Contextualizing social workers’ problem-solving strategies: Fostering personal emancipation and enhancing employability in clients’ activation trajectories

References

• Bengtsson, M. 2014. “Towards Standby-Ability: Swedish and Danish Activation Policies in Flux.” International Journal of Social Welfare 23: S54–S70. doi:10.1111/ijsw.12075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonoli, G. 2010. “The Political Economy of Active Labor-Market Policy.” Politics & Society 38 (4): 435–457. doi:10.1177/0032329210381235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Card, D., J. Kluve, and A. Weber. 2010. “Active Labour Market Policy Evaluations: A Meta Analysis.” The Economic Journal 120: F452–F477. doi:10.3386/w16173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caswell, D., and M. Høybye-Mortensen. 2015. “Responses from the Frontline: How Organisations and Street-Level Bureaucrats Deal with Economic Sanctions.” European Journal of Social Security 3 (1): 489–503.
   Google Scholar
• Circular on Social Services in the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration Law. 2012. 2009–12–18–131 §29.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, M. 2014. “Rethinking Neoliberalism.” Journal of Sociology 50 (2): 150–163. doi:10.1177/1440783312442256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Work and Inclusion. 2006. “Work, Welfare and Social Inclusion.” (White Paper No. 9, 2006–2007). Oslo: Department of Work and Inclusion.
   Google Scholar
• Diop-Christensen, A. 2015. “Is ‘Making Work Pay’ Effective for the ‘Unemployable’? the Impact of Benefit Sanctions on Social Assistance Recipients in Denmark.” Journal of European Social Policy 25 (2): 210–224. doi:10.1177/0958928715573484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djuve, A. B., and H. C. Kavli. 2015. “Facilitating User Involvement in Activation Programmes: When Careers and Clerks Meet Pawns and Queens.” Journal of Social Policy 44 (2): 235–254. doi:10.1017/S0047279414000804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farmer, E. 2009. “How Do Placements in Kinship Care Compare with Those in Non-Kin Foster Care: Placement Patterns, Progress and Outcomes?” Child & Family Social Work 14 (3): 331–342. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2206.2008.00600.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 2000a. “Governmentality.” In Power: Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984, edited by J. Faubion, 201–222. Vol. 3. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 2000b. “The Subject and Power.” In Power: Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984, edited by J. Faubion, 326–348. Vol. 3. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Gitterman, A., and C. Knight. 2013. “Evidence-Guided Practice: Integrating the Science and Art of Social Work.” Families in Society 94: 70–78. doi:10.1606/1044-3894.4282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinsch, M., M. Gray, and E. Sharland. 2016. “Re-Conceptualising the Link between Research and Practice in Social Work: A Literature Review on Knowledge Utilisation.” International Journal of Social Welfare 25 (1): 98–104. doi:10.1111/ijsw.12164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks, S. 2016. “Theory and Social Work: A Conceptual Review of the Literature.” International Journal of Social Welfare 25 (4): 399–414. doi:10.1111/ijsw.2016.25.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjörne, E., K. Juhila, and C. Van Nijnatten. 2010. “Negotiating Dilemmas in the Practices of Street Level Welfare Work.” International Journal of Social Welfare 19: 303–309. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2397.2010.00721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyslop, I. 2012. “Social Work as a Practice of Freedom.” Journal of Social Work 12 (4): 404–422. doi:10.1177/1468017310388362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Federation of Social Workers (IFSW) and International Association of Schools of Social Work (IASSW). 2014. “Global Definition of Social Work.” http://ifsw.org/get-involved/global-definition-of-social-work.
   Google Scholar
• Jochem, S. 2011. “Nordic Employment Policies—Change and Continuity before and during the Financial Crisis.” Social Policy & Administration 45 (2): 131–145. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9515.2010.00760.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson, H. 2001. “Activation Policies in the Nordic Countries: Social Democratic Universalism under Pressure.” Journal of European Area Studies 9 (1): 63–77. doi:10.1080/14608460120061957.
   Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, H. 2009. “From a Beautiful Swan to an Ugly Duckling: The Renewal of Danish Activation Policy since 2003.” European Journal of Social Security 11 (4): 337–368. doi:10.1177/138826270901100401.
   Google Scholar
• Juritzen, T. I., H. L. Soberg, C. Røe, M. Saebu, G. Engen, T. Bliksvaer, and E. Engebretsen. 2017. “The One or the Many.” Qualitative Health Research 27 (1): 51–59. doi:10.1177/1049732316668297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallio, J., H. Blomberg, and C. Kroll. 2013. “Social Workers’ Attitudes Towards the Unemployed in the Nordic Countries.” International Journal of Social Welfare 22: 219–229. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2397.2012.0089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kananen, J. 2012. “Nordic Paths from Welfare to Workfare: Danish, Swedish and Finnish Labour Market Reforms in Comparison.” Local Economy 27 (5–6): 558–576. doi:10.1177/0269094212445351.
   Google Scholar
• Killick, C., and B. J. Taylor. 2012. “Judgements of Social Care Professionals on Elder Abuse Referrals: A Factorial Survey.” British Journal of Social Work 42 (5): 814–832. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcr109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjørstad, M. 2005. “Between Professional Ethics and Bureaucratic Rationality: The Challenging Ethical Position of Social Workers Who are Faced with Implementing a Workfare Policy.” European Journal of Social Work 8: 381–398. doi:10.1080/13691450500314459.
   Google Scholar
• Kluve, J. 2010. “The Effectiveness of European Active Labor Market Programs.” Labour Economics 17: 904–918. doi:10.1016/j.labeco.2010.02.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvale, S. 2008. Doing Interviews. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E., and C. Mouffe. 1985/1996. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Liljegren, A. 2012. “Pragmatic Professionalism: Micro-Level Discourse in Social Work.” European Journal of Social Work 15: 295–312. doi:10.1080/13691457.2010.543888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malmberg-Heimonen, I. E. 2015. “Social Workers’ Training Evaluated by a Cluster-Randomized Study: Reemployment for Welfare Recipients?” Research on Social Work Practice 25 (6): 643–653. doi:10.1177/1049731515569357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malterud, K., V. D. Siersma, and A. D. Guassora. 2016. “Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies.” Qualitative Health Research 26 (13): 1753–1760. doi:10.1177/1049732315617444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meeuwisse, A., R. Scaramuzzino, and H. Swärd. 2011. “Everyday Realities and Visionary Ideals among Social Workers in the Nordic Countries: A Matter of Specialization and Work Tasks?” Nordic Social Work Research 1 (1): 5–23. doi:10.1080/2156857X.2011.562030.
   Google Scholar
• Nilssen, E., and N. Kildal. 2009. “New Contractualism in Social Policy and the Norwegian Fight against Poverty and Social Exclusion.” Ethics and Social Welfare 3 (3): 303–321. doi:10.1080/17496530903209550.
   Google Scholar
• Novotná, G. 2014. “Competing Institutional Logics in the Development and Implementation of Integrated Treatment for Concurrent Disorders in Ontario: A Case Study.” Journal of Social Work 14 (3): 260–278. doi:10.1177/1468017313476613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nybom, J. 2013. “Activation and ‘Coercion’ among Swedish Social Assistance Claimants with Different Work Barriers and Socio-Demographic Characteristics: What Is the Logic?” International Journal of Social Welfare 22 (1): 45–57. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2397.2011.00858.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palinkas, L. A. 2014. “Causality and Causal Inference in Social Work: Quantitative and Qualitative Perspectives.” Research on Social Work Practice 24 (5): 540–547. doi:10.1177/1049731514536056.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raeymaeckers, P., and D. Dierckx. 2012. “To Work or Not to Work? the Role of the Organisational Context for Social Workers’ Perceptions on Activation.” British Journal of Social Work 42. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcs048.
   Google Scholar
• Røysum, A. 2012. “The Reform of the Welfare Services in Norway: One Office–One Way of Thinking?” European Journal of Social Work 16: 708–723. doi:10.1080/13691457.2012.722982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Social Services in the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration Law. § 2009-12-18–131.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, T. 2013. “Paperwork First, Not Work First: How Caseworkers Use Paperwork to Feel Effective.” Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare 40 (1): 9–27.
   Google Scholar
• Toerien, M., R. Sainsbury, P. Drue, and A. Irvine. 2013. “Putting Personalisation into Practice: Work-Focused Interviews in Jobcentre Plus.” Journal of Social Policy 42: 309–327. doi:10.1017/S0047279412000980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulmestig, R., and G. Marston. 2015. “Street-Level Perceptions of Procedural Rights for Young Unemployed People—A Comparative Study between Sweden and Australia.” Social Policy & Administration 49 (3): 394–411. doi:10.1111/spol.12085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Berkel, R., V. Borghi, and J. Newman. 2007. “The “Double Dynamics” of Activation: Institutions, Citizens and the Remaking of Welfare Governance.” International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 27 (9/10): 364–375. doi:10.1108/01443330710822066.
   Google Scholar
• Wallander, L. 2012. “Measuring Social Workers’ Judgements: Why and How to Use the Factorial Survey Approach in the Study of Professional Judgements.” Journal of Social Work 12 (4): 364–384. doi:10.1177/1468017310387463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitworth, A. 2016. “Neoliberal Paternalism and Paradoxical Subjects: Confusion and Contradiction in UK Activation Policy.” Critical Social Policy 36 (3): 412–431. doi:10.1177/0261018315624442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitworth, A., and E. Carter. 2014. “Welfare-To-Work Reform, Power and Inequality: From Governance to Governmentalities.” Journal of Contemporary European Studies 22 (2): 104–117. doi:10.1080/14782804.2014.907132.
   Google Scholar