The use of a client-feedback system in activation encounters

References

• Andreassen, T. A. 2019. “Measures of Accountability and Delegated Discretion in Activation Work: Lessons from the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Service.” European Journal of Social Work 22 (4): 664–667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnstein, S. 1969. “A Ladder of Citizen Participation.” Journal of the American Institute of Planners 35 (4): 216–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barfoed, E. M. 2018. “‘From Stories to Standardised Interaction: Changing Conversational Formats in Social Work.” Nordic Social Work Research 8 (1): 36–41.
   Google Scholar
• Bartels, K. P. R. 2013. “Public Encounters: The History and Future of Face-to-Face Contact between Public Professionals and Citizens.” Public Administration 91 (2): 469–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barth, R. P., B. R. Lee, M. A. Lindsey, K. S. Collins, F. Strider, B. F. Charita, K. D. Becker, and J. A. Sparks. 2012. “Evidence-Based Practice at a Crossroads: The Timely Emergence of Common Elements and Common Factors.” Research on Social Work Practice 22 (1): 109–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beresford, P. 2012. “The Theory and Philosophy behind User Involvement.” In Social Care, Service Users and User Involvement: Research Highlight Series, edited by P. Beresford and S. Carr, 21–36. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Born, A., and P. Jensen. 2010. “Dialogued-based Activation – A New ‘Dispositive’?” International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 30 (5/6): 326–336.
   Google Scholar
• Bø-Rygg, A., and S. Oltedal. 2017. Ung@Jobb. Sluttrapport for Rogalandsprosjektet Praksis- Og Kunnskapsutvikling I Nav-kontor. Stavanger: Stavanger University.
   Google Scholar
• Caswell, D., L. Eskelinen, and S. P. Olesen. 2013. “Identity Work and Client Resistance Underneath the Canopy of Active Employment Policy.” Qualitative Social Work 12 (1): 8–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. 2014. Constructing Grounded Theory. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Danneris, S., and T. Dall. 2017. “Expressing and Responding to Self-efficacy in Meetings between Clients and Social Work Professionals.” Nordic Social Work Research 7 (2): 115–140.
   Google Scholar
• Drew, P., and J. Heritage. 1992. Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, B. L. 2012. “The Partners for Change Outcome Management System (PCOMS): The Heart and Soul of Change Project.” Canadian Psychology 53 (2): 93–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eskelinen, L., S. P. Olesen, and D. Caswell. 2010. “Client Contribution in Negotiations on Employability – Categories Revised?” International Journal of Social Welfare 19: 330–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flinkfeldt, M. 2017. “Wanting to Work: Managing the Sick Role in High-Stake Sickness Insurance Meetings.” Sociology of Health & Illness 39 (7): 1149–1165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. 1959. Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, C., K. Juhila, M. Matarese, and C. van Nijnatten. 2014. “Social Work Discourse in Practice.” In Analysing Social Work Communication: Discourse in Practice, edited by C. Hall, K. Juhila, M. Matarese, and C. van Nijnatten, 1–8. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, H. C., and S. Natland. 2017. “The Working Relationship between Social Worker and Service User in an Activation Policy Context.” Nordic Social Work Research 7 (2): 101–114.
   Google Scholar
• Healy, K. 2012. Social Work Methods and Skills. The Essential Foundation of Practice. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kadushian, A., and G. Kadushian. 2013. The Social Work Interview. 5th ed. New York: Colombia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• The Labour and Welfare Administration Act No. 20 of 16 June 2006. “Lov Om Arbeids- Og velferdsforvaltningen/NAV-loven.” https://lovdata.no/dokument/NL/lov/2006-06-16-20
   Google Scholar
• Lee, E., J. Herschman, and M. Johnstone. 2019. “How to Convey Social Workers’ Understanding to Clients in Everyday Interactions? Toward Epistemic Justice.” Social Work Education 38 (4): 485–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning, P. K. 2008. “Goffman on Organizations.” Organization Studies 29 (5): 677–699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matarese, M. T., and D. Caswell. 2017. “I’m Gonna Ask You about Yourself, so I Can Put It on Paper.” The British Journal of Social Work 48 (3): 714–732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minas, R. 2009. “Activation in Integrated Services? Bridging Social and Employment Services in European Countries.” Working paper 2009: 11. Stockholm: Institute for Future Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Molander, A., H. Grimen, and E. O. Eriksen. 2012. “Professional Discretion and Accountability in the Welfare State.” Journal of Applied Philosophy 29 (3): 214–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NESH. 2016. “Forskningsetiske Retningslinjer for Samfunnsvitenskap, Humaniora, Juss Og Teologi. [Guidelines for Research Ethics in the Social Sciences, Humanities, Law and Theology] (4. Utg.).” Accessed 12 September 2018. http://www.etikkom.no/forskningsetiske-retningslinjer/Samfunnsvitenskap-jus-og-humaniora/
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, G., and I. T. Ellingsen. 2019. “Arbeidsmarkedstiltak Som Læringsarena: Nav-veiledere Og Unge Arbeidsledige Om ‘Læring I Tiltak’.” Fontene Forskning 12 (1): 30–42.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, J. 2015. Social Work Practice. Assessment, Planning, Intervention and Review. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Prior, L. 2003. Using Documents in Social Research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Riis-Johansen, M. O., K. Halvorsen, E. Andenæs, and G. Thomassen. 2018. “Interaksjon Med Brukere I Nav: Analyse Av Samtaledata Som Grunnlag for Fagutvikling.” Tidsskrift for Velferdsforskning 21 (3): 227–240.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. 2016. “Shifting the Social Work Practice Paradigm: The Contribution of the Interactional Model.” Journal of Social Work Education 52 (1): 16–27.
   Google Scholar
• Solberg, J. 2011. “Activation Encounters: Dilemmas of Accountability in Constructing Clients as ‘Knowledgeable’.” Qualitative Social Work 10 (3): 381–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solberg, J. 2017. “Logic of Accounting: The Case of Reporting Previous Options in Norwegian Activation Encounters.” Discourse Processes 54 (7): 545–567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparks, J. A., and B. L. Duncan. 2018. “The Partners for Change Outcome Management System: A Both/And System for Collaborative Practice.” Family Process 57 (3): 800–816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., and J. Corbin. 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. 2nd ed ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Symonds, J. 2018. “Engaging Parents with Parenting Programmes: Relationship Building in Initial Conversations.” British Journal of Social Work 48: 1296–1314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toerien, M., R. Sainsbury, P. Drew, and A. Irvine. 2013. “Putting Personalisation into Practice: Work-Focused Interviews in Jobcentre Plus.” Journal of Social Policy 42 (2): 302–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, S., L. J. Dodd, C. Steele, and R. Randall. 2016. “A Systematic Review of Current Understandings of Employability.” Journal of Education and Work 29 (8): 877–901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar