Fair to Women and Minorities? A Cautionary Tale from Clark County, Nevada.” Law & Society Review 45 (3): 731–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haire, Susan Brodie. 2001. “Rating the Ratings of the American Bar Association Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary.” Justice System Journal 22 (1): 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, Melinda Gann. 1990. “Opinion Assignment Procedures and Conference Practices in State Supreme Courts.” Judicature 73: 209–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, Melinda Gann. 2014. “Representation in State Supreme Courts: Evidence from the Terminal Term.” Political Research Quarterly 67 (2): 335–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, Ange-Marie. 2007. “When Multiplication Doesn’t Equal Quick Addition: Examining Intersectionality as a Research Paradigm.” Perspectives on Politics 5 (1): 63–79.
   Google Scholar
• Hanmer, Michael J., and Kerem Ozan Kalkan. 2013. “Behind the Curve: Clarifying the Best Approach to Calculating Predicted Probabilities and Marginal Effects from Limited Dependent Variable Models.” American Journal of Political Science 57 (1): 263–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haynie, Kerry L. 2002. “The Color of Their Skin or the Content of Their Behavior? Race and Perceptions of African American Legislators.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 27: 295–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hettinger, Virginia A., Stefanie A. Lindquist, and Wendy L. Martinek. 2006. Judging on a Collegial Court: Influences on Federal Appellate Decision-Making. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, J. W. 1981. Courts of Appeals in the Federal Judicial System: A Study of the Second, Fifth, and District of Columbia Circuits. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huddy, Leonie, and Nayda Terkildsen. 1993. “Gender Stereotypes and the Perception of Male and Female Candidates.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (1): 119–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, David A., Teena Wilhelm, and Richard L. Vining Jr. 2015. “Deliberation Rules and Opinion Assignment Procedures in State Supreme Courts: A Replication.” Justice System Journal 36 (4): 395–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lax, Jeffrey R., and Charles M. Cameron. 2007. “Bargaining and Opinion Assignment on the U.S. Supreme Court.” Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 23 (2): 276–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maltzman, Forrest, James F. Spriggs, and Paul J. Wahlbeck. 2000. Crafting Law on the Supreme Court: The Collegial Game. Cambridge, UK; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maltzman, Forrest, and Paul J. Wahlbeck. 1996. “May It Please the Chief? Opinion Assignments in the Rehnquist Court.” American Journal of Political Science 40 (2): 421–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maltzman, Forrest, and Paul J. Wahlbeck. 2004. “A Conditional Model of Opinion Assignment on the Supreme Court.” Political Research Quarterly 57 (4): 551–563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLauchlan, William P. 1972. “Ideology and Conflict in Supreme Court Opinion Assignment, 1946–1962.” The Western Political Quarterly 25 (1): 16–27.
   Google Scholar
• Nash, Jonathan Remy. 2015. “Expertise and Opinion Assignment on the Courts of Appeals: A Preliminary Investigation.” Florida Law Review 66 (4): 1599–1684.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, Todd D., ed. 2002. Ageism: Stereotyping and Prejudice Against Older Persons. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peresie, Jennifer L. 2005. “Female Judges Matter: Gender and Collegial Decisionmaking in the Federal Appellate Courts.” Yale Law Journal 114: 1759–1790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, Thomas F. 1998. “Intergroup Contact Theory.” Annual Review of Psychology 49 (1): 65–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randazzo, Kirk A., Richard W. Waterman, and Michael P. Fix. 2011. “State Supreme Courts and the Effects of Statutory Constraint: A Test of the Model of Contingent Discretion.” Political Research Quarterly 64 (4): 779–789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rathjen, Gregory James. 1974. “Policy Goals, Strategic Choice, and Majority Opinion Assignments in the U.S. Supreme Court: A Replication.” American Journal of Political Science 18 (4): 713–724.
   Google Scholar
• Ridgeway, Cecilia L., Yan E. Li, Kristan G. Erickson, Kristen Backor, and Justine E. Tinkler. 2009. “How Easily Does a Social Difference Become a Status Distinction? Gender Matters.” American Sociological Review 74 (1): 44–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohde, David W. 1972. “Policy Goals, Strategic Choice and Majority Opinion Assignments in the U.S. Supreme Court.” Midwest Journal of Political Science 16: 652–682.
   Google Scholar
• Segal, Jennifer. 2000. “Representative Decision Making on the Federal Bench: Clinton’s District Court Appointees.” Political Research Quarterly 53 (1): 137–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, Maya. 2014. “How Judicial Qualification Ratings May Disadvantage Minority and Female Candidates.” Journal of Law and Courts 2 (1): 33–65.
   Google Scholar
• Shepherd, Joanna M. 2009. “The Influence of Retention Politics on Judges’ Voting.” The Journal of Legal Studies 38 (1): 169–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigelman, Carol K., Lee Sigelman, Barbara J. Walkosz, and Michael Nitz. 1995. “Black Candidates, White Voters: Understanding Racial Bias in Political Perceptions.” American Journal of Political Science 39: 243–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slotnick, Elliot E. 1979a. “Who Speaks for the Court? Majority Opinion Assignment from Taft to Burger.” American Journal of Political Science 23 (1): 60–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slotnick, Elliot. 1979b. “Judicial Career Patterns and Majority Opinion Assignment on the Supreme Court.” Journal of Politics 41 (2): 640–648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slotnick, Elliot. 1983. “Federal Trial and Appellate Judges: How Do They Differ?” Western Political Quarterly 36 (4): 570–578.
   Google Scholar
• Spaeth, Harold J. 1983. “Distributive Justice: Majority Opinion Assignments in the Burger Court.” Judicature 67: 299–304.
   Google Scholar
• Steffensmeier, Darrell, Jeffery Ulmer, and John Kramer. 1998. “The Interaction of Race, Gender, and Age in Criminal Sentencing: The Punishment Cost of Being Young, Black, and Male.” Criminology 36 (4): 763–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szmer, John, Robert K. Christensen, and Erin B. Kaheny. 2015. “Gender, Race, and Dissensus on State Supreme Courts.” Social Science Quarterly 96 (2): 553–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vining, Richard L., and Teena Wilhelm. 2011. “Measuring Case Salience in State Courts of Last Resort.” Political Research Quarterly 64 (3): 559–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, David G., and Joseph Berger. 1997. “Gender and Interpersonal Task Behaviors: Status Expectation Accounts.” Sociological Perspectives 40: 1–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahlbeck, Paul J. 2006. “Strategy and Constraints on Supreme Court Opinion Assignment.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 154 (6): 1729–1755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahlbeck, Paul J., James F. Spriggs, and Forrest Maltzman. 1998. “Marshalling the Court: Bargaining and Accommodation on the United States Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science 42 (1): 294–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar