The theoretical foundation of social case work

References

• Agnew, Elizabeth. 2004. From Charity to Social Work: Mary E. Richmond and the Creation of an American Profession. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berelman, William C. 1968. “Mary Richmond’s Social Diagnosis in Retrospect.” Social Casework, July: 395–402.
   Google Scholar
• Brante, Thomas. 2003. Om konstitueringen av nya vetenskapliga fält - exemplet i socialt arbete [About the Constitution of New Scientific Fields – The Example of Social Work]. Høgskoleverkets rapportserie 2003: 16R.
   Google Scholar
• Burnham, David. 2011. “Selective Memory: A Note on Social Work Histography.” British Journal of Social Work 41: 5–21.
   Google Scholar
• Cornell, Kathryn L. 2006. “Person-in-situation: History, Theory, and New Directions for Social Work Practice.” Praxis 6 (Fall 2006): 50–57.
   Google Scholar
• Dahle, Rannveig. 1992. Å kunne litt av hvert [Knowing Something About Most Things]. Nytt om kvinneforskning 2/92: 16–18.
   Google Scholar
• Engebretsen, Eivind. 2005. “Barnevernet som tekst – nærlesning av 15 utvalgte journaler fra 1950-og 1980-tallet [Children's Services as Texts – A Close Reading of 15 Selected Journals From the 1950s and 1980s]. PhD diss.” Humanistic Faculty, University of Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, Joel. 1970. “Portents From the Past: What Ever Happened to Social Diagnosis?” International Social Work 13 (2): 18–28.
   Google Scholar
• Fjeldheim, Siri. 2013. “Fra Richmond til Hollis – en gjennomgang av lærebøker i sosialt arbeid fra 1917 til 1964 [From Richmond to Hollis – A Review of Social Work Textbooks From 1917 to 1964].” Master thesis in social work, Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Gadamer, Hans Georg. 2010. Sannhet og metode [Truth and Method]. Oslo: Pax Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Gubrium, Erika. 2013. “Poverty, Shame, and the Class Journey in Public Imagination.” Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory 15 (1): 105–122.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, Gordon. 1951. Theory and Practice of Social Case Work. New York: Columbia University Press Hollis.
   Google Scholar
• Hollis, Florence. 1964. Casework – A Psychosocial Therapy. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Holter, Harriet. 1960. “Sosialarbeiderens yrkesrolle [The Professional Role of the Social Worker.]” Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning I (1): 28–49.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, Gunn Strand, and Siv Oltedal. 1996. Modeller i sosialt arbeid. Fra ulike røtter til samme felt [Models in Social Work. From Different Roots to the Same Field]. Tano: Aschehoug.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Louise C., and Stephen J. Yanca. 2004. Social Work Practice – A Generalist Approach. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson Yvonne M. 1999. “Indirect Work: Social Works Uncelebrated Strength.” Social Work 44 ( 4): 323–334.
   Google Scholar
• Kokkinn, Judy. 2005. Profesjonelt sosialt arbeid [Professional Social Work]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, Irene. 2004. Hva er sosialt arbeid [What is Social Work?]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Mead, George Herbert. 1967. Sindet, selvet og samfundet [Mind, Self, and Society]. København: Akademisk Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Meeuwisse, Anna, Sunesson Sune, and Hans Swärd. 2006. Socialt arbete: en grundbok [Social Work: A Basic Textbook]. København: Natur & Kultur.
   Google Scholar
• Montalvo, Frank F. (1965) 1982. “The Third Dimension in Social Casework: Mary E Richmond’s Contribution to Family Treatment”. Clinical Social Work Journal 10 (2): 103–112.
   Google Scholar
• Murdoch, Allison D. 2007. “Situational Approaches to Direct Practice: Origin, Decline and Re-emergence”. Social Work 52 (3): 211–217.
   Google Scholar
• Payne, Malcolm. 1991. Modern Social Work Theory: A Critical Introduction. Basingstoke: The Macmillan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perlman, Helen Harris. 1957. Looking Back to See Ahead. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pittman-Munke, Peggy. 1985. “Mary E. Richmond: The Philadelphia Years.” Social Casework: The Journal of Contemporary Social Work. March: 160–166.
   Google Scholar
• Pozzuto, Richard, and Margaret Arnd-Caddigan. 2008. “Social Work in the US: Sociohistorical Context and Contemporary Issues.” Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group: Australian Social Work 61 (1): 57–71.
   Google Scholar
• Pumphrey, Muriel W. 1957. “Mary Richmond’s Process of Conceptualization.” Social Casework 38: 399–406.
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, Mary E. 1917. Social Diagnosis. New York: Russel Sage House.
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, Mary. 1922. What is Social Case Work? An Introductory Description. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, Mary. 1930. The Long View Papers and Adresses. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Rogowski, Steve. 2010. Social Work. The Rise and the Fall of a Profession. Bristol: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saari, Carolyn. 2002. The Environment: Its Role in Psychosocial Functioning and Psychotherapy. New York: Colombia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, Lawrence. 1992. The Skills of Helping – Individuals, Families and Groups. Itasca, IL: F.E. Peacock.
   Google Scholar
• Soydan, Haluk. 1993. Det sociala arbetets idéhistoria [The History of Ideas in Social Work]. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
   Google Scholar
• Timms, Noel. 1997. “Taking Social Work Seriously: The Contribution of the Functional School.” British Journal of Social Work 27: 723–737.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, Francis J. 1996. Social Work Treatment. Interlocking Theoretical Approaches. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, Francis J. 2002. Diagnosis in Social Work. New Imperatives. New York: The Howarth Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walkowitz, Daniel J. 1990. “The Making of a Feminine Professional Identity: Social Workers in the 1920s.” The American Historical Review 95 (4): 1051–1075.
   Google Scholar
• van Wormer, Katherine. 2002. “Our Social Work Imagination.” Journal of Teaching in Social Work 22 (3–4): 21–37.
   Google Scholar