Street-level bureaucrat in the introduction programme – client-centred and authority-centred strategies to handle challenging working conditions

References

• Abdulla, A. 2017. “Readiness or Resistance? Newly Arrived Adult Migrants’ Experiences, Meaning Making, and Learning in Sweden.” Phd diss., Linköping University, Linköping.
   Google Scholar
• Act. 2016:752. About Temporary Restrictions on the Possibility of Obtaining a Residence Permit in Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Act. 2010:197. on establishment initiatives for certain newly arrived immigrants.
   Google Scholar
• Act. 2017:584. On Responsibility for Establishment Services for Certain Newly Arrived Immigrants.
   Google Scholar
• Astvik, W., and M. Melin. 2013. “Överlevnadsstrategier i socialt arbete: Hur påverkar copingstrategier kvalitet och hälsa?” Arbetsmarknad Och Arbetsliv 19 (4): 61–73.
   Google Scholar
• Ataç, I. 2019. “Deserving Shelter: Conditional Access to Accommodation for Rejected Asylum Seekers in Austria, the Netherlands, and Sweden.” Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies 17 (1): 44–60. doi:10.1080/15562948.2018.1530401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borelli, L. M., and A. Lindberg. 2018. “The Creativity of Coping: Alternative Tales of Moral Dilemmas among Migration Control Officers.” International Journal of Migration and Border Studies 4 (3): 16–178.
   Google Scholar
• Brännström, L., K. Giritli Nygren, G. Lindén, and J. Nyhlén. 2018. “Lived Experiences of Changing Integration Policies: Immigrant Narratives of Institutional Support and Labour Market Inclusion/Exclusion in Sweden.” Nordic Journal of Migration Research 8 (1): 25–34. doi:10.1515/njmr-2018-0009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Brodkin, E. 2011. “Policy Work: Street-Level Organizations Under New Managerialism.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21 (2): 253–277. doi:10.1093/jopart/muq093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodkin, E. 2012. “Reflections on Street‐Level Bureaucracy: Past, Present, and Future.” Public Administration Review 72 (6): 940–949. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02657.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dominelli, L. 2004. Social Work: Theory and Practice for a Changing Profession. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dubois, V. 2010. The Bureaucrat and the Poor: Encounters in French Welfare Offices. Surrey: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Dustmann, C., F. Fasani, T. Frattini, L. Minale, and U. Schoenberg. 2017. “On the Economics and Politics of Refugee Migration.” Economic Policy 32 (91): 497–550. doi:10.1093/epolic/eix008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engdahl, M. 2016. “Medborgarskap och arbetsmarknaden.” In Mångfaldens dilemman. Medborgarskap och integrationspolitik, edited by B. Bengtsson, G. Myrberg, and R. Andersson. Malmö: Gleerups. 65–80.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson, E. 2018. “The Naked Truth about Migrants’ Views − User Involvement as Radical Knowledge Production.” Nordic Social Work Research. doi:10.1080/2156857X.2018.1547786.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson, E. 2019. Perspektiv på integration och etablering – Kunskapsunderlag för ett strategiskt arbete med stöd till nyanlända. Linköping: Linköping University.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, T. 2013. “Organisational Rules and Discretion in Adult Social Work.” The British Journal of Social Work 43 (4): 739–758. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcs008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandes, A. G. 2015. “Introduktionsprogram för nyanlända i Sverige, Danmark och Norge.” In Socialt arbete och migration, edited by N. Montesino and E. Righard. Malmö: Gleerups. 63–86.
   Google Scholar
• Floros, K., and M. Bak Jørgensen. 2020. “Tracing the Future of Migrants’ Labour Relations. Experiences of Institutionalised Migrant Precarity in Denmark and Greece.” Political Geography: 77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2019.102120
   Google Scholar
• Government Missive. 2008. Egenmakt mot utanförskap – regeringens strategi för integration. Stockholm: Government Offices of Sweden. 09:24.
   Google Scholar
• Greer, I. 2016. “Welfare Reform, Precarity and the Re-commodification of Labor.” Work, Employment and Society 30 (1): 162–173. doi:10.1177/0950017015572578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafson, Å. 2004. “Om integrations- och normaliseringsprocesser bland bosniska flyktingar.” PhD diss., Umeå University, Umeå.
   Google Scholar
• Handler, J. 1986. The Conditions of Discretion: Autonomy, Community, Bureaucracy. New York: Russell Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Handler, J., and E. J. Hollingsworth. 1971. The “Deserving Poor”: A Study of Welfare Administration. New York: Markham.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, P. 2017. “Asylum or Austerity? The ‘Refugee Crisis’ and the Keynesian Interlude.” European Political Science 17 (1): 128–139. doi:10.1057/s41304-017-0122-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holm Vohnsen, N. 2017. The Absurdity of Bureaucracy. How Implementation Works. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hupe, P., and A. Buffat. 2014. “A Public Service Gap: Capturing Contexts in A Comparative Approach of Street-level Bureaucracy.” Public Management Review 16 (4): 548–569. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.854401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikonen, A.-M. 2015. Perspectives on the Introduction Program Health and Well-being. Voices from Newly Arrived Migrants. Malmö: Malmö University.
   Google Scholar
• Jilke, S., and L. Tummers. 2018. “Which Clients are Deserving of Help? A Theoretical Model and Experimental Test.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 28 (2): 226–238. doi:10.1093/jopart/muy002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson, K. 2018. De professionella och etableringsuppdraget. Linköping: Linköping University.
   Google Scholar
• Kamali, M. 1999. “Distorted Integration: Problems of Monolithic Order.” Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 12 (1): 81–97.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, J. 2015. “Integrationen och arbetets marknad.” PhD diss., Atlas Akademi, Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Levitas, R. 2005. The Inclusive Society? Social Exclusion and New Labour. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lindencrona, F. 2008. “Strategies for a Health Promoting Introduction for Newly-arrived Refugees and Other Immigrants.” PhD diss., Karolinska institutet, Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. 2010. Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Original edition published in 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Lundberg, A. 2017. “En kommentar till Sveriges krispolitik mot människor på flykt.” Tidskrift for Velferdsforskning 20 (4): 349–356. doi:10.18261/.2464-3076-2017-04-07.
   Google Scholar
• Maynard-Moody, S., and M. Musheno. 2000. “State Agent or Citizen Agent: Two Narratives of Discretion.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10 (2): 329–358. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024272.
   Google Scholar
• Meyers, M., B. Glaser, and K. Donald. 1998. “On the Front Lines of Welfare Delivery: Are Workers Implementing Policy Reforms?” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 17 (1): 1–22. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6688(199824)17:1<1::AID-PAM1>3.0.CO;2-I.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Labour. 2018. Regleringsbrev för budgetåret 2018 avseende Arbetsförmedlingen. Stockholm: Ministry of Labor.
   Google Scholar
• Neergaard, A. 2004. Arbetsförmedlarna på en rasifierad arbetsmarknad: förändrare, förstärkare eller bara förvaltare? Norrköping: Centre for ethnic and urban studies.
   Google Scholar
• Oberfield, Z. W. 2010. “Rule following and Discretion at Government’s Frontlines: Continuity and Change during Organization Socialization.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 20 (4): 735–755. doi:10.1093/jopart/mup025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polsky, A. 1991. The Rise of the Therapeutic State. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Proposition. 2009. Nyanlända invandrares arbetsmarknadsetablering – egenansvar med professionellt stöd. Stockholm: Government Offices of Sweden. 10:60.
   Google Scholar
• Prottas, J. 1979. People‐Processing: The Street‐Level Bureaucrat in Public Service Bureaucracies. Toronto: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Qvist, M. 2012. “Styrning av lokala integrationsprogram. Institutioner, nätverk och professionella normer inom det svenska flyktingmottagandet.” PhD diss., Linköping University, Linköping.
   Google Scholar
• Qvist, M., and C. Tovatt. 2014. Från förväntningar till utfall – etableringsreformen på lokal nivå. Slutrapport för utvärdering av myndigheternas genomförande av etableringsreformen i Södermanlands län. Nyköping: Länsstyrelsen i Södermanlands län.
   Google Scholar
• Regulation. 2017:819. On Remuneration to Participants in Labor Market Policy Initiatives.
   Google Scholar
• Regulation. 2017:820. On Establishment Initiatives for Certain Newly Arrived Immigrants.
   Google Scholar
• Rytter, M. 2018. “Writing against Integration: Danish Imaginaries of Culture, Race and Belonging.” Ethnos 84 (4): 678–697, d o i: 1 0.1 080/00141844.2018.1458745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sales, R. 2002. “The Deserving and the Undeserving? Refugees, Asylum Seekers and Welfare in Britain.” Critical Social Policy 22 (3): 456–478. doi:10.1177/026101830202200305.
   Google Scholar
• SAPM (Swedish Agency for Public Management). 2019. Ett nytt regelverk för etableringsuppdraget – genomförande och effekter för Arbetsförmedlingens verksamhet. Stockholm: Swedish Agency for Public Management.
   Google Scholar
• Schierenbeck, I. 2003. “Bakom välfärdsstatens dörrar.” PhD diss., University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, A., and H. Ingram. 1993. “Social Construction of Target Populations: Implications for Politics and Policy.” The American Political Science Review 87 (2): 334–347. doi:10.2307/2939044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SNAO (Swedish National Audit Office). 2015. Nyanländas etablering: är statens insatser effektiva? Stockholm: Swedish National Audit Office.
   Google Scholar
• SPES (Swedish Public Employment Service). 2016. Arbetsförmedlingens återrapportering 2016. Aktiviteter inom etableringsuppdraget. Stockholm: Swedish Public Employment Service.
   Google Scholar
• SPES (Swedish Public Employment Service). 2017a. Kunskapsöversikt: Nyanländas etablering på den svenska arbetsmarknaden. Stockholm: Swedish Public Employment Service.
   Google Scholar
• SPES (Swedish Public Employment Service). 2017b. Perspektiv på etableringsuppdraget. Stockholm: Swedish Public Employment Service.
   Google Scholar
• SPES (Swedish Public Employment Service). 2018. Förbättra genomförandet av etableringsuppdraget. Slutredovisning. Stockholm: Swedish Public Employment Service.
   Google Scholar
• SPES (Swedish Public Employment Service). 2019a. Arbetsförmedlingens årsredovisning 2018. Stockholm: Swedish Public Employment Service.
   Google Scholar
• SPES (Swedish Public Employment Service). 2019b. Arbetsmarknadspolitiska program. Årsrapport 2018. Stockholm: Swedish Public Employment Service.
   Google Scholar
• ST Trade union. 2012. Uppdrag jobb! – Arbetsförmedlares recept för att få alla i arbete. Stockholm: ST Labour union.
   Google Scholar
• Tovatt, C. 2013. Att avkoda systemets regler. Nyanlända invandrares berättelser om mötet med etableringen. Nyköping: Länsstyrelsen i Södermanlands län.
   Google Scholar
• Tummers, L. G., V. Bekkers, E. Vink, and M. Musheno. 2015. “Coping during Public Service Delivery: A Conceptualization and Systematic Review of the Literature.” Journal of Public Administration, Research and Theory 25 (4): 1099–1126. doi:10.1093/jopart/muu056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Oorschot, W., F. Roosma, B. Meuleman, and T. Reeskens. 2017. The Social Legitimacy of Targeted Welfare: Attitudes to Welfare Deservingness. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Wallander, L., and A. Molander. 2014. “Disentangling Professional Discretion: A Conceptual and Methodological Approach.” Professions and Professionalism 4 (3): 808–826. doi:10.7577/pp.808.
   Google Scholar
• Winter, S., and V. Lehmann Nielsen. 2008. Implementering af politik. Århus: Academica.
   Google Scholar
• Zaun, N. 2017. “States as Gatekeepers in EU Asylum Politics: Explaining the Non‐adoption of a Refugee Quota System.” Journal of Common Market Studies 56 (1): 44–62. doi:10.1111/jcms.12663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar