Dataism versus relationshipism: a social work perspective

References

• Allegheny County. 2017. Developing Predictive Risk Models to Support Child Maltreatment Hotline Screening Decisions. Pittsburgh, PA: Allegheny County Department of Human Services.
   Google Scholar
• Aronson, J., and K. Smith. 2009. “Managing Restructured Social Services: Expanding the Social?” British Journal of Social Work 40 (2): 530–547. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcp002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baines, D. 2010. “Neoliberal Restructuring, Activism/participation and Social Unionism in the Nonprofit Social Services.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 39 (1): 10–28. doi:10.1177/0899764008326681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biestek, F. 1957. The Casework Relationship. Chicago: Loyola University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Binns, R. 2017. “Algorithmic Accountability and Public Reason.” Philosophy and Technology 31 (4): 543–556. doi:10.1007/s13347-017-0263-5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bouverne-De Bie, M. 2015. Social Agogics: A Social Pedagogical Perspective on Social Work [Sociale Agogiek: Een Sociaalpedagogisch Perspectief op Sociaal Werk]. Ghent: Academia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bowker, G. C., and S. L. Star. 2000. Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Broadhurst, K., D. Wastell, S. White, C. Hall, S. Peckover, A. Pithouse, K. Thompson, and D. D. Davey. 2010. “Performing “Initial Assessment”: Identifying the Latent Conditions for Error at the Front-door of Local Authority Children’s Services’.” British Journal of Social Work 40 (2): 352–370. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcn162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, J., and D. van den Broek. 2013. “Accountable and Countable: Information Management Systems and the Bureaucratization of Social Work.” British Journal of Social Work 39 (7): 1326–1342. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcn027.
   Google Scholar
• Carrilio, T. E. 2008. “Accountability, Evidence and the Use of Information Systems in Social Service Programs.” Journal of Social Work 8 (2): 135–148. doi:10.1177/1468017307088495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, J. and Newman, J. 1997. The Managerial State. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Clayton, V., M. Sanders, E. Shoenwald, L. Surkis, and D. Gibbons. 2020. Machine Learning in Children’s Services. London: What Works for Children’s.
   Google Scholar
• Dalrymple, J., and J. Boylan. 2013. Effective Advocacy in Social Work. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Devlieghere, J. 2017. The logic of the database : in search of responsive social work. Belgium: Ghent UniversityFaculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Devlieghere, J., Bradt, L. and Roose, R. 2018. “Creating transparency through electronic Information systems : opportunities and pitfalls.” British Journal of Social Work 48 (3): 734–750. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcx052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devlieghere, J. and Roose, R. 2020. “A policy, management and practitioners’ perspective on social work’s rational turn : there are cracks at every level.” European Journal of Social Work 23 (1): 144–155. doi:10.1080/13691457.2018.1460324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, T. 2011. “Professionals, Managers and Discretion: Critiquing Street-level Bureaucracy.” British Journal of Social Work 41 (2): 368–386. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcq074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, T. 2013. “The Moral Economy of Street-Level Service.” In Paper Presented at International Political Science Association: RC32 - Public Policy and Administration, 381–399. Dubrovnik, Croatia: University of London .
   Google Scholar
• Evans, T., and M. Hardy. 2010. Evidence and Knowledge for Practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Falconer, M. K., T. Rhodes, K. C. Mena, and R. Reid. 2009. “Management Information Systems: Applications in Home Visiting Programs Designed to Prevent Child Abuse and Neglect.” Journal of Technology in Human Services 27 (3): 194–215. doi:10.1080/15228830903093098.
   Google Scholar
• Gambrill, E. 2005. “Decision Making in Child Welfare: Errors and Their Context.” Children and Youth Services Review. Special Issue: Decision Making in Child Welfare 27 4: 347–352. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2004.12.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, P. M. 2004. “The Electronic Eye: Emerging Surveillant Practices in Social Work with Children and Families.” European Journal of Social Work 7 (1): 57–71. doi:10.1080/136919145042000217401.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, P. M. 2005. “Social Work’s ‘Electronic Turn’: Notes on the Deployment of Information and Communication Technologies in Social Work with Children and Families.” Critical Social Policy 25 (4): 529–553. doi:10.1177/0261018305057044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P. 2013. “The development of electronic information systems for the future: Practitioners, 'embodied structures' and 'technologies-in-practice’.” The British Journal of Social Work 43 (3): 430–445. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcr202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P. 2015. “Electronic information systems and social work: principles of participatory design for social workers.” Advances in Social Work 16 (1): 31–42.
   Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P. 2017. “Decision-making about the adoption of information technology in social welfare agencies: some key considerations.” European Journal of Social Work 21 (4): 1–9. doi:10.1080/13691457.2017.1297773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P. 2018. “Developments in electronic information systems in social welfare agencies: from simple to complex.” The British Journal of Social Work 49 (1): 1–15. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcy014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P. 2020. “Algorithmically Based Decision Support Tools: Skeptical Thinking about the Inclusion of Previous Involvement.” Practice 33 (1): 1–14. doi:10.1080/09503153.2020.1749584.
   Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P. 2021. “Practitioner perspectives on the implementation of an electronic information system to enforce practice standards in England.” European Journal of Social Work 24 (5): 761–771. doi:10.1080/13691457.2020.1870213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, E. 1957. “Attributes of a Profession.” Social Work 2: 5–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harari, Y. N. 2017. Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow. London: Harvill Secker.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, A., and I. Shaw. 2011. Social Work and ICT. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hollnagel, E., and D. D. Woods. 2005. Joint Cognitive Systems: Foundations of Cognitive Systems Engineering. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huuskonen, S., and P. Vakkari. 2015. “Selective Clients’ Trajectories in case Files: Filtering Out Information in the Recording Process in Child Protection.” The British Journal of Social Work 45 (3): 792–808. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bct160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isokuorttia, N., E. Aaltio, T. Laajasaloc, and J. Barlow. 2020. “Effectiveness of Child Protection Practice Models: A Systematic Review.” Child Abuse and Neglect 108: 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., and G. Klein. 2009. “Conditions for Intuitive Expertise: A Failure to Disagree.” American Psychologist 64 (6): 515–526. doi:10.1037/a0016755.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keddell, E., and I. Hyslop. 2006. “Networked Decisions: Decision-Making Thresholds in Child Protection.” The British Journal of Social Work 50 (7): 1961–1980. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcz131.
   Google Scholar
• Keymolen, E., and D. Broeders. 2013. “Innocence Lost: Care and Control in Dutch Digital Youth Care.” British Journal of Social Work 43 (1): 41–63. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcr169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klikauer, T. 2015. “What Is Managerialism?” Critical Sociology 41 (7–8): 1103–1119. doi:10.1177/0896920513501351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leslie, D., L. Holmes, C. Hitrova, and C. Ott. 2020. Ethics Review of Machine Learning in Children’s Social Care. London: What Works for Children’s Social Care.
   Google Scholar
• Leung, T. T. F. 2006. “Accountability to Welfare Service Users: Challenges and Responses of Service Providers.” British Journal of Social Work 38 (3): 531–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ley, T., and U. Seelmeyer. 2007. “Professionalism and Information Technology: Positioning and Mediation.” Social Work and Society 6 (2): 338–351.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. 1971. “Street-level Bureaucracy and the Analysis of Urban Reform.” Urban Affairs Quarterly 6 (4): 392–409. doi:10.1177/107808747100600401.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. 1976. “Towards a Theory of Street-level Bureaucracy.” In Theoretical Perspective on Urban Politics, edited by W. Hawley and M. Lipsky, 24–40. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. 1980. Street Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. 1991. “The Paradox of Managing Discretionary Workers in Social Welfare Policy.” In The Sociology of Social Security, edited by M. Adler, 212–228. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. 2015. Digital Sociology. London and New York: Routledge and Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Macchione, N., W. Wooten, N. Yphantides, and J. R. Howell. 2013. “Integrated Health and Human Services Information Systems to Enhance Population-based and Person-centered Service.” American Journal of Preventative Medicine 45 (3): 373–384. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2013.06.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro, E. 2004. “The Impact of Audit on Social Work Practice.” British Journal of Social Work 34 (8): 1075–1095. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bch130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro, E. 2005. “What Tools Do We Need to Improve Identification of Child Abuse?” Child Abuse Review 14 (6): 374–388. doi:10.1002/car.921.
   Google Scholar
• Munro, E. 2019. Effective Child Protection. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mutschler, E., and Y. Hasenfeld. 1986. Integrated Information Systems for Social Work Practice. Social Work 31 (5): 345–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble, C., and M. Henrickson. 2011. “Editorial: After Neo-liberalism, New Managerialism and Postmodernism, What Next for Social Work?” Journal of Social Work 11 (2): 128–131. doi:10.1177/1468017311403371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nothdurfter, U., and K. Hermans. 2018. “Meeting (Or Not) at the Street Level? A Literature Review on Street-level Research in Public Management, Social Policy and Social Work.” International Journal of Social Welfare 26 (3): 204–294. doi:10.1111/ijsw.12308.
   Google Scholar
• Parton, N. 1998. “Risk, Advanced Liberalism and Child Welfare: The Need to Rediscover Uncertainty and Ambiguity.” British Journal of Social Work 28 (1): 5–27. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjsw.a011317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parton, N. 2008. “The ‘Change for Children’ Programme in England: Towards the ‘Preventive-surveillance State’.” Journal of Law and Society 35 (1): 166–187. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6478.2008.00420.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen, J. S. 2019. “The Digital Welfare State: Dataism versus Relationshipism.” In Big Data, edited by J. S. Pedersen and A. Wilkinson, 301–324. Massachusetts: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, J. S., and A. Wilkinson. 2019. “The Promise, Application and Pitfalls of Big Data.” In Big Data, edited by J. S. Pedersen and A. Wilkinson, 1–12. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pithouse, A., K. Broadhurst, C. Hall, S. Peckover, D. Wastell, and S. White. 2012. “Trust, Risk and the (Mis)management of Contingency and Discretion through New Information Technologies in Children’s Services.” Journal of Social Work 12 (2): 158–178. doi:10.1177/1468017310382151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postle, K. 2002. “Working between the Idea and the Reality: Ambiguities and Tensions in Care Managers’ Work.” The British Journal of Social Work 32 (3): 335–351. doi:10.1093/bjsw/32.3.335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, G. 2003. “Implementing OASys: Lessons from Research into LSI-R and ACE.” Probation Journal 50 (1): 30–40. doi:10.1177/0264550503501001.
   Google Scholar
• Rogowski, S. 2011. “Managers, Managerialism and Social Work with Children and Families: The Deformation of a Profession?” Practice: Social Work in Action 23 (3): 157–167. doi:10.1080/09503153.2011.569970.
   Google Scholar
• Roose, R., G. Roets, and M. Bouverne-De Bie. 2012. “Irony and Social Work: In Search of the Happy Sisyphus.” British Journal of Social Work 42 (8): 1592–1607. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcr163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosholm, M., S. Bodilsen, and A. M. Villumsen. 2021. “Ethical Considerations in Relation to ‘Focus on Notifications’: A Project on the Use of Predictive Risk Models in Social Work.”
   Google Scholar
• Ruch, G., D. Turney, and A. Ward. 2010. Relationship Based Social Work: Getting to the Heart of Practice. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Salganic, M. J. 2018. Bit by Bit: Social Research in the Digital Age. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, R., Lester, L. and Ochieng, J. 2013. “Advocacy.” Encyclopedia of Social Work 2: 1–12
   Google Scholar
• Scourfield, J., and I. Welsh. 2003. “Risk, Reflexivity and Social Control in Child Protection: New Times or Same Old Story?” Critical Social Policy 23 (3): 298–420. doi:10.1177/02610183030233005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Student Guide. 2020. https://studenterguiden.dk/en/Socialraadgiver/DenmarkCopenhagenAarhusOdenseAalborgRoskildeKolding/uddannelser/Bachelors/185
   Google Scholar
• Tsui, M.S. and Cheung, F.C.H. 2004. “Gone with the wind: the impetus of managerialism on human services.” British Journal of Social Work 34 (3): 437–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnell, A., and S. Essex. 2006. Working with “Denied” Child Abuse: The Resolutions Approach. London: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wastell, D. 2011. Managers as Designers in the Public Services: Beyond Technomagic. Axminster: Triarchy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Welbourne, P. 2009. “Social Work: The Idea of a Profession and the Professional Project.” Locus SOCI@L 3: 19–35.
   Google Scholar
• Wijenayake, S., T. Graham, and P. Christen. 2018. “A Decision Tree Approach to Predicting Recidivism in Domestic Violence.” Presented at the Big Data Analytics for Social Computing (BDASC) workshop held at the Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (PAKDD’18), Melbourne, Australia, June 2018. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.09862
   Google Scholar