When emotions count in construction of interview data

References

• Austin, J. 1956. “A Plea for Excuses.” In Proceedings of the Aristolelian Society, 1956–57. Transcribed into hypertext by Andrew Chrucky. Accessed August 23, 2004. http://sammelpunkt.philo.at:8080/1309/1/plea.html.
   Google Scholar
• Behar, R. 1996. The Vulnerable Observer: Anthropology that Breaks Your Heart. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, E. C., and M. L. Shepherd. 2011. “Ethical Reflections: Examining Reflexivity through the Narrative Paradigm.” Qualitative Health Research 21: 1283–1294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., L. J. D. Wacquant, and B. K. Nicolaysen. 1993. Den kritiske ettertanke: grunnlag for samfunnsanalyse [Original title: Résponses. Pour une anthropologie réflexive.]. Oslo: Samlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Brecht, Bertolt. 1999. The Caucasian Chalk Circle. Translated by Eric Bentley. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burkitt, I. 1997. “Social Relationships and Emotions.” Sociology 31 (1): 37–55.
   Google Scholar
• Buttny, Richard. 1993. Social Accountability in Communication. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Coffey, Amanda, and Paul Atkinson. 1996. Making Sense of Qualitative Data Complementary Research Strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cylwik, H. 2001. “Notes from the Field: Emotions of Place in the Production and Interpretation of Text.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 4 (3): 243–250. http://www.informaworld.com/10.1080/13645570110057924.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, Norman K. 1999. “Evaluating Qualitative Research in the Poststructural Moment: The Lessons James Joyce Teaches us.” In Qualitative Research Volume III, edited by A. Bryman and R. G. Burgess, 311–329. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, S. 2012. “Reflexivity and the Capacity to Think.” Qualitative Health Research. http://qhr.sagepub.com/content/early/2012/11/29/1049732312467854.
   Google Scholar
• Ezzy, D. 2010. “Qualitative Interviewing as an Embodied Emotional Performance.” Qualitative Inquiry 16: 163–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flemmen, A. B., and S. H. Eriksen. 2009. “Detour to Knowledge – Meeting Strangers through Interpreters.” In Det hjemlige og det globale [The Domestic and the Global]. Festschrift for Randi Rønning Balsvik, edited by Einar Niemi and Christine Smith-Simonsen, 274–288. Oslo: Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Game, A. 1997. “Sociology’s Emotions.” The Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology 34 (4): 385–399.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, J. 2007. “Emotions and Research.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 10 (3): 195–209. http://www.informaworld.com/10.1080/13645570701541894.
   Google Scholar
• Holloway, I., and F. C. Biley. 2011. “Being a Qualitative Researcher.” Qualitative Health Research 21: 968–975.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holstein, James A., and Jaber F. Gubrium. 2003. Inside Interviewing: New Lenses, New Concerns. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Holtan, A. 2008. “Family Types and Social Integration in Kinship Foster Care.” Children and Youth Services Review 30: 1022–1036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtan, A., and S. H. Eriksen. 2006. “The Brittle Attraction: Women Deprived of the Custody of Children.” International Journal of Child and Family Welfare 9 (3): 178–191.
   Google Scholar
• Hubbard, G., K. Backett-Milburn, and D. Kemmer. 2001. “Working with Emotion: Issues for the Researcher in Fieldwork and Teamwork.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 4 (2): 119–137. http://www.informaworld.com/10.1080/13645570116992.
   Google Scholar
• James, Allison, Chris Jenks, and Alan Prout. 1998. Theorizing Childhood. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Järvinen, M. 2001. “Accounting for Trouble: Identity Negotiations in Qualitative Interviews with Alcoholics.” Symbolic Interaction 24 (3): 263–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Järvinen, M. 2005. “Intervju i en interaksjonistisk begrepsramme” [Interview in a Conceptual Framework of Interactionism]. In Kvalitative metoder i et interasksjonistisk perspektiv: interview, observasjoner og dokumenter [Qualitative Methods in a Perspective of Interactionism: Interview, Observation and Document], edited by M. Järvinen and N. Mik-Meyer, 27–49. København: Reitzel.
   Google Scholar
• Knowles, C. 2006. “Handling your Baggage in the Field: Reflections on Research Relationships.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 9 (5): 393–404. http://www.informaworld.com/10.1080/13645570601076819.
   Google Scholar
• Lee-Treweek, G., and S. Linkogle. 2000. Danger in the Field – Risk and Ethics in Social Research. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, Peter, and Gill Crow. 1998. Family Group Conferences in Child Welfare. Oxford: Blackwell Science.
   Google Scholar
• Melrose, M. 2002. “Labour Pains: Some Considerations on the Difficulties of Researching Juvenile Prostitution.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 5 (4): 333–351.http://www.informaworld.com/10.1080/13645570110045963.
   Google Scholar
• Riessman, C. 2003. “Analysis of Personal Narratives.”Chap. 16 In Inside Interviewing New Lenses, New Concerns, edited by James A. Holstein and Jaber F. Gubrium, 331–334. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Skivenes, M., and A. Strandbu. 2006. “A Child Perspective and Children’s Participation.” Children Youth and Environments 16 (2): 10–27.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, Jonathan H. 2005. The Sociology of Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins, R. 1993. “Taking It Personally: A Note on Emotion and Autobiography.” Sociology 27 (1): 93–100.
   Google Scholar
• Young, E., and R. Lee. 1996. “Fieldworker Feelings as Data: ‘Emotion Work’ and ‘Feeling Rules’ in the First Person Accounts of Sociological Fieldwork.” In Health and the Sociology of Emotions, edited by V. James and J. Gabe, 97–114. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar