Social work technologies

References

• Addams, J. 1902. 2002. Democracy and social ethics. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett, L., and F. Vavrus. 2017. “Comparative case studies: An innovative approach.” Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education (NJCIE) 1 (1). doi:10.7577/njcie.1929.
   Google Scholar
• Beer, D. 2017. “The social power of algorithms.” Information, Communication & Society 20 (1): 1–13. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2016.1216147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, D., and K. Crawford. 2012. “Critical Questions for Big Data: Provocations for a Cultural, Technological, and Scholarly Phenomenon.” Information, Communication & Society 15 (5): 662–679. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, J. 1997. “Foucault in cyberspace: Surveillance, sovereignty, and hardwired censors.” U. Cin. L. Rev 66: 177.
   Google Scholar
• Bozdag, E. 2013. “Bias in algorithmic filtering and personalization.” Ethics and information technology 15 (3): 209–227. doi:10.1007/s10676-013-9321-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadhurst, K., C. Hall, D. Wastell, S. White, and A. Pithouse. 2010. “Risk, instrumentalism and the humane project in social work: Identifying the informal logics of risk management in children’s statutory services.” British Journal of Social Work 40 (4): 1046–1064. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcq011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carney, S. 2009. “Negotiating policy in an age of globalization: Exploring educational “policyscapes” in Denmark, Nepal, and China.” Comparative Education Review 53 (1): 63–88. doi:10.1086/593152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, D., and C. Fuchs. 2019. Digital Objects, Digital Subjects: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Capitalism, Labour and Politics in the Age of Big Data. London: University of Westminster Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dunleavy, P., H. Margetts, J. Tinkler, and S. Bastow. 2006. Digital era governance: IT corporations, the state, and e-government. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Emslie, M., and R. Watts. 2017. “On technology and the prospects for good practice in the human services: Donald Schön, Martin Heidegger, and the case for phronesis and praxis.” Social Service Review 91 (2): 319–356. doi:10.1086/692117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eubanks, V. 2018. Automating Inequality. How high-tech tools profile, police and punish the poor. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, P. M. 2005. “Social work’s ‘electronic turn’: notes on the deployment of information and communication technologies in social work with children and families.” Critical Social Policy 25 (4): 529–553. doi:10.1177/0261018305057044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P. 2019. “Can Predictive Algorithms Assist Decision-Making in Social Work with Children and Families?.” Child Abuse Review 28 (2): 114–126. doi:10.1002/car.2547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, A., and I. Shaw. 2011. Social Work and ICT. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Høybye-Mortensen, M. 2015. “Decision-making tools and their influence on caseworkers’ room for discretion.” British Journal of Social Work 45 (2): 600–615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Høybye-Mortensen, M., and P. Ejbye-Ernst. 2019. “What is the purpose? Caseworkers’ perception of performance information.” European Journal of Social Work 22 (3): 458–471. doi:10.1080/13691457.2017.1366427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matscheck, D., and L. B. Eklundh. 2015. “Does BBIC make a difference? Structured assessment of child protection and support.” Nordic Social Work Research 5 (3): 192–211. doi:10.1080/2156857X.2014.986749.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer-Schönberger, V., and K. Cukier. 2013. Big data: A revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Munro, E. 2009. “Managing societal and institutional risk in child protection.” Risk analysis 29 (7): 1015–1023. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01204.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble, S. U. 2018. Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neil, C. 2017. Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. New York: Broadway Books.
   Google Scholar
• Peláez, A. L., G. Pérez, M. V. A. Massó, and M. V. Aguilar-Tablada Massó. 2018. “e-Social work: building a new field of specialization in social work?.” European Journal of Social Work 21 (6): 804–823. doi:10.1080/13691457.2017.1399256.
   Google Scholar
• Perron, B. E., H. O. Taylor, J. E. Glass, J. Margerum-Leys, and M. Hoybye-Mortensen. 2010. “Information and Communication Technologies in Social Work.” Adv. Soc Work 11 (2): 67–81. doi:10.18060/241.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Richmond, M. E. 1917. Social Diagnosis. NY: Russel Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, M. E. 1922. What is Social Case Work? An Introductory Description. NY: Russel Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Seltzer, M., and M. Haldar. 2015. “The other Chicago school – a sociological tradition expropriated and erased.” Nordic Social Work Research 5 (sup. 1): 25–41. doi:10.1080/2156857X.2015.1067638.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, I., M. Bell, I. Sinclair, P. Sloper, W. Mitchell, P. Dyson, J. Clayden, and J. Rafferty. 2009. “An exemplary scheme? An evaluation of the Integrated Children’s System.” British Journal of Social Work 39 (4): 613–626. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcp040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R. J., and T. Eaton. 2014. “Information and communication technology in child welfare: The need for culture-centered computing.” J. Soc. & Soc. Welfare 41: 137–160.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, K. M. 2018. “The impact of political guidelines on participation of children and families’ network in the risk assessment process.” Nordic Social Work Research 9 (3): 250–261. doi:10.1080/2156857X.2018.1518814.
   Google Scholar
• White, S., D. Wastell, K. Broadhurst, and C. Hall. 2010. “When policy o’erleaps itself: The ‘tragic tale’ of the Integrated Children’s System.” Critical Social Policy 30 (3): 405–429. doi:10.1177/0261018310367675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar