Direct and indirect effects of prejudice: sexism, information, and voting behavior in political campaigns

References

• Ajzen, I., and M. Fishbein. 1980. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood-Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, Deborah, and Kristi Andersen. 1993. “Gender as a Factor in the Attribution of Leadership Traits.” Political Research Quarterly 46 (3): 527–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, R. M., and D. A. Kenny. 1986. “The Moderator–Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (6): 1173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barreto, Manuela, and Naomi Ellemers. 2005. “The Perils of Political Correctness: Men’s and Women’s Responses to Old-Fashioned and Modern Sexist Views.” Social Psychology Quarterly 68 (1): 75–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bar-Tal, Daniel, Carl F. Graumann, Arie Wolfgang Kruglanski, and W. Stroebe, eds. 2013. Stereotyping and Prejudice: Changing Conceptions. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, Nichole M. 2015a. “Emotional, Sensitive, and Unfit for Office? Gender Stereotype Activation and Support Female Candidates.” Political Psychology 36 (6): 691–708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, Nichole M. 2015b. “Who Stereotypes Female Candidates? Identifying Individual Differences in Feminine Stereotype Reliance.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 3 (1): 94–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock, J, J Byrd-Craven, and M Burkley. 2017. “The Role of Sexism in Voting in the 2016 Presidential Election.” Personality and Individual Differences 119: 189–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bracic, A, M Israel-Trummel, and A. F Shortle. 2018. “Is Sexism for White People? Gender Stereotypes, Race and the 2016 Presidential Election.” Political Behavior 41: 281–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brigham, John C. 1971. “Ethnic Stereotypes.” Psychological Bulletin 76 (1): 15.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, Deborah Jordan. 2013. He Runs, She Runs: Why Gender Stereotypes Do Not Harm Women Candidates. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burrell, Barbara. 1994. A Woman’s Place is in the House: Campaigning for Congress in the Feminist Era. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, James E. 2001. “Social Identity, Modern Sexism, and Perceptions of Personal and Group Discrimination by Women and Men.” Sex Roles 45 (11-12): 743–766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlin, Diana B., and Kelly L Winfrey. 2009. “Have You Come a Long Way, Baby? Hillary Clinton, Sarah Palin, and Sexism in 2008 Campaign Coverage.” Communication Studies 60 (4): 326–343.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, Susan J., and Kelly Dittmar. 2010. “The 2008 Candidacies of Hillary Clinton and Sarah Palin: Cracking the ‘Highest, Hardest Glass Ceiling’.” In Gender and Elections: Shaping the Future of American Politics, edited by Susan J. Carroll and Richard L. Fox, 44–47. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cassese, E. C, and T. D Barnes. 2018. “Reconciling Sexism and Women's Support for Republican Candidates: A Look at Gender, Class, and Whiteness in the 2012 and 2016 Presidential Races.” Political Behavior 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Cassese, E. C, and M. R Holman. 2019. “Playing the Woman Card: Ambivalent Sexism in the 2016 US Presidential Race.” US Presidential Race. Political Psychology 40 (1): 55–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, Elizabeth Adell, Sue Thomas, and Clyde Wilcox, eds. 1994. The Year of the Woman: Myths and Realities. Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Darcy, R. S., and S. S. Schramm. 1977. “When Women Run Against Men.” Public Opinion Quarterly 41 (1): 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devine, Patricia G. 1989. “Stereotypes and Prejudice: Their Automatic and Controlled Components.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56 (1): 5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ditonto, Tessa. 2017. “A High Bar or a Double Standard? Gender, Competence, and Information in Political Campaigns.” Political Behavior 39 (2): 301–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ditonto, T. 2019. “The Mediating Role of Information Search in the Relationship Between Prejudice and Voting Behavior.” Political Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12599.
   Google Scholar
• Ditonto, T. M., A. J. Hamilton, and D. P. Redlawsk. 2014. “Gender Stereotypes, Information Search and Voting Behavior in Political Campaigns.” Political Behavior 36 (2): 335–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolan, Kathleen. 2004. Voting for Women How the Public Evaluates Women Candidates. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dolan, Kathleen. 2014. When Does Gender Matter?: Women Candidates and Gender Stereotypes in American Elections. USA: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dwyer, Caitlin E., Daniel Stevens, John L. Sullivan, and Barbara Allen. 2009. “Racism, Sexism, and Candidate Evaluations in the 2008 US Presidential Election.” Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy 9 (1): 223–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., and I. Ajzen. 1975. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, R. L. 1997. Gender Dynamics in Congressional Elections. Vol. 2. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Frasure-Yokley, L. 2018. “Choosing the Velvet Glove: Women Voters, Ambivalent Sexism, and Vote Choice in 2016.” Journal of Race, Ethnicity and Politics 3 (1): 3–25.
   Google Scholar
• Gaertner, S., and F. Dovidio. 1986. “The Aversive Form of Racism.” In Prejudice, Discrimination, and Racism, edited by J. Dovidio and S. Gaertner, 61–89. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glick, P., and S. T. Fiske. 2001. “An Ambivalent Alliance: Hostile and Benevolent Sexism as Complementary Justifications for Gender Inequality.” American Psychologist 56 (2): 109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwald, Anthony G., Debbie E. McGhee, and Jordan L Schwartz. 1998. “Measuring Individual Differences in Implicit Cognition: The Implicit Association Test.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74 (6): 1464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, Danny. 2011. “When Gender and Party Collide: Stereotyping in Candidate Trait Attribution.” Politics & Gender 7 (02): 133–165.
   Google Scholar
• Heider, Fritz. 1958. The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Heldman, Caroline, Susan J. Carroll, and Stephanie Olson. 2005. “‘She Brought Only a Skirt’: Print Media Coverage of Elizabeth Dole's Bid for the Republican Presidential Nomination.” Political Communication 22 (3): 315–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holman, Mirya R., Jennifer L. Merolla, and Elizabeth J Zechmeister. 2011. “Sex, Stereotypes, and Security: A Study of the Effects of Terrorist Threat on Assessments of Female Leadership.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 32 (3): 173–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huddy, Leonie, and Theresa Capelos. 2002. “Gender Stereotyping and Candidate Evaluation.” In The Social Psychology of Politics, 29–53. Boston, MA: Springer US.
   Google Scholar
• Huddy, Leonie, and Nayda Terkildsen. 1993. “Gender Stereotypes and Perceptions of Male and Female Candidates.” American Journal of Political Science 37: 119–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, Kim Fridkin. 1992. “Does Being Male Help? An Investigation of the Effects of Candidate Gender and Campaign Coverage on Evaluations of US Senate Candidates.” The Journal of Politics 54 (02): 497–517.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, Kim Fridkiin. 1996. The Political Consquences of Being a Woman: How Stereotypes Influence the Conduct and Consequences of Political Campaigns. New York: Columbia.
   Google Scholar
• Koch, Jeffrey. 2000. “Do Citizens Apply Gender Stereotypes to Infer Candidates’ Ideological Orientations?” The Journal of Politics 62: 414–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, Richard R., and David P. Redlawsk. 1997. “Voting Correctly.” American Political Science Review 91: 585–598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, Richard R., and David P. Redlawsk. 2001. “Advantages and Disadvantages of Cognitive Heuristics in Political Decision-Making.” American Journal of Political Science 45: 951–971.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, Richard R., and David P. Redlawsk. 2006. How Voters Decide: Information Processing During Political Campaigns. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lau, Richard R., David P. Redlawsk, and David J. Andersen. 2008. “An Exploration of Correct Voting in Recent U.S. Presidential Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 52: 395–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawless, Jennifer L. 2004. “Women, War, and Winning Elections: Gender Stereotyping in the Post-September 11th Era.” Political Research Quarterly 57 (3): 479–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawless, Jennifer L., and Kathryn Pearson. 2008. “The Primary Reason for Women's Underrepresentation? Reevaluating the Conventional Wisdom.” The Journal of Politics 70 (01): 67–82.
   Google Scholar
• Lodge, M., K. M. McGraw, and P. Stroh. 1989. “An Impression-driven Model of Candidate Evaluation.” American Political Science Review 83 (2): 399–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matson, Marsha, and Terri Susan Fine. 2006. “Gender, Ethnicity, and Ballot Information: Ballot Cues in Low-Information Elections.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 6 (1): 49–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mo, Cecilia H. 2015. “The Consequences of Explicit and Implicit Gender Attitudes and Candidate Quality in the Calculations of Voters.” Political Behavior 37 (2): 357–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratliff, K. A, L Redford, J Conway, and C. T Smith. 2017. “Engendering Support: Hostile Sexism Predicts Voting for Donal Trump Over Hillary Clinton in the 2016 US Presidential Election.” Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 22 (4): 578–593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riggle, E. D., and M. M. Johnson. 1996. “Age Difference in Political Decision Making: Strategies for Evaluating Political Candidates.” Political Behavior 18 (1): 99–118.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, M. J. 1960. “Cognitive Reorganization in Response to the Hypnotic Reversal of Attitudinal Affect.” Journal of Personality 28: 39–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenwasser, Shirley M., and Jana Seale. 1988. “Attitudes Towards a Hypothetical Male or Female Presidential Candidate—A Research Note.”.” Political Psychology 9 (4): 591–598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudman, Laurie A., Anthony G. Greenwald, and Debbie E McGhee. 2001. “Implicit Self-Concept and Evaluative Implicit Gender Stereotypes: Self and Ingroup Share Desirable Traits.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 27 (9): 1164–1178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudman, Laurie A., and Stephen E Kilianski. 2000. “Implicit and Explicit Attitudes Toward Female Authority.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 26 (11): 1315–1328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanbonmatsu, Kira, and Kathleen Dolan. 2009. “Do Gender Stereotypes Transcend Party?” Political Research Quarterly 62 (3): 485–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaffner, Brian., Matthew MacWilliams, and Tatishe Nteta. 2018. “Understanding White Polarization in the 2016 Vote for President: The Sobering Role of Racism and Sexism.” Political Science Quarterly 133: 9–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, Monica, and Angela L Bos. 2014. “Measuring Stereotypes of Female Politicians.” Political Psychology 35 (2): 245–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, Monica C., and Angela L Bos. 2016. “The Interplay of Candidate Party and Gender in Evaluations of Political Candidates.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 37 (3): 274–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sears, David O. 1988. “Symbolic Racism.” In Eliminating Racism, 53–84. Boston, MA: Springer US.
   Google Scholar
• Seltzer, Richard, Jody Newman, and Melissa Voorhees Leighton. 1997. Sex as a Political Variable: Women as Candidates and Voters in US Elections. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Sobel, M. E. 1982. “Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models.” Sociological Methodology 13: 290–312.
   Google Scholar
• Spence, J. T., R. Helmreich, and J. Stapp. 1973. “A Short Version of the Attitudes Toward Women Scale (AWS).” Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 2 (4): 219–220.
   Google Scholar
• Swim, Janet K., Kathryn J. Aikin, Wayne S. Hall, and Barbara A Hunter. 1995. “Sexism and Racism: Old-Fashioned and Modern Prejudices.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 68 (2): 199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swim, Janet K., and Laurie L Cohen. 1997. “Overt, Covert, and Subtle Sexism a Comparison between the Attitudes Toward Women and Modern Sexism Scales.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 21 (1): 103–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swim, Janet K., Robyn Mallett, and Charles Stangor. 2004. “Understanding Subtle Sexism: Detection and Use of Sexist Language.” Sex Roles 51 (3-4): 117–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tougas, Francine, Rupert Brown, Ann M. Beaton, and Stephane Joly. 1995. “Neosexism: Plus ça Change, Plus C'est Pareil.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 21 (8): 842–849.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentino, N. A, C Wayne, and M Oceno. 2018. “Mobilizing Sexism: The Interaction of Emotion and Gender Attitudes in the 2016 US Presidential Election.” Public Opinion Quarterly 82 (S1): 799–821.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins, Marla B., Seth Kaplan, Arthur P. Brief, Amanda Shull, Joerg Dietz, Marie-Therese Mansfield, and Robin Cohen. 2006. “Does It Pay to be a Sexist? The Relationship Between Modern Sexism and Career Outcomes.” Journal of Vocational Behavior 69 (3): 524–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods, Harriet. 2000. Stepping Up to Power: The Political Journey of American Women. Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar