Welfare technology dilemmas facing young people with intellectual impairment – some illustrated theoretical explorations

References

• Batson, Gregory. [1972] 1999. Steps to an Ecology of Mind. Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bijker, Wiebe E., Thomas P. Hughes, and Trevor J. Pinch, eds. [1987] 2012. The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History. London: The MIT Press
   Google Scholar
• Brady, Nancy B., Susan Bruce, Amy Goldman, Karen Erickson, Beth Mineo, Bill T. Ogletree, and Paul Diane. 2016. “Communication Services and Supports for Individuals With Severe Disabilities: Guidance for Assessment and Intervention.” American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities 121 (2): 121–138.10.1352/1944-7558-121.2.121
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dahle Alvseike, Hilde, and Kolbjørn Brønnick. 2012. “Feasibility of Using an iPad as a Hub for Smart House Technology with Elderly People: Effects on Cognition, Self-efficacy and Technology Experience.” Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare 5: 299–306.10.2147/JMDH
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Design–led Innovations for Active Ageing (daa). 2013. “Welfare Technology – Design-led Innovations for Active Ageing.” Accessed March 9, 2015. http://daaproject.eu/assets/files/projects/downloads/WelfareTechnology_Pamphlet.pdf
   Google Scholar
• De Moor, Katrien, Katrien Berte, Lieven De Marez, Wout Joseph, Tom Deryckere, and Luc Martens. 2010. “User-driven Innovation? Challenges of User Involvement in Future Technology Analysis.” Science and Public Policy 37 (1): 51–61.10.3152/030234210X484775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devik Andreassen, Siri, and Ove Hellzen. 2012. Velferdsteknologi og hjemmeboende eldre. Hvilke gevinster er oppnådd med velferdsteknologi som kommunikasjonsstøtte for hjemmeboende eldre i kommunehelsetjenesten? - Og hva kan påvirke utbytte. En systematisk litteraturstudie. [Welfare Technology and Elderly People Living Independently. What are the Benefits for Welfare Technology such as the Communication Support Provided to Elderly People in Municipal Services? – What May Affect the Yield? A Systematic Literature Review]. Steinkjær: Høgskolen i Nord-Trøndelag.
   Google Scholar
• Dosi, Giovanni, Christopher Freeman, Richard Nelson, Gerald Silverberg, and Luc Soete. 1988. Technological Change and Economic Theory. Pisa: LEM.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, E. 1985. The Rules of Sociological Method. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gane, Mike. 2010. On Durkheim’s Rules of Sociological Method. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Getz, L. 2012. “Mobile App Technology for Social Workers.” Social Work Today 12 (3): 8.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, Barney G., and L. Anselm Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, J. David, and Morten Levin, eds. 2007. Introduction to Action Research: Social Research for Social Change. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, Sarah A. 2010. “The Social Inclusion of Young Adults with Intellectual Disabilities: A Phenomenology of their Experiences.” Doctor of Philosophy, Faculty of The Graduate College at the University of Nebraska. University of Nebraska.
   Google Scholar
• Hammersley, Martyn, and Paul Atkinson. 2007. Ethnography: Principles in Practice. London: Routledge.10.1002/9781405165518.wbeose070
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, Bjørn. 2012. “Ethical Challenges with Welfare Technology: A Review of the Literature.” Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011 19 (2): 389–406.
   Google Scholar
• Hoole, L., and S. Morgan. 2010. “It’s only Right that we get Involved: Service-user Perspectives on Involvement in Learning Disability Services.” British Journal of Learning Disabilities. 39: 5–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jason, Jay. 2013. “Navigating Paradox as a Mechanism of Change and Innovation in Hybrid Organizations.” Academy of Management Journal 56 (1): 137–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laberg, Toril. 2011. “Velferdsteknologi og ergoterapi.” [Welfare Technology and Occupational Theory.] Ergoterapeuten 6: 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Law, John, and Ingunn Moser. 2007. “Good Passages, Bad Passages.” In Technoscience: The Politics of Intervention, edited by Aksdal Kristin, Brita Brenna, and Ingunn Moser, 157–178. Oslo: Unipub.
   Google Scholar
• Mckenzie, Judith. 2013. “Models of Intellectual Disability: Towards a Perspective of (Poss)ability.” Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 57 (4): 370–379.10.1111/jir.2013.57.issue-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mørk, Tone. 2010. ”Welfare Technology.” In Nordic Centre for Welfare and Social Issues. Stockholm: Helsingfors and Dronninglund.
   Google Scholar
• Mort, Maggie, Celia Roberts, Jeanette Pols, Miquel Domenech, and Ingunn Moser. 2015. “Ethical Implications of Home Telecare for Older People: A Framework Derived from a Multi-sited Participative Study.” Health Expectations 18 (3): 438–449.10.1111/hex.2015.18.issue-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser, Ingunn, and Hilde Thygesen. 2013. “Velferdsteknologi og teleomsorg: Nye idealer og former for omsorg.” [Welfare Technology and Tele Care: New Ideas and Ways of Care.] In Samhandling for helse. Kunnskap, kommunikasjon og teknologi i helsetjenesten [Collaboration of Health: Knowledge, Communication and Technology in Health Care Services], edited by Aksel Tjora and Melby Line, 144–157. Oslo, Gyldendal Akademisk.
   Google Scholar
• Øderud, Tone, Lisbeth Grut, and Sigrid Aketun. 2015. Samspill – GPS i Oslo - Pilotering av Trygghetspakke 3. Bruk av GPS for lokalisering av personer med demens [Interaction – GPS in Oslo - Piloting of Security Package 3]. Trondheim: SINTEF.
   Google Scholar
• Pols, Jeanette. 2012. Care at Distance. On the Closeness of Technology. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.10.26530/OAPEN_413032
   Google Scholar
• Poole, Marshall Scott, and Andrew H. Van de Ven. 2004. Handbook of Organizational Change and Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Preisler, Marie. 2014. “Denmark Supercharges Welfare Technology.” Nordic Labour Journal. Accessed December 12. http://www.nordiclabourjournal.org/i-fokus/robotics-in-working-life/article.2014-04-05.8545245494
   Google Scholar
• Scior, Katrina. 2011. “Public Awareness, Attitudes and Beliefs Regarding Intellectual Disability: A Systematic Review.” Research in Developmental Disabilities 32: 2164–2182.10.1016/j.ridd.2011.07.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scior, K., J. Addai-Davis, M. Kenyon, and J. C. Sheridan. 2013. “Stigma, Public Awareness about Intellectual Disability and Attitudes to Inclusion among Different Groups.” Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 57: 1014–1026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Wendy K., and Marianne W. Lewis. 2011. “Toward a Theory of Paradox. A Dynamic Equilibrium of Organizing.” The Academy of Management Review 36 (2): 381–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Støkken, Anne Marie, Asbjørn Johannessen, and Sidsel Natland, eds. 2011. Samarbeidsforskning i praksis [Collaboration Research in Practice]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Swartz, Leslie, and Brian Watermeyer. 2008. “Cyborg Anxiety: Oscar Pistorius and the Boundaries of What it Means to be Human.” Disability and Society 23 (2): 187–190.10.1080/09687590701841232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, D., R. K. Fisher, and R. Kayess. 2013. ”The Role of Assistive Technology in Supporting people with Disabilities and Complex Care Needs: A Literature Review.” In Social Policy Research Centre. Sydney: Australia Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Tøssebro, Jan. 2013. “Two Decades of Disability Research in Norway – 1990–2010.” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 15 (1): 71–89.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, Karl E. 2001. Making Sense of the Organization. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• WHO. 2010. “Better Health, Better Lives: Children and Young People with Intellectual Disabilities and Their Families”. The Case for Change. Background paper for the Conference in Denmark. WHO.
   Google Scholar
• WHO. 2011. World Report on Disability. Geneva: WHO.
   Google Scholar