In-group interest cues do not change issue attitudes

References

• Andersen, J. G. 1992. “Sources of Welfare-State Support in Denmark: Self-Interest or Way of Life?” International Journal of Sociology 22 (4): 25–48.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, T. D., and E. C. Cassese. 2017. “American Party Women: A Look at the Gender Gap Within Parties.” Political Research Quarterly 70 (1): 127–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartels, L. M. 2005. “Homer Gets a Tax Cut: Inequality and Public Policy in the American Mind.” Perspectives on Politics 3 (1): 15–31.
   Google Scholar
• Betsch, C., C. Ulshöfer, F. Renkewitz, and T. Betsch. 2011. “The Influence of Narrative v. Statistical Information on Perceiving Vaccination Risks.” Medical Decision Making 31 (5): 742–753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bittner, A., and E. Goodyear-Grant. 2017. “Digging Deeper Into the Gender Gap: Gender Salience as a Moderating Factor in Political Attitudes.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 50 (2): 559–578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolsen, T., and T. J. Leeper. 2013. “Self-Interest and Attention to News among Issue Publics.” Political Communication 30 (3): 329–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, N., and D. Kinder. 2012. “Categorical Politics: Gender, Race, and Public Opinion.” In New Directions in Public Opinion, edited by Adam J. Berinsky, 151–179. Milton Park: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Converse, P. E. 1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In Ideology and Discontent, edited by D. E. Apter, 207–261. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, M. C. 1994. Behind the Mule: Race and Class in African-American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gallup. 2018. “In U.S., Estimate of LGBT Population Rises to 4.5.” https://news.gallup.com/ poll/234863/estimate-lgbt-population-rises.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Green, E. G., C. Staerkle, and D. O. Sears. 2006. “Symbolic Racism and Whites’ Attitudes Towards Punitive and Preventive Crime Policies.” Law and Human Behavior 30 (4): 435–454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haider-Markel, D. P., and P. R. Miller. 2017. “Equality or Transformation? LGBT Political Attitudes and Priorities and the Implications for.” In LGBTQ Politics: A Critical Reader. Vol. 3, edited by Marla Brettschneider, Susan Burgess, and Christine Keating , 270–294. New York, NY: NYU Press .
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, B. F., and M. R. Michelson. 2017. Listen, We Need to Talk: How to Change Attitudes About LGBT Rights. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins, D. J. 2018. The Increasingly United States: How and Why American Political Behavior Nationalized. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huddy, L., E. Cassese, and M.-K. Lizotte. 2008. Gender, Public Opinion, and Political Reasoning. 31–49. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jardina, A. 2019. White Identity Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kam, C. D., and D. R. Kinder. 2007. “Terror and Ethnocentrism: Foundations of American Support for the War on Terrorism.” The Journal of Politics 69 (2): 320–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinder, D. R. 1998. “Opinion and Action in the Realm of Politics.” In The Handbook of Social Psychology, edited by Daniel Todd Gilbert, Susan T. Fiske, Gardner Lindzey, 778–867. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Krosnick, J. A. 1990. “Government Policy and Citizen Passion: A Study of Issue Publics in Contemporary America.” Political Behavior 12 (1): 59–92.
   Google Scholar
• Leach, C. W., M. Van Zomeren, S. Zebel, M. L. Vliek, S. F. Pennekamp, B. Doosje, J. W. Ouwerkerk, and R. Spears. 2008. “Group-level Self-Definition and Self-Investment: A Hierarchical (Multicomponent) Model of in-Group Identification.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 95 (1): 144–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lizotte, M. K. 2017. “The Gender Gap in Public Opinion.” In The Political Psychology of Women in US Politics, edited by Angela L. Bos and Monica C. Schneider, 51–69. Milton Park: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, T. E., and D. R. Kinder. 1996. “Issue Frames and Group-Centrism in American Public Opinion.” The Journal of Politics 58 (4): 1055–1078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rainey, C. 2014. “Arguing for a Negligible Effect.” American Journal of Political Science 58 (4): 1083–1091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez, G. R., and E. D. Vargas. 2016. “Taking a Closer Look at Group Identity: The Link between Theory and Measurement of Group Consciousness and Linked Fate.” Political Research Quarterly 69 (1): 160–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sears, D. O., R. R. Lau, T. R. Tyler, and H. M. Allen. 1980. “Self-interest vs. Symbolic Politics in Policy Attitudes and Presidential Voting.” American Political Science Review 74 (3): 670–684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., M. G. Billig, R. P. Bundy, and C. Flament. 1971. “Social Categorization and Intergroup Behaviour.” European Journal of Social Psychology 1 (2): 149–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, I. K., and C. N. Laird. 2020. Steadfast Democrats: How Social Forces Shape Black Political Behavior, Volume 19. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winter, N. J. 2006. “Beyond Welfare: Framing and the Racialization of White Opinion on Social Security.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (2): 400–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, N. J. 2008. Dangerous Frames: How Ideas About Race and Gender Shape Public Opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar