From stories to standardised interaction: changing conversational formats in social work

References

• Aas, Katja F. 2004. “From Narrative to Database: Technological Change and Penal Culture.” Punishment and Society 6 (4): 379–393.10.1177/1462474504046119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrahamson, Maria, and Kalle Tryggvesson. 2009. “Socialtjänstens användning av standardiserade klientbedömningsinstrument: ASI som retorik och praktik i två svenska kommuner” [The use of standardized assessment tools within the social service organization.] Nordisk Alkohol- och Narkotikatidskrift 26 (1): 21–39.
   Google Scholar
• Alexandersson, Karin. 2006. Vilja Kunna Förstå. Om implementering av systematisk dokumentation för verksamhetsutveckling i socialtjänsten [Willingness, comprehension, capability: About implementation of systematic documentation for developing social work in the public social services]. Örebro: Örebro universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Anderberg, Mats, and Mikael Dahlberg. 2009. Strukturerade intervjuer inom missbruksvården: som en grund för kunskapsutveckling [Structured interviews in substance abuse treatment: As a foundation for the development of knowledge]. Diss., Växjö: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bergmark, Anders, and Tommy Lundström. 1998. “Metoder i socialt arbete. Om insatser och arbetssätt i socialtjänstens individ- och familjeomsorg” [Methods in social work. An inventory analysis of practice in Swedish individual and family services.] Socialvetenskaplig tidskrift 5 (4): 291–314.
   Google Scholar
• Bergmark, Anders, and Tommy Lundström. 2011. “Guided or Independent? Social Workers, Central Bureaucracy and Evidence-based Practice.” European Journal of Social Work 14 (3): 323–337.10.1080/13691451003744325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergmark, Åke, and Tommy Lundström. 2016. “Metoder i socialt arbete – vad är det?” [Methods in social work: What is that?] In Socialt arbete – en grundbok. 3rd ed., edited by A. Meeuwisse, H. Swärd, S. Sunesson and M. Knutagård.
   Google Scholar
• Bergmark, Anders, Åke Bergmark, and Tommy Lundström. 2012. “‘The Mismatch between the Map and the Terrain: Evidence-Based Social Work in Sweden.” European Journal of Social Work 14 (4): 598–609.10.1080/13691457.2012.706215
   Google Scholar
• Björk, Alexander. 2016. Evidence-based Social Work behind the Scenes. Diss., Stockholm: Stockholm University.
   Google Scholar
• Bowker, Geoffrey C., and Susan Leigh Starr. 1999. Sorting Things Out. Classification and its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Broadhurst, Karen, and Claire Mason. 2014. “Social Work beyond the VDU: Foregrounding Co-Presence in Situated Practice: Why Face-to-Face Practice Matters.” British Journal of Social Work 44: 578–595.10.1093/bjsw/bcs124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruner, Jerome. 2004. “Life as Narrative.” Social Research 71 (3): 691–709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlstedt, Elisabeth, and Katarina Jacobsson. 2017. “Indications of Quality or Quality as a Matter of Fact? ‘Open Comparisons’ within the Social Sork Sector.” Statsvetenskaplig tidskrift 119 (1): 47–69.
   Google Scholar
• Caswell, Dorthe, Lene Eskelinen, and Sören P. Olesen. 2011. “Identity Work and Client Resistance underneath the Canopy of Active Employment Policy.” Qualitative Social Work 12 (1): 8–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cedersund, Elisabet. 1992. Talk, Text and Institutional Order: A Study of Communication in Social Welfare Bureaucracies. Linköping: Linköping University.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, Janan. 2015. Examining Social Work and Technology: A Cross-Disciplinary Analysis of Technology Issues in Violence Against Women Shelters in Ontario. Diss., Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Denvall, Verner, and Kerstin Johansson. 2012. “Kejsarens nya kläder: implementering av evidensbaserad praktik i socialt arbete” [The emperor’s new clothes: Implementation of evidence-based practice in social work.] Socialvetenskaplig tidskrift 19 (1): 26–45.
   Google Scholar
• Devlieghere, Jochen. 2017. The Logic of the Database: In Search of Responsive Social Work. Diss., Ghent: Ghent University.
   Google Scholar
• Drew, Paul, and John Heritage. 1992. Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engström, Christer. 2005. Implementering och utvärdering av Addiction Severity Index (ASI) i socialtjänsten [Implementation and evaluation of the ASI in the social services]. Stockholm: Statens Institutionsstyrelse.
   Google Scholar
• Eskelinen, Lene, Sören P. Olesen, and Dorthe Caswell. 2008. Potentialer i socialt arbejde: Et konstruktionistisk blik på faglig praksis [Potentials in social work: A construcionist gaze on professional pratice]. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Evetts, Julia. 2009. “New Professionalism and New Public Management: Changes, Continuities and Consequences.” Comparative Sociology 8: 247–266.10.1163/156913309X421655
   Google Scholar
• Gambrill, Eileen. 2007. “Views of Evidence-based Practice: Social Workers’ Code of Ethics and Accreditation Standards as Guides for Choice.” Journal of Social Work Education 43 (3): 447–462.10.5175/JSWE.2007.200600639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, Harold. 1967. Studies in Ethnometodology. London: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P., and C. Humphreys. 2010. “Child Protection Practitioners and Decision-Making Tools: Observations from the Front Line.” British Journal of Social Work 40: 2598–2616.10.1093/bjsw/bcp155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, Erving. 1969. Where the Action is. Three Essays. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of Talk. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, Christopher. 1997. Social Work as Narrative. Storytelling and Persuasion in Professional Texts. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Hall ,Christopher, Kirsi Juhila, Maureen Matarese, and Carolus van Nijnatten. 2014. Analysing Social Work Communication: Discourse in Practice. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Herz, Marcus. 2012. Från ideal till ideologi: Konstruktioner av kön och etnicitet inom socialtjänsten [From ideal to ideology. Constructions of gender and ethnicity in the social services]. Örebro: Örebro university.
   Google Scholar
• Martinell Barfoed, Elizabeth. 2014. “Standardiserad interaktion – en utmaning för socialt arbete” [Standardized interaction – a challenge in social work.] Socialvetenskaplig tidskrift 21 (1): 4–23.
   Google Scholar
• Martinell Barfoed, Elizabeth, and Katarina Jacobsson. 2012. “Moving from ‘gut feeling’ to ‘pure facts’: Launching the ASI interview as part of in-service Training for Social Workers.” Nordic Social Work Research 2 (1): 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Hjärpe, Teres. 2017. “Measuring Social Work: Quantity as Quality in the Social Services.” Statsvetenskaplig tidskrift 119 (1): 23–46.
   Google Scholar
• Holstein, James A., and Jaber F. Gubrium. 2000. The Selves We Live By. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Houtkoop-Steenstra, Hanneke. 2000. The Standardized Survey Interview. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511489457
   Google Scholar
• Houtkoop-Steenstra, Hanneke, and Charles Antaki. 1997. “Creating Happy People by Answering Yes-No Questions.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 30 (4): 285–313.10.1207/s15327973rlsi3004_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Høybye-Mortensen, Matilde. 2015. “Decision-Making Tools and Their Influence on Caseworkers’ Room for Discretion.” British Journal of Social Work 45 (2): 600–615.10.1093/bjsw/bct144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobsson ,Katarina, and Elizabeth Martinell Barfoed. 2016. “ Trender i socialt arbete” [ Trends in social work.] In Socialt arbete: En grundbok, edited by, A.Meeuwisse,H.Swärd, S. Sunessonand M. Knutagård, 313–330. Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.
   Google Scholar
• Jergeby, Ulla. 2008. Evidensbaserad praktik i socialt arbete [Evidence-based practice in social work]. Stockholm: NBSW/Gothia.
   Google Scholar
• Juhila, Kirsi, Åsa Mäkitalo, and Martine Noordegraaf. 2014. “Analysing Social Work Interaction: Premises and Approaches.” In Analysing Social Work Communication, edited by Chris Hall, Kirsi Juhila, Maureen Matarese and Carolus van Nijnatten, 9–24. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kullberg, Christian. 1994. Socialt arbete som kommunikativ praktik [Social work as a communicative practice]. Linköping: Linköping university.
   Google Scholar
• Lauri, Marcus. 2016. Narratives of Governing: Rationalization, Responsibility and Resistance in Social Work. Diss., Umeå: Umeå University.
   Google Scholar
• Lundgren, Lena M., Bengt-Åke Armelius, Kerstin Armelius, Jan Brännström, Deborah Chassle, and Lisa Sullivan. 2012. “Beskrivning av tre klientprofiler inom svensk missbrukarvård” [Description of three client profiles in individuals assessed for a substance use disorder in the Swedish Social Welfare System.] Socialvetenskaplig tidskrift 19 (3–4): 200–216.
   Google Scholar
• Marcuse, Herbert. 1964. One-dimensional man. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maynard, Douglas W., and Nora C. Schaeffer. 2006. “Standardization-in-interaction: The Survey Interview.” In Talk and Interaction in Social Research Methods, edited by Paul Drew, Geoffrey Raymond and Darin Weinberg, 9–27. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McLean, Christine, and Keith Hoskin. 1998. “Organizing Madness: Reflections on the Forms of the Form.” Organization 5 (4): 519–541.10.1177/135050849854005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro, Eileen. 2011. “The Munro Review of Child Protection: Final Report. A child-centered system.” Presented to Parliament, May 2011.
   Google Scholar
• NBHW (National Board of Health and Welfare). 2014. ASI-manualen: anvisningar till ASI Grund och ASI Uppföljning [The ASI-manual: instructions to ASI Basic and ASI Follow-Up]. Stockholm: National Board of Health and Welfare.
   Google Scholar
• Parton, Nigel. 1998. “Risk, Advanced Liberalism and Child Welfare: The Need to Rediscover Uncertainty and Ambiguity.” British Journal of Social Work 28 (1): 25–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parton, Nigel. 2000. “Some Thoughts on the Telationship between Theory and Practice, in and for Social Work.” British Journal of Social Work 30 (4): 449–463.10.1093/bjsw/30.4.449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parton, Nigel. 2006. “Changes in the Form of Knowledge in Social Work: From the ‘Social’ to the ‘Informational’?” British Journal of Social Work 38 (2): 253–269.10.1093/bjsw/bcl337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peckover, Sue, Sue White, and Christopher Hall. 2010. “Making and Managing Electronic Children: E-assessment in Child Welfare.” Information, Communication and Society 11 (3): 375–394.
   Google Scholar
• Pettersson, Ulla. 2001. Socialt arbete, politik och professionalisering [Social work, politics and professionalization]. Diss., Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.
   Google Scholar
• Ponnert ,Lina, and Kerstin Svensson. 2016. “ Standardisation – The End of Professional Discretion?” European Journal of Social Work19 (3–4): 586–599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prior ,Lindsey. 2003. Using Documents in Social Research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Riessman ,Catherine K.2008. Narrative Methods for the Human Sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, Aaron. 2003. “Evidence-based Social Sork Practice: Challenges and Promise.” Social Work Research 27 (4): 197–208.10.1093/swr/27.4.197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, Ian, Margaret Bell, Ian Sinclair, Patricia Sloper, Wendy Mitchell, Paul Dyson, Jasmine Clayden, and Jackie Rafferty. 2009b. “An Exemplary Scheme? An Evaluation of the Integrated Children’s System.” British Journal of Social Work 39 (4): 613–626.10.1093/bjsw/bcp040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Dorothy E. 1978. “‘K is Mentally Ill’: The Anatomy of a Factual Account.” Sociology 12 (1): 22–53.
   Google Scholar
• Souninen ,Eero. 1999. “ Doing ‘Delicacy’ in Instituions of Helping: A Case of Probation Office Interaction.” In Constructing Social Work Practices, edited by ArjaJokinen, Kirsi Juhilaand Tarja Pösö, 103–115. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Star, Susan Leigh, and Martha Lampland. 2009. “Reckoning with Standards.” In Standards and Their Stories, edited by Martha Lampland and Susan Leigh Star, 3–33. London: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, Lucy, and Brigitte Jordan. 1990. “Interactional Troubles in Face-to-Face Survey Interviews.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 85: 232–241.10.1080/01621459.1990.10475331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson, Lennart G., and Anette Karlsson. 2008. “Profesjoner, kontroll og ansvar” [Professions, control and responsibility.] In Profesjonsstudier, edited by Anders Molander and Lars Inge Terum, 261–275. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, Carolyn, and Susan White. 2000. Practising Reflexivity in Health and Welfare. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, Carolyn, and Sue White. 2006. “Knowledge and Reasoning in Social Work Educating for Humane Judgement.” British Journal of Social Work 36 (6): 937–954.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmermans, Stefan, and Steven Epstein. 2010. “A World of Standards but not a Standard World: Toward a Sociology of Standards and Standardization.” Annual Review of Sociology 36: 69–89.10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trevithick, Pamela. 2012. Social Work Skills and Knowledge. 3rd ed. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• White ,Susan, and John Stancombe. 2002. “ Colonising Care? Potentialities and Pitfalls of Scientific-Bureaucratic Rationality in Social Care.” Journal of Social Work Research and Evaluation3 (2): 187–201.
   Google Scholar
• White, Sue, Chris Hall, and Sue Peckover. 2009. “The Descriptive Tyranny of the Common Assessment Framework: Technologies of Categorization and Professional Practice in Child Welfare.” British Journal of Social Work 39 (7): 1197–1217.10.1093/bjsw/bcn053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wooffitt, Robin, and Sue Widdicombe. 2006. “Interaction in Interviews.” In Talk and Interaction in Social Research Methods, edited by Paul Drew, Geoffrey Raymond, and Darin Weinberg, 28–49. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar