Balancing standards and flexibility – Preconditions for a recovery-based tool in a Swedish alcohol and drug treatment context

References

• Abrahamson, M., and K. Tryggvesson. 2008. “Användning Av Bedömningsinstrument I Missbruksvården - En Nationell Kartläggning Och Fallstudier Av Två Län [The Use of Assesment Tools in Substance Abuse Treatment].” https://www.socialstyrelsen.se/publikationer2008/2008-112-2
   Google Scholar
• Anderberg, M., and M. Dahlberg. 2009. “Strukturerade Intervjuer Inom Missbruksvården: - Som En Grund För Kunskapsutveckling.” http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:vxu:diva-5286
   Google Scholar
• Bergmark, A., Å. Bergmark, and T. Lundström. 2011. Evidensbaserat Socialt Arbete : Teori, Kritik, Praktik [Evidence Based Social Work]. Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.
   Google Scholar
• Best, D., and A. B. Laudet. 2010. “The Potential of Recovery Capital.” https://www.thersa.org/discover/publications-and-articles/reports/the-potential-of-recovery-capital
   Google Scholar
• Best, D., C. Andersson, J. Irving, and M. Edwards. 2017. “Recovery Identity and Wellbeing: Is It Better to Be ‘Recovered’ or ‘In Recovery’?” Journal of Groups in Addiction & Recovery 12 (1): 27–36. doi:10.1080/1556035X.2016.1272071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, D., M. Edwards, A. Mama-Rudd, I. Cano, and J. Lehman. 2016. “Measuring an Individual’s Recovery Barriers and Strengths.” Addiction Professional; Cleveland 14 (4): 26,28–31.
   Google Scholar
• Björk, A. 2013. “Working with Different Logics: A Case Study on the Use of the Addiction Severity Index in Addiction Treatment Practice.” Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs 3. doi:10.2478/nsad-2013-0015.
   Google Scholar
• Björk, A. 2017. “Mot En Situerad Standardisering Inom Socialtjänsten [Towards a Situated Standardisation in the Social Services].” Socialvetenskaplig tidskrift 24 (3–4): 303–313.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, D. J., M. Kreuter, B. Spring, L. Cofta-Woerpel, L. Linnan, D. Weiner, S. Bakken, C. P. Kaplan, L. Squiers, and C. Fabrizio. 2009. “How We Design Feasibility Studies.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine 5: 452–457.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Brunsson, N., and B. Jacobsson. 2002. A World of Standards. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199256952.001.0001/acprof-9780199256952
   Google Scholar
• Burns, J., and D. Marks. 2013. “Can Recovery Capital Predict Addiction Problem Severity?” Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly 3: 303–320.
   Google Scholar
• Cloud, W., and R. Granfield. 2008. “Conceptualizing Recovery Capital: Expansion of a Theoretical Construct.” Substance Use & Misuse 12–13 (12–13): 1971. doi:10.1080/10826080802289762.
   Google Scholar
• Corrigan, P. W., S. Qin, L. Davidson, G. Schomerus, V. Shuman, and D. Smelson. 2019. “How Does the Public Understand Recovery from Severe Mental Illness versus Substance Use Disorder?” Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 42 (4): 341–349. doi:10.1037/prj0000380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G. 1990. “4 the Three Political Economies of the Welfare State.” International Journal of Sociology 20 (3): 92–123. doi:10.1080/15579336.1990.11770001.
   Google Scholar
• Fernler, K. 2012. “Perspektiv På Implementering – Leading Health Care [Perspectives on Implementation].” LHC REPORT, 8. http://leadinghealthcare.se/publikationer/perspektiv-pa-implementering/
   Google Scholar
• Grape, O., B. Blom, and R. Johansson. 2006. Organisation Och Omvärld : Nyinstitutionell Analys Av Människobehandlande Organisationer [Organisation and Surrounding World]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Groshkova, T., D. Best, and W. White. 2013. “The Assessment of Recovery Capital: Properties and Psychometrics of a Measure of Addiction Recovery Strengths.” Drug and Alcohol Review 32 (2): 187–194. doi:10.1111/j.1465-3362.2012.00489.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guberman, N., J. Keefe, P. Fancey, and L. Barylak. 2007. “‘Not Another Form!’: Lessons for Implementing Carer Assessment in Health and Social Service Agencies.” Health & Social Care in the Community 15 (6): 577–587. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2524.2007.00718.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasenfeld, Y. 2009. Human Services as Complex Organizations. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• HM Government. 2010. Drug Strategy 2010. HM Government. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/drug-strategy-2010
   Google Scholar
• Inter-ministerial Group on Drugs. 2012. Putting Full Recovery First: The Recovery Roadmap. Home Office. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/putting-full-recovery-first-the-recovery-roadmap
   Google Scholar
• Jenner, H., and V. Segraeus. 2005. “The Swedish DOC System – An Attempt to Combine Documentation and Self-Evaluation.” European Addiction Research 11 (4): 186–192. doi:10.1159/000086400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson, R. 2002. Nyinstitutionalismen Inom Organisationsanalysen : En Skolbildnings Uppkomst, Spridning Och Utveckling [The Neoinstituionalism in the Organisational Analysis]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson, R. 2007. Vid Byråkratins Gränser : Om Handlingsfrihetens Organisatoriska Begränsningar I Klientrelaterat Arbete [At the Borderlines of Bureaucracy]. Lund: Arkiv.
   Google Scholar
• Knaapen, L. 2014 “Evidence-Based Medicine or Cookbook Medicine? Addressing Concerns over the Standardization of Care“. Science & Medicine 8 (6): 823–836.
   Google Scholar
• Laudet, A. B. 2007. “What Does Recovery Mean to You? Lessons from the Recovery Experience for Research and Practice.” Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 33 (3): 243–256. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2007.04.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. 1969. Toward a Theory of Street-level Bureaucracy. Madison: University of Wisconsin.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, D. J., J. P. Garske, and M. K. Davis. 2000. “Relation of the Therapeutic Alliance with Outcome and Other Variables: A Meta-analytic Review.” Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 68 (3): 438–450. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.68.3.438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinell Barfoed, E. 2014. “Standardiserad Interaktion - En Utmaning I Socialt Arbete [Standardised Interaction - a Challenge in Social Work].” Socialvetenskaplig Tidskrift 1: 4–23.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, P. G., and W. R. Miller. 2009. “What Should We Be Aiming for in the Treatment of Addiction?” Addiction (Abingdon, England) 104 (5): 685–686. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02514.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, B., J. Hejdenberg, S. Hinrichs-Krapels, and D. Armstrong. 2018. “Do Feasibility Studies Contribute To, or Avoid, Waste in Research?” Plos One 13 (4): e0195951. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0195951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morton, S., L. O’Reilly, and K. O’Brien. 2016. “Boxing Clever: Utilizing Education and Fitness to Build Recovery Capital in a Substance Use Rehabilitation Program.” Journal of Substance Use 21 (5): 521–526. doi:10.3109/14659891.2015.1077281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neale, J., S. Nettleton, and L. Pickering. 2013. “Does Recovery-oriented Treatment Prompt Heroin Users Prematurely into Detoxification and Abstinence Programmes? Qualitative Study.” Drug and Alcohol Dependence 127 (1): 163–169. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.06.030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettersen, H., M. Brodahl, J. Rundgren, L. Davidson, and I. A. Havnes. 2019. “Partnering with Persons in Long-term Recovery from Substance Use Disorder: Experiences from a Collaborative Research Project.” Harm Reduction Journal 16 (1): 1–14. doi:10.1186/s12954-019-0310-x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scott, C., M. Dennis, and M. Foss. 2005. “Utilizing Recovery Management Checkups to shorten the cycle of relaps, treatment reentry, and recovery“. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 78 (3): 325–338
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scottish Government. 2008. The Road to Recovery: A New Approach to Tackling Scotland’s Drug Problem. Scottish Government. https://www.gov.scot/publications/road-recovery-new-approach-tackling-scotlands-drug-problem/
   Google Scholar
• Skillmark, M., and V. Denvall. 2018. “The Standardizers: Social Workers’ Role When Implementing Assessment Tools in the Swedish Social Services.” Nordic Social Work Research 8 (1): 88–99. doi:10.1080/2156857X.2017.1309678.
   Google Scholar
• Skogens, L. 2012. “ASI I Retorik Och Praktik [ASI - Rhetoric and Practice].” Socionomens Forskningssupplement 32: 34–42.
   Google Scholar
• Skogens, L., and N. von Greiff. 2016. “Conditions for Recovery from Alcohol and Drug Abuse – Comparisons between Male and Female Clients of Different Social Position.” Nordic Social Work Research 6 (3): 211–221. doi:10.1080/2156857X.2016.1156018.
   Google Scholar
• Skogens, L., N. von Greiff, and J. Esch Ekström. 2017. “Positiva Förändringsprocesser Bland Unga Vuxna I Öppenvård. [Positive Processes of Change in Young Adults in Outpatient Care].” Socialvetenskaplig Tidskrift 24 (7): 39–57. https://journals.lub.lu.se/svt/article/view/16895
   Google Scholar
• Spear, S. E., A. H. Brown, and R. A. Rawson. 2005. ““Painting a Picture of the Client”: Implementing the Addiction Severity Index in Community Treatment Programs.” Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 29 (4): 277–282. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2005.08.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spies, G. M., C. S. L. Delport, and M. P. le Roux. 2015. “Developing Safety and Risk Assessment Tools and Training Materials: A Researcher-practice Dialogue.” Research on Social Work Practice 25 (6): 670–680. doi:10.1177/1049731514565393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svendsen, T. S., J. Bjornestad, T. E. Slyngstad, J. R. McKay, A. W. Skaalevik, M. Veseth, C. Moltu, and S. Nesvaag. 2020. ““Becoming Myself”: How Participants in a Longitudinal Substance Use Disorder Recovery Study Experienced Receiving Continuous Feedback on Their Results.” Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy 15 (1). doi:10.1186/s13011-020-0254-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Betty Ford Institute Consensus Panel. 2007. “What Is Recovery? A Working Definition from the Betty Ford Institute.” Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 33 (3): 221–228. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2007.06.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The National Board of Health and Welfare. 2019. “Nationella Riktlinjer För Vård Och Stöd Vid Missbruk Och Beroende – Stöd För Styrning Och Ledning [National Guidelines for Care and Support for Substance Abuse and Dependence].” http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/publikationer2019/2019-1-16/
   Google Scholar
• Timmermans, S., and S. Epstein. 2010. “A World of Standards but Not A Standard World: Toward A Sociology of Standards and Standardization“. Annual Review of Sociology 36: 69–89. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1691324
   Google Scholar
• Topor, A., L. Skogens, and N. von Greiff. 2018. “Building Trust and Recovery Capital: The Professionals’ Helpful Practice.” Advances in Dual Diagnosis 11 (2): 76–87. doi:10.1108/ADD-11-2017-0022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topor, A., M. Borg, S. Di Girolamo, and L. Davidson. 2011. “Not Just an Individual Journey: Social Aspects of Recovery.” International Journal of Social Psychiatry 57 (1): 90–99. doi:10.1177/0020764009345062.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisner, C., K. Delucchi, H. Matzger, and L. Schmidt. 2003. “The Role of Community Services and Informal Support on Five-year Drinking Trajectories of Alcohol Dependent and Problem Drinkers.” Journal of Studies on Alcohol 64 (6): 862–873. doi:10.15288/jsa.2003.64.862.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• White, W. L. 2007. “Addiction Recovery: Its Definition and Conceptual Boundaries.” Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 33 (3): 229–241. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2007.04.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuiderent-Jerak, T. 2015. Situated Intervention: Sociological Experiments in Health Care. Cambridge: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262029384.001.0001
   Google Scholar