The turn towards co-creation within the Norwegian welfare state: community work in new clothing?

References

• Ågotnes, G., F. F. Jacobsen, and M. Szebehely. 2018. “The Growth of the For-profit Nursing Home Sector in Norway and Sweden: Driving Forces and Resistance.” In The Privatization of Care: The Case of Nursing Homes, edited by P. Armstrong, 38–50. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Askheim, O. P., I. M. Lid, and S. Østensjø. 2019. “Samproduksjon I Forskning – Hva Er Det, Og Hva Innebærer Det? [Co-production in Research: What Is It, and What Does It Imply?].” In Samproduksjon I Forskning. Forskning Med Nye Aktører, edited by O. P. Askheim, I. M. Lid, and S. Østensjø, 13–35. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget Open Access. doi:https://doi.org/10.18261/9788215031675-2019.
   Google Scholar
• Askheim, O. P., and J. R. Høiseth. 2019. “Medforskerrollen –i Spenningsfeltet Mellom Anerkjennelse, Kooptering Og «tokenisme» [The Role of the Co-researcher: In the Tension between Recognition, Co-optation and “Tokenism”).” In Samproduksjon I Forskning. Forskning Med Nye Aktører, edited by O. P. Askheim, I. M. Lid, and S. Østensjø, 214–230. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget Open Access. doi:https://doi.org/10.18261/9788215031675-2019.
   Google Scholar
• Askheim, O. P., K. Christensen, S. Fluge, and I. Guldvik. 2016. “User Participation in the Norwegian Welfare Context: An Analysis of Policy Discourses.” Journal of Social Policy 46 (3): 583–601. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279416000817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Askheim, O. P. 2016. “Samproduksjon Som Velferdssektorens Kinderegg [Co-production as the Kinderegg of the Welfare Sector].” Tidsskrift for Omsorgsforskning 2 (1): 24–36. doi:https://doi.org/10.18261/2387-5984-2016-01-06.
   Google Scholar
• Askheim, O. P. 2020. “Service Users and Academics: Collaborators Not Competitors in Welfare Research.” Nordic Social Work Research 1–11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2020.1852954.
   Google Scholar
• Bacchi, C. L. 2009. Analysing Policy: What’s the Problem Represented to Be? Frenchs Forest, NSW: Pearson, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, S., A. Hart, K. Pahl, and P. Ward. 2019. “Co-producing Research: A Community Development Approach.” In Co-Producing Research: A Community Development Approach, edited by S. Banks, A. Hart, K. Pahl, and P. Ward, 1–18. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, D. B., and K. Pahl. 2018. “Co-production: Towards a Utopian Approach.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 21 (1): 105–117. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2017.1348581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beresford, P. 2013. “From “Other” to Involved: User Involvement in Research: An Emerging Paradigm.” Nordic Social Work Research 3 (2): 139–148. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2013.835138.
   Google Scholar
• Blix, B. H., and T. Hamran. 2017. ““When the Saints Go Marching In”: Constructions of Senior Volunteering in Norwegian Government White Papers, and in Norwegian Senior Volunteers’ and Health-care Professionals’ Stories.” Ageing and Society 38 (7): 1399–1428. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/s0144686x17000046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borg, M., and O. P. Askheim. 2010. “Deltagerbasert Forskning I Psykisk Helsearbeid – Et Bidrag Til Mer «brukbar» Kunnskap? [Participant-based Research in Psychiatric Health Work].” Tidsskrift for Psykisk Helsearbeid 7 (2), 100–109 : Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Branom, C. 2012. “Community-based Participatory Research as a Social Work Research and Intervention Approach.” Journal of Community Practice 20 (3): 260–273. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10705422.2012.699871.
   Google Scholar
• Butterfield, A., and T. Soska. 2004. “University-community Partnership: Universities in Civic Engagement.” Journal of Community Practice 12 (3–4): 1–11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1300/J125v12n03_01.
   Google Scholar
• Checkoway, B. 1997. “Reinventing the Research University for Public Service.” Journal of Planning Literature 11 (3): 307–319. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/088541229701100301.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, K., and S. Fluge. 2016. “Brukermedvirkning I Norsk Eldreomsorgspolitikk – Om Utviklingen Av Retorikken Om Individuelt Medansvar. [User Involvement in Norwegian Elderly Care Politics: On the Development of the Rhetoric of Individual Responsibility].” Tidsskrift for Velferdsforskning 19 (3): 261–277. doi:https://doi.org/10.18261/.2464-3076-2016-03-04.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson, E. 2020. “The Naked Truth about Migrants’ Views: User Involvement as Radical Knowledge Production.” Nordic Social Work Research 10 (4): 302–316. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2018.1547786.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. 2009. Scales of Justice: Reimagining Political Space in a Globalizing World. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. 1993 [1970]. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. London: Penguin Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Glynos, J., and E. Speed. 2012. “Varieties of Co-production in Public Services: Time Banks in a UK Health Policy Context.” Critical Policy Studies 6 (4): 402–433. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2012.730760.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, T., C. Jackson, S. Shaw, and T. Janamian. 2016. “Achieving Research Impact through Co-creation in Community-based Health Services: Literature Review and Case Study.” The Milbank Quarterly 94 (2): 392–429. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hrafnsdóttir, S., and E. Karlsdóttir. 2009. “Community Work in Iceland.” In Community Work in the Nordic Countries: New Trends, edited by G. S. Hutchinson, 64–74. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Hugman, R., and L. Bartolomei. 2014. “The Ethics of Participation in Community Work Practice.” In Participation in Community Work: International Perspectives, edited by A. K. Larsen, V. Sewpaul, and G. O. Hole, 19–29. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, G. S. 2010. Samfunnsarbeid. Mobilisering Og Deltagelse I Sosialfaglig Arbeid. Sosialarbeideren i samfunnsarbeid [Community Work: Mobilization and Participation in Social Work]. Oslo: Gyldendal.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, F. 2015. “Understanding Public Elderly Care Policy in Norway: A Narrative Analysis of Governmental White Papers.” Journal of Aging Studies 34: 199–205. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2015.04.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenhaug, L. M. 2017. “Myndighetenes Forventninger Til Pårørende Som Samprodusenter I Omsorgstjenester [The Expectations of the Government Towards Next of Kin as Co-producers in Care Services].” Tidsskrift for Velferdsforskning 21 (1): 39–58. doi:https://doi.org/10.18261/.2464-3076-2018-01-03.
   Google Scholar
• Krogh, A. H., Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J.et al 2020. Samskabelse af innovative offentlige løsninger [Co-creation of innovative public solutions]. In Samskaping: Sosial Innovasjon for Helse og Velferd, edited by E. Willumsen, and A. Ødegård, 45–65. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, A. K., V. Sewpaul, and G. O. Hole. 2014. “Introduction.” In Participation in Community Work: International Perspectives, edited by A. K. Larsen, V. Sewpaul, and G. O. Hole, 11–14. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ledwith, M. 2011. Community Development: A Critical Approach. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ledwith, M. 2016. Community Development in Action: Putting Freire into Practice. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lindén, K. 2009. “Community Work: Integration or Mobilisation?” In Community Work in the Nordic Countries: New Trends, edited by G. S. Hutchinson, 168–182. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Culture. 2018. “Voluntarism – Strong, Independent, Diverse: The Governmental Voluntary Policy. (Meld. St. 10 (2018–2019).” Report to the Storting (white paper). Oslo. Accessed 1 Feb 2021. https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/meld.-st.-10-20182019/id2621384/.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Health and Care Services. 2011. “Innovation in the Care Services.” Official Norwegian Reports. NOU 2011: 11. Accessed 15 Mar 2021. https://www.regjeringen.no/en/dokumenter/nou-2011-11/id646812/.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Health and Care Services. 2013. “Public Health Report (Meld. St. 34 D. 2012–2013).” Report to the Storting (white paper). Oslo. Accessed 15 Mar 2021. https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/meld-st-34-20122013/id723818/
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Health and Care Services. 2018. ”A Full Life – All Your Life: A Quality Reform for Older Persons. (Meld. St. 15 (2017–2018).” Report to the Storting (white paper). Oslo. Accessed 1 Feb 2021. https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/196f99e63aa14f849c4e4b9b9906a3f8/en-gb/pdfs/stm201720180015000engpdfs.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Health and Care Services. 2019. “Public Health Report: Good Lives in a Safe Society. (Meld. St. 19 (2018-2019).” Report to the Storting (white paper). Oslo. Accessed 1 Feb 2021. https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/meld.-st.-19-20182019/id2639770/
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Local Government and Modernisation. 2020. “An Innovative Public Sector: Culture, Leadership and Competence. (Meld. St. 30 (2019–2020).” Report to the Storting (white paper). Oslo. Accessed 15 Mar 2021. https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/meld.-st.-30-20192020/id2715113/.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, L., and K. Uba 2015. “Austerity Measures across Europe: Technical Report.” Retrieved October 6, 2020. Accessed 10 Jun 2020. http://www.livewhat.unige.ch/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Austerity-Measures-Across-Europe.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nowotny, O., M. Gibbons, and P. Scott. 2001. Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Popple, K. 1995. Analyzing Community Work: Its Theory and Practice. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Røiseland, A., and C. Lo. 2019. “Samskaping – Nyttig Begrep for Norske Forskere Og Praktikere? [Co-creation: A Useful Term for Norwegian Researchers and Practitioners?].” Norsk Statsvitenskapelig Tidsskrift 35 (1): 51–58. doi:https://doi.org/10.18261/.1504-2936-2019-01-03.
   Google Scholar
• Rycroft-Malone, J., C. Burton, J. Wilkinson, G. Harvey, B. McCormack, R. Baker, S. Dopson, et al. 2015. “Collective Action for Implementation: A Realist Evaluation of Organisational Collaboration in Healthcare.” Implementation Science 11 (1): 17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0380-z.
   Google Scholar
• Sewpaul, V., I. Østhus, and C. Mhone. 2014. “Power and Participation in Community Work Research and Practice.” In Participation in Community Work: International Perspectives, edited by A. K. Larsen, V. Sewpaul, and G. O. Hole, 107–119. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sjöberg, S., and P. Turunen. 2018a. “Forskning Och Metoder För Kunskap Och Handling. [Research and Methods for Knowledge and Practice].” In Samhällsarbete: Aktörer, Arenor Och Perspektiv, edited by S. Sjöberg and P. Turunen, 89–113. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Sjöberg, S., and P. Turunen. 2018b. “Samhällsarbetets Begrepp, Inriktningar Och Perspectiv. [Community Work’s Concepts, Directions and Perspectives].” In Samhällsarbete: Aktörer, Arenor Och Perspektiv, edited by S. Sjöberg and P. Turunen, 19–44. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, S. 1997. Building Community Strengths: A Resource Book on Capacity Building. London: Community Development Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Stuckler, D., A. Reeves, R. Loopstra, M. Karanikolos, and M. McKee. 2017. “Austerity and Health: The Impact in the UK and Europe.” European Journal of Public Health 27 (4): 18–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckx167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turunen, P. 2013. Deltagardemokratiska Och Systemiska Metoder För Komplexa Samhällsfrågor Och Samhällsentreprenörskap: Ett Komparativt Perspektiv. [Participant democratic and systemic methods for complex societal issues and society entrepreneurship: A comparative perspective]. Göteborg: Institutionen för sociologi och arbetsvetenskap, Göteborgs universitet. Accessed10 Jan 2021 http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-26279
   Google Scholar
• Turunen, P. 2009. “Nordic Community Work in Transition: A Change Towards Diversity and Reflexivity.” In Community Work in the Nordic Countries: New Trends, edited by G. S. Hutchinson, 38–63. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Twelvetrees, A. 2017. Community Development, Social Action and Social Planning. London: Red Globe Press Accessed1 Feb 2021.
   Google Scholar