Evidence and research designs in applied sociology and social work research

References

• Adorno, T. W. 1957. “Sociologi og empirisk forskning [Sociology and Empirical Research].” In Det videnskabelige perspektiv [The Scientific Perspective], edited by L-H. Schmidt, 291–312. Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Albæk, E. 1988. Fra sandhed til information – evalueringsforskning i USA – før og nu [From Truth to Information – Evaluations i USA in the Past and Today]. Copenhagen: Akademisk forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, M. J., M. Fisher, and L. Uggerhøj. 2014. “Helsinki Statement on Social Work Practice Research.” Nordic Social Work Research 4: 7–13.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z. 1989. Modernity and the Holocaust. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Beveridge, J. 1954. Beveridge and His Plan. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
   Google Scholar
• Börjeson, M., and K. Johansson. 2014. “In Search for a Model for Knowledge Production and Practice Research in Swedish Social Work.” Nordic Social Work Research 4: 70–85. 10.1080/2156857X.2014.938686
   Google Scholar
• Burawoy, M. 2005. “For Public Sociology.” American Sociological Review 70: 4–28. 10.1177/000312240507000102
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. 1978. “Qualitative Knowing in Action Research.” In The Social Contexts of Method, edited by P. Brenner and M. Brenner, 184–209. London: Croom Helm.
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, I. 2003. “Trying to do More Good than Harm in Policy and Practice: The Role of Rigorous, Transparent, Up-to-Date Evaluations.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 589: 22–40. 10.1177/0002716203254762
   Google Scholar
• Dean, M. 1999. Governmentality – Power and Rule in Modern Society. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ekeland, T.-J. 2005. “Kvalitetssikring eller instrumentalistisk fejlgreb.” [Obtaining Quality or an Instrumental Failure.] Social Kritik 17 (102): 34–47.
   Google Scholar
• Fetterman, D. M., S. J. Kaftarian, and A. Wandersman. 1996. Empowerment Evalutation – Knowledge and Tools for Self-Assessment & Accountability. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, H., and O. Rieper. 2009. “The Evidence Movement: The Development and Consequences of Methodologies in Review Practices.” Evaluation 15 (2): 141–163. 10.1177/1356389008101968
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1980. Power/Knowledge – Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977. London: Harvester Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fritz, J. M. 1991. “The Emergence of American Clinical Sociology.” In Handbook of Clinical Sociology, edited by H. M. Rebach and J. G. Bruhn, 17–30. London: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gadamer, H.-G. 1989. Truth and Method. London: Sheed & Ward, The Crossword Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures – Selected Essays by Clifford Geertz. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. 1963. Stigma. Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. New Jersey, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Guba, E. G., and Y. S. Lincoln. 1989. Fourth Generation Evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1981. Theorie des Kommunikativen Handelns [Theory of Communicative Action]. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M. 2005. “Is the Evidence-based Practice Movement Doing More Good than Harm? Reflections on Iain Chalmers’ Case for Research-based Policy Making and Practice.” Evidens & Policy 1 (1): 85–100.
   Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M., and P. Atkinson. 2007. Ethnography – Principles in Practice. 3rd ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hannerz, U. 1980. Exploring the City. Inquiries Toward an Urban Antropology. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hede, A., and D. Andersen. 2005. Virker velfærden? – Et debatoplæg om evidens og velfærd. [Does the Welfare Work? A Discussion Paper on Evidence and Welfare]. København: Mandag Morgen.
   Google Scholar
• Høgsbro, K. 2004. “Procesevaluering.” [Proces Evaluation.] In Håndbog i Evaluering, edited by O. Rieper, 66–80. København: AKF.
   Google Scholar
• Høgsbro, K. 2007. ETIBA – en forskningsbaseret evaluering af rehabiliterings – og træningsindsatsen for børn med autisme [ETIBA – A Research Based Evaluation of the Rehabilitation and Training of Preschool Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders]. Copenhagen: AKF.
   Google Scholar
• Høgsbro, K. 2012. “Social Policy and Self-help in Denmark – A Foucauldian Perspektive.” International Journal of Self Help & Self Care 6 (1): 43–64.
   Google Scholar
• Høgsbro K. 2013. “Evidenslogik og praktisk erfaring indenfor rehabilitering.” [The Logic of Evidence and Practical Experiances from Rehabilitation Programs.] In Handicapforståelser, edited by I. S. Bonfils, B. Kirkebæk, L. Olsen, and S. Tetler, 119–134. København: Akademisk Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Høgsbro, K., H. Pruijt, N. Pokrovsky, and G. Tsobanoglou. 2009. “Sociological Practice and the Sociotechnics of Governance.” In The New ISA Handbook of Contemporary Sociology: Conflict, Competition, Cooperation, edited by A. Denis and D. K. Fishman, 42–57. London: SAGE/ISA.
   Google Scholar
• Järvinen, M., and N. Mik-Meyer. 2003. At skabe en klient – institutionelle identiteter og socialt arbejde [Creating a Client – Institutional Identities and Social Work]. København: Hans Reitzel.
   Google Scholar
• Koch, L. 1996. Racehygiejne i Danmark 1920–56 [Eugenics in Denmark 1920–56]. København: Gyldendal.
   Google Scholar
• Konnerup, M. 2005. “De gode viljers utilstrækkelighed – virkning, evidens og socialt arbejde.” [The Limits of the Good Will – Impact, Evidens and Social Work.] In Empiri, Evidens, Empati – Nordiska Röster om Kunskapsutvikling i Socialt Arbejde, edited by S. Ljunggren, 116–135: Copenhagen: NOPUS.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, P. 1971. Road Belong Cargo – A Study of the Cargo Movement in the Southern Madang District of New Guinea. London: Butler & Tanner.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarsfeld, P. F., and J. G. Reitz. 1975. An Introduction to Applied Sociology. Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, I. 2004. Hva er Socialt Arbeid [What is Social Work]? Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, R., and M. Fink. 2006. “The Case Against Evidence Based Principles in Psychiatry.” Medical Hypotheses 67: 401–410. 10.1016/j.mehy.2006.02.025
   Google Scholar
• Lévi-Strauss, C. 1963. Structural Anthropology. Middlesex: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lindblom, C. E., and D. K. Cohen. 1979. Usable Knowledge – Social Science and Social Problem Solving. London: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R., and N. Tilley. 1997. Realistic Evaluation. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, M. 2007. “Systematic Reviews in Social Policy: To go Forward, Do We First Need to Look Back?” Evidens & Policy 3 (4): 505–526.
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, O. K. 2011. Konkurrencestaten [The Competitive State]. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Podgórecki, A. 1996. “Sociotechnics: Basic Concepts and Issues.” In Social Engineering, edited by A. Podgórecki, J. Alexander, and R. Shields, 23–57. Ottawa, ON: Carleton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prince, M. 2001. “How Social is Social Policy? Fiscal and Mardet Discourse in North American Welfare States.” Social Policy and Administration 35 (1): 2–13.
   Google Scholar
• Sbordone, R. J. 1998. “Ecological Validity: Some Critical Issues for the Neuropsychologist.” In Ecological Validity of Neuropsychological Testing, edited by R. J. Sbordone and C. J. Long, 15–41. New York, NY: St. Lucie Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schutz, A., and T. Luckmannn. 1989. The Structures of the Life-world. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simons, H. 2004. “Utilizing Evaluation Evidence to Enhance Professional Practice.” Evaluation 10 (4): 410–429. 10.1177/1356389004050284
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. 2005. Institutional Ethnography – A Sociology for People. Toronto: AltaMira.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. 2006. Institutional Ethnography as Practice. Toronto: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, C. 2007. Sociologies of Disability and Illness. New York, NY: Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Uggerhøj, L. 2014. “Learning from Each Other: Collaboration Processes in Practice Research.” Nordic Social Work Research 4: 44–57. 10.1080/2156857X.2014.928647
   Google Scholar
• Ventimiglia, J. A., J. Marschke, P. Carmichael, and R. Loew. 2000. “How do Clinicians Evaluate their Practice Effectiveness? A Survey of Clinical Social Workers.” Smith College Studies in Social Work 70: 287–306. 10.1080/00377310009517593
   Google Scholar
• Webb, S. A. 2001. “Some Considerations on the Validity of Evidence-based practice in Social Work.” British Journal of Social Work 31: 57–79. 10.1093/bjsw/31.1.57
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. 1904. “Die ‘Objectivität’ Sozialwissenschaftlicher und Sozialpolitischer Erkenntnis [The Objectivity of the Realization of Social Research and Social Policy].” In Max Weber. Udvalgte Tekster, edited by H. Andersen, H. H. Bruun, and L. B. Kaspersen, 65–127. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, C. H. 1972. Evaluation Research – Methods of Assessing Program Effectiveness. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar