Is measuring results in social services possible? The lived experiences of professionals in key positions

References

• Agerberg, M. 2014. “NPM var en syndabock ingen hade hört talas om [NPM Was a Scapegoat Nobody Had Heard of].” Läkartidningen 18: 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Ammons, D.N, and W. C. Rivenbark. 2008. “Factors Influencing the Use of Performance Data to Improve Municipal Services: Evidence from the North Carolina Benchmarking Project.” Public Administration Review 68 (2): 304–318. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00864.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnaboldi, M., I. Lapsley, and I. Steccolini. 2015. “Performance Management in the Public Sector: The Ultimate Challenge.” Financial Accountability and Management 31 (1): 1–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnek,M., M. Bergman, H. Edquist, L. Hultkrantz, S. Lundberg, and M. Svensson. 2013. Den offentliga sektorn-en analogi om att mäta produktivitet och prestationer [The Public Sector-an Analogy of Measuring Productivity and Performance]. Stockholm: Fritzes.
   Google Scholar
• CODEX-rules & guidelines for research, 2017. “Rules and Guidelines.” [Online]. http://www.codex.vr.se/en/regler.shtml
   Google Scholar
• Cree, V., S. Jain, and D.P. Hillen. 2019. “Evaluating Effectiveness in Social Work: Sharing Dilemmas in Practice.” European Journal of Social Work 22(4) 599–610. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2018.1441136.
   Google Scholar
• Flood, A. 2010. “Understanding Phenomenology.” Nurse Research 17 (2): 7–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2010.01.17.2.7.c7457.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gadamer, H. G. 1989. Förnuftet I Vetenskapens Tidsålder [Reason in the Age of Science]. Göteborg: Daidalos.
   Google Scholar
• Gärdenfors, P. 2006. Den meningssökande människan [The Meaning-seeking Man]. Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.
   Google Scholar
• Gozzi, R. 1996. “The Jigsaw Puzzle as a Metaphore for Knowledge.” ETC: A Review of General Semantics 53 (4): 447–451.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. 1991. “A Public Management for All Seasons?” Public Administration 69 (1): 3–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kretchmar, R. S. 2005. “Jigsaw Puzzles and River Banks: Two Ways of Picturing Our Future.” Ouest 57: 171–177.
   Google Scholar
• Lindgren, L. 2014. Nya Utvärderingsmonstret: Om kvalitetsmätning i den offentliga sektorn [The New Evaluation Monster: About Quality Measurement in the Publicsector]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Lindseth, A., and A. Norberg. 2004. “A Phenomenological Hermeneutical Method for Researching Lived Experience.” Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 18: 145–153. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6712.2004.00258.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mapp, T. 2008. “Understanding Phenomenology: The Lived Experience.” British Journal of Midwifery 16 (5): 308–311. doi:https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2008.16.5.29192.
   Google Scholar
• Mik-Meyer, N. 2018. “Organizational Professionalism: Social Workers Negotiating Tools of NPM.” Professions & Professionalism 8 (1): 1–11. doi:https://doi.org/10.7577/pp.2381.
   Google Scholar
• Mishler, E. 1986. Research Interviewing: Context and Narrative. USA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Modell, S. 2005. “Performance Management in the Public Sector: Past Experiences, Current Practices and Future Challenges.” Australian Accounting Review 15 (37): 55–65. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1835-2561.2005.tb00304.x.
   Google Scholar
• Oh, Y., and C. B. Bush. 2015. “Assessing Public Sector Performance and Untangling the Complexity of Public Performance Measurement. International Review of Public Administration 20 (3): 256–272. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2015.1047143.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. 2015. Qualitative Research & Evaluations Methods. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Poertner, J., T. Moore, and T. McDonald. 2008. “Managing for Outcomes: The Selection of Sets of Outcome Measures.” Administration in Social Work 32 (4): 5–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03643100802293808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pooler, D., T. Wolfer, and M. Freeman. 2014. “Finding Joy in Social Work II: Intrapersonal Sources.” Social Work 59 (3): 213–221. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swu020.
   Google Scholar
• Ricœur, P. 1976. Interpretation Theory. Fort Worth: Texas Christian University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ricœur, P. 1991. From Text to Action. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ricœur, P. 2016. Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences: Essays on Language, Action and Interpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Cambridge Philosophy Classics).
   Google Scholar
• Skaržauskienė, A. 2010. “Managing complexity: Systems thinking as a catalyst of the organization performance.” Measuring Business Excellence 14 (4): 49–64. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/13683041011093758.
   Google Scholar
• Social Service Act 2001:453. 2019. “[Online].” http://www.riksdagen.se/webbnav/index.aspx?nid=3911&bet=2001:453
   Google Scholar
• van Manen, M. 2016. Researching Lived Experience:Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy.[Second Edition]. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Verbeeten, F. H., and R. F. Speklé. 2015. “Management Control, Results-oriented Culture and Public Sector Performance: Empirical Evidence on New Public Management.” Organization Studies 36 (7): 953–978. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840615580014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Berkel, R., and E. Knies. 2016. “Performance Management, Caseloads and the Frontline Provision of Social Services.” Social Policy & Administration 50 (1): 59–78. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yvonne Feilzer, M. 2010. “Doing Mixed Methods Research Pragmatically: Implications for the Rediscovery of Pragmatism as a Research Paradigm.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 4 (1): 6–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689809349691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar