Two sides of the coin – Domestic violence survivors’ expectations of financial support and social workers’ expectations of survivors within the social assistance system

References

• Adams, A. E., R. M. Tolman, D. Bybee, C. M. Sullivan, and A. C. Kennedy. 2012. “The Impact of Intimate Partner Violence on Low Income Women’s Economic Well-Being: The Mediating Role of Job Stability.” Violence Against Women 18 (12): 1345–1367. doi:10.1177/1077801212474294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M. 2003. “Beyond Neopositivists, Romantics, and Localists: A Reflexive Approach to Interviews in Organizational Research.” Academy of Management Review 28 (1): 13–33. doi:10.2307/30040687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M., C. Hardy, and B. Harley. 2008. “Reflecting on Reflexivity: Reflexive Textual Practices in Organization and Management Theory.” Journal of Management Studies 45 (3): 480–501. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00765.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M., and D. Kärreman. 2012. Qualitative Research and Theory Development. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Anderberg, D., and H. Rainer. 2013. “Economic Abuse: A Theory of Intrahousehold Sabotage.” Journal of Public Economics 97: 282–295. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2012.10.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basu, B., and F. Famoye. 2004. “Domestic Violence against Women, and Their Economic Dependence: A Count Data Analysis.” Review of Political Economy 16 (4): 457–472. doi:10.1080/0953825042000256685.
   Google Scholar
• Brodkin, E. 1990. “Implementation as Policy Politics.” In Implementation and the Policy Process: Opening up the Black Box, edited by D. J. Palumbo and D. J. Calista, 107–118. New York: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brodkin, E., and G. Marston, eds. 2013. Work and the Welfare State: Street-Level Organizations and Workfare Politics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Byberg, I. 2002. “Kontroll eller handlingsfrihet? En studie om organiseringens betydelse i socialbidragsarbetet” [Control or Discretion – A Study of the Impact of the Organizational Form of Social Assistance Activities]. PhD diss., Stockholm University. doi:10.1044/1059-0889(2002/er01).
   Google Scholar
• Elman, R. A. 2001. “Unprotected by the Swedish Welfare State Revisited: Assessing a Decade of Reforms for Battered Women.” Women’s Studies International Forum 24 (1): 39–52. doi:10.1016/S0277-5395(00)00164-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enander, V. 2008. “Women Leaving Violent Men: Crossroads of Emotion, Cognition and Action.”PhD diss., University of Gothenburg.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson, M. 2010. “Makar emellan: Äktenskaplig oenighet och våld på kyrkliga och politiska arenor, 1810–1880” [Between Spouses: Marital Conflict and Violence in Religious and Political Arenas, 1810–1880]. PhD diss., Linnaeus University.
   Google Scholar
• Geremek, B. 1994. Poverty: A History. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P. 2015. “Implementing Electronic Information Systems in Human Service Organizations: The Challenge of Categorization.” Practice 27 (3): 163–175. doi:10.1080/09503153.2015.1014334.
   Google Scholar
• Haeseler, L. A. 2013a. “Themes of Coping in the Spectrum of Domestic Violence Abuse: A Review of the Literature.” Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work 10 (1): 25–32. doi:10.1080/15433714.2013.751230.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haeseler, L. A. 2013b. “Practitioner Perspectives of the Economic Coping Experiences of Women of Domestic Violence Abuse.” Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work 10 (1): 1–9. doi:10.1080/15433714.2012.751004.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harsløf, I., and R. Ulmestig, eds. 2013. Changing Social Risks and Social Policy Responses in the Nordic Welfare States. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan .
   Google Scholar
• Hasenfeld, Y. 1999. “Social Services and Welfare-to-Work: Prospects for the Social Work Profession.” Administration in Social Work 23 (3–4): 185–199. doi:10.1300/J147v23n03_11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasenfeld, Y. 2000. “Organizational Forms as Moral Practices: The Case of Welfare Departments.” Social Service Review 74 (3): 329–351. doi:10.1086/516408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasenfeld, Y., ed. 2010. Human Services as Complex Organizations. 2nd ed. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hasenfeld, Y., T. Ghose, and K. Larson. 2004. “The Logic of Sanctioning Welfare Recipients: An Empirical Assessment.” Social Service Review 78 (2): 304–319. doi:10.1086/382771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hetling, A. 2011. “Welfare Caseworker Assessments and Domestic Violence Services: Findings from Administrative Data and Case Narratives.” Violence Against Women 17 (8): 1046–1066. doi:10.1177/1077801211414928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hvinden, B., and H. Johansson, eds. 2007. Citizenship in Nordic Welfare States: Dynamics of Choice, Duties and Participation in a Changing Europe. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Irvine, A. 2011. “Duration, Dominance and Depth in Telephone and Face-to-Face Interviews: A Comparative Exploration.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 10 (3): 202–220. doi:10.1177/160940691101000302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Järvinen, M., and N. Mik-Meyer, eds. 2003. At skabe en klient: institutionelle identiteter i socialt arbejde [To Create a Client: Institutional Identities in Social Work]. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Kandaswamy, P. 2010. “You Trade in a Man for the Man: Domestic Violence and the U.S. Welfare State.” American Quarterly 62 (2): 253–277. doi:10.1353/aq.0.0133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, L., S. Burton, and L. Regan. 1996. “Beyond Victim or Survivor: Sexual Violence, Identity and Feminist Theory and Practice.” In Sexualizing the Social, edited by L. Adkins and V. Merchant, 77–101. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Köhler, P. A., K. Thorén, and R. Ulmestig. 2008. “Activation Policies in Sweden: `Something Old, Something New, Something Borrowed and Something Blue.” In Bringing the Jobless into Work, edited by W. Eichhorst, O. Kaufmann, and R. Konle-Seidl, 257–296. Springer Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Laakso, J. H., and D. J. Drevdahl. 2006. “Women, Abuse, and the Welfare Bureaucracy.” Affilia 21 (1): 84–96. doi:10.1177/0886109905283135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindhorst, T., E. Casey, and M. Meyers. 2010. “Frontline Workers Responses to Domestic Violence in Public Welfare Offices.” Social Work 55 (3): 235–243. doi:10.1093/sw/55.3.235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindhorst, T., M. Oxford, and M. R. Gillmore. 2007. “Longitudinal Effects of Domestic Violence on Employment and Welfare Outcomes.” Journal of Interpersonal Violence 22 (7): 812–828. doi:10.1177/0886260507301477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. 2010. Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Ljungwald, C. 2011. “The Emergence of the Crime Victim in the Swedish Social Services Act.” PhD diss., Stockholm University.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, S. R. 2014. “Beyond the Existence Proof: Ontological Conditions, Epistemological Implications, and In-Depth Interviews Research.” Quality & Quantity 48 (1): 387–408. doi:10.1007/s11135-012-9775-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundberg, L. 2017. “A New Area of Expertise? Incorporating Social Work with Intimate Partner Violence into Swedish Social Services Organizations.” Nordic Social Work Research 2017: 1–14. doi:10.1080/2156857X.2017.1343744.
   Google Scholar
• Lundgren, E., G. Heimer, J. Westerstrand., and A.-M. Kalliokoski. 2001. Captured Queen: Men’s Violence against Women in ‘Equal’ Sweden – A Prevalence Study. Stockholm: Fritzes offentliga publikationer.
   Google Scholar
• McLaren, H. 2013. “Domestic Violence, Housing and Employment: Workers’ Perspectives on Employment Assistance in Supported Accommodation.” Australian Journal of Social Issues 48 (4): 415–433. doi:10.1002/j.1839-4655.2013.tb00291.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panican, A., and R. Ulmestig. 2016. “Social Rights in the Shadow of Poor Relief: Social Assistance in the Universal Swedish Welfare State.” Citizenship Studies 20 (3–4): 475–489. doi:10.1080/13621025.2016.1139053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peter, T. 2006. “Domestic Violence in the United States and Sweden: A Welfare State Typology Comparison within A Power Resources Framework.” Women’s Studies International Forum 29 (1): 96–107. doi:10.1016/j.wsif.2005.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postmus, J. L. 2004. “Battered and on Welfare: The Experience of Women with the Family Violence Option.” Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare 31 (2): 113–123. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/jssw/vol31/iss2/7.
   Google Scholar
• Postmus, J. L., S.-B. Plummer, S. McMahon, N. S. Murshid, and M. S. Kim. 2012. “Understanding Economic Abuse in the Lives of Survivors.” Journal of Interpersonal Violence 27 (3): 411–430. doi:10.1177/0886260511421669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purvin, D. M. 2007. “At the Crossroads and in the Crosshairs: Social Welfare Policy and Low-Income Women’s Vulnerability to Domestic Violence.” Social Problems 54 (2): 188–210. doi:10.1525/sp.2007.54.2.188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roschelle, A. R. 2008. “Welfare Indignities: Homeless Women, Domestic Violence, and Welfare Reform in San Francisco.” Gender Issues 25 (3): 193–209. doi:10.1007/s12147-008-9061-9.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, C. K., and M. Schnabel. 2006. “Organizing for Economic Empowerment of Battered Women: Women’s Savings Accounts.” Journal of Community Practice 14 (3): 47–68. doi:10.1300/J125v14n03_04.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, C. K., T. L. Weaver, and M. Schnabel. 2007. “Economic Education for Battered Women: An Evaluation of Outcomes.” Affilia 22 (3): 240–254. doi:10.1177/0886109907302261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmel, G., and C. Jacobson. 1965. “The Poor.” Social Problems 13 (2): 118–140. doi:10.2307/798898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skillmark, M., L. Agevall Gross., C. Kjellgren., and V. Denvall. 2017. “The Pursuit of Standardization in Domestic Violence Social Work: A Multiple Case Study of How the Idea of Using Risk Assessment Tools Is Manifested and Processed in the Swedish Social Services.” Qualitative Social Work 2017. doi:10.1177/1473325017739461.
   Google Scholar
• Social Services Act (2001:453). [Socialtjänstlag 2001:453]. Stockholm: Sveriges Riksdag.
   Google Scholar
• Stranz, H. 2007. “Utrymme för variation – om prövning av socialbidrag” [Scope for Variation: On Assessments of Social Assistance Eligibility]. PhD diss., Stockholm University.
   Google Scholar
• Stylianou, A., J. Mathisen, L. Postmus, and S. McMahon. 2013. “Measuring Abusive Behaviors: Is Economic Abuse a Unique Form of Abuse?” Journal of Interpersonal Violence 28 (16): 3186–3204. doi:10.1177/0886260513496904.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedish Research Council. 2002. Forskningsetiska principer inom humanistisk-samhällsvetenskaplig forskning [Ethical Research Principles in Humanities and Social Science Research]. Stockholm: Vetenskapsrådet.
   Google Scholar
• Thorén, H. K. 2008. “Activation Policy in Action – A Street-Level Study of Social Assistance in the Swedish Welfare State.” PhD diss., Växjö University.
   Google Scholar
• Trygged, S., E. Hedlund, and I. Kåreholt. 2013. “Våldsutsatta kvinnor drabbas av långsiktiga negativa ekonomiska konsekvenser” [Abused Women Suffer Long-Term Negative Economic Consequences]. Socialmedicinsk tidskrift 90 (4): 604–612. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-96815.
   Google Scholar
• Van Aerschot, P. 2011. Activation Policies and the Protection of Individual Rights: A Critical Assessment of the Situation in Denmark, Finland and Sweden. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar