Child protection investigations of child custody cases in Norway: caseworkers’ obstacles and coping strategies

References

• Anderson, S., S. A. Anderson, K. Palmer, M. S. Mutchler, and L. Baker. 2010. “Defining High Conflict.” The American Journal of Family Therapy 39 (1): 11–27. doi:10.1080/01926187.2010.530194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archard, D., and M. Skivenes. 2009. “Hearing the Child.” Child & Family Social Work 14 (4): 391–399. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2206.2008.00606.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, P. L., and T. Luckmann. 1967. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Anchor Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bergman, A.-S., and A. Rejmer. 2017. “Parents in Child Custody Disputes: Why are They Disputing?” Journal of Child Custody 14 (2–3): 134–150. doi:10.1080/15379418.2017.1365320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birnbaum, R., and N. Bala. 2010. “Toward the Differentiation of High‐conflict Families: An Analysis of Social Science Research and Canadian Case Law.” Family Court Review 48 (3): 403–416. doi:10.1111/j.1744-1617.2010.01319.x.
   Google Scholar
• BLD. 2009. “Snakk Med Meg! En Veileder Om Å Snakke Med Barn I Barnevernet.” [Talk to me! A guide to talking to children in Child Protection Services]. Oslo: Barne- og likestillingsdepartementet.
   Google Scholar
• BLD. 2012–2013. “Prop. 85 L: Endringer I Barnelova (Barneperspektivet I Foreldretvister).” [Amendments to the Children Act]. Oslo: Barne-, likestillings- og inkluderingsdepartementet.
   Google Scholar
• BLD. 2013. “Forholdet Mellom Barnevernloven Og Barneloven. Barneverntjenestens Rolle Der Foreldrenes Konflikter Går Utover Barnets Omsorgssituasjon.” [The relationship between the Child Welfare Act and the Children’s Act]. Oslo: Barne-, likestillings- og inkluderingsdepartementet.
   Google Scholar
• BLD. 2015–2016. “Meld. St. 24. Familien—ansvar, Frihet Og Valgmuligheter.” [Consultation paper. Family—responsibility, freedom, and choice]. Oslo: Barne-, likestillingsdepartementet.
   Google Scholar
• BLD. 2019. “Høringsnotat—Forslag Til Ny Barnevernslov.” [Consultation paper. Proposed amendments to the Child Welfare Act]. Oslo: Barne- og likestillingsdepartementet.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Broadhurst, K., D. Wastell, S. White, C. Hall, S. Peckover, K. Thompson, A. Pithouse, and D. Davey. 2010. “Performing ‘Initial Assessment’: Identifying the Latent Conditions for Error at the Front-door of Local Authority Children’s Services.” The British Journal of Social Work 40 (2): 352–370. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcn162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camisasca, E., S. Miragoli, P. Di Blasio, and J. Grych. 2017. “Children’s Coping Strategies to Inter-parental Conflict: The Moderating Role of Attachment.” Journal of Child and Family Studies 26 (4): 1099–1111. doi:10.1007/s10826-016-0645-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cashmore, J. 2011. “Children’s Participation in Family Law Decision-making: Theoretical Approaches to Understanding children’s Views.” Children and Youth Services Review 33 (4): 515–520. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.05.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Child Welfare Act (1992).
   Google Scholar
• Children’s Act (1982).
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., and A. Strauss. 1990. “Grounded Theory Research: Procedures, Canons, and Evaluative Criteria.” Qualitative Sociology 13 (1): 3–21. doi:10.1007/BF00988593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, S. L., E. M. Andenes, and J. Y. Dahl. 2020. “Questioned Parents and the Professional Gaze. Negotiating the Organizational Narratives of the At-risk Parent.” Journal of Children’s Services 16 (1): 1–12. doi:10.1108/JCS-01-2020-0001.
   Google Scholar
• Egelund, T. 2003. ““Farlige” Forældre: Den Institutionelle Konstruktion Af Dem, Der Afviger Fra Os.” In At Skabe En Klient: Institutionelle Identiter I Socialt Arbejde. [Constructring a Client: Institutional Identities in Social Work], edited by M. Järvinen and N. Mik-Meyer, 59–81, København:Hans Reitzels Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Ekeland, T.-J., R. Bergem, and V. Myklebust. 2019. “Evidence-based Practice in Social Work: Perceptions and Attitudes among Norwegian Social Workers.” European Journal of Social Work 22 (4): 611–622. doi:10.1080/13691457.2018.1441139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, H. 2016. “What Social Workers Do in Performing Child Protection Work: Evidence from Research into Face-to-face Practice.” Child & Family Social Work 21 (3): 283–294. doi:10.1111/cfs.12142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, H. 2017. “How Children Become Invisible in Child Protection Work: Findings from Research into Day-to-day Social Work Practice.” The British Journal of Social Work 47 (4): 1007–1023. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcw065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilson, L. 2015. “Lipsky’s Street Level Bureaucracy.” In The Oxford Handbook of Classics in Public Policy and Administration, edited by S. J. Balla, M. Lodge, and E. C. Page. Oxford:Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harold, G. T., and R. Sellers. 2018. “Annual Research Review: Interparental Conflict and Youth Psychopathology—an Evidence Review and Practice Focused Update.” Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 59 (4): 374–402. doi:10.1111/jcpp.12893.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heggdalsvik, I. K., P. A. Rød, and K. Heggen. 2018. “Decision-making in Child Welfare Services: Professional Discretion versus Standardized Templates.” Child & Family Social Work 23 (3): 522–529. doi:10.1111/cfs.12444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennum, N. 2011. “Children’s Confidences, Parents’ Confessions: Child Welfare Dialogues as Technologies of Control.” Qualitative Social Work 11 (5): 535–549. doi:10.1177/1473325011408175.
   Google Scholar
• HOD. 2012. Forskrift Om Fastlegeordning I Kommunene [Regulations on Family Doctors in Municipalities]. Oslo: Helse- og omsorgsdepartementet.
   Google Scholar
• Höjer, I., and K. Röbäck. 2009. “Constructing Children’s Views in the Enforcement of Contact Orders.” The International Journal of Children’s Rights 17 (4): 663–680. doi:10.1163/157181808X401457.
   Google Scholar
• Holstein, J. A., and J. F. Gubrium. 1995. The Active Interview. London:Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Houston, C., Bala, N., & M. Saini. (2017). Crossover cases of high‐conflict families involving child protection services: Ontario research findings and suggestions for good practices. Family court review, 55(3), 362–374. doi:10.1111/fcre.12289
   Google Scholar
• Jevne, K. S., and O. S. Ulvik. 2012. “Grensearbeid: Barnevernets Møte Med Foreldrekonfliktsaker [Boundary Work: Child Welfare Work in High-conflict Custodial Cases].” Fontene Forskning, no. 2: 18–32.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. 2010. Street-level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services (30th Anniversary Expanded Ed.). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Marthinsen, E., G. Clifford, H. Fauske, and W. Lichtwarck. 2020. “Professional Values Challenged by Case Management—Theorizing Practice in Child Protection with Reflexive Practitioners.” Social Sciences (Basel) 9 (4): 44. doi:10.3390/socsci9040044.
   Google Scholar
• Mik-Meyer, N. 2017. The Power of Citizens and Professionals in Welfare Encounters: The Influence of Bureaucracy, Market and Psychology. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. L. 2010. Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. London:SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Munro, E. 2002. Effective Child Protection. London:SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Munro, E., and J. Hardie. 2019. “Why We Should Stop Talking about Objectivity and Subjectivity in Social Work.” The British Journal of Social Work 49 (2): 411–427. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcy054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NOU. 2012:5. Bedre beskyttelse av barns omsorg. Ekspertutvalgets utredning om det biologiske prinsipp i barnevernet. [Better protection of children's care]. Oslo: Barne-, Likestillings-og inkluderingsdepartementet
   Google Scholar
• NOU. 2016:16. Ny Barnevernslov. Sikring Av Barns Rett Til Omsorg Og Beskyttelse [The New Child Welfare Act: Securing Children’s Rights to Care and Procetion]. Oslo: Barne-, Likestillings-og inkluderingsdepartementet.
   Google Scholar
• Rejmer, A., and A.-S. Bergman. 2016. “Barnkonventionens Implementering I Svensk Lagstiftning Och Praktik—barns Bästa Och Barns Rätt Att Uttrycka Sina Åsikter Vid Vårdnadstvister [Implementation of the Convention on the Rights of the Child in Swedish Legislation and Practice—the Best Interests of Children and the Right of Children to Express Their Opinions in Custody Disputes].” Barn (Trondheim, Norway) 37 (3–4). doi:10.5324/barn.v37i3-4.3380.
   Google Scholar
• Rhoades, K. A. 2008. “Children’s Responses to Interparental Conflict: A Meta-Analysis of Their Associations with Child Adjustment.” Child Development 79 (6): 1942–1956. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01235.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rød, P. A., A. C. Iversen, and K. Underlid. 2013. “The Child Welfare service’s Assessments in Custody Cases that Involve Minors.” European Journal of Social Work 16 (4): 470–488. doi:10.1080/13691457.2012.709484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rød, P. A., T.-J. Ekeland, and F. Thuen. 2008. “Barns Erfaringer Med Konfliktfylte Samlivsbrudd: Problemforståelse Og Følelsesmessige Reaksjoner [Children’s Experiences of Conflictual Parental Breakups: Understanding and Emotional Reactions].” Tidsskrift for Norsk Psykologforening 45 (5): 555–562.
   Google Scholar
• Saini, M., T. Black, E. Godbout, and S. Deljavan. 2019. “Feeling the Pressure to Take Sides: A Survey of Child Protection Workers‘ Experiences about Responding to Allegations of Child Maltreatment within the Context of Child Custody Disputes.” Children and Youth Services Review 96: 127–133. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.11.044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sletten, M. S., and I. T. Ellingsen. 2020. “When Standardization Becomes the Lens of Professional Practice in Child Welfare Services.” Child & Family Social Work 25 (3): 714–722. doi:10.1111/cfs.12748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sudland, C. 2020. “Challenges and Dilemmas Working with High-conflict Families in Child Protection Casework.” Child & Family Social Work 25 (2): 248–255. doi:10.1111/cfs.12680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tisdall, E. K. M. 2016. “Subjects with Agency? Children’s Participation in Family Law Proceedings.” The Journal of Social Welfare & Family Law 38 (4): 362–379. doi:10.1080/09649069.2016.1239345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNCRC. 1989. The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. Geneva: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• van Bijleveld, G. G., C. W. M. Dedding, and J. F. Bunders-Aelen. 2015. “Children’s and Young people’s Participation within Child Welfare and Child Protection Services: A State-of-the-art Review.” Child & Family Social Work 20 (2): 129–138. doi:10.1111/cfs.12082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vis, S. A., Ø. Christiansen, K. J. S. Havnen, C. Lauritzen, A. C. Iversen, and T. Tjelflaat. 2020. Barnevernets Undersøkelsesarbeid—fra Bekymring Til Beslutning: Samlede Resultater Og Anbefalinger [The Child Proction Services Investigations—from Concern to Decision: Overall Results and Recommendations]. Oslo: Bufdir.
   Google Scholar
• Vis, S. A., A. Holtan, and N. Thomas. 2012. “Obstacles for Child Participation in Care and Protection Cases-why Norwegian Social Workers Find It Difficult.” Child Abuse Review 21 (1): 7–23. doi:10.1002/car.1155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins, D. 2015. “Balancing Risk and Protective Factors: How Do Social Workers and Social Work Managers Analyse Referrals that May Indicate Children are at Risk of Significant Harm.” British Journal of Social Work 45 (1): 395–411. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bct114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar