Social workers as relational actors: descriptions of care order preparations in Finland

References

• Barter, K. 2008. “Building Relationships with Involuntary Clients in Child Protection: Lessons from Successful Practice.” In The Carrot or the Stick? Towards Effective Practice with Involuntary Clients in Safeguarding Children Work, edited by M. Calder, 93–103. Lymes Regis: Russell House Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Benbenishty, R., B. Davidson-Arad, M. Lopez, J. Devaney, T. Spratt, C. Koopmans, E. Knorth, C. Witteman, J. Del Valle, and D. Haye. 2015. “Decision-making in Child Protection: An International Comparative Study on Maltreatment Substantiation, Risk Assessment and Interventions Recommendations, and the Role of Professionals’ Child Welfare Attitudes.” Child Abuse & Neglect 49: 63–75. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.03.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berrick, J., S. Peckover, T. Pösö, and M. Skivenes. 2015. “The Formalized Framework for Decision Making in Child Protection Care Orders: A Cross-country Comparison.” Journal of European Social Policy 25: 366–378. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928715594540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadhurst, K. 2010. “Partnership and the Limits of Procedure: Prospects for Relationship between Parents and Professionals under the New Public Law Outline.” Child and Family Social Work 15: 97–106. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2206.2009.00648.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckley, H. 2003. Child Protection Work. Beyond the Rhetoric. London: Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, K., C. O’Mahony, C. Shore, and A. Parkes. 2018. “What Social Workers Talk about When They Talk about Child Care Proceedings in the District Court in Ireland?” Child & Family Social Work 23: 113–121. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, K., T. Pösö, and M. Skivenes, eds. 2017. Child Welfare Removals by the State: A Cross-country Analysis of Decision-making Systems. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Calder, M. 2008. The Carrot or the Stick? Towards Effective Practice with Involuntary Clients in Safeguarding Children Work. Lyme Regis: Russell House.
   Google Scholar
• Child Welfare Act 417. 2007. https://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/kaannokset/2007/en20070417_20131292.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Coffey, A., and P. Atkinson. 1996. Making Sense of Qualitative Data. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Egelund, T. 1996. “Bureaucracy or Professionalism? The Work Tools of Child Protection Services.” International Journal of Social Welfare 5: 165–174.
   Google Scholar
• Enroos, R., J. Korpinen, and T. Pösö. in preparation. ‘Informed Consent’ Revisited: A Conceptual Exercise with a Focus on Decision-Making in Child Welfare.
   Google Scholar
• Falconer, R., and S. Shardlow. 2018. “Comparing Child Protection Decision-making in England and Finland: Supervised or Supported Judgement?” Journal of Social Work Practice 32: 111–124. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2018.1438996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, N., N. Parton, and M. Skivenes, Eds. 2011. Child Protection Systems. International Trends and Orientations. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grell, P., N. Ahmadi, and B. Blom. 2017. “The Balancing Act: Clients with Complex Needs Describe Their Handling of Specialised Personal Social Services in Sweden.” British Journal of Social Work 47: 611–629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gubrium, J. F., and J. Holstein. 2001. Institutional Selves. Troubled Identities in a Postmodern World. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, C., K. Juhila, N. Parton, and T. Pösö, Eds. 2003. Constructing Clienthood in Social Work and Human Services. London: Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Harrikari, T. 2019. Lastensuojelun historia [The History of Child Welfare]. Tampere: Vastapaino.
   Google Scholar
• HE 252/2006vp. “Hallituksen esitys eduskunnalle Lastensuojelulaiksi ja eräiksi siihen liittyviksi laeiksi [Government Proposal about the Child Welfare Act and Some Acts Related to It to the Parliament].” https://www.finlex.fi/fi/esitykset/he/2006/20060252
   Google Scholar
• Heino, T., and K. Pursi. 2018. “Miten maakunta voi vähentää tarvetta lasten huostaanottoon? [How Could a Region Decrease the Need for Care Orders?].” Short research reviews 5. Helsinki: Terveyden ja hyvinvoinnin laitos. https://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/136072/URN_ISBN_978-952-343-079-2.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
   Google Scholar
• Hultman, E., T. Forkby, and S. Höjer. 2018. “Professionalised, Hybrid, and Layperson Models in Nordic Child Protection: Actors in Decision-making in Out of Home Placements.” Nordic Social Work Research. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2018.1538897.
   Google Scholar
• Hultman, E., S. Höjer, and M. Larsson. 2019. “Age Limits for Participation in Child Protection Court Proceedings in Sweden.” Child & Family Social Work. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12686.
   Google Scholar
• Kettle, M. 2018. “A Balancing Act: A Grounded Theory Study of the Professional Judgement of Child Protection Social Workers.” Journal of Social Work Practice 32: 219–231. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2018.1438997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson, S., and Y. Sjöblom. 2010. “Perspectives on Narrative Methods in Social Work Research.” International Journal of Social Welfare 19 (3): 272–280. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2397.2009.00672.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lastensuojelu. 2019. “[Child Welfare 2019]. Statistical analysis by request.” Terveyden ja hyvinvoinnin laitos ja Suomen virallinen tilasto. Accessed 12 June 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Leviner, P. 2014. “Child Protection under Swedish Law – Legal Duality and Uncertainty.” European Journal of Social Work 17 (2): 206–220. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2013.791249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, C., and J. Boddy. 2017. “Cooperation or Coercion? Children Coming into the Care System under Voluntary Arrangements.” https://www.frg.org.uk/images/YFYV/KI-Report-10.07-final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mänttäri-van der Kuip, M. 2016. “Moral Distress among Social Workers: The Role of Insufficient Resources.” International Journal of Social Welfare 25: 86–97. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misztal, B. A. 2003. Theories of Social Remembering. Maidenhead Philadelphia: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Payne, M. 2000. Anti-bureaucratic Social Work. Birmingham: Venture Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petrelius, P., and P. Eriksson. 2018. “Uudistuva lastensuojelu – Kohti asiakkaiden Ja ammattilaisten yhteistoimintaa [Reforming Child Welfare – Towards Partnership between Service-users and Practitioners].” Working papers 32. Helsinki: THL.
   Google Scholar
• Polletta, F., P. Chen, B. Gardner, and A. Motes. 2011. “The Sociology of Storytelling.” Annual Review of Sociology 37: 109–130. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-081309-150106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponnert, L., and S. Johansson. 2018. “Juridification and Standardisation: Two Legal Dimensions Influencing Contemporary Child Protection.” British Journal of Social Work 48: 2020–2037. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcx150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pösö, T., and R. Huhtanen. 2017. “Removals of Children in Finland: A Mix of Voluntary and Involuntary Decisions.” In Child Welfare Removals by the State: A Cross-country Analysis of Decision-making Systems, edited by K. Burns, T. Pösö, and M. Skivenes, 18–39. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pösö, T., E. Pekkarinen, S. Helavirta, and R. Laakso. 2018. ““Voluntary” and “Involuntary” Child Welfare: Challenging the Distinction.” Journal of Social Work 18: 253–272. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017316653269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riessman, C. 1993. Narrative Analysis. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Satka, M. 1995. Making Social Citizenship. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.
   Google Scholar
• Skivenes, M., and M. Tonheim. 2016. “Improving the Care Order Decision-making Processes: Viewpoints of Child Welfare Workers in Four Countries.” Human Service Organisations: Management, Leadership & Governance 40: 107–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer, W. 2001. “Self-presentation and Organisational Processing in a Human Service Agency.” In Institutional Selves. Troubled Identities in a Postmodern World, edited by J. Gubrium and J. Holstein, 158–175. NewYork: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thoburn, J. 2010. “Towards Knowledge-based Practice in Complex Child Protection Cases: A Research-based Expert Briefing.” Journal of Children’s Services 5: 9–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.5042/jcs.2010.0114.
   Google Scholar
• Trotter, C. 2008. “Involuntary Clients: A Review of the Literature.” In The Carrot or the Stick? Towards Effective Practice with Involuntary Clients in Safeguarding Children Work, edited by M. Calder, 3–11. Lyme Regis: Russell House.
   Google Scholar
• Venables, J., and K. Healey. 2019. “Collaborating with Parents during Intervention with Parental Agreement: Practitioner Perspectives on Procedural Justice.” Child & Family Social Work 24: 33–41. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar