References
- Bakketeig, E., and E. Backe-Hansen. 2008. Forskningskunnskap om ettervern [Research on Aftercare in Norway]. Oslo: NOVA - Norwegian Social Research, NOVA Report 17/2008.
- Bakketeig, E., and E. Backe-Hansen. 2018. “Agency and Flexible Support in Transition from Care: Learning from the Experiences of a Norwegian Sample of Care Leavers Doing Well.” Nordic Social Work Research. online first.
- Brown, S., and D. Wilderson. 2010. “Homelessness Prevention for Former Foster Youth: Utilization of Transitional Housing Programs.” Children and Youth Services Review 32 (10): 1464–1472. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.07.002.
- Courtney, M. E. 2009. “The Difficult Transition to Adulthood for Foster Youth in the U.S.: Implications for the State as Corporate Parent.” Social Policy Report 23 (1): 3–18. doi:10.1002/j.2379-3988.2009.tb00058.x.
- Egelund, T., P. S. Christensen, T. B. Jakobsen, T. G. Jensen, and R. F. Olsen. 2009. Anbragte børn og unge. En forskningsoversigt [Children and Young People in Out-of-Home Care. An Overview]. Copenhagen: SFI – The Danish National Centre for Social Welfare, Report 09: 24.
- Fallesen, P. 2014. “Identifying Divergent Foster Care Careers for Danish Children.” Child Abuse & Neglect 38 (11): 1860–1871. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2014.08.004.
- Gypen, L., J. Vanderfaeillie, S. De Maeyer, L. Belenger, and F. Van Holen. 2017. “Outcomes of Children Who Grew up in Foster Care: Systematic Review.” Children and Youth Services Review 76: 74–83. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.02.035.
- Jakobsen, T. B., I. Hammen, and L. Steen. 2010. Efterværn – Støtte til tidligere anbragte unge. Midtvejsevaluering af forsøg med efterværn under handlingsprogrammet “Lige muligheder” [Aftercare – Support to Young Persons Ageing Out of Care through “Equal Opportunities”]. Copenhagen: SFI – The Danish National Centre for Social Welfare, Report 10: 31.
- Lausten, M. 2014. “Needs and Characteristics of High-Resource Using Children and Youth: Denmark.” In Therapeutic Residential Care for Children and Youth. Developing Evidence-Based International Practice, edited by J. K. Whittaker, J. F. Del Valle, and L. Holmes, 73–84. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
- Mood, C. 2010. “Logistic Regression: Why We Cannot Do What We Think We Can Do, and What We Can Do about It.” European Sociological Review 26 (1): 67–82. doi:10.1093/esr/jcp006.
- Munkeby, L. 2005. Lykkehjulet. En studie av Trondheim Kommunes arbeid med forberedelsene til at ungdom er på vei ut av barnevernets omsorg [Wheel of Fortune. A Study of the Work in Trondheim Municipality on Preparing Young People Leaving the Care of Child Welfare Services]. Trondheim: NTNU.
- National Board of Social Services. 2011. Håndbog om Barnets Reform [Handbook of the Reform of Children]. Odense: National Board of Social Services.
- Okpych, N. J. 2015. “Receipt of Independent Living Services among Older Youth in Foster Care: An Analysis of National Data from the U.S.” Children and Youth Services Review 51: 74–86. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.01.021.
- Oterholm, I. 2008. “Barneverntjenestens arbeid med ettervern” [The Work with Aftercare in Child Welfare Services]. In Forskningskunnskap om ettervern [Research on Aftercare in Norway], edited by E. Bakketeig and E. Backe-Hansen, 161–206. Oslo: NOVA - Norwegian Social Research, NOVA Report 17/2008.
- Oterholm, I. 2018. “Limitations of Aftercare.” Nordic Social Work Research. doi:10.1080/2156857X.2018.1463283.
- Oterholm, I., and V. Paulsen. 2018. “Young People and Social Workers’ Experience of Differences between Child Welfare Services and Social Services.” Nordic Social Work Research. doi:10.1080/2156857X.2018.1450283.
- Storø, J. 2012. Ettervern og overgang for ungdom i barnevernet [Aftercare and the Transition of Youth in Care]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
- Storø, J. 2018. “To Manage on One’s Own after Leaving Care? A Discussion of the Concepts Independence versus Interdependence.” Nordic Social Work Research. doi:10.1080/2156857X.2018.1463282.
- Wells, M. A., and Y. A. Unrau. 2005. “Patterns of Foster Care Service Delivery.” Children and Youth Services Review 27: 511–531. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2004.10.002.