Language as resource and challenge among bilingual social workers in the Swedish social services

References

• Ahmed, S. 2000. Strange Encounters: Embodied Others in Post-coloniality. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Baines, D. 2002. “Storylines in Racialized Times: Racism and Anti-Racism in Toronto’s Social Services.” British Journal of Social Work 32 (2): 185–199. doi:10.1093/bjsw/32.2.185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1977. “The Economic of Linguistic Exchanges.” Social Science Information 16 (6): 645–668. doi:10.1177/053901847701600601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambon, A. 2013. “Recognising the Other, Understanding the Other: A Brief History of Social Work and Otherness.” Nordic Social Work Research 3 (2): 120–129. doi:10.1080/2156857X.2013.835137.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. 2001. “The Reflexive Interview and a Performative Social Science.” Qualitative Research 1 (1): 23–46. doi:10.1177/146879410100100102.
   Google Scholar
• Dominelli, L. 2004. “Crossing International Divides: Language and Communication within International Settings.” Social Work Education 23 (5): 515–525. doi:10.1080/0261547042000252253.
   Google Scholar
• Dunk-West, P. 2013. How to Be a Social Worker: A Critical Guide for Students. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Eliassi, B. 2017. “Conceptions of Immigrant Integration and Racism among Social Workers in Sweden.” Journal of Progressive Human Services 28 (1): 6–35. doi:10.1080/10428232.2017.1249242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engstrom, D., and J. W. Min. 2004. “Perspectives of Bilingual Social Workers.” Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work 13 (1): 59–82. doi:10.1300/J051v13n01_04.
   Google Scholar
• Engstrom, D., L. Piedra, and J. W. Min. 2009. “Bilingual Social Workers: Language and Service Complexities.” Administration in Social Work 33 (2): 167–185. doi:10.1080/03643100902768832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Essed, P. 1996. Diversity. Gender, Color, and Culture. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fook, J. 2002. Social Work: Critical Theory and Practice. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fook, J. 2012. Social Work: A Critical Approach to Practice. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, M., and M. Holloway. 2005. “Language in the Shaping of Social Work.” British Journal of Social Work 35 (1): 37–53. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bch161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruber, S. 2016. “Cultural Competence in Institutional Care for Youths: Experts with Ambivalent Positions.” Nordic Social Work Research 6 (2): 89–101. doi:10.1080/2156857X.2015.1109541.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, C., S. Slembrouck, and S. Sarangi. 2006. Language Practices in Social Work: Categorisation and Accountability in Child Welfare. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, G. 2006. “Broadening the Conceptual Lens on Language in Social Work: Difference, Diversity and English as a Global Language.” British Journal of Social Work 36: 401–418. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bch271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, G. 2007a. “Language as A Problem, A Right or A Resource? A Study of How Bilingual Practitioners See Language Policy Being Enacted in Social Work.” Journal of Social Work 7 (1): 71–92. doi:10.1177/1468017307075990.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, G. 2007b. “A Postcolonial Perspective on Language and Difference in Social Work: Bilingual Practitioners Working in the Linguistic Borderlands.” European Journal of Social Work 10 (1): 73–88. doi:10.1080/13691450601143682.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, G. 2009. “Language Politics, Linguistic Capital and Bilingual Practitioners in Social Work.” British Journal of Social Work 39: 1082–1100. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcm153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe, D. 1998. “Relationship-based Thinking and Practice in Social Work.” Journal of Social Work Practice 12 (1): 45–56. doi:10.1080/02650539808415131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hylander, I. 2001. Fokusgrupper som kvalitativ datainsamlingsmetod. Linköpings universitet: Institutionen för pedagogik och psykologi
   Google Scholar
• Kamali, M. 2002. Kulturkompetens i socialt arbete: om socialarbetarens och klientens kulturella bakgrund. Stockholm: Carlsson.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, G. 2000. ‘Race’, Gender, Social Welfare. Encounters in a Postcolonial Society. Cambridge: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parton, N., and P. O’Byrne. 2000. Constructive Social Work: Towards a New Practice. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Payne, M. 2014. Modern Social Work Theory. 4th ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pollack, S. 2003. “Focus-Group Methodology in Research with Incarcerated Women: Race, Power, and Collective Experience.” Affilia 18 (4): 461–472. doi:10.1177/0886109903257550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sainsbury, D. 2012. Welfare States and Immigrant Rights: The Politics of Inclusion and Exclusion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• SCB. 2020. “Summary of Population Statistics 1960–2019.” https://www.scb.se/en/finding-statistics/statistics-by-subject-area/population/population-composition/population-statistics/pong/tables-and-graphs/yearly-statistics–the-whole-country/summary-of-population-statistics/
   Google Scholar
• Sjögren, J. 2018. Med relationen som redskap?: Om socialsekreterare, klientarbete och professionalitet i socialtjänsten. Linköping: Linköpings universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Socialstyrelsen. 2010. Interkulturellt socialt arbete. Stockholm: Socialstyrelsen.
   Google Scholar
• Sundberg, G. 2013. “Representation, mångfald och förnyelse i offentlig förvaltning.” In I det offentligas tjänst: Nya förutsättningar för tjänstemannarollen, edited by Å. Casula Vifell and A. Ivarsson Westerberg. Malmö: Gleerups, pp. 69–89.
   Google Scholar
• Svennevig, J. 2012. “Interaction in Workpace Meetings.” Discourse Studies 14 (1): 3–10. doi:10.1177/1461445611427203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temple, B., and A. Young. 2004. “Qualitative Research and Translation Dilemmas.” Qualitative Research 4 (2): 161–178. doi:10.1177/1468794104044430.
   Google Scholar
• Trevithick, P. 2003. “Effective Relationship-based Practice: A Theoretical Exploration.” Journal of Social Work Practice 17 (2): 163–176. doi:10.1080/026505302000145699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valenta, M. 2012. “Insider Position and Social Identities of Service Providers with Immigrant Backgrounds in Accomodation for Asylum Seekers.” Nordic Social Work Research 2 (2): 87–104. doi:10.1080/2156857X.2012.694822.
   Google Scholar
• van Nes, F., T. Abma, H. Jonsson, and D. Deeg. 2010. “Language Differences in Qualitative Research: Is Meaning Lost in Translation?” European Journal of Ageing 7 (4): 313–316. doi:10.1007/s10433-010-0168-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins-Hayes, C. 2009. The New Welfare Bureaucrats Entanglements of Race, Class, and Policy Reform. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins-Hayes, C. 2011. “Race, Respect and Red Tape: Inside the Black Box of Racially Representative Bureaucracies.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21 (Suppl. 2): i233–i251. doi:10.1093/jopart/muq096.
   Google Scholar