Undeserving rich or untrustworthy government? How elite rhetoric erodes support for soaking the rich

References

• Barber, B. 1983. The Logic and Limits of Trust. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bartels, L. M. 2008. Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Cappella, J. N., and K. H. Jamieson. 1997. Spiral of Cynicism: The Press and the Public Good. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carnes, N. 2013. White-collar Government: The Hidden Role of Class in Economic Policy Making. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, S. 1997. “Effects of Attention to Campaign Coverage on Political Trust.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 9 (3): 286–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyck, J. J. 2010. “Political Distrust and Conservative Voting in Ballot Measure Elections.” Political Research Quarterly 63: 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enns, P. K., N. J. Kelly, J. Morgan, T. Volscho, and C. Witko. 2014. “Conditional Status Quo Bias and Top Income Shares: How U.S. Political Institutions Have Benefited the Rich.” The Journal of Politics 76 (02): 289–303.
   Google Scholar
• Franko, W., C. J. Tolbert, and C. Witko. 2013. “Inequality, Self-interest, and Public Support for ‘Robin Hood’ Tax Policies.” Political Research Quarterly 66 (4): 923–937.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franko, W. W., and C. Witko. 2018. The New Economic Populism: How States Respond to Economic Inequality. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilens, M. 2012. Affluence and Influence: Economic Inequality and Political Power in America. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Hetherington, M. J. 1998. “The Political Relevance of Political Trust.” The American Political Science Review 92 (4): 791–808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hetherington, M. J. 2006. Why Trust Matters: Declining Political Trust and the Demise of American Liberalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hetherington, M J, and T Rudolph. 2015. Why Washington Won't Work: Polarization, Political Trust, and the Governing Crisis. University of Chicago Press
   Google Scholar
• Holmberg, S. 1999. “Down and Down We Go: Political Trust in Sweden.” In Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government, edited by P. Norris. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, A. M., and J. S. Matthews. 2017. “Policy Attitudes in Institutional Context: Rules, Uncertainty, and the Mass Politics of Public Investment.” American Journal of Political Science. 61(1): 194-207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluegel, J. R., and E. R. Smith. 1986. Beliefs About Inequality: Americans’ Views of What Is and What Ought to Be. New York, NY: A. de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Lau, R. R., and I. B. Rovner. 2009. “Negative Campaigning.” Annual Review of Political Science 12 (1): 285–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, R. R., L. Sigelman, C. Heldman, and P. Babbitt. 1999. “The Effects of Negative Political Advertisements: A Meta-analytic Assessment.” The American Political Science Review 93 (4): 851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCall, L. 2013. The Undeserving Rich: American Beliefs About Inequality, Opportunity, and Redistribution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mettler, S. 2011. The Submerged State: How Invisible Government Policies Undermine American Democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, A. H., and O. Listhaug. 1999. “Political Performance and Institutional Trust.” In Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government, edited by P. Norris. Oxford University Press. 204-216.
   Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. C. 2016. In-Your-Face Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Pres.
   Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. C., and B. Reeves. 2005. “The New Videomalaise: Effects of Televised Incivility on Political Trust.” American Political Science Review 99 (1): 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton, K. 1999. “Social and Political Trust.” In Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government, edited by P. Norris. Oxford University Press. 169-187.
   Google Scholar
• Norton, M. I., and D. Ariely. 2011. “Building a Better America—One Wealth Quintile at a Time.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 6 (1): 9–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, B. I., and L. R. Jacobs. 2009. Class War?: What Americans Really Think About Economic Inequality. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, T. E. 1994. Out of Order. New York, NY: Vintage Book.
   Google Scholar
• Piketty, T., and E. Saez. 2007. “How Progressive is the U.S. Federal Tax System? A Historical and Institutional Perspective.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 21 (1): 2–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piston, S. 2018. Class Attitudes in America: Sympathy for the Poor, Resentment of the Rich, and Political Implications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schlozman, K. L., S. Verba, and H. E. Brady. 2012. The Unheavenly Chorus: Unequal Political Voice and the Broken Promise of American Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, I. 2002. “Why the Poor Don’t Soak the Rich.” Daedalus 131 (1): 118–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sides, J. 2016. “Stories or Science? Facts, Frames, and Policy Attitudes.” American Politics Research 44 (3): 387–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorson, E., E. Ognianova, J. Coyle, and F. Denton. 2000. “Negative Political Ads and Negative Citizen Orientations Toward Politics.” Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising 22 (1): 13–40.
   Google Scholar
• Tolbert, C. J., C. Witko, and C. Wolbers. 2019. “Public Support for Higher Taxes on the Wealthy: California’s Proposition 30.” Politics and Governance 7 (2): 351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentino, N. A., M. N. Beckmann, and T. A. Buhr. 2001. “A Spiral of Cynicism for Some: The Contingent Effects of Campaign News Frames on Participation and Confidence in Government.” Political Communication 18 (4): 347–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar