The actorhood imperative. On universities as organisational actors

References

• Alasuutari, Pertti. 2015. “The Discursive Side of New Institutionalism.” Cultural Sociology 9 (2): 162–184. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975514561805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alasuutari, Pertti, and Ali Qadir. 2014. “Epistemic Governance: an Approach to the Politics of Policy-Making.” European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology 1 (1): 67–84. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23254823.2014.887986
   Google Scholar
• Bieletzki, Nadja. 2018. The Power of Collegiality. A Qualitative Analysis of University Presidents’ Leadership in Germany. Wiesbaden: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bleiklie, Ivar, Jürgen Enders, and Benedetto Lepori. 2015. “Organizations as Penetrated Hierarchies: Environmental Pressures and Control in Professional Organizations.” Organization Studies 36 (7): 873–896. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840615571960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloch, Roland. 2021. “Performing Size. On the Effects of ‘Critical Mass’ in Science.” Globalisation, Societies and Education, 1–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2021.1992751
   Google Scholar
• Bloch, Roland, and Alexander Mitterle. 2017. “On Stratification in Changing Higher Education: the ‘Analysis of Status’ Revisited.” Higher Education 73 (6): 929–946. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0113-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloch, Roland, Alexander Mitterle, Catherine Paradeise, and Tobias Peter. 2018. Universities and the Production of Elites. Discourses, Policies, and Strategies of Excellence and Stratification in Higher Education. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bloch, Roland, Catherine O’Connell, Jakob Hartl, and O’Siochru. 2021. English and German academics’ perspectives on metrics in higher education: evaluating dimensions of fairness and organisational justice. Higher Education, accepted for publication 1 March 2021, https://rdcu.be/ckEDE.
   Google Scholar
• Boxenbaum, Eva, and Stefan Jonsson. 2008. “Isomorphism, Diffusion and Decoupling.” In The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, edited by Royston Greenwood, 78–98. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bröckling, Ulrich, Susanne Krasmann, and Thomas Lemke. 2011. “From Foucault’s Lectures at the Collège de France to Studies of Governmentality: An Introduction.” In Governmentality. Current Issues and Future Challenges, edited by Ulrich Bröckling, Susanne Krasmann, and Thomas Lemke, 1–33. New York, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bromley, Patricia, and John W. Meyer. 2015. Hyper-organization. Global Organizational Expansion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bromley, Patricia, and John W. Meyer. 2021. “Hyper-Management: Neoliberal Expansions of Purpose and Leadership.” Organization Theory 2 (3): 1–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877211020327
   Google Scholar
• Brunsson, Nils, and Kerstin Sahlin-Andersson. 2000. “Constructing Organizations: The Example of Public Sector Reform.” Organization Studies 21 (4): 721–746. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840600214003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drori, Gili S., and John W. Meyer. 2006. “Global Scientization. In Globalization and Organization.” In World Society and Organizational Change, edited by Gili S. Drori, John W. Meyer, and Hokyu Hwang, 50–68. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Drori, Gili S., John W. Meyer, and Hokyu Hwang. 2009. “Global Organization: Rationalization and Actorhood as Dominant Scripts.” In Institutions and Ideology, edited by Renate E. Meyer, Kerstin Sahlin-Andersson, Marc J. Ventresca, and Peter Walgenbach, 17–43. Emerald: Bingley.
   Google Scholar
• Elken, Mari, and Trude Røsdal. 2017. “Professional Higher Education Institutions as Organizational Actors.” Tertiary Education and Management 23 (4): 376–387. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2017.1371217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enders, Jürgen, Harry De Boer, and Elke Weyer. 2013. “Regulatory Autonomy and Performance. The Reform of Higher Education re-Visited.” Higher Education 65 (1): 5–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9578-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espeland, Wendy Nelson, and Michael Sauder. 2007. “Rankings and Reactivity. How Public Measures Recreate Social Worlds.” American Journal of Sociology 113 (1): 1–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/517897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. 1993. “About the Beginning of the Hermeneutics of the Self: Two Lectures at Dartmouth.” Political Theory 21 (2): 198–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. 1997. “Technologies of the Self.” In Michel Foucault. Ethics. Subjectivity and Truth, edited by Paul Rabinow, 223–251. New York: The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. 2000a. "Governmentality." In Michel Foucault. Power, edited by James D. Faubion, 201–22. New York: New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. 2000b. “The Subject and Power.” In Michel Foucault. Power, edited by James D. Faubion, 326–348. New York: The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. 2000c. “Questions of Method.” In Michel Foucault. Power, edited by James D. Faubion, 223–238. New York: The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frølich, Nicoline, Tom Christensen, and Bjørn Stensaker. 2019. “Strengthening the Strategic Capacity of Public Universities: The Role of Internal Governance Models.” Public Policy and Administration 34 (4): 475–493. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076718762041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frølich, Nicoline, Jeroen Huisman, Stig Slipersæter, Bjørn Stensaker, and Paulo Charles Pimentel Bótas. 2013. “A Reinterpretation of Institutional Transformations in European Higher Education. Strategising Pluralistic Organisations in Multiplex Environments.” Higher Education 65 (1): 79–93. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9582-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frølich, Nicoline, Bjørn Stensaker, and Jeroen Huisman. 2017. “Understanding Strategy Practices in Universities.” In Managing Universities: Policy and Organizational Change from a Western European Comparative Perspective, edited by Ivar Bleiklie, Jürgen Enders, and Benedetto Lepori, 167–188. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Fumasoli, Tatiana, Giovanni Barbato, and Matteo Turri. 2020. “The Determinants of University Strategic Positioning: a Reappraisal of the Organisation.” Higher Education 80 (2): 305–334. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00481-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fumasoli, Tatiana, and Jeroen Huisman. 2013. “Strategic Agency and System Diversity: Conceptualizing Institutional Positioning in Higher Education.” Minerva 51 (2): 155–169. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-013-9225-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, Royston, C. R. Hinings, and Dave Whetten. 2014. “Rethinking Institutions and Organizations.” Journal of Management Studies 51 (7): 1206–1220. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasse, Raimund, and Georg Krücken. 2013. “Competition and Actorhood: A Further Expansion of the Neo-Institutional Agenda.” Sociologia Internationalis 51 (2): 181–205. doi:https://doi.org/10.3790/sint.51.2.181
   Google Scholar
• Hazelkorn, Ellen. 2009. “Rankings and the Battle for World-Class Excellence.” Higher Education Management and Policy 21 (1): 1–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1787/hemp-v21-art4-en
   Google Scholar
• Hüther, Otto, and Georg Krücken. 2016. “Nested Organizational Fields: Isomorphism and Differentiation among European Universities.” In The University Under Pressure, edited by Elizabeth Popp Berman, and Catherine Paradeise, 53–88. Emerald: Bingley.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, Hokyu, Jeannette A. Colyvas, and Gili S. Drori. 2019. “The Proliferation and Profusion of Actors in Institutional Theory.” In Agents, Actors, Actorhood. Institutional Perspectives on the Nature of Agency, edited by Hokyu Hwang, Jeannette A. Colyvas, and Gili S. Drori, 3–20. Emerald: Bingley.
   Google Scholar
• King, Brayden G., Teppo Felin, and David A. Whetten. 2010. “Finding the Organization in Organizational Theory: A Meta-Theory of the Organization as a Social Actor.” Organization Science 21 (1): 290–305. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosmützky, Anna. 2016. “Mission Statements and the Transformation of German Universities Into Organizational Actors.” Recherches Sociologiques & Anthropologiques 47 (1): 41–66.
   Google Scholar
• Krücken, Georg. 2019. “Multiple Competitions in Higher Education: a Conceptual Approach.” Innovation 23(2), 163–181. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2019.1684652
   Google Scholar
• Krücken, Georg, and Frank Meier. 2006. “Turning the University Into an Organizational Actor.” In Globalization and Organization. World Society and Organizational Changem, edited by Gili S. Drori, John W. Meyer, and Hokyu Hwang, 241–257. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lounsbury, Michael. 2008. “Institutional Rationality and Practice Variation: New Directions in the Institutional Analysis of Practice.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 33 (4–5): 349–361. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2007.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, John W. 1996. “Otherhood: The Promulgation and Transmission of Ideas in the Modern Organizational Environment.” In Translating Organizational Change, edited by Barbara Czarniawska, and Guje Sevón, 241–252. Berlin: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, John W. 2008. “Reflections on Institutional Theories of Organizations.” In The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, edited by Royston Greenwood, 790–812. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, John W. 2010. “World Society, Institutional Theories, and the Actor.” Annual Review of Sociology 36 (1): 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, John W. 2017. Afterword: Fragmented Organizations in the Society of Organizations. In New Themes in Institutional Analysis: Topics and Issues from European Research, edited by Georg Krücken, Carmelo Mazza, Renate E. Meyer, and Peter Walgenbach, 426–34. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, John W. 2019. “Reflections on Rationalization, Actors, and Others.” In Agents, Actors, Actorhood. Institutional Perspectives on the Nature of Agency, edited by Hokyu Hwang, Jeannette A. Colyvas, and Gili S. Drori, 275–285. Emerald: Bingley.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, John W., John Boli, and George M. Thomas. 1994. “Ontology and Rationalization in the Western Cultural Account.” In Institutional Environments and Organizations. Structural Complexity and Individualism, edited by W. Richard Scott, and John W. Meyer, 9–27. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, John W., Gili S. Drori, and Hokyu Hwang. 2006. “World Society and the Proliferation of Formal Organization.” In Globalization and Organization. World Society and Organizational Change, edited by Gili S. Drori, John W. Meyer, and Hokyu Hwang, 25–49. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, Renate E., and Markus A. Höllerer. 2014. “Does Institutional Theory Need Redirecting?” Journal of Management Studies 51 (7): 1221–1233. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, John W., and Ronald L. Jepperson. 2000. “The “Actors” of Modern Society: The Cultural Construction of Social Agency.” Sociological Theory 18 (1): 100–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, John W., and Brian Rowan. 1977. “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony.” American Journal of Sociology 83 (2): 340–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitterle, Alexander, Carsten Würmann, and Roland Bloch. 2015. “Teaching Without Faculty. Policy Interactions and Their Effects on the Network of Teaching in German Higher Education.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 36 (4): 560–577. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2015.980489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paradeise, Catherine, Emanuela Reale, Ivar Bleiklie, and Ewan Ferlie. 2009. University Governance. Western European Comparative Perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, Jesper Strandgaard, and Frank Dobbin. 1997. “The Social Invention of Collective Actors.” American Behavioral Scientist 40 (4): 431–443. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764297040004006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez, Francisco O. 2006. “The Rationalization of Universities.” In Transnational Governance. Institutional Dynamics of Regulation, edited by Marie-Laure Djelic, and Kerstin Sahlin-Andersson, 225–244. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ramirez, Francisco O. 2010. “Accounting for Excellence: Transforming Universities Into Organizational Actors.” In Higher Education, Policy, and the Global Competition Phenomenon, edited by Laura M. Portnoi, Val Dean Rust, and Sylvia S. Bagley, 43–58. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Rostan, Michele, and Massimiliano Vaira. 2011. “Structuring The Field Of Excellence.” In Questioning Excellence in Higher Education, edited by Michele Rostan, and Massimiliano Vaira, 57–74. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Samiolo, Rita. 2017. “Accounting, Actorhood and Actors: A Comment on: Casting Call: The Expanding Nature of Actorhood in U.S. Firms, 1960–2010 by Patricia Bromley and Amanda Sharkey.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 59: 21–26. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2017.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strang, David, and John W. Meyer. 1993. “Institutional Conditions for Diffusion.” Theory and Society 22 (4): 487–511. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00993595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thoenig, Jean-Claude, and Catherine Paradeise. 2016. “Strategic Capacity and Organisational Capabilities: A Challenge for Universities.” Minerva 54 (3): 293–324. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-016-9297-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thoenig, Jean-Claude, and Catherine Paradeise. 2018. “Higher Education Institutions as Strategic Actors.” European Review 26 (S1): S57–S69. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1062798717000540
   Google Scholar
• Whitley, Richard. 2008. “Universities as Strategic Actors: Limitations and Variations.” In The University in the Market. Proceedings from a Symposium Held in Stockholm, 1-3 November 2007, edited by Lars Engwall, and D. L. Weaire, 23–37. London: Portland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whitley, Richard. 2012. “Transforming Universities. National Conditions of Their Varied Organisational Actorhood.” Minerva 50 (4): 493–510. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-012-9215-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitley, Richard, and Jochen Gläser. 2014. “The Impact of Institutional Reforms on the Nature of Universities as Organisations.” In Organizational Transformation and Scientific Change: the Impact of Institutional Restructuring on Universities and Intellectual Innovation, edited by Richard Whitley, and Jochen Gläser, 19–49. Bingley: Emerald.
   Google Scholar