Diversity, consensus, and decision making: evidence from the U.S. Courts of Appeals

References

• Beim, Deborah, and Jonathan Kastellec. 2014. “The Interplay of Ideological Diversity, Dissents, and Discretionary Review in the Judicial Hierarchy: Evidence from Death Penalty Cases.” The Journal of Politics 76 (4): 1074–1088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benesh, Sara. 2006. “The Contribution of Extra Judges.” Arizona Law Review 48: 301–315.
   Google Scholar
• Block, Frederic. 2006. “Senior Status: An Active Senior Judge Corrects Some Common Misunderstandings.” Cornell Law Review 92: 533–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowie, Jennifer Barnes, Donald R. Songer, and John Szmer. 2014. The View from the Bench and Chambers: Examining Judicial Process and Decision Making on the U.S. Courts of Appeals. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, Christina L., and Adam G. Rutkowski. 2020. “Judicial Behavior in Disability Cases: Do Judge Sex and Race Matter?” Politics, Groups, and Identities.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, William J., Jr. 1985. “In Defense of Dissents.” Hastings Law Journal 37: 427–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, Marilynn B. 1999. “The Psychology of Prejudice: Ingroup Love and Outgroup Hate?” Journal of Social Issues 55 (3): 429–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caldeira, Gregory A., and Christopher J. W. Zorn. 1998. “Of Time and Consensual Norms in the Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science 43 (3): 874–902.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, Colin A., and Pravin K. Trivedi. 2010. Microeconometrics Using Stata. Rev ed. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chatman, Jennifer A., and Francis J. Flynn. 2001. “The Influence of Demographic Heterogeneity on the Emergence and Consequences of Cooperative Norms in Work Teams.” Academy of Management Journal 44 (5): 956–974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, Robert K., and John J. Szmer. 2012. “Examining the Efficiency of the U.S. Courts of Appeals: Pathologies and Prescriptions.” International Review of Law and Economics. doi:10.1016/j.irle.2011.12.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, Jonathan Matthew. 2002. Inside the Appellate Courts: The Impact of Court Organization on Judicial Decision Making in the United States Courts of Appeals. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Correll, Shelley J., and Cecilia L. Ridgeway. 2006. “Expectation States Theory.” In Handbook of Social Psychology, edited by John Delamater, 23–51. New York: Klewater Academic: Plenum Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Dovi, Suzanne. 2020. “Women ‘Doing’ the Judiciary: Rethinking the Justice Argument for Descriptive Representation.” Politics, Groups, and Identities.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, Lee, William M. Landes, and Richard A. Posner. 2011. “Why (and When) Judges Dissent: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Legal Analysis 3 (1): 101–137.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, Lee, William M. Landes, and Richard A. Posner. 2013. The Behavior of Federal Judges: A Theoretical & Empirical Study of Rational Choice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, Sheldon. 1997. Picking Federal Judges: Lower Court Selection from Roosevelt through Reagan. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haire, Susan B., and Laura P. Moyer. 2015. Diversity Matters: Judicial Policy Making in the U.S. Courts of Appeals. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haire, Susan, Laura Moyer, and Shawn Treier. 2013. “Diversity, Deliberation, and Judicial Opinion Writing.” Journal of Law and Courts 1 (3): 303–330.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, Allison. 2018. “Can Racial Diversity Among Judges Affect Sentencing Outcomes?” Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the MPSA, April 2018. Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, David, Kenneth H. Price, Joanne H. Gavin, and Anna T. Florey. 2002. “Times, Teams, and Task Performance: Changing Effects of Surface- and Deep-Level Diversity on Work Group Cohesion.” Academy of Management Journal 45: 1029–1045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazelton, Morgan, Rachael Hinkle, and Michael Nelson. 2017. “The Elevator Effect: How Collegiality Impacts Dissent.” Unpublished Manuscript. http://mjnelson.org/papers/HHN.Elevator.Effect.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hettinger, Virginia A., Stefanie A. Lindquist, and Wendy L. Martinek. 2006. Judging on a Collegial Court: Influences on Federal Appellate Decision Making. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hogg, Michael A., John C. Turner, and Barbara Davidson. 1990. “Polarized Norms and Social Frames of Reference: A Test of the Self-Categorization Theory of Group Polarization.” Basic and Applied Social Psychology 11 (1): 77–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooper, Laural, Dean Miletich, and Angelia Levy. 2011. Case Management Procedures in the Federal Courts of Appeals. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Federal Judicial Center.
   Google Scholar
• Janis, Irving L. 1972. Victims of Groupthink: A Psychological Study of Foreign-Policy Decisions and Fiascoes. 2nd ed. Boston, MA: Little Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Jehn, Karen A., and Elizabeth A. Mannix. 2001. “The Dynamic Nature of Conflict: A Longitudinal Study of Intragroup Conflict and Group Performance.” Academy of Management Journal 44 (2): 238–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jehn, Karen A., Gregory B. Northcraft, and Margaret A. Neale. 1999. “Why Differences Make a Difference: A Field Study of Diversity, Conflict and Performance in Workgroups.” Administrative Science Quarterly 44 (4): 741–763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, Carrie. 2018. “Trump Is Reshaping The Judiciary. A Breakdown by Race, Gender and Qualification.” NPR, November 15. Accessed January 27, 2019. https://www.npr.org/2018/11/15/667483587/trump-is-reshaping-the-judiciary-a-breakdown-by-race-gender-and-qualification.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, Alice, Miki Kittilson, Valerie Hoekstra, and Maria Escobar-Lemmon. 2020. “Diverse and Inclusive High Courts: A Global and Intersectional Perspective.” Politics, Groups, and Identities. doi:10.1080/21565503.2020.1782948.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpowitz, Christopher F., and Tali Mendelberg. 2014. The Silent Sex: Gender, Deliberation, and Institutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karpowitz, C., T. Mendelberg, and L. Shaker. 2012. “Gender Inequality in Deliberative Participation.” American Political Science Review 106 (3): 533–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, Eden B., Michelle R. Hebl, and Daniel J. Beal. 2009. “Conflict and Cooperation in Diverse Workgroups.” Journal of Social Issues 65 (2): 261–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick, Jennet. 2020. “Fairness Has a Face: Descriptive Representation and Neutrality on Courts.” Politics, Groups, & Identities.
   Google Scholar
• Lindquist, Stefanie A. 2007. “Bureaucratization and Balkanization: The Origins and the Effects of Decision-Making Norms in the Federal Appellate Courts.” University of Richmond Law Review 41: 659–706.
   Google Scholar
• Mannix, Elizabeth, and Margaret A. Neale. 2005. “What Differences Make a Difference? The Promise and Reality of Diverse Teams in Organizations.” Psychological Science in the Public Interest 6 (2): 31–55.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moyer, Laura. 2013. “Rethinking Critical Mass in the Federal Appellate Courts.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 34 (1): 49–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyer, Laura P., and Ellen M. Key. 2018. “Political Opportunism, Position Taking, and Court-Curbing Legislation.” Justice System Journal 39 (2): 155–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, Dana, and Joseph Smith. 2017. “Lawyer, Interrupted: Gender Bias in Oral Arguments at the US Supreme Court.” Journal of Law and Courts 5 (2): 337–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner, Richard. 1996. The Federal Courts: Challenge and Reform. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prasad, Pushkala, Judith K. Pringle, and Alison M. Konrad. 2006. “Examining the Contours of Workplace Diversity.” In Handbook of Workplace Diversity, edited by Pushkala Prasad, Judith K. Pringle, and Alison M. Konrad, 1–22. London, England: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rucker, Philip. 2013. “Obama Pushing to Diversify Federal Judiciary Amid GOP Delays.” Washington Post, March 3. Accessed January 25, 2019. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/obama-pushing-to-diversify-federal-judiciary-amid-gop-delays/2013/03/03/.
   Google Scholar
• Slotnick, Elliot E. 1983–1984. “The Paths to the Federal Bench: Gender, Race, and Judicial Recruitment Variation.” Judicature 67: 371–388.
   Google Scholar
• Slotnick, Elliot, Sheldon Goldman, and Sara Schiavoni. 2015. “Writing the Book of Judges: Part 1: Obama’s Judicial Appointments Record after Six Years.” Journal of Law and Courts 3 (2): 331–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, Henry, and John Turner. 1986. “The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior.” In Psychology of Intergroup Relations, edited by S. Worchel and W. G. Austin, 7–24. Chicago, IL: Nelson Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Tillman, Elizabeth A., and Rachael K. Hinkle. 2018. “Of Whites and Men: How Gender and Race Impact Authorship of Published and Unpublished Opinions in the US Courts of Appeals.” Research & Politics 5 (1): 1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobias, Carl. 2003. “Sixth Circuit Federal Judicial Selection.” University of California Davis Law Review 36: 721–755.
   Google Scholar
• Van Knippenberg, Daan, Carsten K. W. De Dreu, and Astrid C. Homan. 2004. “Work Group Diversity and Group Performance: An Integrative Model and Research Agenda.” Journal of Applied Psychology 89 (6): 1008–1021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, Albert. 2005. “As You Like It: Senior Federal Judges and the Political Economy of Judicial Tenure.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 2 (3): 495–549.
   Google Scholar