‘How’ we do social work, not ‘what’ we do

References

• Banks, Sarah. 2004. Ethics, Accountability, and the Social Professions. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, Sarah. 2011. “Ethics in an Age of Austerity: Social Work and the Evolving New Public Management.” Journal of Social Intervention: Theory and Practice 20 (2): 5–23.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, Sarah. 2012. Ethics and Values in Social Work. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, Peter L., and Thomas Luckmann. 1967. The social construction of reality. New York: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• van Berkel, Rik, Willibrord de Graaf, and Tomàs Sirovátka. 2011. “The Governance of Active Welfare States.” In The Governance of Active Welfare States in Europe, edited by Rik van Berkel, Willibrord de Graaf, and Tomàs Sirovátka, 1–21. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230306714
   Google Scholar
• British Association of Social Workers (BASW). 2012. The State of Social Work. What Social Workers Think About the State of Their Profession in 2012. http://cdn.basw.co.uk/upload/basw_23651-3.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cooley, Charles H. 1902. Human Nature and the Social Order. New York: Shocken.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, Paul, and Walter Powell. 1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review 48 (2): 147–160.10.2307/2095101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, Paul, and Walter Powell. 1991. “Introduction.” In The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, edited by Walter W. Powell and Paul J. DiMaggio, 1–38. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evetts, Julia. 2006. “The Sociology of Professional Groups.” Current Sociology 54 (1): 133–143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0011392106057161.10.1177/0011392106057161
   Google Scholar
• Evetts, Julia. 2011. “A New Professionalism? Challenges and Opportunities.” Current Sociology 59 (4): 406–422. doi:10.1177/0011392111402585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fossestøl, Knut, Eric Breit, and Elin Borg. 2014. NAV-reformen 2014. En oppfølgingsstudie av lokalkontorenes organisering etter innholdsreformen [The NAV Reform 2014. A Follow Up Study of the Organization of Local Offices After the Content Reform]. Report 13/2014. Oslo: The Work Research Institute.10.7577/afi/rapport/2014:13
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. [1966] 2002. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Freidson, Eliot. 2001. Professionalism. The Third Logic. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gould, Nick. 2004. “Introduction: The Learning Organization and Reflective Practice – The Emergence of a Concept.” In Social Work, Critical Reflection and the Learning Organization, edited by Nick Gould and Mark Baldwin, 1–9. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, Mel, and Leanne Schubert. 2012. “Sustainable Social Work: Modelling Knowledge Production, Transfer and Evidence-based Practice.” International Journal of Social Welfare 21 (2): 203–214.10.1111/j.1468-2397.2011.00802.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, Mel, and Leanne Schubert. 2013. “Knowing What We Know About Knowledge in Social Work: The Search for a Comprehensive Model of Knowledge Production.” International Journal of Social Welfare 22 (4): 334–346.10.1111/ijsw.2013.22.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanssen, Jorid Krane, Gunn Strand Hutchinson, Rolv Lyngstad, and Johans Tveit Sandvin. 2015. “What Happens to the Social in Social Work?” Nordic Social Work Research. 5 (Issue Supplement 1): 115–126. doi:10.1080/2156857X.2015.1060895.
   Google Scholar
• Hasenfeld, Yeheskel. 2010. “The Attributes of Human Service Organizations.” In Human Services as Complex Organizations. 2nd ed, edited by Yeheskel Hasenfeld, 9–32. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Helgøy, Ingrid, Nanna Kildal, and Even Nilssen. 2011. “A New Professional Role in a Changing Organization.” Nordic Organization Studies 13 (3): 34–54.
   Google Scholar
• Hirvonen, Helena. 2014. “Doing Gendered and (Dis)Embodied Work. Care Work in the Context of Medico-managerial Welfare State.” Nordic Social Work Research 4 (2): 113–128.10.1080/2156857X.2013.867895
   Google Scholar
• Hugman, Richard. 2009. “But Is It Social Work? Some Reflections on Mistaken Identities.” British Journal of Social Work 39 (6): 1138–1153.10.1093/bjsw/bcm158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessen, Jorunn Theresia, and Per Arne Tufte. 2014. “Discretionary Decision-making in Changing Context of Activation Policies and Welfare Reforms.” Journal of Social Policy 43 (2): 269–288. doi:10.1017/S0047279413000998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvale, Steinar, and Svend Brinkman. 2009. Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, Irene. 2009. “Discourses Within and About Social Work.” In Revitalizing Communities in a Globalizing World, edited by Lena Dominelli, 43–66. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenz, Walter. 2001. “Social Work Responses to ‘New Labour’ in Continental European Countries.” British Journal of Social Work 31 (4): 595–609.10.1093/bjsw/31.4.595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthies, Aila-Leena. 2013. “The Otherness of Social Work Under Neoliberal Governance.” Nordic Social Work Research 3 (2): 149–158. doi:10.1080/2156857X.2013.803495.
   Google Scholar
• Meeuwisse, Anna, Roberto Scaramuzzino, and Hans Swärd. 2011. “Everyday Realities and Visionary Ideals Among Social Workers in the Nordic Countries: A Matter of Specialization and Work Tasks?” Nordic Social Work Research 1 (1): 5–23.10.1080/2156857X.2011.562030
   Google Scholar
• Mills, Sara. 1997. Discourse. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Minas, Renate. 2014. “One-stop Shops: Increasing Employability and Overcoming Welfare State Fragmentation?” International Journal of Social Welfare 23 (Issue Supplement S1): S40–S53.10.1111/ijsw.2014.23.issue-s1
   Google Scholar
• Minas, Renate, Sharon Wright, and Rik van Berkel. 2012. “Decentralization and Centralization: Governing the Activation of Social Assistance Recipients in Europe.” International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 32 (5/6): 286–298.10.1108/01443331211236989
   Google Scholar
• Morriss, Lisa. 2016. “Being Seconded to a Mental Health Trust: The (In)Visibility of Mental Health Social Work.” British Journal of Social Work. Published online: March 27. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcw022.
   Google Scholar
• Nothdurfter, Urban. 2016. “The Street-level Delivery of Activation Policies: Constraints and Possibilities for a Practice of Citizenship.” European Journal of Social Work. 19 (3–4): 420–440. doi:10.1080/13691457.2015.1137869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Leary, Patrick, Ming-Sum Tsui, and Gillian Ruch. 2013. “The Boundaries of the Social Work Relationship Revisited: Towards a Connected, Inclusive and Dynamic Conceptualisation.” British Journal of Social Work 43 (1): 135–153.10.1093/bjsw/bcr181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parton, Nigel. 2000. “Some Thoughts on the Relationship Between Theory and Practice in and for Social Work.” British Journal of Social Work 30 (4): 449–463.10.1093/bjsw/30.4.449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perlinski, Marek, Björn Blom, and Stefan Morèn. 2012. “Getting a Sense of the Client: Working Methods in the Personal Social Services in Sweden.” Journal of Social Work 13 (5): 508–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersén, Anna Charlotta, and Jan Ingvar Olsson. 2015. “Calling Evidence-based Practice into Question: Acknowledging Phronetic Knowledge in Social Work.” British Journal of Social Work 45 (5): 1581–1597.10.1093/bjsw/bcu020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pithouse, Andrew. 1998. Social Work: The Social Organisation of an Invisible Trade. Aldershot: Avebury Gower.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, Cristopher. 2003. “Joined-up Government: A Survey.” Political Studies Review 1 (1): 34–49.10.1111/1478-9299.00004
   Google Scholar
• Royal Proposition No. 46. (2004–2005). Ny arbeids og velferdsforvaltning [The New Employment and Welfare Administration]. Oslo: Ministry of Labour and Social Affair.
   Google Scholar
• Røysum, Anita. 2012. “Sosialt arbeid i nye kontekster. En studie om sosialarbeideres erfaringer med Nav-reformen [Social Work in New Contexts. A Study of Social Workers’ Experiences within the Nav Reform].” PhD-diss., Høgskolen i Oslo og Akershus: HIOA.
   Google Scholar
• Røysum, Anita. 2013. “The Reform of the Welfare Services in Norway: One Office – One Way of Thinking?” European Journal of Social Work 16 (5): 708–723. doi:10.1080/13691457.2012.722982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Røysum, Anita. 2014. “Ubehaget ved å forenkle det komplekse [The Discontent in Simplifying the Complexity].” In Ubehaget i sosialt arbeid [Social Work and Its Discontent], edited by Anbjørg Ohnstad, Marianne Rugkåsa, and Signe Ylvisaker, 141–159. Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk.
   Google Scholar
• Trevithick, Pamela. 2008. “Revisiting the Knowledge Base of Social Work: A Framework for Practice.” British Journal of Social Work 38 (6): 1212–1237.10.1093/bjsw/bcm026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trevithick, Pamela. 2012. “Practice Perspectives.” In Sage Handbook of Social Work, edited by Mel Gray, James Midgley, and Stephen Webb, 113–128. London: Sage.10.4135/9781446247648
   Google Scholar