Learning to reason: the factorial survey as a teaching tool in social work education

References

• Abbott, A. 1988. The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Auspurg, K., and T. Hinz. 2015. Factorial Survey Experiments. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.10.4135/9781483398075
   Google Scholar
• Austin, M. J., and T. Packard. 2009. “Case‐Based Learning: Educating Future Human Service Managers.” Journal of Teaching in Social Work 29 (2): 216–236. doi:10.1080/08841230802240993.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, S. 2003. Ethics, Accountability and the Social Professions. Houndmills: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Benbenishty, R., R. Osmo, and N. Gold. 2003. “Rationales Provided for Risk Assessments and for Recommended Interventions in Child Protection: A Comparison between Canadian and Israeli Professionals.” British Journal of Social Work 33 (2): 137–155. doi:10.1093/bjsw/33.2.137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borell, K., and G. Egonsdotter. 2012. “Forskningsnotis. Om Möjligheterna att Replikera Professionella Utmaningar i Lektionssalen: Datorbaserad Simulering av Barnavårdsutredningar.” [Research Note: On the Possibilities to Replicate Professional Challenges in the Classroom: Computer based Simulations of Child Protection Investigations.] Högre Utbildning 2 (1): 47–50. http://hogreutbildning.se/page/tidigare-nummer-test
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, J. 2011. “Explicit Argumentation as a Supervisory Tool for Decision Making in Child Protection Cases Involving Human Rights Issues.” Practice: Social Work in Action 23 (1): 31–44. doi:10.1080/09503153.2010.532546.
   Google Scholar
• Dülmer, H. 2007. “Experimental Plans in Factorial Surveys: Random or Quota Design?” Sociological Methods & Research 35 (3): 382–409. doi:10.1177/0049124106292367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dülmer, H. 2015. “The Factorial Survey: Design Selection and Its Impact on Reliability and Internal Validity.” Sociological Methods & Research 45 (2): 304–347. doi:10.1177/0049124115582269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A. 2006. “An Introduction to the Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance, edited by K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, and R. R. Hoffman, 3–19. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511816796
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. St. B. T. 2003. “In Two Minds: Dual-process Accounts of Reasoning.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 (10): 454–459. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2003.08.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. St. B. T. 2008. “Dual-processing Accounts of Reasoning, Judgment, and Social Cognition.” Annual Review of Psychology 59: 255–278. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, T. 2013. “Organisational Rules and Discretion in Adult Social Work.” British Journal of Social Work 43 (4): 739–758. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcs008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freidson, E. 2001. Professionalism, the Third Logic: On the Practice of Knowledge. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gambrill, E. 2012. Critical Thinking in Clinical Practice: Improving the Quality of Judgments and Decisions. 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Gambrill, E. 2014. “Social Work Education and Avoidable Ignorance.” Journal of Social Work Education 50 (3): 391–413. doi:10.1080/10437797.2014.916937.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H. 1984. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Oxford: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G., and H. Brighton. 2009. “Homo Heuristicus: Why Biased Minds Make Better Inferences.” Topics in Cognitive Science 1 (1): 107–143. doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01006.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodin, R. J. 1988. Reasons for Welfare: The Political Theory of the Welfare State. Princeton, NY: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, J. 2014. Enlightenment 2.0: Restoring Sanity to Our Politics, Our Economy, and Our Lives. Toronto: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Herreid, C. F. (1997) 1998. “What Makes a Good Case?” Journal of College Science Teaching 27 (3): 163–165.
   Google Scholar
• IFSW (International Federation of Social Workers). 2012. Statement of Ethical Principles. Accessed March 19, 2016. http://ifsw.org/policies/statement-of-ethical-principles/.
   Google Scholar
• Jasso, G. 1988. “Whom Shall We Welcome? Elite Judgments of the Criteria for the Selection of Immigrants.” American Sociological Review 53 (6): 919–932. http://www.jstor.org/stable/209590010.2307/2095900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasso, G. 2006. “Factorial Survey Methods for Studying Beliefs and Judgments.” Sociological Methods & Research 34 (3): 334–423. doi:10.1177/00491241052831217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, B. 2013. “User Movies as a Means of Incorporating the Knowledge and Experience of Users in Web-based Professional Education.” Social Work Education 32 (4): 468–483. doi:10.1080/02615479.2012.689277.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, K. A. 2003. “Making the Case for the Case Method in Graduate Social Work Education.” Journal of Teaching in Social Work 23 (1–2): 183–200. doi:10.1300/J067v23n01_12.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, K. 2005. “Widening the Lens: The Efficacy of the Case Method in Helping Direct Practice MSW Students Understand and Apply Mezzo and Macro Dimensions of Practice.” Social Work Education 24 (2): 197–211. doi:10.1080/0261547052000333135.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., and G. Klein. 2009. “Conditions for Intuitive Expertise: A Failure to Disagree.” American Psychologist 64 (6): 515–526. doi:10.1037/a0016755.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkebøen, G. 2009. “Decision Behaviour: Improving Expert Judgment.” In Making Essential Choices with Scant Information, edited by T. M. Williams, K. Samset, and K. J. Sunnevåg, 169–194. New York: Palgrave.10.1057/9780230236837
   Google Scholar
• Lovett, F. 2010. A General Theory of Domination and Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199579419.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Lynn, Jr., L. E. 1999. Teaching and Learning with Cases: A Guidebook. New York: Chatham House.10.4135/9781483330211
   Google Scholar
• Mercier, H. 2011. “When Experts Argue: Explaining the Best and the Worst of Reasoning.” Argumentation 25 (3): 313–327. doi:10.1007/s10503-011-9222-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercier, H., and D. Sperber. 2011. “Why Do Humans Reason? Arguments for an Argumentative Theory.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (2): 57–111.10.1017/S0140525X10000968
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milner, M., and T. Wolfer. 2014. “The Use of Decision Cases to Foster Critical Thinking in Social Work Students.” Journal of Teaching in Social Work 34 (3): 269–284. doi:10.1017/S0140525X10000968.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molander, A., and H. Grimen. 2010. “Understanding Professional Discretion.” In Sociology of Professions: Continental and Anglo-Saxon Traditions, edited by L. G. Svensson and J. Evetts, 167–187. Göteborg: Daidalos.
   Google Scholar
• Molander, A., H. Grimen, and E. O. Eriksen. 2012. “Professional Discretion and Accountability in the Welfare State.” Journal of Applied Philosophy 29 (3): 214–230. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5930.2012.00564.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro, E. 1999. “Common Errors of Reasoning in Child Protection Work.” Child Abuse & Neglect 23 (8): 745–758. doi:10.1016/S0145-2134(99)00053-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osmo, R., and R. Landau. 2001. “The Need for Explicit Argumentation in Ethical Decision-Making in Social Work.” Social Work Education 20 (4): 483–492. doi:10.1080/02615470120064723.
   Google Scholar
• Parkinson, B., and A. S. R. Manstead. 1993. “Making Sense of Emotion in Stories and Social Life.” Cognition & Emotion 7 (3): 295–323. doi:10.1080/02699939308409191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pullen-Sansfacon, A. 2010. “Virtue Ethics for Social Work: A New Pedagogy for Practical Reasoning.” Social Work Education 29 (4): 402–415. doi:10.1080/02615470902991734.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. 1993. Political Liberalism. New York: Colombia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, P. H., and S. L. Nock. 1982. Measuring Social Judgments: The Factorial Survey Approach. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sackett, D. L., W. M. C. Rosenberg, J. A. M. Gray, R. B. Haynes, and W. S. Richardson. 1996. “Evidence Based Medicine: What It is and What It Isn’t.” British Medical Journal 312 (7023): 71–72. doi:10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelsson, E., and L. Wallander. 2014. “Disentangling Practitioners’ Perceptions of Substance Use Severity: A Factorial Survey.” Addiction Research & Theory 22 (4): 348–360. doi:10.3109/16066359.2013.856887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelsson, E., and L. Wallander. 2015. “Perceptions of Treatment Needs: A Factorial Survey of Swedish Addiction Care Practitioners.” Addiction Research & Theory 23 (6): 469–480. doi:10.3109/16066359.2015.1034696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauer, C., K. Auspurg, T. Hinz, and S. Liebig. 2011. “The Application of Factorial Surveys in General Population Samples: The Effects of Respondent Age and Education on Response times and Response Consistency.” Survey Research Methods 5 (3): 89–102. doi:10.18148/srm/2011.v5i3.4625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sperber, D., and H. Mercier. 2012. “Reasoning as a Social Competence.” In Collective Wisdom, edited by H. Landemore and J. Elster, 368–392. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511846427
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. J. 2006. “Factorial Surveys: Using Vignettes to Study Professional Judgement.” British Journal of Social Work 36 (7): 1187–1207. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bch345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. J. 2013. Professional Decision-making and Risk in Social Work. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C., and S. White. 2006. “Knowledge and Reasoning in Social Work: Educating for Humane Judgement.” British Journal of Social Work 36 (6): 937–954. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bch365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TCSW (The College of Social Work). 2012. Professional Capabilities Framework. Accessed March 19, 2016. https://www.basw.co.uk/resource/?id=1137.
   Google Scholar
• Tilbury, C., J. Osmond, and T. M. Scott. 2010. “Teaching Critical Thinking in Social Work Education: A Literature Review.” Advances in Social Work and Welfare Education 1 (1): 31–50.
   Google Scholar
• Toulmin, S. (1958) 2003. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Updated edition 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Towle, C. 1954. The Learner in Education for the Professions as Seen in Education for Social Work. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Wallander, L. 2008. Modelling Professional Judgements: An Application of the Factorial Survey Approach to the Field of Social Work. Stockholm: Stockholm University.
   Google Scholar
• Wallander, L. 2009. “25 Years of Factorial Surveys in Sociology: A Review.” Social Science Research 38 (3): 505–520. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2009.03.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallander, L. 2012. “Measuring Social Workers’ Judgements: Why and How to Use the Factorial Survey Approach in the Study of Professional Judgements.” Journal of Social Work 12 (4): 364–384. doi:10.1177/1468017310387463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallander, L., and J. Blomqvist. 2005a. Vad Styr Vårdvalen? En Faktoriell Survey av Faktorer som Predicerar Val av Insats inom Socialtjänstens Missbruksvård [What Factors Influence Treatment Referrals? A Factorial Survey of Predictors of Choices of Treatment within the Social Services’ Substance Misuse Treatment System] (Report No. 3). Stockholm: Stockholm City, Research & Development Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Wallander, L., and J. Blomqvist. 2005b. “Who ‘Needs’ Compulsory Care? A Factorial Survey of Swedish Social Workers’ Assessments of Clients in Relation to the Care of Abusers (Special Provisions) Act.” Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs (English Supplement): 63–85. http://www.nordicwelfare.se/Publikationer/NAD---Archive/#5
   Google Scholar
• Wallander, L., and J. Blomqvist. 2008. “Modeling Ideal Treatment Recommendations: A Factorial Survey of Swedish Social Workers’ Ideal Recommendations of Inpatient or Outpatient Treatment for Problem Substance Users.” Journal of Social Service Research 35 (1): 47–64. doi:10.1080/01488370802477436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallander, L., and A. Molander. 2014. “Disentangling Professional Discretion: A Conceptual and Methodological Approach.” Professions & Professionalism 4 (3): 1–19. doi:10.7577/pp.808.
   Google Scholar
• Wingate, U., N. Andon, and A. Cogo. 2011. “Embedding Academic Writing Instruction into Subject Teaching: A Case Study.” Active Learning in Higher Education 12 (1): 69–81. doi:10.1177/1469787410387814.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfer, T. A., and K. A. Gray. 2007. “Using the Decision Case Method to Teach Legislative Policy Advocacy.” Journal of Teaching in Social Work 27 (1–2): 37–59. doi:10.1300/J067v27n01_03.
   Google Scholar
• Yeung, K. S. S., A. P. Y. Ho, M. C. H. Lo, and E. A. Chan. 2010. “Social Work Ethical Decision Making in an Inter-disciplinary Context.” British Journal of Social Work 40 (5): 1573–1590. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcp065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar